Keeping slim is good for the planet, say scientists

Maintaining a healthy body weight is good news for the environment, according to a study which appears today in the International Journal of Epidemiology.

Because food production is a major contributor to global warming, a lean population, such as that seen in Vietnam, will consume almost 20% less food and produce fewer greenhouse gases than a population in which 40% of people are obese (close to that seen in the USA today), according to Phil Edwards and Ian Roberts of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine's Department of Epidemiology and Population Health.

Transport-related emissions will also be lower because it takes less energy to transport slim people. The researchers estimate that a lean population of 1 billion people would emit 1.0 GT (1,000 million tonnes) less carbon dioxide equivalents per year compared with a fat one.

In nearly every country in the world, average body mass index (BMI) is rising. Between 1994 and 2004 the average male BMI in England increased from 26 to 27.3, with the average female BMI rising from 25.8 to 26.9 (about 3 kg - or half a stone - heavier). Humankind - be it Australian, Argentinian, Belgian or Canadian - is getting steadily fatter.

'When it comes to food consumption, moving about in a heavy body is like driving around in a gas guzzler', say the authors. 'The heavier our bodies become the harder and more unpleasant it is to move about in them and the more dependent we become on our cars. Staying slim is good for health and for the environment. We need to be doing a lot more to reverse the global trend towards fatness, and recognise it as a key factor in the battle to reduce emissions and slow climate change', they conclude.

More information: Phil Edwards and Ian Roberts: Population adiposity and climate change. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;1-5

Source: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

   

• Egnite - Apr 20, 2009
  • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
  Sorry, this should read....Keeping slim is good on the eyes, say scientists!
  
  Seriously, that's a fair statement to make when there are so many factors that this report has failed to even consider.
  
  i.e. Fattie sits at home all day doing nothing
  skinny drives a couple hundred miles to go cycling
  Fattie is short of breath all the time (low CO2 emission)
  Skinny is puffing and panting burning tonnes of energy to keep skinny (high CO2 emission)
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• jonnyboy - Apr 20, 2009
  • Rank: not rated yet
  MORE PSUEDOSCIENCE
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
• freethinking - Apr 21, 2009
  • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
  Why such negativity you guys.... this researcher is just trying to cash in on the global warming bandwagon.... no more than Al Gore.
  • report abuse
  • • Current rank
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5