Atmospheric lead causes clouds to form more easily, could change pattern of rain and snow

April 19, 2009 Clouds: Lighter than air but laden with lead

Enlarge

Cirrus clouds (also known as ice clouds) form high in the atmosphere. Their formation may be affected by lead generated from human activities. Courtesy of the National Weather Service

(PhysOrg.com) -- By sampling clouds -- and making their own -- researchers have shown for the first time a direct relation between lead in the sky and the formation of ice crystals that foster clouds. The results suggest that lead generated by human activities causes clouds to form at warmer temperatures and with less water. This could alter the pattern of both rain and snow in a warmer world.

The lead-laden come with a silver lining, however. Under some conditions, these clouds let more of the earth's heat waft back into space, cooling the world slightly. Atmospheric lead primarily comes from human sources such as coal.

The international team of researchers reported their results in the May issue of Nature Geoscience. The collaboration included researchers from institutions in the United States, Switzerland and Germany.

"We know that the vast majority of lead in the atmosphere comes from man-made sources," said atmospheric chemist Dan Cziczo of the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and study author. "And now we show that the lead is changing the properties of clouds and therefore the balance of the sun's energy that affects our atmosphere."

Globe Trotting for Lead

Scientists first attempted to goad rain from the sky with silver and lead iodide in the 1940s. Since then, researchers have known that lead can pump up the ice crystals in clouds. But daily human activities also add lead to the atmosphere. The top sources include coal burning, small airplanes flying at the altitude where clouds form, and construction or wind freeing lead from the ground. Cziczo and colleagues wanted to know how lead from these sources affects clouds.

To find out, the researchers collected air from high atop a mountain peak on the Colorado-Wyoming border. In their high altitude lab, they created artificial clouds from the air in a cloud chamber about the size of a small refrigerator. Half of the ice crystals they plucked from the synthetic clouds, they found, contained lead.

The team then collected a dollop of real cloud atop a mountain in Switzerland. About half of those ice crystals also contained lead. But finding lead in an incriminating position doesn't mean it causes ice crystals.

To determine whether lead causes and clouds to form, the team turned to a lab in Germany that houses a cloud chamber three stories tall, as well as a smaller chamber in Switzerland. They created dust particles that were either lead-free or contained one percent lead by weight, which is about what scientists find in the atmosphere. They put these dust particles into the chambers and measured the temperature and humidity at which point ice nucleated around the dust.

They found that lead changed the conditions under which clouds appeared. The air didn't have to be as cold or as heavy with water vapor if lead was present.

"Most of what nucleates clouds are dust particles," said Cziczo. "Half of the ones we looked at had lead supercharging them."

Leaden Clouds, Cooler Climes

To investigate what this might mean for the earth's climate, the researchers simulated the global climate with either lead-free dust particles floating around, or with either 10 percent or all of them containing lead.

The computer simulation showed that the clouds they looked at -- typically high, thin clouds -- formed at lower altitudes and different locations in the northern hemisphere when lead was present in . This will probably affect precipitation, said Cziczo.

"In our atmosphere, lead affects the distribution and density of the kinds of clouds we looked at," said Cziczo, "which might then affect where and when rain and snow fall."

Clouds at lower altitudes let more of the earth's heat, or so-called longwave radiation, escape out to space. So lead-triggered clouds could partly offset global warming due to greenhouse gases.

But that doesn't mean lead in the atmosphere will simply cool the planet, said Cziczo, since they looked at only one type of cloud. Cloudy skies are far more complicated than their wispy image lets on.

"This work highlights how complex these interactions between lead and water vapor and temperature are," said Cziczo. "They're not as simple as greenhouse gases."

Future work will look at the type of lead and how much is needed to affect clouds and precipitation, as well as the atmospheric distribution of the metal dust.

More information: D. J. Cziczo, O. Stetzer, A. Worringen, M. Ebert, S. Weinbruch, M. Kamphus, S. J. Gallavardin, J. Curtius, S. Borrmann, K. D. Froyd, S. Mertes, O. Möhler and U. Lohmann, Inadvertent Climate Modification Due to Anthropogenic , , May 2009, DOI 10.1038/NGEO499 (http://www.nature.com/ngeo/index.html).

Source: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (news : web)


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Stumble it Digg this share on Facebook retweet share on Reddit add to delicious
Rate this story - 4.6 /5 (8 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • Mercury_01 - Apr 19, 2009
    • Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
    So when can we start spraying the sky with lead?
  • jonnyboy - Apr 19, 2009
    • Rank: 3.4 / 5 (5)
    "So lead-triggered clouds could partly offset global warming due to greenhouse gases. "

    Does this seem to go along with the earth dramatically warming(if you believe the GCW theorists) at almost exactly the same time as we eliminated leaded gasoline from our fuel tanks and therefore lead from the atmosphere?
  • ryuuguu - Apr 19, 2009
    • Rank: 4.5 / 5 (4)
    @jonnyboy

    Try reading the article, instead of just making policataly motived comments about science, it helps understanding the issues.

    The lead is not from leaded gasoline but from burning coal. Leaded gasoline greatly increases lead content of air in cities and near roads in rural areas at ground level. Whereas coal burning power plants produce more lead, but because of high smoke stacks this is not so much of an immediate health problem, it does how ever put large amounts of lead in to the atmosphere.
  • LuckyBrandon - Apr 19, 2009
    • Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
    this actually makes me wonder if the increase in hurricanes over the past say, 50 years or so, has any relation to this....
  • Fazer - Apr 19, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
    This is fascinating. This is why we shouldn't have knee jerk reactions. We need to keep studying until we have a good grasp of what is actually happening. Big pieces of the puzzle, like this one, are still missing. Sudden, massive efforts to curb various emissions could help, but they could also speed up any undesirable effects.

    For example, what if massive coal burning in the 19th and 20th centuries artificially cooled off the Earth, masking a natural warming trend toward the interglacial peak? If not for that coal burning, it would now be much warmer, perhaps as warm as was mentioned in that recent article about higher sea levels during the last interglacial.
  • frogz - Apr 19, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    Lead is bad. We've worked so hard to keep it out of water, now someone is suggesting we spray it into the air? Wtf?
  • Fazer - Apr 19, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    Here is a link to the story I mentioned above:

    http://www.physor...684.html
  • Soylent - Apr 20, 2009
    • Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
    Lead is bad. We've worked so hard to keep it out of water, now someone is suggesting we spray it into the air? Wtf?


    No you thicky. Someone is suggesting that we ARE dumping about as much lead into the atmosphere as always(it's called coal power) and it has this effect.
  • frogz - Apr 20, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    Lead is bad. We've worked so hard to keep it out of water, now someone is suggesting we spray it into the air? Wtf?




    No you thicky. Someone is suggesting that we ARE dumping about as much lead into the atmosphere as always(it's called coal power) and it has this effect.


    Maybe you missed these lines....

    **Scientists first attempted to goad rain from the sky with silver and lead iodide in the 1940s.**

    &

    **Future work will look at the type of lead and how much is needed to affect clouds and precipitation, as well as the atmospheric distribution of the metal dust.**

    mmhmm.

  • E_L_Earnhardt - Apr 20, 2009
    • Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
    Lead is BAD in living cells! Please don't put any MORE IN THE AIR i BREATHE!
  • Fazer - Apr 21, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    This is fascinating. This is why we shouldn't have knee jerk reactions. We need to keep studying until we have a good grasp of what is actually happening. Big pieces of the puzzle, like this one, are still missing. Sudden, massive efforts to curb various emissions could help, but they could also speed up any undesirable effects.



    For example, what if massive coal burning in the 19th and 20th centuries artificially cooled off the Earth, masking a natural warming trend toward the interglacial peak? If not for that coal burning, it would now be much warmer, perhaps as warm as was mentioned in that recent article about higher sea levels during the last interglacial.


    I posted the wrong link earlier, this is the sea level story I was refering to:

    http://www.physor...292.html

    I've been checking things out, and it is hard to find charts of atmospheric lead levels. What little I have come across suggests that levels were high in the 70's and started dropping in the 80's due to the switch to unleaded gasoline.

    I also found a mention of high lead levels during the Younger Dryas, the Little Ice Age.

    This is not my forte. Any of you detail oriented people on here interested in this? Or do you think I'm just full of it?

    And no, I certainly am not suggesting spraying lead in the air to cool things off, I just see an interesting correlation, and I don't know how to do the research to find out more.
  • Velanarris - Apr 22, 2009
    • Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
    @jonnyboy

    Try reading the article, instead of just making policataly motived comments about science, it helps understanding the issues.

    The lead is not from leaded gasoline but from burning coal. Leaded gasoline greatly increases lead content of air in cities and near roads in rural areas at ground level. Whereas coal burning power plants produce more lead, but because of high smoke stacks this is not so much of an immediate health problem, it does how ever put large amounts of lead in to the atmosphere.


    Because a 50 foot difference is huge in the scope of a 10 to 16km thick troposphere.
  • lengould100 - Apr 22, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
    Proof that very likely BOTH sides of the arguments over global warming are wrong, and that those who are trashing the scientists studying climate are nutbars.
  • Velanarris - Apr 22, 2009
    • Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
    Proof that very likely BOTH sides of the arguments over global warming are wrong, and that those who are trashing the scientists studying climate are nutbars.
    Which would be exactly what myself, miki, and gray say repeatedly. Welcome to our side Len.
  • Fazer - Apr 26, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    There is nothing wrong with studying the environment. It is an admirable undertaking to go to college, at sometimes great expense, and to then focus your talents on learning more about the world.

    There is something wrong when scientists, or any group, pile on and endorse government actions before all of the facts are in and understood.

April 19, 2009 all stories

Comments: 15

4.6 /5 (8 votes)
  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • share this

  • hide
  • Related Stories

  • Scientists Want to Solve Puzzle of Excess Water Vapor Near Cirrus Clouds
    created Nov 30, 2006 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Ice clouds put Mars in the shade
    created Jan 16, 2008 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Cloud formation affected by human activity, study says
    created Sep 12, 2006 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Study may produce better weather forecasts
    created Aug 11, 2005 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • AIM to Clear Up Mystery of Elusive Clouds at Edge Of Space
    created Apr 11, 2007 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0



  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

  • The IPCC and the term "most"
    created Nov 23, 2009
  • Is global warming a fact?
    created Nov 23, 2009
  • Random variability of wind patterns
    created Nov 23, 2009
  • Record precipitation in the UK
    created Nov 22, 2009
  • How to move cloud from one time to another..
    created Nov 22, 2009
  • Which countries around the world cause the most destruction to the rain forest
    created Nov 21, 2009
  • More from Physics Forums - Earth

Other News

Monster Waves on the Sun are Real

Monster Waves on the Sun are Real (w/ Video)

Space & Earth / Astronomy

created 1hour ago | popularity 5 / 5 (5) | comments 0

Sometimes you really can believe your eyes. That's what NASA's STEREO (Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory) spacecraft are telling researchers about a controversial phenomenon on the sun known as the "solar ...


Cosmic 'dig' reveals vestiges of the Milky Way's building blocks

Cosmic 'Dig' Reveals Vestiges of the Milky Way's Building Blocks

Space & Earth / Astronomy

created 6 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (11) | comments 1

(PhysOrg.com) -- Peering through the thick dust clouds of our galaxy's "bulge" (the myriads of stars surrounding its center), a team of astronomers has unveiled an unusual mix of stars in the stellar grouping ...


No Wheel Stall in Diagnostic Drive

Spirit Mars Rover: No Wheel Stall in Diagnostic Drive

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 2 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0

(PhysOrg.com) -- On Sol 2095 (Tuesday, Nov. 24), Spirit performed a set of diagnostic actions related to a stall of the right-rear wheel on the previous drive, three days earlier.


Climate experts debate strategies for reducing atmospheric carbon and future warming

Climate experts debate strategies for reducing atmospheric carbon and future warming

Space & Earth / Environment

created 2 hours ago | popularity 3 / 5 (2) | comments 2

(PhysOrg.com) -- Reducing carbon dioxide to safe levels may require extracting carbon from the air, says Cornell climate researcher.


Oceanic crust formation is dynamic after all

Oceanic crust formation is dynamic after all

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 5 hours ago | popularity 4 / 5 (1) | comments 0

Imagine the Earth's crust as the planet's skin: Some areas are old and wrinkled while others have a fresher, more youthful sheen, as if they had been regularly lathered with lotion.