Space junk raises risks for Hubble repair mission

May 12, 2009 By SETH BORENSTEIN , AP Science Writer
Space junk raises risks for Hubble repair mission (AP)

Enlarge

This computer generated image, supplied by NASA, shows objects that are currently being tracked in Earth orbit. Approximately 95% of the objects in this illustration are orbital debris, i.e., not functional satellites. The dots represent each item. The orbital debris dots are scaled according to the image size of the graphic to optimize their visibility and are not scaled to Earth. This image provide a good visualization of where the greatest orbital debris populations exist. The space shuttle Atlantis is flying at about 350 miles above Earth, an area littered with more dangerous space junk than the lower orbits where shuttles normally park at the international space station. (AP Photo/NASA)

(AP) -- Space shuttle Atlantis is now in a rough orbital neighborhood - a place littered with thousands of pieces of space junk zipping around the Earth at nearly 20,000 mph. There are more pieces of shattered satellites and used-up rockets in this region than astronauts have ever encountered. And the crew must be there for more than a week to repair the Hubble Space Telescope. As soon as the job is complete, the shuttle will scamper to safety.

The telescope orbits about 350 miles above Earth, a far dirtier place than where shuttles normally fly. And all those tiny projectiles raise the constant threat of a potentially fatal collision.

"It's a riskier environment when we go to this altitude," said NASA safety chief Bryan O'Connor, a former shuttle commander. But, he added, it's a risk that NASA can handle.

After the 2003 Columbia accident, just going up to Hubble was deemed too dangerous because flying to the telescope entails climbing to a different orbit than the . That means the shuttle cannot use the outpost as a safe harbor in an emergency.

NASA now puts the risk for a catastrophic collision with junk during the mission at 1 in 229 - greater than typical flights to the space station but lower than the agency's initial estimates.

On Wednesday, the crew will grab the telescope and tuck it inside the shuttle's cargo bay, where spacewalking astronauts will make repairs and upgrades over the next week. The work begins Thursday.

The crew spent Tuesday checking the outside of the shuttle for any damage from debris during launch, finding four nicks that initially seem minor. It's a standard procedure since Columbia got hit by a piece of foam during launch and later disintegrated during re-entry.

But the biggest danger on any shuttle flight is getting hit with space junk or tiny space rocks at high speeds during orbit, not during launch. Because objects circle the Earth at high speed, something as small as one-third the width of a dime can penetrate the shuttle's cabin, causing a major - maybe even fatal - problem, according to NASA.

And where Atlantis is camped out has only gotten messier recently. In 2007, China destroyed one of its satellites to test a weapon, scattering debris. In February, a dead Russian satellite and an American communications satellite collided, spreading more trash in higher orbits.

So far, space junk trackers have spotted about 950 pieces from this year's crash and more than 2,500 from the 2007 explosion. And there's much more they have not seen.

Harvard astronomer Jonathan McDowell, who tracks objects in orbit, said "people are going to be watching (Atlantis' mission) very carefully. It's a real danger."

While it's unlikely debris will cause a serious problem, McDowell expects Atlantis to come home "with a couple major dings in its windshield or radiator."

NASA's top space junk expert said it's important to put the worries into perspective.

"It's not something to lose sleep over," said NASA chief space debris scientist Nicholas Johnson. "We do take it very, very seriously, but in the scheme of things, it's a small risk."

Still, Johnson acknowledged that the higher orbit is far more dangerous than the space station's position 225 miles above Earth.

"Hubble is being pummeled regularly," Johnson said. "We see evidence of thousands of impacts."

Initially, when Johnson and other experts at the Johnson Space Center calculated the risk for losing Atlantis because of debris, it was slightly worse than 1 in 200.

That's the threshold for NASA to think twice about doing the flight. Engineers came up with some maneuvers to reduce the likelihood of getting hit, and have now decided the risk is an acceptable 1 in 229. That risk is usually about 1 in 300 during space station missions.

NASA canceled this Hubble mission in 2004, citing the risks of not being able to go to the space station in case of emergency. But the mission was reinstated after engineers devised ways to patch damage in flight, and the space agency created a plan for a quick rescue flight if needed. The shuttle Endeavour sits on the launch pad on standby to retrieve the Atlantis crew if the shuttle is too damaged to fly home.

NASA also found other ways to curb the risk of damage. As soon as Atlantis finishes fixing Hubble and places it back in orbit, the shuttle will skedaddle down to a lower, cleaner and safer orbit. The crew will also make another inspection of the shuttle before heading back to Earth.

In addition, Atlantis is flying an egg-shaped orbit, going as high as 350 miles to catch up to Hubble, but also dropping as close as 135 miles, making it less prone to space junk and easier for a rescue flight if necessary, according to NASA spokesman Rob Navias.

The Air Force is tracking more than 19,000 objects in all sorts of orbits - most of it junk.

The dirtiest spots are at 525 miles up where the Chinese satellite was destroyed and 490 miles, where the Russian-American satellite collision occurred.

Even though the Hubble-Atlantis orbit is more than 100 miles below those zones, it's too close for complete comfort. That's because the trash spreads into nearby orbits, Johnson said.

And the higher the orbits, the longer it stays aloft because there's even less drag from the ultra-thin atmosphere pulling stuff down. For example, a 4-inch object 490 miles up will stay in orbit for more than a century, Johnson said.

At Hubble's altitude, the same object would come down in about a decade; from the space station, it would be gone in a few months.

The Air Force Space Command tracks debris larger than 4 inches and gives warning to NASA and others if trash is projected to come close to astronauts. Twice in the past year, NASA has moved the space station to dodge nearby junk. But that's only the debris the Air Force can track.

Objects between one-tenth of an inch and 4 inches are dangerous enough to cause major and even fatal damage, but cannot be specifically tracked.

"The greatest risk to space missions comes from the non-trackable debris," Johnson said.

---

On the Net

NASA Orbital Debris Program Office: http://www.orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov

©2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

2.9 /5 (8 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

djp
May 12, 2009

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
I wonder who put the debris there in the first place. We are our own obstacle to a better future.
PB94941
May 12, 2009

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Best job ever - shooting space junk out of our orbit.. somebody hire me =D
GrayMouser
May 12, 2009

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
I wonder who put the debris there in the first place. We are our own obstacle to a better future.

Don't worry, some, unknown, percentage is natural. Not that it makes any difference to the target.
PPihkala
May 12, 2009

Rank: 2 / 5 (1)
I think all that trash is the legacy of human space exploration. We have been too eager to leave there our discarded equipment. I also think that someone should think how to clean those orbits. Maybe with solar powered satellite that uses laser to burn them. Or maybe by making a big net that can be used to catch those particles. But probably there are very few if none affordable ways to clean it up. :(
Yes
May 12, 2009

Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
The only solution may be a big Q-Switched laser that can can push debris to a lower orbit so it will burn up in the atmosphere.
But try to bring up one of these lasers in orbit. Any country will say that cleaning up space debris is just a justification for military operations.
A great example that the necessary can't be done.
tkjtkj
May 13, 2009

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
re: "This computer generated image, supplied by NASA, shows objects that are currently being tracked in Earth orbit."



I find it hard to accept that rendering of the density-spread of orbiting objects. It's not conceivable to me that there is no hint whatsoever of any increased density in the plane of the earth's equator: most launches, by far take advantage of earth's rotation (to gain payload!) by launching in that plane .. The image, however seems to show, if anything, a suggestion of increased objects in the polar orbit plane .. this seems counter-intuitive ..

I smell a 'space rat' here!



i'd welcome some email'd commentary! thanks!

tkjtkj@gmail.com

zevkirsh
May 13, 2009

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
particle beams to blast these things into the earths atmosphere. only way to go.
Egnite
May 13, 2009

Rank: 2 / 5 (1)
Send a space [recycling] station into orbit and we could start building in space without the huge costs of getting some of the materials into orbit.
holoman
May 13, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Blasting garbage into Earths atmosphere not
recommended, it would be better to send it on its
way into space.

The Earth's environment is contaminated enough and unless the garbage is taken down to its species and the species combine in some Earth friendly way
would not recommend reintroduction.
Rank 2.9 /5 (8 votes)
Related Stories
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Never ending outer space.....
    created12 hours ago
  • Neutron Star fragments?
    created14 hours ago
  • stationary or not?
    created18 hours ago
  • Scale of the Universe
    createdFeb 10, 2012
  • Titan's lack of impact craters
    createdFeb 09, 2012
  • Real pictures of black hole eating a star?
    createdFeb 08, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy

More news stories

Latin America mining boom clashes with conservation

Latin America is experiencing a mining boom as prices rise fuelled by a hike in global demand, but the region is also being hit by a wave of violent protests, strikes and rallies by environmentalists.

Space & Earth / Environment

created 5 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

Political leaders play key role in how worried Americans are by climate change: study

More than extreme weather events and the work of scientists, it is national political leaders who influence how much Americans worry about the threat of climate change, new research finds.

Space & Earth / Environment

created Feb 06, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (6) | comments 72

NASA budget will axe Mars deal with Europe: scientists

US President Barack Obama's budget proposal to be submitted next week for 2013 will cut NASA's budget by 20 percent and eliminate a major partnership with Europe on Mars exploration, scientists said Thursday.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created Feb 10, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 55

Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago

(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...

Space & Earth / Environment

created Feb 10, 2012 | popularity 4.1 / 5 (14) | comments 20 | with audio podcast report

High planetary tilt lowers odds for life?

Highly-tilted worlds would have extreme seasons, subjecting life to alternating periods of scorching and subzero temperatures. This could make the development of all but hardiest, simplest creatures a long ...

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created Feb 06, 2012 | popularity 4.8 / 5 (12) | comments 14 | with audio podcast


Google might launch Drive for cloud storage soon

(PhysOrg.com) -- Google's next big move, according to the Wall Street Journal, is a cloud storage service called Drive. Hardly first to the plate, Google is simply catching up to introducing its cloud reposi ...

Love a click away in Indonesia's Twitter Republic

He was a geeky kid from Yogyakarta, she a glamorous city girl in Jakarta. In a country with one of the world's most vibrant social networking scenes they fell in love on Twitter.

Europeans protest controversial Internet pact

Tens of thousands of people marched in protests in more than a dozen European cities Saturday against a controversial anti-online piracy pact that critics say could curtail Internet freedom.

Walney offshore wind farm is world's biggest (for now)

(PhysOrg.com) -- The Walney wind farm on the Irish Sea--characterized by high tides, waves and windy weather--officially opened this week. The farm is treated in the press as a very big deal as the Walney ...

Navy to begin tests on electromagnetic railgun prototype launcher

The Office of Naval Research (ONR)'s Electromagnetic (EM) Railgun program will take an important step forward in the coming weeks when the first industry railgun prototype launcher is tested at a facility ...

Explained: Sigma

It's a question that arises with virtually every major new finding in science or medicine: What makes a result reliable enough to be taken seriously? The answer has to do with statistical significance -- but ...