Struggling US newspapers look to e-readers
May 5, 2009 by Chris Lefkow
The front page of The Christian Science Monitor from March 26. The Christian Science Monitor printed its final edition on March 27, bringing a 100-year run as a daily newspaper to an end but beginning a new era as an online publication.
As US newspapers drown in a sea of red ink, publishers are desperately searching for ways to survive in a digital future.
Some are toying with the idea of charging readers for news on the Web while others are ganging up to extract money from powerful aggregators such as Google News which link to their articles.
Online advertising is seen as a potential savior in some newsrooms although it currently accounts for less than 15 percent of revenue at most US dailies.
Another proposal gaining currency is selling digital subscriptions through electronic readers similar to Amazon's popular Kindle.
Rupert Murdoch's News Corp., newspaper and magazine publisher Hearst and California-based start-up Plastic Logic are among the companies known to be developing e-readers.
Japanese electronics giant Sony is also reported to be adapting its e-book reader for daily content and Apple is rumored to be developing a full-color media tablet of its own.
But Amazon may have once again stolen the march on its rivals.
The New York Times reported on Monday that the Seattle, Washington-based online retail giant plans to unveil a large-screen version of its Kindle book reader on Wednesday tailored for displaying newspapers and magazines.
Amazon invited media outlets to a press conference in New York on Wednesday but declined to reveal what it plans to announce at the event.
The Times, however, said Amazon will show off an e-reader that "could present much of the editorial and advertising content of traditional periodicals in generally the same format as they appear in print."
It quoted "people briefed on the plans" as saying that the Times was one of several news organizations "expected to be involved in the introduction of the device."
Amazon's traditional Kindle is designed for electronic books but the new device has a screen roughly the size of a standard sheet of paper and is more geared towards periodicals "and perhaps textbooks," the Times said.
With advertising revenue and circulation declining at US newspapers and magazines, the Times said the device was being seen by struggling US media companies as "a way to get readers to pay for those periodicals."
"Publishers could possibly use these new mobile reading devices to hit the reset button and return in some form to their original business model: selling subscriptions, and supporting their articles with ads," the Times said.
It noted that digital delivery would allow newspaper publishers to save millions on printing and distribution costs.
With so much news already available for free on the Internet, the notion that electronic readers could provide a measure of salvation for the newspaper industry met with some skepticism.
"The idea that a large screen Kindle (or any similar device) could save newspapers is a joke," wrote Silicon Valley technology blog TechCrunch.
"The idea that people are going to run out in droves to get these new giant Kindles just to have the privilege of paying for newspaper content is absurd."
Billionaire investor Warren Buffett did not address the specific subject of e-readers but over the weekend he joined the chorus of those predicting nothing but trouble for the US newspaper industry.
Addressing shareholders in his company Berkshire Hathaway, Buffett said he would not invest in newspapers "at any price" and predicted they could be faced with "unending losses."
Amazon already offers dozens of newspaper subscriptions for its existing Kindle readers but the number of subscribers is believed to be just a tiny fraction of the circulation of the print editions of the newspapers.
The Plastic Logic e-reader, a lightweight device with a touch screen about the size of a pad of letter paper, is going to be used on a test basis by two Detroit newspapers later this year.
(c) 2009 AFP
Feb 08, 2010
The idea of newspaper has always been to provide, foremost, local news, and if any of those newspaper death-wishers want their local news on the Internet, where would they go? Of course, the websites of their local newspapers, where newspapers are faithfully making their contents available free of charge.
The survival of most newspapers has always depended on their unique local contents--their national and international contents were, with a few exceptions of major city newspapers such as New York Times and Washington Post, always provided by the international press agencies such as Reuters and AP. In fact, nowadays, even the major city newspapers are using content provided by the news agencies rather than by their own reporters to the point that most American newspapers have national and international sections that are virtually identical. Their readers know this, and they are now going to the sources of the news now that it is possible to do so via the Internet.
But local news is not so easy to obtain, although there are local TV station providing them on fixed time slots. Local TV stations have always competed with their local newspapers, but until the advent of the Internet, newspapers had an advantage in that once the newsprint was in the reader's hand, it was always readily available, whereas TV viewers had to wait for local news to come on at pre-specified times. This is no longer the case, since all local TV stations post their news on the Internet.
TV stations, in essence, have become more like paperless newspapers also. Thus, in order for newspaper to survive, they must become more of a multimedia provider than just a printed news provider. This was not possible in the days of limited TV channel availability and tight cross-ownership restrictions set by the FCC, but the Internet makes all that mute. Here are some strategic points for newspaper to consider:
First, the newspapers buying news content from the international press agencies must demand that those agencies stop providing news free of charge on the Internet; after all, why should newspapers pay for the news agencies' reporting, but not the online readers who can access the agencies' website directly? This does not make any business sense.
Second, all locally generated newspaper content must be fee-based for access, and newspapers must stop providing links to the full articles to news aggregators, such as Google--only the headlines and short trailers should be posted. If Google doesn't like the idea, newspapers should invest in a venture to build a news aggregator website that caters to their interest better than Google.
Third, establish an industry-wide agency similar to RIAA to enforce the copyright law so that the Internet hobbyists cannot repost news without prior approval from the sources of their reposting. It would also help to ask Congress to pass addenda to the copyright law to tighten reposting requirements and obligations on the Internet on copyrighted news items.
Fourth, newspapers must recognize that the wasteful practice of printing news on millions of tons of newsprint must come to an end (the same for magazines); thus, the transition to e-readers is inevitable, logical, and environmentally sound.
Fifth. E-readers should be provided as a part of each annual newspaper subscription. Furthermore, they should have additional functionalities for subscribing to periodicals, as well as reading online e-books (each newspaper can build its own unique library of e-books with reviews, recommendations, and limited-time free offers). The bundling of e-readers with subscription is probably the most difficult part of the survival strategy, as it might not be financially feasible until the cost of each e-reader reaches at $100 or less. It is certain to happen soon, but perhaps not soon enough to save many of the major newspapers that have high level of expense to maintain their operations.
There are many, many other things that can be done to re-enhance the attractiveness of local newspapers, but in reality, what they must become is not just newspapers to keep up with the latest news but multimedia news sources and the hubs for all sorts of reliable and unique local information that otherwise might be hard to find in any other single website. Local newspaper people know their locality the best, so they need to take full advantage of their knowledge with the help of the Internet.