New memory material may hold data for one billion years

May 20, 2009 New memory material may hold data for one billion years

Enlarge

Scientists are reporting an advance toward a memory device capable of storing data for more than one billion years. Credit: The American Chemical Society

(PhysOrg.com) -- Packing more digital images, music, and other data onto silicon chips in USB drives and smart phones is like squeezing more strawberries into the same size supermarket carton. The denser you pack, the quicker it spoils. The 10 to 100 gigabits of data per square inch on today’s memory cards has an estimated life expectancy of only 10 to 30 years. And the electronics industry needs much greater data densities for tomorrow’s iPods, smart phones, and other devices.

Scientists are reporting an advance toward remedying this situation with a new device that can store thousands of times more data than conventional chips with an estimated lifetime of more than one billion years. Their discovery is scheduled for publication in the June 10 issue of ACS’ Nano Letters.

Alex Zettl and colleagues note in the new study that some of today’s highest-density experimental storage media can retain ultra-dense data for only a fraction of a second. They note that William the Conqueror’s Doomsday Book, written on vellum in 1086 AD, has survived 900 years. However, the medium used for a digital version of the book, encoded in 1986, failed within 20 years.

The researchers describe development of an experimental consisting of an iron nanoparticle (1/50,000 the width of a human hair) enclosed in a hollow . In the presence of electricity, the nanoparticle can be shuttled back and forth with great precision. This creates a programmable memory system that, like a silicon chip, can record digital information and play it back using conventional computer hardware. In lab and theoretical studies, the researchers showed that the device had a storage capacity as high as 1 terabyte per square inch (a trillion bits of information) and temperature-stability in excess of one billion years.

More information: Nano Letters, “Nanoscale Reversible Mass Transport for Archival Memory”

Provided by American Chemical Society (news : web)


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Stumble it Digg this share on Facebook retweet share on Reddit add to delicious
Rate this story - 4.6 /5 (45 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • Nik_2213 - May 20, 2009
    • Rank: 4.6 / 5 (5)
    Behold ! A genuine digital abacus !!
  • holoman - May 20, 2009
    • Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
    A billion years, why not make it
    a Gazillion Gazillion Gazillion Gazillion years !

    Here's something else to think about that has been
    verified over and over.

    Ferroelectric densities of .2 to .5 Petabits = 200 to 500 Terabits sq. in. / 40 Petabits = 40,000 to 100 Petabits = 100,000 Terabits cu.cm. or 200,000 to 500,000 Gigabits sq.in. / 40,000,000 to 100,000,000 Gigabits cu.cm. with symmetrical read / write times of < 10 picoseconds for 100 year non-volatile storage having infinite rewrites.

    Ferroelectrics space age material that has been shown to have robust Nuclear / EMF / Cosmic radiation protection exceeding all other materials used in data storage and display technology.


  • fixer - May 20, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
    Really? but I might buy a new laptop in only 50 000 years.
    will it be compatible?
  • dirk_bruere - May 20, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
    Maybe the time will come with a fully mature computing technology where an update really is needed only every 50,000 years. But not soon.
  • NeilFarbstein - May 20, 2009
    • Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
    I want a lifetime warrantee!!!
  • sender - May 20, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I would like photopolymers in the nanotube that bunch up and diffract dithered LED's for computing and solid LED's for memory, optical computers now!
  • Azpod - May 20, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    If they can make it last 10x as much, it may last long enough to be read by whatever species evolves in the star system that's created from the Sun's ashes.

    I want to encode the time-honored phrase of extreme wisdom: 'kiss my shiny metal ass.' :p
  • PPihkala - May 21, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    So we know their memory can last long enough to outlast the devices used to interface it. Next challenge is to make it commercial success. If it can't compete, no one will be using it.
  • Sirussinder - May 21, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Good start, but nothing today comes even close to the reliability of carving information into stone if you want to store it for 1 billion years. And its easily accessible/readable to anyone or I guess maybe at this point in time, anything alive and aware of it.

    Egyptians still has us beat when it comes to data storage. It even survived the dark ages where unfortunately in Europe, tons of books and ancient knowledge was deliberately burned by the church or accidentally burned to be lost forever. My point is stone doesn't burn and its lots of work to destroy carvings on stone.
  • djp - May 21, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    hehe, great but wait. Maybe there are already nanostorage devices left on earth in ancient locations around the world. We are probably rediscovering the tech. :-p

    Whats the use of a device that will be used by a species with an amnesia cycle of every 5 to 10 thousand years. Hieroglyphs had to be re-deciphered, and that's talking about stuff people could see without highly specialized laser or electron telescopy.
  • Szkeptik - May 21, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
    Cool. We could program the highest degree of knowledge into it and put it onto satellites leaving the solar system. If at some distant day and location an intelligence might find them, and have sufficient technology to read the memory that could be the ultimate time capsule. Even if we were gone for millions of years by then, all the cities and colonies crumbled to dust long ago, we could still tell our story. Ah... just dreaming. Would be EPIC though.
  • wiyosaya - May 21, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    I wonder if they have given this a "shock" test. To me, the article makes it sound like it is based on the electric field physically moving the iron nanoparticle. This sounds like it might be highly susceptible to physical shock.

    Imagine yourself a scientist 10 million year from now. You've just discovered a memory device based on this technology that contains the sum of all knowledge from an ancient era. What you don't know is that the device is susceptible to shock, and you drop the device. DOH! :O
  • John_Doe - May 21, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I imagine myself an alien scientist 100 thousand years from now finding a desert planet with thousands (maybe more) of landfills, full or carbon nanotubes (because they are the only thing that doesn't degrade, right?), then a couple of months later all my crew develops a strange cellular disease (why not, aliens with cells?). I research ancients databases created by the extinct civilization (and stored with nanotubes, of course) and guess what, the name of the disease is "CANCER" (LOL). This could be an episode of some SCI-FI series...
  • AstroGuardian - May 22, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    When did one billion years of testing pass?
    Or their lie is just too cheap.
  • nick7201969 - May 22, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
    I would not buy this device because next year they will be coming out with *TWO* billion year capabilities. Thus, making this one obsolete.
  • jonnyboy - May 23, 2009
    • Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
    When did one billion years of testing pass?
    Or their lie is just too cheap.


    They computer simulated the lifetime of the product. I am pretty sure that they ran the model at MIT
  • crackerhead - May 26, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    what about rust ? degradation of carbon nanotubes may be easy but anything made of iron will react . Y-not rust proof a few bridges now ?

May 20, 2009 all stories

Comments: 17

4.6 /5 (45 votes)
  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • share this

  • hide
  • Related Stories




  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

  • Fatigue Properties of Chinese steel
    created Nov 04, 2009
  • Finding Hardness values
    created Nov 04, 2009
  • Fluid flow, pressure drop simulation in Comsol
    created Nov 04, 2009
  • units of vickers,brinell and rockwell . . .
    created Nov 04, 2009
  • More from Physics Forums - Materials & Chemical Engineering

Other News

New Digital 'Electronics' Concept May Continue Moore's Law

New Digital 'Electronics' Concept May Continue Moore's Law

Nanotechnology / Nanophysics

created Nov 05, 2009 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (50) | comments 8

(PhysOrg.com) -- Computers of the future could be operating not on electrons, but on tiny waves traveling through an electron "fluid," if a new proposal is successful. The new circuit design, recently introduced ...


Nanoparticles for gene therapy improve

Nanoparticles for gene therapy improve

Nanotechnology / Bio & Medicine

created Nov 06, 2009 | popularity 5 / 5 (4) | comments 3

(PhysOrg.com) -- About five years ago, Professor Janet Sawicki at the Lankenau Institute in Pennsylvania read an article about nanoparticles developed by MIT's Robert Langer for gene therapy, the insertion ...


Breakthrough in industrial-scale nanotube processing

Breakthrough in industrial-scale nanotube processing

Nanotechnology / Nanomaterials

created Nov 02, 2009 | popularity 4.9 / 5 (20) | comments 3

(PhysOrg.com) -- Rice University scientists today unveiled a method for the industrial-scale processing of pure carbon-nanotube fibers that could lead to revolutionary advances in materials science, power ...


Scientists witness nature's complexity unfold in self-assembling quasicrystals

Scientists witness nature's complexity unfold in self-assembling quasicrystals

Nanotechnology / Nanomaterials

created Oct 31, 2009 | popularity 4.9 / 5 (16) | comments 3

(PhysOrg.com) -- Just a few decades ago, scientists believed that all ordered matter consists of self-repeating building blocks -- atoms, ions or molecules. In this view, the ordinary solids of everyday life ...


Nanoparticles may cause DNA damage across a cellular barrier

Nanoparticles may cause DNA damage across a cellular barrier

Nanotechnology / Bio & Medicine

created Nov 05, 2009 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (9) | comments 1

(PhysOrg.com) -- Scientists have shown in the laboratory that metal nanoparticles damaged the DNA in cells on the other side of a cellular barrier. The research, by the University of Bristol, is published ...