A human failure, seen at face value

March 13, 2009 by Anne Trafton A human failure, seen at face value

(PhysOrg.com) -- Humans excel at recognizing faces, but how we do this has been an abiding mystery in neuroscience and psychology. In an effort to explain our success in this area, researchers are taking a closer look at how and why we fail.

A new study from MIT looks at a particularly striking instance of failure: our impaired ability to recognize faces in photographic negatives. The study, which appears in the this week, suggests that a large part of the answer might lie in the brain's reliance on a certain kind of image feature.

The work could potentially lead to , for settings as diverse as industrial quality control or object and . On a different front, the results and methodologies could help researchers probe face-perception skills in children with autism, who are often reported to experience difficulties analyzing facial information.

Anyone who remembers the days before digital photography has probably noticed that it's much harder to identify people in photographic negatives than in normal photographs. "You have not taken away any information, but somehow these faces are much harder to recognize," says Pawan Sinha, an associate professor of brain and cognitive sciences and senior author of the PNAS study.

Sinha has previously studied light and dark relationships between different parts of the face, and found that in nearly every normal , a person's eyes appear darker than the forehead and cheeks. He theorized that are hard to recognize because they disrupt these very strong regularities around the eyes.

To test this idea, Sinha and his colleagues asked subjects to identify photographs of famous people in not only positive and , but also in a third type of image in which the celebrities' eyes were restored to their original levels of luminance, while the rest of the photo remained in negative.

Subjects had a much easier time recognizing these "contrast chimera" images. According to Sinha, that's because the light/dark relationships between the eyes and surrounding areas are the same as they would be in a normal image.

Similar contrast relationships can be found in other parts of the face, primarily the mouth, but those relationships are not as consistent. "The relationships around the eyes seem to be particularly significant," says Sinha.

Other studies have shown that people with autism tend to focus on the mouths of people they are looking at, rather than the eyes, so the new findings could help explain why autistic people have such difficulty recognizing faces, says Sinha.

The findings also suggest that neuronal responses in the brain may be based on these relationships between different parts of the face. The team found that when they scanned the brains of people performing the recognition task, regions associated with facial processing (the fusiform face areas) were far more active when looking at the contrast chimeras than when looking at pure negatives.

Other authors of the paper are Sharon Gilad of the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel and MIT postdoctoral associate Ming Meng, both of whom contributed equally to the work..

Provided by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (news : web)


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Stumble it Digg this share on Facebook retweet share on Reddit add to delicious
Rate this story - 4 /5 (6 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • dev2000 - Mar 13, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I guess the "eyes" have it then!

    Haw haw haw haw haw!

    (silence)
  • dbren - Mar 13, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Interesting, in that I've been spending the last couple weeks going through negatives of pictures I took in my teens and twenties to scan in for a "slide show" for a friend's upcoming 50th birthday party. While there have been a few images that I haven't found the first few times looking for them (in a roll a knew they were in) I really haven't had any trouble identifying my friends and family members in the images, despite the age difference, in the negatives. Perhaps familiarity of the face plays a role here. Then again, I spent hours a day in darkrooms in my mid-late teens (as a middle school and high school newspaper and annual photographer), so maybe negative recognition is a skill that can be learned.
  • PPihkala - Mar 13, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Dbren, that would make sense: If one can learn to recognize negative images, it means that normally we have also learned to recognize the normal images. And since autistic people mostly look at the mouths of people, they are less adapt at learning this normal face recognition concerning area around eyes. It also tells that the persons training autistic people should tell them to focus to eyes, to make them learn in the correct way.
  • el_gramador - Mar 15, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    So basic business commentary then. "Look them straight in the eyes and have your goal in mind."

March 13, 2009 all stories

Comments: 4

4 /5 (6 votes)
  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • share this

  • hide
  • Related Stories

  • For computer scientists exploring face recognition, the question is 'who?'
    created Feb 07, 2007 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • The nose knows: 2 fixation points needed for face recognition
    created Oct 20, 2008 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Autistic children can interpret mental states when facial expressions are animated
    created Mar 26, 2007 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Here's looking at you, fellow!
    created Mar 02, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Study shows faces are processed like words
    created Mar 07, 2005 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0



  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

  • Micro-voltmeter and microscopic instruments
    created 20 hours ago
  • Flush? [Thrush]
    created Dec 20, 2009
  • Undescended Testicles
    created Dec 20, 2009
  • strange lump o.O
    created Dec 18, 2009
  • More from Physics Forums - Medical Sciences

Other News

Could acetaminophen ease psychological pain?

Medicine & Health / Psychology & Psychiatry

created 8 hours ago | popularity 4 / 5 (2) | comments 2

Headaches and heartaches. Broken bones and broken spirits. Hurting bodies and hurt feelings. We often use the same words to describe physical and mental pain. Over-the-counter pain relieving drugs have long been used to alleviate ...


On the tip of your tongue: Researchers reveal our motor system activates when we hear speech

On the tip of your tongue: Researchers reveal our motor system activates when we hear speech

Medicine & Health / Neuroscience

created 8 hours ago | popularity 4.5 / 5 (2) | comments 0

(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers from Royal Holloway, University of London have discovered our motor system activates automatically when we hear speech. These findings could, in the future, play a central role ...


Nanoscale changes in collagen are a tipoff to bone health

Nanoscale changes in collagen are a tipoff to bone health

Medicine & Health / Research

created 8 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0

Using a technique that provides detailed images of nanoscale structures, researchers at the University of Michigan and Detroit's Henry Ford Hospital have discovered changes in the collagen component of bone ...


Got smell? Research shows that accurate taste perception relies on a functioning olfactory system

Medicine & Health / Neuroscience

created 9 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

As anyone suffering through a head cold knows, food tastes wrong when the nose is clogged, an experience that leads many to conclude that the sense of taste operates normally only when the olfactory system is also in good ...


New human reproductive hormone could lead to novel contraceptives

New human reproductive hormone could lead to novel contraceptives

Medicine & Health / Research

created 10 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 0

(PhysOrg.com) -- Nearly 10 years after the discovery that birds make a hormone that suppresses reproduction, University of California, Berkeley, neuroscientists have established that humans make it too, opening ...