Understanding stellar explosions is less straightforward than previously thought

April 30, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Stellar explosions called novæ are caused by nuclear reactions between the star's atoms. In order to better understand such violent phenomena, astrophysicists study the radiation emitted by certain types of atom, and in particular the fluorine-18 produced by these reactions.

Now, researchers at GANIL (The French large heavy-ion located in Caen), in collaboration with teams from the UK, Belgium, Romania and France, have determined that fluorine-18 appears to be less abundant than expected. This discovery therefore reduces the chances of observing the radiation emitted by this atom. It implies new constraints for the observation and understanding of novæ. This work has just been published in the journal .

Observed since ancient times, novæ are stellar explosions which occur in our galaxy around 20 times a year. Today, physicists think that they take place in stellar binary systems, which are made up of two stars, a red giant and a small, hot companion called a white dwarf. "Matter is torn off the red giant and falls onto the surface of the white dwarf," explains François de Oliveira Santos, a physicist working at GANIL. "This stellar matter accumulates on the surface of the white dwarf, leading to an increase in its temperature and density. A number of nuclear reactions, transforming one or more atomic nuclei into other particles, then take place: stable atomic nuclei (carbon, oxygen, etc) in the star are transformed into radioactive nuclei, such as fluorine-18." It is by observing the radiation emitted by these particles that researchers hope to better understand the physical processes taking place during novæ.

Fluorine-18 is a radioactive atom whose unstable nucleus is deficient in compared to its stable form, fluorine-19. When it disintegrates, fluorine-18 emits specific electromagnetic radiation that astrophysicists study in order to get a better understanding of what goes on inside novæ. "The amount of emitted during the explosion depends on the amount of fluorine-18 present," de Oliveira Santos explains. In order to show this, researchers have tried to identify all the nuclear reactions that lead to the creation and destruction of fluorine-18. Since these reactions depend on the structure of the nuclei, they have been studied with the use of particle accelerators.

An experiment carried out at Louvain-la-Neuve University in Belgium, as part of an international collaboration, has led scientists to revise downwards their estimate of the amount of fluorine-18 present in novae. The conclusion is that nuclear reactions involving fluorine-18 in these explosions lead to its destruction to a greater degree than had previously been estimated. "Our result is in agreement with recent theoretical work," de Oliveira Santos points out. "We obtained this result thanks to a new experimental technique that uses beams of accelerated radioactve nuclei." It leads to new constraints for the observation and understanding of stellar explosions.

More information: Discovery of a New Broad Resonance in 19Ne : Implications for the Destruction of the Cosmic -Ray Emitter 18F. J. C. Dalouzy, L. Achouri, M. Aliotta, C. Angulo, H. Benhabiles, C. Borcea, R. Borcea, P. Bourgault, A. Buta, A. Coc, A. Damman, T. Davinson, F. de Grancey, F. de Oliveira Santos, N. de Séréville, J. Kiener, M. G. Pellegriti, F. Negoita, A. M. Sánchez-Benítez, O. Sorlin, M. Stanoiu, I. Stefan, and P. J. Woods, Physical Review Letters. 24 April 2009

Provided by Laboratoire CNRS EN LUTTE- Physique et Mecanique des Miliieux Heterogeneous (news : web)

4.8 /5 (4 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

omatumr
Apr 30, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
NEUTRON REPULSION POWERS COSMIC EXPLOSIONS

Systematic properties of rest masses of the 3,000 different types of atomic nuclei that comprise the visible universe reveal repulsive interactions between neutrons as the energy source that powers the Sun, ordinary stars, and cosmic explosions [1].

The concept of a Hydrogen-filled cosmos created by a Big Bang is now obsolete [1].

[1] See: On the cosmic nuclear cycle and the similarity of nuclei and stars, Journal of Fusion Energy 25 (2006) pp. 107-114; DOI:10.1007/s10894- http://arxiv.org/.../0511051

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://www.omatumr.com
superhuman
May 01, 2009

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Yes, neutrons repulse each other just as protons do but how is this supposed to be an energy source? The repulsion itself is not enough to extract energy as evidenced by magnets.
laserdaveb
May 01, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
"neutrons repulse each other just as protons do"? by what mechanism? not charge..i know i'm ignorant,so point me to the proof of that statement.
omatumr
May 01, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
laserdaveb said: "neutrons repulse each other just as protons do"? by what mechanism? not charge..i know i'm ignorant,so point me to the proof of that statement.

The proof that the n-n interaction is repulsive is in the nuclear rest mass data points of the 3,000 different types of atoms that comprise the entire visible universe.

Here are the data: http://www.omatumr.com/Data/2000Data.htm" title="http://http://www.omatumr.com/Data/2000Data.htm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.omatum...Data.htm

Here are a few of the early papers where the n-n repulsion is discussed:

1. "Attraction and repulsion of nucleons: Sources of stellar energy", J. Fusion Energy 19, 93-98 (2001)

2. "The Sun s origin, composition and source of energy", in Lunar and Planetary Science XXIX, Abstract 1041, available as 1041-pdf from Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, TX (CD-ROM, 2001)

3. "Nuclear systematics: III. The source of solar luminosity", J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 252, 3-7 (2002)

4. The Sun s origin and composition: Implications from meteorite studies", Proceedings of Asteroids, Comets, Meteors (ACM 2002), 29 July - 2 August 2002, Technical University Berlin, Berlin, Germany (ESA-SP- 500, editor: Barbara Warmbein), pp. 787-790 (2003)

5. "The standard solar model versus experimental observations", Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Beyond Standard Model Physics - BEYOND 2002 (IOP, Bristol, editor: H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus) pp. 307-316 (2003)

6. "Neutron repulsion confirmed as energy source", J. Fusion Energy 20, 197-201 (2003)

7. "Composition of the solar interior: Information from isotope ratios", Proceedings of the SOHO 12 / GONG 2002 Conference on Local and Global Helioseismology: The Present and the Future, 27 October-1 November 2002, Big Bear Lake, CA, U.S.A. (ESA SP-517, editor: Huguette Lacoste) pp. 345-348 (2003)

With kind regards,
OLiver K. Manuel
http://www.omatumr.com

omatumr
May 01, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
"Yes, neutrons repulse each other just as protons do but how is this supposed to be an energy source?"

Energy is released when the neutrons are separated:

a.) Neutron-emission

b.) Fragmentation

c.) Fission

See: On the cosmic nuclear cycle and the similarity of nuclei and stars, Journal of Fusion Energy 25 (2006) pp. 107-114; DOI:10.1007/s10894- http://arxiv.org/.../0511051

or http://arxiv.org/.../0511379

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://www.omatumr.com
superhuman
May 02, 2009

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
"neutrons repulse each other just as protons do"? by what mechanism? not charge..i know i'm ignorant,so point me to the proof of that statement.


Strong interactions, one simple proof is the lack of stable nuclei containing only neutrons or only protons, a more complicated explanation is that neutrons and protons are fermions (spin 1/2 particles) and identical fermions cannot occupy exactly the same state (Pauli exclusion principle) so if two fermions come too close a strong force will drive them away.

Energy is released when the neutrons are separated:
a.) Neutron-emission
b.) Fragmentation
c.) Fission


Both neutron emission (which only happens when nuclides have excess neutrons) and fission are well known so I don't understand what new energy source you are talking about.
omatumr
May 02, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Superhuman,

Do you understand that:

a.) Neutrons do not drip from neutron-rich nuclei, and

b.) Fission fragments do not drift apart slowly?

Do you not know that these are violent, energetic processes?

Please take a few minutes to study and think about information recorded in this CRADLE OF THE NUCLIDES:

http://www.omatumr.com/Data/2000Data.htm" title="http://http://www.omatumr.com/Data/2000Data.htm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.omatum...Data.htm

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://www.omatumr.com


laserdaveb
May 03, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
thank you superhuman..your more "complicated" explanation was helpful.

Oliver, i'm reading my way through your publications as time permits..but i'm still at the "hmmm" level.
omatumr
May 04, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
THE JOY OF CONTINUOUS DISCOVERY

Take your time, laserdaveb.

I started research on the origin of the solar system in 1960 and have enjoyed almost 50 years of continuous discovery.

I cannot imagine a more joyous path through life!

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://www.omatumr.com
Lao Tzu : "To know that you do not know is best,
To pretend to know what you do not know is a disease."

superhuman
May 05, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
Superhuman,
Do you understand that:
a.) Neutrons do not drip from neutron-rich nuclei, and
b.) Fission fragments do not drift apart slowly?
Do you not know that these are violent, energetic processes?
Please take a few minutes to study and think about information recorded in this CRADLE OF THE NUCLIDES:


I do know that fission can be very energetic but this is well known and since you talk about completely novel energy source I would like to know how your theory differs from standard theory.

In standard theory only nuclides with excess neutrons undergo fission, so if you claim this is the source of Sun's energy you would need to explain where do those nuclides with excess neutrons come from.

I like your cradle of nuclides but I don't see anything special about it. To extract energy from a nucleus you have to transmute it into another lying lower on this graph of yours, depending on the nuclide you start with you would have to either add or subtract neutrons. Since you say Sun's energy comes from neutron repulsion can you say which nuclides are transmuted into which?

I do find your Sun model interesting though in that I find it quite probable the Sun has a heavy core and that our Solar System was created as you picture it in one of those publications - when a similarly layered star exploded. On the other hand my knowledge in this area is very limited so I don't know how it compares to currently accepted models.
omatumr
May 05, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Thanks, Superman.

Physics World has a discussion of the book, "Sun in a Bottle: The Strange History of Fusion and the Science of Wishful Thinking" by Charles Seife (2008 Viking Books) that may be helpful.

It took me 50 years to figure out that the Sun is not a ball of Hydrogen and that Hydrogen is the exhaust gas, not the fuel, that powers the Sun.

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://www.omatumr.com
Alizee
May 06, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
..repulsive interactions between neutrons as the energy source that powers the Sun...
Your model, where most of energy is produced by process releasing antineutrinos contradicts the experimental data, in which currently most accurate upper limit on the solar antineutrino/neutrino flux ratio is lower then 1.7% with 90% confidence range.
omatumr
May 06, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
Alizee,

Please provide a reference.

Thanks,
Oliver K. Manuel
omatumr
May 08, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
WAKE UP, ALIZEE

Please provide a reference for your very strange statement that, "the solar antineutrino/neutrino flux ratio is lower then 1.7% with 90% confidence range."

You may want to read our paper on "The need to measure low energy anti-neutrinos (E < 0.782MeV) from the Sun," Phys. Atom. Nucl. 67 (2004) pages 1959-1962; Yad. Fiz. 67 (Russian, 2004) pages 1983-1986.

http://arxiv.org/.../0410168

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://www.omatumr.com
Rank 4.8 /5 (4 votes)
Related Stories
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • what is electricity???
    created4 hours ago
  • Can Plasma Be Solid
    created5 hours ago
  • What is delta Δ ?
    created6 hours ago
  • Need some help understanding Hertz–Knudsen formula
    created6 hours ago
  • Anatomy of Fat man: implosion-critical bomb
    created8 hours ago
  • what makes two sounds similar???
    created9 hours ago
  • More from Physics Forums - General Physics

More news stories

Explained: Sigma

It's a question that arises with virtually every major new finding in science or medicine: What makes a result reliable enough to be taken seriously? The answer has to do with statistical significance -- but ...

Physics / General Physics

created Feb 09, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (20) | comments 78

Quantum physicist explains $100K offer for proof scaled-up quantum computing is impossible

(PhysOrg.com) -- MIT researcher Scott Aaronson has certainly riled the physics community with his offer this past Friday, of $100,000 to anyone who can prove that scaled-up quantum computing is impossible. ...

Physics / Quantum Physics

created Feb 08, 2012 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (15) | comments 37 | with audio podcast weblog

Diamond light, brighter than the sun

It’s the size of five football pitches and generates light 10 billion times brighter than the sun. As the Diamond Light Source celebrates its tenth anniversary this year, Penny Bailey visits one of the ...

Physics / General Physics

created Feb 07, 2012 | popularity 4.1 / 5 (10) | comments 18 | with audio podcast

Physicists 'record' magnetic breakthrough

An international team of scientists has demonstrated a revolutionary new way of magnetic recording which will allow information to be processed hundreds of times faster than by current hard drive technology.

Physics / General Physics

created Feb 07, 2012 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (43) | comments 15 | with audio podcast

Hints of the Higgs - papers are submitted

Back in December 2011, the ATLAS and CMS experiments at CERN presented some exciting results that provided tantalising hints of the Higgs boson.

Physics / General Physics

created Feb 08, 2012 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (8) | comments 10


Scientists discover molecular secrets of 2,000-year-old Chinese herbal remedy

For roughly two thousand years, Chinese herbalists have treated Malaria using a root extract, commonly known as Chang Shan, from a type of hydrangea that grows in Tibet and Nepal. More recent studies suggest that halofuginone, ...

New method to examine batteries -- MRI from the inside

There is an ever-increasing need for advanced batteries for portable electronics, such as phones, cameras, and music players, but also to power electric vehicles and to facilitate the distribution and storage of energy derived ...

Google might launch Drive for cloud storage soon

(PhysOrg.com) -- Google's next big move, according to the Wall Street Journal, is a cloud storage service called Drive. Hardly first to the plate, Google is simply catching up to introducing its cloud reposi ...

A mitosis mystery solved: How chromosomes align perfectly in a dividing cell

Although the process of mitotic cell division has been studied intensely for more than 50 years, Whitehead Institute researchers have only now solved the mystery of how cells correctly align their chromosomes during symmetric ...

Lab study raises questions over nano-particle impact

Tests involving chickens have raised questions about the impact on health from engineered nano-particles, the ultra-fine grains commonly used in drugs and processed foods, scientists said on Sunday.

Starve a virus, feed a cure? Findings show how some cells protect themselves against HIV

A protein that protects some of our immune cells from the most common and virulent form of HIV works by starving the virus of the molecular building blocks that it needs to replicate, according to research published online ...