UC Davis Historian Catalogs U.S. Secrets, Lies and Conspiracies

March 16, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- The government's own secrets, lies and conspiracies have fueled a 45-year-long decline in America's trust in its leaders, a University of California, Davis, history professor argues in a new book.

Among the bizarre-but-documented conspiracies: U.S. plots to kill Cuban president Fidel Castro (one scheme involved dropping poison pills in his drinks; another called for planting an exploding seashell in his favorite scuba-diving bay); proposed military attacks on U.S. citizens as a pretext for war with Cuba (bombing U.S. cities, for one; blowing up John Glenn's rocket during his historic spaceflight, for another); and a study that dropped into the drinks of unsuspecting Americans in random bars.

Kathryn Olmsted outlines these and other in "Real Enemies: and American , World War I to 9/11," her third book on secrets and lies in government and politics. It was published this month by Oxford University Press.

"Isn't everyone interested in secrets and lies?" Olmsted says of her research focus. "Conspiracy theories are really a window into a culture."

And the view through that window is one of growing paranoia. Olmsted notes that in a 1964 poll, nearly 80 percent of Americans said that they trusted officials to do the right thing most or all of the time -- an all-time high.

Contrast that with 2006, when more than half of Americans ages 18 to 29 told pollsters they believed that the Bush administration had either planned the 9/11 attacks or deliberately let them happen.

In "Real Enemies," Olmsted traces this rampant suspicion to post-World War I growth in government size, power and secrecy.

She notes that in 1913, the total federal budget was less than $1 billion, the fledgling Bureau of Investigation had no responsibility for suppressing dissent, and few Americans regarded the government as big or strong enough to merit fear.

But just five years later, the federal government controlled a $13 billion budget, oversaw several agencies charged with countering subversion, and, under the Sedition Act of 1918, possessed the power to arrest anyone who said or printed anything that was "disloyal" or "contemptuous" of the government.

"Some Americans had worried for decades that malign forces might take over the government," Olmsted writes in the book. "Now, with the birth of the modern state, they worried that the government itself might be the most dangerous force of all."

"Real Enemies" charts the continued growth in state power through the 20th century, including the McCarthy era, Cold War and Vietnam War. The second half of the century saw the CIA plotting Castro's murder with the mafia, the FBI spying on civil rights leaders, and a president, Nixon, conspiring to use state power to punish his personal enemies.

"By the end of the 1970s, Americans knew more about their government's secrets and misdeeds than any people in ," she writes. "And the more they learned, the more they suspected that the government was still hiding bigger, more explosive secrets."

After the start of the Iraq War, suspicion was so high that Americans were willing to give credence to the idea that President Bush had a hand in the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Olmsted divides these conspiracy theorists into two camps: the LIHOP, who believed that Bush "let it happen on purpose," and the MIHOP, who believed he "made it happen on purpose."

"Real Enemies" builds on Olmsted's previous books: "Challenging the Secret Government: The Post-Watergate Investigations of the CIA and FBI" and "Red Spy Queen: A Biography of Elizabeth Bentley."

Research for "Real Enemies" consumed five years and required combing through thousands of pages of congressional transcripts and once-classified government documents. Olmstead also visited university libraries around the country to sift through the private papers of prominent conspiracy victims and theorists, including scientist Linus Pauling, who faced FBI harassment as a suspected communist during the Cold War, and Sylvia Meagher, an analyst for the World Health Organization who devoted herself to disproving the government's account of John F. Kennedy's assassination.

The cure for corrosive conspiracy theories, according to Olmsted, is increased government transparency and accountability. And Americans must make themselves informed skeptics.

"When you live in a democracy, you have to educate yourself about your government to hold it accountable," the history professor says. "I always tell my students that being a citizen in a democracy is a lot of work. You have to be skeptical of your government, and you have to be skeptical of conspiracy theories about your government. Trusting either totally is a mistake."

Provided by UC Davis


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Stumble it Digg this share on Facebook retweet share on Reddit add to delicious
Rate this story - 4.1 /5 (10 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • COCO - Mar 17, 2009
    • Rank: 2 / 5 (2)
    Nothing new here unless you get all your dope from MSM - I really hope there is truth to a White House plan to reopen the 911 investigation under the leadership of someone with cross-credibility like Karl Rove.
  • LariAnn - Mar 17, 2009
    • Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
    IMHO, many government officials at the levels where we see them (Senate, Congress, etc.) are so bumbling and inept that they couldn't mount a proper conspiracy if they tried! Genuine conspiracies are likely to be orchestrated under 'deep cover' and few, if any, people even know the principals involved, much less the agenda or ultimate outcome planned. We can only guess that it is self-serving on behalf of the conspirators and entirely inimical to the personal freedoms of those who are not part of the group.
  • phlipper - Mar 17, 2009
    • Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
    Anything from this UC Davis "historian" about Democrat lies and revisionist history?.....I thought not.
  • LuckyBrandon - Mar 17, 2009
    • Rank: 2 / 5 (1)
    Does it really matter. All in all, it boils down the a 2 part simple fact: 1. The government has been lying to us and raping us of our financials for far far too long (after all, taxation IS a main reason for overthrowing England in our revolution), and will continue to do so 2. It was time to overthrow this purist formed government long long ago, and WE are the idiots for letting it stay in power out of fear of being deemed a "terrorist" or other "bad name".

    Since history is written by the victors, if we all just let our balls drop and did what we all know has to be done, we wouldn't be terrorists, but true heroes (ok and probably a number of martors too).

    It will be done eventually, I just wonder how much hell we'll truly have to go through before we all get off our asses. Its our own ignorance allowing this....

March 16, 2009 all stories

Comments: 4

4.1 /5 (10 votes)
  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • share this

  • hide
  • Related Stories

  • Conspiracy! Fact and fiction are closer than we think
    created Jan 15, 2008 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Spy researcher says once improbable Bond villains now close to real thing
    created Oct 30, 2008 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Post-Sept. 11 surveillance impact studied
    created Sep 14, 2005 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Why rebel groups attack civilians
    created May 29, 2008 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Author explores CIA connections to torture tactics
    created Jan 09, 2006 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0



  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

Other News

Living buildings could mop up carbon dioxide

Living buildings could mop up carbon dioxide

Other Sciences / Other

created 13 hours ago | popularity 1 / 5 (2) | comments 1

(PhysOrg.com) -- Architecture could help us tackle climate change, if we start to design our buildings with 'living' materials, according to Dr Rachel Armstrong, UCL Bartlett School of Architecture.


Researcher: Faint writing seen on Shroud of Turin (AP)

Researcher: Faint writing seen on Shroud of Turin (Update)

Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils

created Nov 20, 2009 | popularity 2.4 / 5 (34) | comments 52

(AP) -- A Vatican researcher has rekindled the age-old debate over the Shroud of Turin, saying that faint writing on the linen proves it was the burial cloth of Jesus. Experts say the historian may be reading ...


Climate change could boost incidence of civil war in Africa

Other Sciences / Social Sciences

created Nov 23, 2009 | popularity 2.4 / 5 (16) | comments 10

Climate change could increase the likelihood of civil war in sub-Saharan Africa by over 50 percent within the next two decades, according to a new study led by a team of researchers at University of California, Berkeley, ...


Explained: The Discrete Fourier Transform

Explained: The Discrete Fourier Transform

Other Sciences / Mathematics

created Nov 25, 2009 | popularity 4.1 / 5 (27) | comments 8

(PhysOrg.com) -- In 1811, Joseph Fourier, the 43-year-old prefect of the French district of Isčre, entered a competition in heat research sponsored by the French Academy of Sciences. The paper he submitted ...


Political views may skew perception of skin tone, new study finds

Other Sciences / Social Sciences

created Nov 24, 2009 | popularity 3.6 / 5 (5) | comments 7

(PhysOrg.com) -- Political affinity could influence how some people view the skin tone of biracial political candidates, according to a new study from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, New York University ...