Spit, anyone?

April 14, 2009 Spit, anyone?

Enlarge

A girl sneezes. Credit: (http://www.stowe.k12.vt.us/sms/teachers/jgrogan/index.htm)

Mark Nicas has given some of his best years to spittle. He builds models - the mathematical kind - of how someone else's slobber ends up on you. The size of the particles, whether they come out in a dry cough or a wet sneeze, their evaporation rate, air speed - these are all complications, reasons why people like Nicas can spend careers piling up academic papers, all the while building up a healthy respect for pathogens.

Nicas, whose day job is at the University of California-Berkeley is one of a team of scientists affiliated with the Center for Advancing Microbial Risk Assessment (CAMRA), funded jointly by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate (DHS S&T) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

"In terms of homeland security, knowing how germs are spread is an important factor in countermeasures for potential biological attacks or pandemics," says Dr. Matthew Clark, Director of DHS S&T's Office of University Programs, who helps fund Nicas' research.

As an interdisciplinary research hub, CAMRA's goal is to help DHS S&T understand the risks associated with certain biological agents, and build a national network beyond the scientific community for sharing those insights.

Statistical predictions about flying saliva may seem like academic caricature. But they have important real-world applications to terrorist biological attacks and deadly diseases like bird flu that can ripple quickly through American cities. Disaster comes from the mouth, warns an ancient Chinese proverb on the dangers of linguistic drivel. But understanding the infectious potential of biological drivel may be the secret to restoring national health in a pandemic.

"When you get on an airplane, it's always best to sit at least three rows from a coughing person," said Nicas. "You don't know what they have."

Nicas used a Department of Homeland Security grant to test his airborne dispersion model for large and small particles in a small laboratory.

He isn't kidding about the airplane advice. It's a version of the three-foot rule—common in infection control circles—which says that transmitting pathogens between people through inhalation typically occurs inside of three feet. Outside that range, large particles carrying most of the pathogens fall out of the air quickly. On airplanes, the risk of infection declines rapidly between rows because of cabin design that circulates air within, not between, rows.

You might wonder if all that time spent thinking about germs might make Nicas obsessive about his own hygiene.

"I have a good sense of the risks," concedes Nicas, "probably more than most people. I try not to shake hands with people who have a cold. I tell my son to wash his hands. But I don't Lysol my counter every 10 minutes."

Source: US Department of Homeland Security - Science and Technology


   
Rate this story - 4.3 /5 (3 votes)


April 14, 2009 all stories

Comments: 0

4.3 /5 (3 votes)

  • hide
  • Related Stories

  • Terrorism risk determines homeland security spending
    created Jun 05, 2008 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • NASA signs homeland security agreement
    created Dec 15, 2005 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Top US cybersecurity official quits
    created Mar 07, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • DHS Employees Sue TSA over Lost Hard Drive
    created May 15, 2007 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • System to pinpoint airline passengers who contaminate cabins
    created May 23, 2007 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0



  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

Other News

Study challenges bird-from-dinosaur theory of evolution - was it the other way around?

Study challenges bird-from-dinosaur theory of evolution - was it the other way around?

Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils

created 9 hours ago | popularity 4.1 / 5 (9) | comments 4 | with audio podcast

(PhysOrg.com) -- A new study just published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences provides yet more evidence that birds did not descend from ground-dwelling theropod dinosaurs, experts say, a ...


'Counterfactual' thinkers are more motivated and analytical, study suggests

Other Sciences / Social Sciences

created 12 hours ago | popularity 4.4 / 5 (5) | comments 4 | with audio podcast

(PhysOrg.com) -- "If only I had..." Almost everyone has said those four words at some time. Rather than intensifying regret, '"what if" reflection about pivotal moments in the past helps people to weave a coherent life story, ...


The Glass Cliff: Female representation in politics and business

Other Sciences / Social Sciences

created 4 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Leadership positions in business have proven to be precarious for women. Female business leaders are more likely to be appointed to powerful leadership positions when an organization is in crisis or high-risk circumstances. ...


Office romance? Not a problem most of time: study

Office romance? Not a problem most of time: study

Other Sciences / Social Sciences

created 11 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 1

(PhysOrg.com) -- Pam and Jim on The Office. Meredith and McDreamy on Grey's Anatomy. Television shows depict many workplace romances, but in the real world how do co-workers view love on the job? According ...


Women on board: Does forced diversity hurt firm performance?

Other Sciences / Social Sciences

created 10 hours ago | popularity 1 / 5 (1) | comments 1

(PhysOrg.com) -- New SEC rules will require public firms to disclose what role, if any, diversity plays in appointing members to their corporate boards, but University of Michigan researchers say any forced restructuring ...