Reversals of Earth's Magnetic Field Explained by Small Core Fluctuations
April 23, 2009 By Lisa Zyga
According to a new model, small fluctuations in convective flow in Earth’s core can explain how the Earth’s magnetic field reverses. Image credit: Wikimedia Commons.
(PhysOrg.com) -- Based on studies of old volcanic basalt, scientists know that the Earth’s magnetic field reverses at irregular intervals, ranging from tens of thousands to millions of years. Volcanic basalt rock contains magnetite, and when the rock cools, its magnetic properties are frozen, recording the Earth's magnetic field of the time. With this data, scientists estimate that the last magnetic field reversal occurred about 780,000 years ago.
Although volcanic basalt reveals when reversals occurred, it’s much more difficult to find evidence for why or how the Earth’s magnetic field reverses. In a recent study, scientists from the Ecole Normale Supérieure and the Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, both in Paris, have proposed a general mechanism that provides a simple explanation for field reversals. In their model, small fluctuations in convective flow in Earth’s core can push the planet’s sensitive magnetic system away from one pole toward an intermediate state, where the system becomes attracted to the opposite pole.
“We have found a mechanism that gives simple explanations of many features of the reversals of Earth’s magnetic field,” François Pétrélis of Ecole Normale Supérieure told PhysOrg.com. “In particular, it explains the existence and the shape (slow phase followed by fast phase) of reversals, the existence and the shape of aborted reversals (‘excursions’), the statistical properties of reversals, and the possibility for very long durations without reversals (‘superchrons’).”
At present times, the Earth’s magnetic field can be described as a magnetic dipole, with the magnetic south pole currently located near the Earth’s geographic north pole, and the magnetic north pole near the geographic south pole (both magnetic poles are misaligned along the Earth’s rotational axis by about 11.3 degrees). The existence of such a long-lived magnetic field can be explained by dynamo theory, which describes how a convective, electrically conducting fluid that rotates can maintain a magnetic field.
As the scientists suggest, the reversal mechanism relies on the existence of a second magnetic mode, in addition to the dipolar field. The presence of a second mode, such as a quadrupolar field, can have significant effects on how the magnetic system reacts to changes in equatorial symmetry. As the researchers explain, the equator can be thought of as a plane of symmetry, and the convective flow in the Earth’s outer core is usually north-south symmetric. Previous studies on paleomagnetic data have proposed that reversals involve an interaction between the dipolar and quadrupolar modes, which would correlate with changes in equatorial symmetry. In support of this idea, some recent numerical simulations have shown that reversals do not occur when the convective flow remains equatorially symmetric.
“The quadrupolar field (it is likely to be a quadrupole but another structure could be possible) is also generated by the flow of the liquid core of the Earth, exactly like the dipolar field,” explained the researchers. “Most of the time, we observe a dipolar field because it is more easily generated by the flow, but in other conditions a quadrupolar field could be maintained, and this occurs in a temporary manner during a reversal.”
To further explain the dipole-quadrupole interaction, the scientists invoked a model that was recently used to describe the dynamics of a magnetic field generated in a very different system: a lab experiment involving a von Karman swirling flow of liquid sodium (which, like the Earth’s magnetic field, is generated by the dynamo effect). The scientists suggest that a general mechanism could explain both magnetic fields, independent of the different symmetries and velocities of the two systems.
“We have shown that if the dipolar field of Earth is coupled to another magnetic mode (a quadrupolar field, for instance), this coupling provides a path to flip the dipole to its opposite,” the scientists said. “If this coupling is strong enough, the magnetic field will spontaneously oscillate between the two modes and their opposite polarities. We will then observe periodic reversals of the magnetic field (this is the case of the solar magnetic field, for which the period is 22 years). In the case of Earth, the coupling is not strong enough, and oscillations are not observed. Velocity fluctuations in the liquid core are then needed to trigger a reversal.”
In the model, small fluctuations in convective flow can push the system away from one pole toward the intermediate quadrupolar state, where it becomes attracted to the opposite pole. A reversal occurs in two phases: a slow phase where the fluctuations are the motor of the evolution, and a fast phase during which the dynamics does not rely on the fluctuations. The first phase, during which the dipole amplitude decreases slowly, seems to last around 50 kiloyears (30,000-70,000 years). The second phase, which starts when the dipolar mode vanishes, is quite faster: 10,000 years are required for the dipole to recover with the opposite polarity. Sometimes, at the end of the first phase, the system may simply return to the initial pole, which is called an “excursion” when it occurs on Earth. However, if the system does reverse, the behavior happens relatively abruptly. In addition, the system usually overshoots immediately after reaching the opposite pole.
The scientists noted that the amplitude of the fluctuations does not need to be large: “Fluctuations of the flow do not switch off the magnetic field and then regenerate it with the opposite polarity,” they said. “In contrast, the dipolar field continuously changes shape during a reversal because the amplitude of the other mode (the quadrupole, for instance) continuously increases, whereas the dipole decreases. When the dipolar component vanishes, it can increase again with the opposite polarity whereas the amplitude of the other mode decreases.”
The model shows that the duration of the magnetic field in one state depends on the intensity of the convection fluctuations and also on the efficiency of the coupling between the two modes. Even a moderate change in convection can greatly affect the magnetic field polarity duration, which could account for “superchrons” - very long periods without geomagnetic reversals. Although little is known about the actual flow inside the Earth’s core, recent observations have shown that the ends of superchrons are often followed by major flood basalt eruptions, which are likely to produce equatorial symmetry breaking of convection at the core-mantle boundary, in support of the scientists’ model.
More information: Pétrélis, François; Fauve, Stéphan; Dormy, Emmanuel; and Valet, Jean-Pierre. “Simple Mechanism for Reversals of Earth’s Magnetic Field.” Physical Review Letters, 102, 144503 (2009).
Copyright 2009 PhysOrg.com.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or part without the express written permission of PhysOrg.com.
-
Simulations shed light on Earth's history of magnetic field reversals
Dec 05, 2005 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Lava flows reveal clues to magnetic field reversals
Sep 25, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Creation of a magnetic field in a turbulent fluid
Mar 10, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Movement of North Magnetic Pole is accelerating
Dec 09, 2005 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Bats may use magnetic polarity for navigation
Sep 20, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (30) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Dark Energy question
1 hour ago
-
Wind Turbine Power
3 hours ago
-
Steam Table issues
5 hours ago
-
electrostatic induction in a conductor should be immpossible
8 hours ago
-
Help! Physics Momentum/Impulse problem!
11 hours ago
-
Gauss' law cubes, how to prove
13 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
SLAC, Stanford team focuses on high-energy electrons to treat cancer
Accelerator physicists at SLAC and cancer specialists from Stanford are working on a new technology that could dramatically reduce the time needed for cancer radiation treatments. The team ran an initial experiment ...
2 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Measurements from high-energy collisions lead to better understanding of why meson particles disappear
For several years, physicists at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), USA, have studied an unusual state of matter called the quarkgluon plasma, which they ...
3 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Quantum physicist explains $100K offer for proof scaled-up quantum computing is impossible
(PhysOrg.com) -- MIT researcher Scott Aaronson has certainly riled the physics community with his offer this past Friday, of $100,000 to anyone who can prove that scaled-up quantum computing is impossible. ...
Explained: Sigma
It's a question that arises with virtually every major new finding in science or medicine: What makes a result reliable enough to be taken seriously? The answer has to do with statistical significance -- but ...
Feb 09, 2012 |
5 / 5 (13) |
26
Physicists 'record' magnetic breakthrough
An international team of scientists has demonstrated a revolutionary new way of magnetic recording which will allow information to be processed hundreds of times faster than by current hard drive technology.
Feb 07, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (39) |
14
|
New understanding of DNA repair could eventually lead to cancer therapy
A research group in the Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry at the University of Alberta is hoping its latest discovery could one day be used to develop new therapies that target certain types of cancers.
Zuckerberg's focus drives Facebook's ascent
When Mark Zuckerberg showed up to rent Judy Fusco's Los Altos, Calif., house in the fall of 2004, soon after he'd arrived in Silicon Valley, the landlord was immediately struck by his confidence.
Antidepressants and pregnancy: Women must consider the impact of drugs on baby, and of depression on baby, themselves
Upon learning they are pregnant, most women dutifully nix the alcohol, sushi and caffeine. But what about antidepressants?
Both maternal and paternal age linked to autism
Older maternal and paternal age are jointly associated with having a child with autism, according to a recently published study led by researchers at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth).
Night, weekend delivery OK for babies with birth defects
Weekday delivery is no better than night or weekend delivery for infants with birth defects, according to a new study presented today at The Pregnancy Meeting, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine's annual conference. ...
Sonic Cradle lands spot in TED exhibition
A Simon Fraser University graduate student project that melds music, meditation and modern technology has landed a rare spot as an exhibit at TEDActive 2012 in Palm Springs, California this month.
Apr 23, 2009
Rank: 2.4 / 5 (12)
The Sun's visible photosphere provides the illusion of a solar "surface" that separates the Earth from the Sun.
In fact, Earth moves through the outer layer of the Sun - the heliosphere - and is gravitationally, electrically and magnetically connected to it.
Solar cycles are actually cycles of deep-seated magnetic fields that periodically poke through the solar "surface" as sunspots, solar storms and violent solar eruptions.
The Standard Solar Model of a Hydrogen-Filled Sun fails to explain solar cycles, as well as many other experimental observations:
http://jenniferma...onomers/
Reversals of Earth's magnetic fields are probably caused by the same deep-seated magnetic fields that produce cycles of solar magnetic storms: The dense, energetic object at the core of our iron-rich Sun.
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://www.omatumr.com/
Apr 23, 2009
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (9)
Apr 23, 2009
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (9)
Apr 23, 2009
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (11)
Apr 23, 2009
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (9)
Apr 24, 2009
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (6)
So he's saying: in 2012 when the reserval kicks in dont be on the equator or near any fault lines or volcanoes cos they are gonna blow. in fact get out of America cos yellowstone will blow too.
Apr 24, 2009
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (4)
Apr 24, 2009
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (4)
And the article states that electricity flowing generates a magnetic field. Since the Earths outer core is liquid Nickel/Iron and it would rotate. However since rotating magnetic capable material does not make a magnet we still need a current to flow around. Just how much electricity has to flow through the planet to generate the magnetic field?
And since the poles do move around and sometimes swap, that would only require a change in direction of flow of the electric field. Should the solid inner core be magnetic then the entire solid inner core would have to flip, if it was a solid state magnet, and that somehow seems a lot more difficult.
My point is just that an electrically generated magnet is more easily shifted than a solid one and I have no idea just what sort of current would be required to generate the field that we actually have on Earth - does anyone know?
Apr 24, 2009
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
One point twenty-one JIGAWATTS!!
Sorry, I couldn't resist :)
Apr 24, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (8)
The magnetic field of the neutron star at the core of the Sun at 1 AU from the Earth, is probably about 1,000,000,000,000 Gauss.
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://www.omatumr.com
Apr 25, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (5)
Apr 26, 2009
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (6)
That was one of the main points of a paper on climate changes, "EARTH'S HEAT SOURCE - THE SUN", that was published in Energy & Environment, vol. 20 (2009) pp.131-144.
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://www.omatumr.com
Apr 26, 2009
Rank: 5 / 5 (7)
While I admit that I never attend a Church or other centre for the purpose of worship, it's difficult to avoid every reference to religion due to weddings, funerals and other commemorative events that often seem to have to include it. I've yet to hear a preacher, speaking at any time about his or her religion, preface their comments by stating that their religion is a theory and their hypothesis backing this is that their God (or Gods) exists.
To be pedantic on the subject, I've also never heard any religious preacher state that they hold a null hypothesis concerning the existence of God (Gods).
Perhaps this accounts for the lack of a "break" around any assertion of a God's existence?
And what has your comment to do with the article?
Apr 26, 2009
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Lol, excellent! It was on TV last Saturday evening where I live (NZ).
I would suggest that this indicates that lightning or a fusion-powered DeLorean is the culprit!
Apr 27, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Apr 28, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
do you have any thoughts about 2012? i heard there is supposed to be a big solar storm then, much less the pole reversal and it's effects.
what are your thoughts?
thank you.
Apr 28, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
"(which, like the Earth%u2019s magnetic field, is generated by the dynamo effect)"
Apr 29, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
No, I did not know about the solar storm predicted in 2012.
But that is not surprising. My areas of research expertise are a.) abundances of isotopes in various parts of the solar system and b.) energy stored in the nuclear rest masses of various types of atoms.
Here is my profile: http://myprofile....anuelo09
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Apr 29, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
RB
Apr 29, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Apr 30, 2009
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Alright, so I have to comment.
First of all, we can't predict solar storms. By the time we observe a solar flare, the X-ray burst has already reached Earth (obviously) and triggered a geomagnetic storm. If we observe a coronal mass ejection directed earthwards, then we have half a day to a day of warning before the particles arrive and induce a geomagnetic storm that way. So, although the solar cycle is now forecast to peak in 2012, we have no methodology of predicting a solar flare or storm or anything of that nature, especially not down to the day (like December 21st).
Also, as the article mentions, our models show that a full polar reversal takes thousands of years to fully complete. I'm not saying that our models are right, but there are many elements of dynamo theory that have proven correct.
Not sure what you are trying to say here. Yes, tidal disturbance induced by the moon likely plays some role in turbulence created at the core-mantle boundary, where the geodynamo is thought to originate. But the moon has no dynamo, it has long since cooled off, with only remnant magnetism locked into ferromagnetic rocks.
I know many people are expecting some drastic shift in global consciousness, a "new age", etc., but I have a suspicion that this has largely already taken place... behold, the internet!
Now, all that said, I secretly hope we are indeed hit with some massive solar storm that causes a spontaneous pole-shift, forces a shift in our biological consciousness, and heralds a restructuring (for the better) of the entire global socioeconomic system. But that's just so unprofessional *YAWN* ;)
Apr 30, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
May 01, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
However, several studies have independently concluded that the solar cycles of sunspots and solar storms arise from angular momentum changes in the Sun [J. D. Jose, "Sun's motion and sunspots", Astron. J. 70 (1965) 193-200; R. W. Fairbridge and J. H. Shirley, "Prolonged minima and the 179-yr cycle of the solar inertial motion," Solar Physics 110 1987) 191-220; T. Landscheidt, "New Little Ice Age instead of Global Warming?" Energy & Environment 114 (2003) No. 2/3, pp. 327-350].
Here is a graph of the Landscheidt solar cycles: http://landscheid...m-graph/
Oliver K. Manuel
http://www.omatumr.com/
May 01, 2009
Rank: not rated yet