Research team finds important role for junk DNA

May 20, 2009 by Kitta MacPherson
Research team finds important role for junk DNA

Enlarge

Princeton scientists are probing the genetics of the pond organism Oxytricha, shown here in the process of reproducing. (Photo: Robert Hammersmith)

(PhysOrg.com) -- Scientists have called it "junk DNA." They have long been perplexed by these extensive strands of genetic material that dominate the genome but seem to lack specific functions. Why would nature force the genome to carry so much excess baggage?

Now researchers from Princeton University and Indiana University who have been studying the of a pond organism have found that junk DNA may not be so junky after all. They have discovered that from regions of what had been viewed as the "dispensable " are actually performing functions that are central for the organism. They have concluded that the genes spur an almost acrobatic rearrangement of the entire genome that is necessary for the organism to grow.

It all happens very quickly. Genes called transposons in the single-celled pond-dwelling organism Oxytricha produce cell proteins known as transposases. During development, the transposons appear to first influence hundreds of thousands of DNA pieces to regroup. Then, when no longer needed, the organism cleverly erases the transposases from its , paring its genome to a slim 5 percent of its original load.

"The transposons actually perform a central role for the cell," said Laura Landweber, a professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at Princeton and an author of the study. "They stitch together the genes in working form." The work appeared in the May 15 edition of Science.

In order to prove that the transposons have this reassembly function, the scientists disabled several thousand of these genes in some Oxytricha. The organisms with the altered DNA, they found, failed to develop properly.

Other authors from Princeton's Department of Ecology and include: postdoctoral fellows Mariusz Nowacki and Brian Higgins; 2006 alumna Genevieve Maquilan; and graduate student Estienne Swart. Former Princeton postdoctoral fellow Thomas Doak, now of Indiana University, also contributed to the study.

Landweber and other members of her team are researching the origin and evolution of genes and genome rearrangement, with particular focus on Oxytricha because it undergoes massive genome reorganization during development.

In her lab, Landweber studies the evolutionary origin of novel genetic systems such as Oxytricha's. By combining molecular, evolutionary, theoretical and synthetic biology, Landweber and colleagues last year discovered an RNA (ribonucleic acid)-guided mechanism underlying its complex genome rearrangements.

"Last year, we found the instruction book for how to put this genome back together again -- the instruction set comes in the form of RNA that is passed briefly from parent to offspring and these maternal RNAs provide templates for the rearrangement process," Landweber said. "Now we've been studying the actual machinery involved in the process of cutting and splicing tremendous amounts of DNA. Transposons are very good at that."

The term "junk DNA" was originally coined to refer to a region of DNA that contained no genetic information. Scientists are beginning to find, however, that much of this so-called junk plays important roles in the regulation of gene activity. No one yet knows how extensive that role may be.

Instead, scientists sometimes refer to these regions as "selfish DNA" if they make no specific contribution to the reproductive success of the host organism. Like a computer virus that copies itself ad nauseum, selfish DNA replicates and passes from parent to offspring for the sole benefit of the DNA itself. The present study suggests that some selfish transposons can instead confer an important role to their hosts, thereby establishing themselves as long-term residents of the genome.

Source: Princeton University (news : web)

4.8 /5 (5 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

superhuman
May 20, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
The label junk DNA is a testament to junk science.

It is obvious to anyone who actually understands evolution that no organism can ever contain 90% of useless DNA. It is simply impossible. Unused DNA would be lost in a very short time frame as it's maintenance incurs huge costs.
HenisDov
May 21, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
Junk DNA, Junk Body Parts
It Is The Lifehood Of Genes That Makes All Organisms Alive
Are Parts Of Our Humanoid Body Superfluous Junk


A. "Research team finds important role for junk DNA"
http://www.prince...8/32C04/


B. From "Aging Seen Without The Emperor'S New Clothes"
http://www.scienc...ut_cells
http://www.articl...441.html

Right they are: "Nearly all organisms experience aging". But why "nearly"?

Why doesn't "science" accept the obvious fact that genes are organisms and "experience aging", too?

Not only yeast, worms and people. Also genes and the interdependent-genes-communes, genomes. Theye are both organisms. They are alive. It is their "lifehood" that makes us and all life forms "alive".

By plain common sense - my favorite scientific approach - they should also be "experiencing aging"...


C. If it is not the lifehood of genes that makes each and all organisms alive,

what otherwise makes each and all organisms alive?


Dov Henis
(Comments From The 22nd Century)
Updated Life's Manifest May 2009
http://www.physfo...ic=14988&st=495&#entry412704
http://www.the-sc...age#2321
Sean_W
May 21, 2009

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I suspect that even the researchers who still use the term "junk" do so for historical reasons not because they think it is "junk". I would also not be surprised if the term "junk" is not much more prevalent in popular science writing than in discourse between scientists. I read and hear terms like "non-coding" (itself not a perfect term) much more than I encounter the term "junk DNA".
PPihkala
May 21, 2009

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
As far as I have understood junk DNA, that naming arose when first studies of genetic information indicated that only under 10% of DNA codes for proteins. Then it was thought that only proteins can have an active role. Now most should understand that this rest of genetic code is for making RNA that can influence how much proteins the protein coding DNA makes. And by varying the amount and timing of proteins they have a great power to change the workings of life.
Rank 4.8 /5 (5 votes)
Related Stories
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • a single mRNA strand is attached to sevaral ribosomes?
    created22 hours ago
  • Oestrogen and FSH
    createdFeb 07, 2012
  • Linear Blood Vessel Network Examples in Animals or Plants
    createdFeb 07, 2012
  • Neuroscientists: What is a Principal Cell Layer?
    createdFeb 06, 2012
  • How does slime mould grow?
    createdFeb 04, 2012
  • Why are mosquitoes and bedbugs successful?
    createdFeb 04, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - Biology

More news stories

Why are there so few fish in the Earth's oceans?

(PhysOrg.com) -- A Stony Brook University researcher has found that, contrary to popular belief, there are not plenty of fish in the sea.

Biology / Plants & Animals

created 5 hours ago | popularity 4.3 / 5 (7) | comments 13 | with audio podcast

Study shows how DNA finds its match

It's been more than 50 years since James Watson and Francis Crick showed that DNA is a double helix of two strands that complement each other. But how does a short piece of DNA find its match, out of the millions ...

Biology / Cell & Microbiology

created 9 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (10) | comments 1 | with audio podcast

Most stretchable spider silk reported

The egg sac silk of the cocoon stalk of the cave spider Meta menardi is the most stretchable egg sac silk yet tested, according to a study published Feb. 8 in the open access journal PLoS ONE.

Biology / Plants & Animals

created 5 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Researchers use Google Earth to verify Mediterranean fish farming data

The Great Wall of China is not the only thing you can see from space. Fish farming cages are clearly visible through Google Earth's satellite images and University of British Columbia researchers have used them to estimate ...

Biology / Ecology

created 5 hours ago | popularity 4 / 5 (1) | comments 0

Transformational fruit fly genome catalog completed

Scientists searching for the genomics version of the holy grail – more insight into predicting how an animal's genes affect physical or behavioral traits – now have a reference manual that should ...

Biology / Biotechnology

created 9 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0 | with audio podcast


Astronomy team discovers nearby dwarf galaxy

(PhysOrg.com) -- A team led by UCLA research astronomer Michael Rich has used a unique telescope to discover a previously unknown companion to the nearby galaxy NGC 4449, which is some 12.5 million light years ...

Amasia: As next supercontinent forms, Arctic Ocean, Caribbean will vanish first

(PhysOrg.com) -- Geologists at Yale University have proposed a new theory to describe the formation of supercontinents, the epic process by which Earth’s major continental blocks combine into a single ...

Transparent iron? For the first time, an experiment shows that atomic nuclei can become transparent

At the high-brilliance synchrotron light source PETRA III, a team of DESY scientists headed by Dr. Ralf Röhlsberger has succeeded in making atomic nuclei transparent with the help of X-ray light. At the ...

Physicists build highly efficient 'no-waste' laser

A team of University of California, San Diego researchers has built the smallest room-temperature nanolaser to date, as well as an even more startling device: a highly efficient, "thresholdless" laser that ...

Scientists strengthen memory by stimulating key site in brain

Ever gone to the movies and forgotten where you parked the car? New UCLA research may one day help you improve your memory.

Quantum physicist explains $100K offer for proof scaled-up quantum computing is impossible

(PhysOrg.com) -- MIT researcher Scott Aaronson has certainly riled the physics community with his offer this past Friday, of $100,000 to anyone who can prove that scaled-up quantum computing is impossible. ...