Quantum paradox directly observed -- a milestone in quantum mechanics

March 4, 2009
Quantum paradox directly observed -- a milestone in quantum mechanics

Enlarge

Quantum image

In quantum mechanics, a vanguard of physics where science often merges into philosophy, much of our understanding is based on conjecture and probabilities, but a group of researchers in Japan has moved one of the fundamental paradoxes in quantum mechanics into the lab for experimentation and observed some of the 'spooky action of quantum mechanics' directly.

Hardy's Paradox, the axiom that we cannot make inferences about past events that haven't been directly observed while also acknowledging that the very act of observation affects the reality we seek to unearth, poses a conundrum that quantum physicists have sought to overcome for decades. How do you observe quantum mechanics, atomic and sub-atomic systems that are so small-scale they cannot be described in classical terms, when the act of looking at them changes them permanently?

In a journal paper published in the New Journal of Physics, 'Direct observation of Hardy's paradox by joint weak measurement with an entangled photon pair', today, Wednesday, 4 March, authored by Kazuhiro Yokota, Takashi Yamamoto, Masato Koashi and Nobuyuki Imoto from the Graduate School of Engineering Science at Osaka University and the CREST Photonic Quantum Information Project in Kawaguchi City, the research group explains how they used a measurement technique that has an almost imperceptible impact on the experiment which allows the researchers to compile objectively provable results at sub-atomic scales.

The experiment, based on Lucien Hardy's thought experiment, which follows the paths of two photons using interferometers, instruments that can be used to interfere photons together, is believed to throw up contradictory results that do not conform to our classical understanding of reality. Although Hardy's Paradox is rarely refuted, it was only a thought experiment until recently.

Using an entangled pair of photons and an original but complicated method of weak measurement that does not interfere with the path of the photons, a significant step towards harnessing the reality of quantum mechanics has been taken by these researchers in Japan.

As the researchers write, "Unlike Hardy's original argument, our demonstration reveals the paradox by observation, rather than inference. We believe the demonstrated joint weak measurement is useful not only for exploiting fundamental quantum physics, but also for various applications such as quantum metrology and quantum information technology."

More information: Journal paper: http://www.iop.org … 11/3/033011/

Source: Institute of Physics

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

itistoday
Mar 04, 2009

Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Thanks for the link to the paper at the end of the article, this summary unfortunately isn't very helpful, but that's understandable as it's a hard topic to distill into plain terms.
superhuman
Mar 04, 2009

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
This is not a "quantum image" but a random photoshop garbage.
Question
Mar 04, 2009

Rank: 1.6 / 5 (5)
It appears to be circular double talk straight from 1984 that proves nothing.
el_gramador
Mar 04, 2009

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
The image is most likely just that. An image from off the web. However, I can say that I do believe they can observe the reactions they state. After all a workaround was found to observe quantum phenomena a few months back.
nxtr
Mar 04, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
I just want to make sure that someone has considered shooting two photons at something from exactly opposite directions. so that the net effect of the collision would be zero, due to the forces directly contradicting each other. I am not a physicist, and hope that this suggestion is not too mundane. It would seem to ne that this would be an efficient way of locating something without disturbing its original position.
benbenny
Mar 05, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Depending on the particle and the medium, it will have different forms of inherent energy such as rotational energy and vibrational energy, and not only kinetic energy which is what you are talking about. When you shoot a photon at a particle you excite it - again depending on the available degrees of freedom. So shooting a pair of photons at a particle from opposite directions will not create a zero affect at all.
out7x
Mar 05, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
This article is gibberish. It seems to be about using entangled photons in the classic double slit experiment.
tkjtkj
Mar 05, 2009

Rank: 3 / 5 (6)
This article is a total waste of space. Not one word is included that might let us comprehend what they claim to have observed. No data, nothing except unsubstantiated, unrevealed, undocumented, and, consequently, useless word-salad.
Shame on you, physorg, for publishing this!
superhuman
Mar 05, 2009

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
I just want to make sure that someone has considered shooting two photons at something from exactly opposite directions. so that the net effect of the collision would be zero, due to the forces directly contradicting each other. I am not a physicist, and hope that this suggestion is not too mundane. It would seem to ne that this would be an efficient way of locating something without disturbing its original position.


Photon cancellation could perhaps be achieved but there are also two other problems with such approach, first photons are in reality formed by oscillations of electric and magnetic fields and for them to exactly cancel the phase of those oscillations has to be opposite for both photons in collision point. The phase depends on original phase and distance so you would have to know where the particle is to adjust distance so that both phases are opposite in location where the collision with the particle takes place.

Besides even if you managed to do it if the photons perfectly canceled out on the particle the particle would not interact with them at all, the photons would just past as through the vacuum and not detect the particle.

To locate something you have to send in a photon and this photon needs to bounce off (scatter) that object, you can then compute where this scattering took place by detecting the scattered photon and comparing it's direction with that of incident photon.

Unfortunately just as the photon is affected by bouncing off so is the particle, it will change it's speed and direction as a result so the information we get only informs us about past particle position or speed.
glaubel
Mar 07, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
Yes yes, more spooky action and joint weak measurement! I think very interesting article and thanks for the link at the end, on something which is only superficially like particle physics (photons having no rest mass)

KBK
Mar 08, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Ah. Now I finally get it.

Forest for the trees and all that.

Photons are mis-labeled.

They are the reflection of the interactive energy point between forces (infinite amplitude fields from this dimensional egress viewing point-which devolve into interactive vortex at their junctive meeting point-thus frequency and oscillation of structure and their inherent stability and unwillingness to change-they are stressed into stability via the infinite 2-dimensional amplitude fields from the higher dimension), not a particle at all.

Turn the whole thing around - and it will make more sense.

Incidentally, this also explains why..that when the given military groups fired lasers (for distance and measurement calculations) at the given alien craft--that their propulsive fields would fail and the craft would crash.

Meaning..that laser light is merely a differential organization as reflective point off static field conditions that are different elsewhere-ie, outside of the 'light source'.
bluehigh
Mar 08, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
Although Hardy's Paradox is rarely refuted ...

Einstein among eminent scientists suggested it arises because QM (esp. the Copenhagen interp.) was an incomplete theory. Besides suggesting that hidden variables are at work, he is famously quoted as suggesting he did not accept this "spooky action at a distance".

EPR is still widely debated and Hardy's Paradox is a nonsenscal maths game. The attributes of entanglement are more likely artifacts of the experiment caused by unknown (hidden) variables.

KBK
Mar 09, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
Just remember-Einstein's UFT --WAS-- published.

It was published for three weeks.

It was near immediately --pulled from publication.

Good luck finding it.
Rank 4 /5 (37 votes)
Related Stories
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Books To Inspire a Beginnig Physics Student
    created2 hours ago
  • Pith balls problem
    created2 hours ago
  • Electrostatics
    created2 hours ago
  • what is phase constant
    created2 hours ago
  • Basics In electromagnetic wave
    created2 hours ago
  • How to calculate theoretical initial velocity?
    created3 hours ago
  • More from Physics Forums - General Physics

More news stories

Putting the squeeze on planets outside our solar system

(PhysOrg.com) -- Using high-powered lasers, scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and collaborators discovered that molten magnesium silicate undergoes a phase change in the liquid state, abruptly ...

Physics / Condensed Matter

created 13 hours ago | popularity 4.3 / 5 (7) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Hovering not hard if you're top-heavy, researchers find

Top-heavy structures are more likely to maintain their balance while hovering in the air than are those that bear a lower center of gravity, researchers at New York University's Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences ...

Physics / General Physics

created 14 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 1 | with audio podcast

SLAC, Stanford team focuses on high-energy electrons to treat cancer

Accelerator physicists at SLAC and cancer specialists from Stanford are working on a new technology that could dramatically reduce the time needed for cancer radiation treatments. The team ran an initial experiment ...

Physics / General Physics

created 17 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 0

Measurements from high-energy collisions lead to better understanding of why meson particles disappear

For several years, physicists at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), USA, have studied an unusual state of matter called the quark–gluon plasma, which they ...

Physics / General Physics

created 18 hours ago | popularity 4.5 / 5 (4) | comments 0

Explained: Sigma

It's a question that arises with virtually every major new finding in science or medicine: What makes a result reliable enough to be taken seriously? The answer has to do with statistical significance -- but ...

Physics / General Physics

created Feb 09, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (16) | comments 53


Anonymous knocks CIA website offline (Update)

The website of the Central Intelligence Agency was inaccessible on Friday after the hacker group Anonymous claimed to have knocked it offline.

New error-correcting codes guarantee the fastest possible rate of data transmission

Error-correcting codes are one of the triumphs of the digital age. They’re a way of encoding information so that it can be transmitted across a communication channel — such as an optical fiber o ...

Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago

(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...

Google users warned of threat to smartphone wallets

Users of Google smartphone wallets were being warned on Friday that there is a way to crack pass codes intended to thwart thieves from going on illicit shopping sprees.

New power source discovered

(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and RMIT University have made a breakthrough in energy storage and power generation.

The power of estrogen -- male snakes attract other males

A new study has shown that boosting the estrogen levels of male garter snakes causes them to secrete the same pheromones that females use to attract suitors, and turned the males into just about the sexiest ...