Depressed people have trouble learning 'good things in life'

(PhysOrg.com) -- While depression is often linked to negative thoughts and emotions, a new study suggests the real problem may be a failure to appreciate positive experiences.

Researchers at Ohio State University found that depressed and non-depressed people were about equal in their ability to learn negative information that was presented to them.

But depressed people weren't nearly as successful at learning positive information as were their non-depressed counterparts.

"Since depression is characterized by negative thinking, it is easy to assume that depressed people learn the negative lessons of life better than non-depressed people - but that's not true," said Laren Conklin, co-author of the study and a graduate student in psychology at Ohio State.

The study appears in the March issue of the Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry.

Researchers tested 34 college students, 17 of whom met criteria for clinical depression and 17 of whom were not depressed.

This study is one of the first to be able to link clinical levels of depression to how people form attitudes when they encounter new events or information, said Daniel Strunk, co-author of the study and assistant professor of psychology at Ohio State.

Strunk said the key to conducting this study was the use of a computer game paradigm co-developed at Ohio State in 2004 by Russell Fazio, a professor of psychology and co-author of this new study. Fazio and his collaborators, Natalie Shook, a PhD graduate of Ohio State now at Virginia Commonwealth University and J. Richard Eiser of the University of Sheffield (England) have used the game in many studies examining differences in the development of positive and negative attitudes.

The developers affectionately call the game "BeanFest." It involves people encountering images of beans on the computer screen. The beans could be good or bad, depending on their shape and the number of speckles they had.

Good beans earned the players points, while bad beans took points away. The goal was to earn as many points as possible.

While the game may seem trivial to a naive audience, Strunk said it offers a unique and powerful way to measure how people learn new attitudes.

"Before, if researchers wanted to investigate how people formed new attitudes, it was very difficult to do," Strunk said. If researchers asked about real-life issues, the problem is that prior learning and attitudes may impact how people respond to new information. But in this game, participants don't have any prior knowledge or attitudes about the beans so researchers could learn how they formed their attitudes in a novel situation, without interference from past experiences.

In the game phase of this study, participants had to choose whether they would accept a bean when it appeared on the screen. If they accepted the bean, the points were added or deducted from their total. If they rejected the bean, they were still told how many points they would have earned or lost if they had accepted it.

Each of the 34 beans was shown three times during the game phase, giving the participants a good opportunity to learn which beans were good and which were bad.

Then, in the test phase, participants had to indicate whether beans they learned about in the game phase were "good" (choosing it would increase points) or "bad" (choosing it would decrease points). The researchers tallied how well participants did in correctly identifying positive and negative beans.

The non-depressed students correctly identified 61 percent of the negative beans, which was about the same as the depressed students, who correctly identified 66 percent of the "bad" beans.

But while the non-depressed students correctly identified 60 percent of the positive beans, depressed students correctly classified only 49 percent of these good beans. Non-depressed students identified the good beans better than the depressed students, who failed to identify good beans better than chance.

"The depressed people showed a bias against learning positive information although they had no trouble learning the negative," Strunk said.

One of measures researchers used in the study classified whether the depressed participants were currently undergoing a mild, moderate or severe episode of depression. In the study, those undergoing a severe depressive episode did more poorly on correctly choosing positive beans than those with mild depression, further strengthening the results.

While more research is needed, Conklin and Strunk said this study suggests possible ways to improve treatment of depressed people.

"Depressed people may have a tendency to remember the negative experiences in a situation, but not remember the good things that happened," Conklin said. "Therapists need to be aware of that."

For example, a depressed person who is trying out a new exercise program may mention how it makes him feel sore and tired - but not consider the weight he has lost as a result of the exercise.

"Therapists might focus more on helping their depressed clients recognize and remember the positive aspects of their new experiences," Strunk said.

Provided by The Ohio State University (news : web)

   

• poi - Mar 18, 2009
  • Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
  ""Therapists might focus more on helping their depressed clients recognize and remember the positive aspects of their new experiences," Strunk said."
  ...what for?
  do you really need to?
  is it so bad to be depressed?
  [lol]
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• Keter - Mar 18, 2009
  • Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
  From what I've observed, depressed people don't seem to have the bandwidth to even notice good experiences other than "oh, I didn't get destroyed by that." And immediately their attention refocuses on a threat, real or perceived. They seem to be constantly battling just to stay afloat.
  
  Biochemical causes of depression (such as postpartum depression), I think if these therapists took a real look at the lives of their depressed patients, they might discover something interesting: it's not that these people have had more negative experiences, it's the way these experiences are grouped.
  
  Let's say someone had a bad childhood, maybe an abusive parent. They started to accumulate negative experiences faster than they could process them. This started the depression. Even when things got better, they still had this backlog of unprocessed negative stuff. They start to finally catch up, and wham, a run of bad luck, and they're back in it. Repeat cycle.
  
  Consider also that depression is pretty much a self-fulfilling prophecy. Depressed people seldom attract positive people or positive life experiences. They don't get the good job or the healthy relationship, so they can be expected to be more at risk for having negative experiences and less likely to have positive ones.
  
  The people I've known who got out of depression didn't fight it. They made hermits of themselves - simple lives, simple jobs, no real expectations - and gave themselves time to process the negative backlog and build some positive outlooks. Then they did something nice for themselves - education, travel, plastic surgery - as a kickstart. Then they went back into normal lives as non-depressed people. This process takes 2-10 years from what I've seen, and does not require drugs or professional intervention. It also has lasting effects. The person who has done this process knows it works and repeat the process if they again begin to feel overwhelmed by negative experiences.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5