Melting threat from West Antarctic Ice Sheet less than previously believed
May 14, 2009(PhysOrg.com) -- While a total or partial collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet as a result of warming would not raise global sea levels as high as some predict, levels on the U.S. seaboards would rise 25 percent more than the global average and threaten cities like New York, Washington, D.C., and San Francisco, according to a new study.
Long thought of as the sleeping giant with respect to sea level rise, Antarctica holds about nine times the volume of ice of Greenland. Its western ice sheet, known as WAIS, is of particular interest to scientists due to its inherent instability, a result of large areas of the continent's bedrock lying below sea level. But the ice sheet's potential contribution to sea level rise has been greatly overestimated, according to new calculations.
"There's a vast body of research that's looked at the likelihood of a WAIS collapse and what implications such a catastrophic event would have for the globe," said Jonathan Bamber, lead author of the study published in Science May 15. "But all of these studies have assumed a 5-meter to 6-meter contribution to sea level rise. Our calculations show those estimates are much too large, even on a thousand-year timescale."
Bamber and his colleagues found a WAIS collapse would only raise sea levels by 3.3 meters, or about 11 feet. Bamber, a professor at the University of Bristol in England, currently is a visiting fellow at the University of Colorado at Boulder's Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, or CIRES.
The study authors used models based on glaciological theory to simulate how the massive ice sheet likely would respond if the floating ice shelves fringing the continent broke free. Vast ice shelves currently block WAIS from spilling into the Weddell and Ross seas, limiting total ice loss to the ocean.
According to theory, if these floating ice shelves were removed, sizeable areas of WAIS would essentially become undammed, triggering an acceleration of the ice sheet toward the ocean and a rapid inland migration of the grounding line. The grounding line is the point where the ice sheet's margins meet the ocean and begin to float.
The most unstable areas of WAIS are those sections sitting in enormous inland basins on bedrock entirely below sea level. If the ice filling these basins becomes undammed by the disappearance of floating ice shelves, it quickly would become buoyant and form new floating ice shelves further inland, in time precipitating further breakup and collapse, according to existing theories.
The study authors assumed that only ice on the downward-sloping and inland-facing side of the basins would be vulnerable to collapse. They also assumed that ice grounded on bedrock that slopes upward inland or on bedrock that lies above sea level likely would survive.
"Unlike the world's other major ice sheets -- the East Antarctic Ice Sheet and Greenland -- WAIS is the only one with such an unstable configuration," said Bamber.
Just how rapid the collapse of WAIS would be is largely unknown. If such a large mass of ice steadily melted over 500 years, as has been suggested in earlier studies, it would add about 6.5 millimeters or a quarter of an inch per year to sea level rise -- about twice the current rate due to all sources.
"Interestingly, the pattern of sea level rise is independent of how fast or how much of the WAIS collapses," he said. "Even if the WAIS contributed only a meter of sea level rise over many years, sea levels along North America's shorelines would still increase 25 percent more than the global average," said Bamber.
Regional variations in sea level would largely be driven by the distribution of ice mass from the Antarctic continent to the oceans, according to the study. With less mass at the South Pole, Earth's gravity field would weaken in the Southern Hemisphere and strengthen in the Northern Hemisphere, causing water to pile up in the northern oceans.
This redistribution of mass also would affect Earth's rotation, which in turn would cause water to build up along the North American continent and in the Indian Ocean.
Source: University of Colorado at Boulder (news : web)
Sep 23, 2004 |
not rated yet |
0
I guess these guys are way way smarter than the rest of the scientific community. Yep. That must be it.
You can worry about it but there's not much you can do to change it anymore than we can stop or create Hurricanes.
I believe both wings are known to believe crazy stuff, especially noteworthy on some of the opinions on the blog you're promoting.
Typical political crap. Spew "hate my enemy" propaganda on every piece of news you read. Grow up, drone.
Information on buoyancy from Archimedes of Syracuse (287 BC - 212 BC) may help us understand the danger of melting ice, just as the tip of an iceberg can provide information on the amount of ice hidden below the water.
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://www.omatumr.com
Somebody has to lose... Oh, I forgot, Science doesn't keep score, it just keeps on testing the theory.
And the crazy right is any different? They are both the same!
Since West Antarctic ice is resting on bedrock, Archimedes is going to be a lot less help than you think. Please take more time to study the geology of the situation before making rash posts.
According to a recent study (the abstract published on this site, by the way), however, it takes thousands of years for a collapse to occur. So, if one does occur recently, it was because one was already under way and we did not start it. Case closed on the pseudoscientific predictions of imminent ice-sheet collapse.
And, I personally wonder that if San Francisco, New York and Washington D.C. were plunged under water, would it be any great loss to the country? Seriously?