Precision measurement of W boson mass portends stricter limits for Higgs particle
March 11, 2009
The Standard Model describes the interactions of the fundamental particle of the world around us. Experimental observations agree with the predictions of the Standard Model with high precision. The W boson, the carrier of the electroweak force, is a key element in these predictions. Its mass is a fundamental parameter relevant for many predictions, including the energy emitted by our sun to the mass of the elusive Standard Model Higgs boson, which provides elementary particles with mass. Credit: Fermilab
(PhysOrg.com) -- Scientists of the DZero collaboration at the Department of Energy's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory have achieved the world's most precise measurement of the mass of the W boson by a single experiment. Combined with other measurements, the reduced uncertainty of the W boson mass will lead to stricter bounds on the mass of the elusive Higgs boson.
The W boson is a carrier of the weak nuclear force and a key element of the Standard Model of elementary particles and forces. The particle, which is about 85 times heavier than a proton, enables radioactive beta decay and makes the sun shine. The Standard Model also predicts the existence of the Higgs boson, the origin of mass for all elementary particles.
Precision measurements of the W mass provide a window on the Higgs boson and perhaps other not-yet-observed particles. The exact value of the W mass is crucial for calculations that allow scientists to estimate the likely mass of the Higgs boson by studying its subtle quantum effects on the W boson and the top quark, an elementary particle that was discovered at Fermilab in 1995.
Scientists working on the DZero experiment now have measured the mass of the W boson with a precision of 0.05 percent. The exact mass of the particle measured by DZero is 80.401 ± 0.044 GeV/c2. The collaboration presented its result at the annual conference on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories known as Rencontres de Moriond last Sunday.
"This beautiful measurement illustrates the power of the Tevatron as a precision instrument and means that the stress test we have ordered for the Standard Model becomes more stressful and more revealing," said Fermilab theorist Chris Quigg.
The DZero team determined the W mass by measuring the decay of W bosons to electrons and electron neutrinos.
Performing the measurement required calibrating the DZero particle detector with an accuracy around three hundredths of one percent, an arduous task that required several years of effort from a team of scientists including students.
Since its discovery at the European laboratory CERN in 1983, many experiments at Fermilab and CERN have measured the mass of the W boson with steadily increasing precision. Now DZero achieved the best precision by the painstaking analysis of a large data sample delivered by the Tevatron particle collider at Fermilab. The consistency of the DZero result with previous results speaks to the validity of the different calibration and analysis techniques used.
"This is one of the most challenging precision measurements at the Tevatron," said DZero co-spokesperson Dmitri Denisov, Fermilab "It took many years of efforts from our collaboration to build the 5,500-ton detector, collect and reconstruct the data and then perform the complex analysis to improve our knowledge of this fundamental parameter of the Standard Model."
The W mass measurement is another major result obtained by the DZero experiment this month. Less than a week ago, the DZero collaboration submitted a paper on the discovery of single top quark production at the Tevatron collider. In the last year, the collaboration has published 46 scientific papers based on measurements made with the DZero particle detector.
Provided by Fermilab
-
Precision measurement of W-boson mass suggests a lighter Higgs particle
Jan 08, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
The hunt for the Higgs steps up a gear
Aug 28, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Tevatron collider yields new results on subatomic matter, forces
Apr 17, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
DZero continues search for a possible light Higgs
Jan 03, 2005 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Tevatron experiments double-team Higgs boson
Aug 04, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (31) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Books To Inspire a Beginnig Physics Student
1 hour ago
-
Pith balls problem
1 hour ago
-
Electrostatics
1 hour ago
-
what is phase constant
1 hour ago
-
Basics In electromagnetic wave
1 hour ago
-
How to calculate theoretical initial velocity?
2 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Putting the squeeze on planets outside our solar system
(PhysOrg.com) -- Using high-powered lasers, scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and collaborators discovered that molten magnesium silicate undergoes a phase change in the liquid state, abruptly ...
12 hours ago |
4.3 / 5 (7) |
0
|
Hovering not hard if you're top-heavy, researchers find
Top-heavy structures are more likely to maintain their balance while hovering in the air than are those that bear a lower center of gravity, researchers at New York University's Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences ...
13 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
1
|
SLAC, Stanford team focuses on high-energy electrons to treat cancer
Accelerator physicists at SLAC and cancer specialists from Stanford are working on a new technology that could dramatically reduce the time needed for cancer radiation treatments. The team ran an initial experiment ...
16 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
0
Measurements from high-energy collisions lead to better understanding of why meson particles disappear
For several years, physicists at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), USA, have studied an unusual state of matter called the quarkgluon plasma, which they ...
17 hours ago |
4.5 / 5 (4) |
0
Explained: Sigma
It's a question that arises with virtually every major new finding in science or medicine: What makes a result reliable enough to be taken seriously? The answer has to do with statistical significance -- but ...
Feb 09, 2012 |
5 / 5 (16) |
53
Anonymous knocks CIA website offline (Update)
The website of the Central Intelligence Agency was inaccessible on Friday after the hacker group Anonymous claimed to have knocked it offline.
Google users warned of threat to smartphone wallets
Users of Google smartphone wallets were being warned on Friday that there is a way to crack pass codes intended to thwart thieves from going on illicit shopping sprees.
New error-correcting codes guarantee the fastest possible rate of data transmission
Error-correcting codes are one of the triumphs of the digital age. Theyre a way of encoding information so that it can be transmitted across a communication channel such as an optical fiber o ...
Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago
(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...
New power source discovered
(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and RMIT University have made a breakthrough in energy storage and power generation.
Small modular reactor design could be a 'SUPERSTAR'
(PhysOrg.com) -- Though most of today's nuclear reactors are cooled by water, we've long known that there are alternatives; in fact, the world's first nuclear-powered electricity in 1951 came from a reactor ...
Mar 11, 2009
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (6)
KEEP TEVATRON ALIVE!
Mar 11, 2009
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (3)
I can't wait for that LHC restart!
Mar 11, 2009
Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
Mar 11, 2009
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (2)
I wish they had mentioned the previous best estimate s we could see how much improvement there was.
Mar 11, 2009
Rank: 2 / 5 (1)
http://www.allame...de/17469
It's a small improvement in uncertainty.
Mar 12, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (7)
Mar 12, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
The true ingenious model is Heim's theory, which can handle these predictions in many orders of precision with using of only five constants and without using of ad hoced particles, like Higgs boson. No results from LHC could improve these calculations or to decrease the number of constants needed, the discovery of Higgs boson the less - they can just a bring a huge explosion, which can destroy our civilization - that's all.
Adding of new constants into regression can never replace the clever ab initio model - it just can prolong safe life of some scientists and companies from our taxes.
Mar 12, 2009
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (3)
Ethelred
Mar 12, 2009
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
Not saying, the product of cosmic ray collisions always have a large speed toward Earth, while product of collider collisions can have a zero momentum toward Earth - so they have a lotta time to interact with it.
These connections are so obvious, that the every notion of cosmic rays in connection of LHC risk should be considered a naive propaganda, supposed to fool the rest of layman society. Those who spreading such "objections" are simply liars.
Mar 12, 2009
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (4)
If our society isn't sufficiently rich to do such experiments, it simply means, it has a different priorities by now and it should invest for example into research of could fusion. Why the hell latest Arata tabletop experiments weren't replicated even after one year? The cost and practical significance of such experiments are incomparable to LHC experiments. Every year we are depleting the nonrecoverable supplies of fossil fuels, destroying life environment and risking global wars - just because we aren't able to concentrate our research to fundamental problems. The main purpose of Higgs boson research is to mask intellectual crisis of contemporary physics.
http://nextbigfut...eat.html
It's apparent, high energy physicists transformed into alchemists, looking for Philosopher's stone instead of solving practical problems - thus being separated from the rest of society. They ignoring fundamental finding, just because they don't play well with their silly theories, full of ad-hoced constants.
http://arxivblog.com/?p=664
Mar 12, 2009
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Sheesh, you are the naive one. There is no Heim's "theory" just some pseudoscience that does not even predict the mass of the particle discussed here, the W boson. The Standard Model has very good predictions of the Higgs mass, and the improved W and top masses narrow the range of allowed masses significantly. You know nothing about high energy physics, go back to talking to your cats and making tinfoil hats.
Mar 12, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
http://en.wikiped...isbelief
At second, 8-dimensional extension of Heim theory made by Dröscher supports quarks and vector bosons and even provides some estimation of rest mass.
At third, W boson was never observed directly and while basic Heim theory predicts mass / lifetime of real, existing particles only, it doesn't need to consider ad-hoced artifacts in doing it with extremely high precision.
http://superstrun...heim.gif
Science should always follow an Occam's razor principle - and if some theory doesn't require ad-hoced artifacts for explanation of observation, it should be considered first.
Or science becomes a God based religion.
Mar 12, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
http://www.newsci...ght.html
Mar 13, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Um, aren't stranglets a postulation of the STANDARD MODEL you reject?
Have your cake, eat it, or kindly shut the hell up...one of the three....
Mar 13, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Mar 18, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
I've pointed out to you (or "you both"), on several occasions how by simple probability over the course of the planet's lifetime that if stranglette creation and subsequent interaction was possible through the sort of collisions taking place in the LHC and Tevatron that it would have already happened.
The comment that completely blows my mind is this:
What part of the preceding statement makes any sense?
If the US Government was aware of the risk of stranglette creation we would not have been involved in the construction of the LHC, nor would we have funded it or sat idlly by while it was built.
Also, how exactly would it be a strategic decision? By the mathematics, if a stable stranglette was created and interacted with our resident matter it would take mere minutes to completely "strange goo" the planet, I don't know what other crazy conspiracies you think the government is up to but unless they have a way to leave Earth without leaving behind so much as an atom thick trail of exhaust within seconds there is no "strategy" to be seen.
There's a few points that the Aether theorists completely discount, and this is because of the ignorance inherent in the framework on which it's based.
Atoms are not dense. Realistically you could be bombarded by strangelettes for a millenia without actually encountering or interacting with one.
Stable Strangelettes are virtually impossible within AWT due to reflexive surface tension aspect of the theory.
Stranglettes are theorized by application of the standard model, which we know to be wrong in some way, shape, or form. Any physicist will tell you it's a "sick" theory. There are too many pieces that are either missing or unaccounted for, and it's ridiculously un-elegant in application as it discounts many necessary aspects of observed physics, for example, Mass, or particle-field mass interaction.