Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope Sees Most Extreme Gamma-Ray Blast Ever
February 19, 2009
GRB 080916C's X-ray afterglow appears orange and yellow in this view that merges images from Swift's UltraViolet/Optical and X-ray telescopes. (Image courtesy NASA/Swift/Stefan Immler)
(PhysOrg.com) -- With the greatest total energy, the fastest motions, and the highest-energy initial emissions ever before seen, a gamma-ray burst recently observed by the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope is one for the record books. The spectacular blast, which also raises new questions about gamma-ray bursts, was discovered by the FGST's Large Area Telescope, a collaboration among NASA, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science and international partners.
"Burst emissions at these energies are still poorly understood, and Fermi is giving us the tools to figure them out," says Large Area Telescope Principal Investigator Peter Michelson, a Stanford University physics professor affiliated with the Department of Energy's SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
The explosion, designated GRB 080916C, occurred at 7:13 p.m. EDT Sept. 15 (after midnight GMT, Sept. 16) in the constellation Carina. Fermi's other instrument, the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM), simultaneously recorded the event. Together, the two instruments provide a view of the blast's gamma-ray emission from energies ranging from 3,000 to more than 5 billion times that of visible light.
A team led by Jochen Greiner at the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Garching, Germany, established that the blast occurred 12.2 billion light-years away using the Gamma-Ray Burst Optical/Near-Infrared Detector (GROND) on the 2.2-meter telescope at the European Southern Observatory in La Silla, Chile.
"Already, this was an exciting burst," says Julie McEnery, a Fermi deputy project scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. "But with the GROND team's distance, it went from exciting to extraordinary."
With the distance in hand, FGST team members showed that the blast exceeded the power of nearly 9,000 ordinary supernovae and that the gas bullets emitting the initial gamma rays must have moved at no less than 99.9999 percent the speed of light. This burst's tremendous power and speed make it the most extreme recorded to date.
The burst is not only spectacular but also enigmatic: a curious time delay separates its highest-energy emissions from its lowest. Such a time lag has been seen clearly in only one earlier burst, and researchers have several explanations for why it may exist.
The environment around a gamma-ray burst is extremely complicated. Although the specifics vary from burst to burst, the surrounding area generally includes the remnants of a stellar explosion, a magnetic field, a black hole and various particles accelerated by the black hole's gravitational pull, as well as huge amounts of radiation. It is possible that the delays could be explained by the structure of this environment, with the low- and high-energy gamma rays "coming from different parts of the jet or [being] created through a different mechanism," Michelson says.
Another, far more speculative theory posits that perhaps time lags result not from anything in the environment around the black hole, but from the gamma rays' long journey from the black hole to our telescopes. If the theorized idea of quantum gravity is correct, then at its smallest scale space is not a smooth medium but a tumultuous, boiling froth of "quantum foam." Lower-energy (and thus lighter) gamma rays would travel faster through this foam than higher-energy (and thus heavier) gamma rays. Over the course of 12.2 billion light years, this very small effect could add up to a significant delay.
The FGST results provide the strongest test to date of the speed of light's consistency at these extreme energies. As FGST observes more gamma-ray bursts, researchers can look for time lags that vary with respect to the bursts. If the quantum gravity effect is present, time lags should vary in relation to the distance. If the environment around the burst origin is the cause, the lag should stay relatively constant no matter how far away the burst occurred.
"This one burst raises all sorts of questions," Michelson says. "In a few years, we'll have a fairly good sample of bursts, and may have some answers."
The team's results appear in the February 19 edition of Science Express.
Gamma-ray bursts are the universe's most luminous explosions. Astronomers believe most occur when exotic massive stars run out of nuclear fuel. As a star's core collapses into a black hole, jets of material—powered by processes not yet fully understood—blast outward at nearly the speed of light. The jets bore all the way through the collapsing star and continue into space, where they interact with gas previously shed by the star. This generates bright afterglows that fade with time.
Provided by SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
-
Radio stars: Caltech's astronomy professor searches for cosmic radio waves
Feb 03, 2012 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Fear no supernova
Dec 16, 2011 |
4.8 / 5 (17) |
23
-
Hubble racks up 10,000 science papers
Dec 07, 2011 |
5 / 5 (2) |
0
-
Swift finds a gamma-ray burst with a dual personality (w/ video)
Nov 30, 2011 |
4.1 / 5 (8) |
3
-
Astrophysics and extinctions: News about planet-threatening events
Oct 07, 2011 |
4.4 / 5 (8) |
0
-
Fast photon control brings quantum photonic technologies closer
1 hour ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (33) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (5) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Is Venus Slowing Down?
2 hours ago
-
Never ending outer space.....
Feb 11, 2012
-
Neutron Star fragments?
Feb 11, 2012
-
stationary or not?
Feb 11, 2012
-
Scale of the Universe
Feb 10, 2012
-
Titan's lack of impact craters
Feb 09, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Planck mission steps closer to the cosmic blueprint
(PhysOrg.com) -- ESA's Planck mission has revealed that our Galaxy contains previously undiscovered islands of cold gas and a mysterious haze of microwaves. These results give scientists new treasure to mine ...
1 hour ago |
5 / 5 (3) |
0
|
Slowing ocean current caused Earth to spin faster
(PhysOrg.com) -- Most people probably didn’t notice it, but back in 2009, the Earth spun around on its axis a tiny bit faster than usual, making for some slightly shorter days. It only happened for a ...
New European rocket lifts off on maiden flight
Europe on Monday successfully launched a new lightweight rocket carrying a test payload, culminating a more than 12-year quest to master the entire range of space launchers.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
4 hours ago |
5 / 5 (5) |
2
Transforming galaxies
(PhysOrg.com) -- Many of the Universe's galaxies are like our own, displaying beautiful spiral arms wrapping around a bright nucleus. Examples in this stunning image, taken with the Wide Field Camera 3 on ...
2 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
|
Alien matter in the solar system: A galactic mismatch
This just in: The Solar System is different from the space just outside it.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
2 hours ago |
4.2 / 5 (6) |
7
|
Independent group inspects Apple supplier
(AP) -- An independent group, the Fair Labor Association, has started auditing Apple Inc.'s Chinese supplier Foxconn after a request by Apple.
Fast photon control brings quantum photonic technologies closer
(PhysOrg.com) -- Using photons instead of electrons to transmit information could lead to faster and more secure ways to communicate, among other advantages. Now a team of physicists has taken another step toward realizing ...
New ability to regrow blood vessels holds promise for treatment of heart disease
(Medical Xpress) -- University of Texas at Austin researchers have demonstrated a new and more effective method for regrowing blood vessels in the heart and limbs a research advancement that could have ...
New molecule has potential to help treat genetic diseases and HIV
(PhysOrg.com) -- Chemists at The University of Texas at Austin have created a molecule that's so good at tangling itself inside the double helix of a DNA sequence that it can stay there for up to 16 days before ...
Ordered planar polymers created for the first time
(PhysOrg.com) -- Scientists under the direction of ETH Zurich have created a minor sensation in synthetic chemistry. They succeeded for the first time in producing regularly ordered planar polymers that form ...
Rapunzel, Leonardo and the physics of the ponytail
(PhysOrg.com) -- New research provides the first mathematical understanding of the shape of a ponytail and could have implications for the textile industry, computer animation and personal care products.
Feb 19, 2009
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (6)
Feb 19, 2009
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
Feb 19, 2009
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Aha! It works!
Of course in these pixelated astronomy pictures it doesn't really matter how big you enlarge it, you still only have the few pixels of data the telescope started with whatever you could squeeze out of it with analysis.
Feb 19, 2009
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Feb 19, 2009
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
z-pinch.
Feb 19, 2009
Rank: 3.6 / 5 (7)
Feb 20, 2009
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
http://www.thunde...bles.htm
hundreds of pictures and articles.
Feb 20, 2009
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Feb 20, 2009
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
sure it did, plus or minus 12.2 billion years or so
Feb 21, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Feb 22, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Feb 23, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
No, is indeed the correct answer. Our universe doesn't reach much past 12.2 GLY. To explain, based on what is presently known and using something resembling standard theories:
The Universe is approximately 13 and bit billion years old based on the Cosmic Background Explorer data. If it has been expanding at the speed of light at its edges and we are at the center (which we must be in an uniformly expanding universe) than the universe is 13 and bit GLY in radius for EVERYONE. Of course there could be more to it than we can see but the usual definition of the Universe is what we can see.
Now if we use a different definition than you have a point. At least we could infer that the universe must be at least 24GLY in radius if we define the Universe as all that came out of the Big Bang. Nothing wrong with that definition but we can't test it.
Ethelred
Feb 23, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
http://www.holosc...d4fsrk24&keywords=cosmic background explorer#dest