High-pressure compound could be key to hydrogen-powered vehicles
May 11, 2009A hydrogen-rich compound discovered by Stanford researchers is packed with promise of helping overcome one of the biggest hurdles to using hydrogen for fuel--namely, how do you stuff enough hydrogen into a volume that is small enough to be portable and practical for powering a car?
The newly discovered material is a high-pressure form of ammonia borane, a solid material which itself is already imbued with ample hydrogen. By working with the parent material at high pressure in an atmosphere artificially enriched with hydrogen, the scientists were able to ratchet up the hydrogen content of the material by roughly 50 percent.
"Including the hydrogen already stored in ammonia borane, this new material can store around 30 weight percent in total," said Yu Lin, lead author of a paper describing the work that was published this week in the online edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The Department of Energy has set a target for hydrogen-powered vehicles of having an on-board storage system able to store 9 percent, by weight, of hydrogen in 2015. The new compound, called ammonia borane-hydrogen, contains more than triple that amount.
But the fly in the hydrogen is that the sought-after storage system must function at ambient pressure and temperature conditions. The process Lin used to get the added hydrogen into the ammonia borane has to take place at a minimum pressure that is approximately 60,000 times the usual pressure at the surface of the Earth.
"For energy applications, we need to stabilize the material near ambient conditions," said Lin, a graduate student in geological and environmental sciences. Currently, most hydrogen-powered machines use either compressed hydrogen gas or liquid hydrogen, which needs to be maintained at high pressure or very low temperature, respectively, relative to ambient temperature and pressure. These methods have associated safety concerns in the case of compressed hydrogen and require significant energy for cooling in the case of liquid hydrogen.
There is currently no material that satisfies all of the requirements for on-board fuel storage for hydrogen-powered vehicles, according to Lin, who is working with Wendy Mao, assistant professor of geological and environmental sciences at Stanford and a co-author of the paper.
"If the material can be stabilized at or near ambient conditions with a large amount of hydrogen content, then I think it will be very promising," Lin said.
There are potentially several ways to help stabilize the compound under normal temperature and pressure conditions. One idea is that there might be some "alternative chemical paths, like adding some catalyst to try to stabilize the system," Lin said.
If Lin and Mao succeed, ammonia borane could move one step closer to becoming an everyday storage material for hydrogen. Also closer to a reality would be scientists' and environmentalists' dream of powering cars with oxygen from the air and hydrogen from the fuel cell, while pumping out only water from the exhaust pipe.
Source: Stanford University (news : web)
Sep 12, 2006 |
not rated yet |
0
I see it as a shame for the US that they are reducing funding to Hydrogen research, because if this is true and continues, it will no doubt lead to a brain drain of your best researchers to countries where they have more enlightened funding policies. I agree with some of the posts here, and suggest that both Europe and Japan are light years ahead with the total Hydrogen roll out scenario.
The thing that gets me is that many developed countries are already producing large quantities of Hydrogen as part of the petroleum refining process, or for the manufacture of fertilisers. It is just going to waste, and the decision about funding appears to have been made because it's all about the quick fix or short term budget criteria.
Surely it would be better to consider where the US Hydrogen technologies are world class, [as described in this article] and be more careful in allocating funds to these research teams such that the competitive advantage is improved as a result.
Lithium-ammonia electrocatalysts seem like a good fuelcontainment system.
The energy consumption involved in liquifying hydrogen is non-trivial. You need complicated, multi-stage cooling that is very inefficient(the amount of energy needed to cool the hydrogen is equivalent to approximately 30% of the energy content in the hydrogen.)
Routinely boiling off hydrogen gas into any enclosed space, a garage or anything else, is a glaring safety hazzard.
When you say suit case you mean something entirely different then when I say suit case. A typical 10-20 litre suitcase would contain 0.7 to 1.4 kg of liquid hydrogen which is equivalent to a mere 1.5-3 US gallones of gasoline when you account for the efficiency of a fuel cell versus an ICE.