Fundamental flaw in transistor noise theory discovered

May 21, 2009
Fundamental flaw in transistor noise theory discovered

Pacemakers, like the implanted one shown in this image, are among the low-power devices that could be affected by new NIST findings about transistor noise. The findings indicate unforeseen problems could crop up as transistors grow smaller and run on less power, potentially impacting cell phones and laptops as well. Credit: Shutterstock; copyright Dario Sabljak

(PhysOrg.com) -- Chip manufacturers beware: There's a newfound flaw in our understanding of transistor noise, a phenomenon affecting the electronic on-off switch that makes computer circuits possible. According to the engineers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology who discovered the problem, it will soon stand in the way of creating more efficient, lower-powered devices like cell phones and pacemakers unless we solve it.

While exploring transistor behavior, the team found evidence that a widely accepted model explaining errors caused by electronic "noise" in the switches does not fit the facts. A transistor must be made from highly purified materials to function; defects in these materials, like rocks in a stream, can divert the flow of and cause the device to malfunction. This, in turn, makes it appear to fluctuate erratically between "on" and "off" states. For decades, the engineering community has largely accepted a theoretical model that identifies these defects and helps guide designers' efforts to mitigate them.

Those days are ending, says NIST's Jason Campbell, who has studied the fluctuations between on-off states in progressively smaller . The theory, known as the elastic tunneling model, predicts that as transistors shrink, the fluctuations should correspondingly increase in frequency.

However, Campbell's group at NIST has shown that even in nanometer-sized transistors, the fluctuation frequency remains the same. "This implies that the theory explaining the effect must be wrong," Campbell said. "The model was a good working theory when transistors were large, but our observations clearly indicate that it's incorrect at the smaller nanoscale regimes where industry is headed."

The findings have particular implications for the low-power transistors currently in demand in the latest high-tech consumer technology, such as laptop computers. Low-power transistors are coveted because using them on chips would allow devices to run longer on less power—think cell phones that can run for a week on a single charge or pacemakers that operate for a decade without changing the battery. But Campbell says that the fluctuations his group observed grow even more pronounced as the power decreased. "This is a real bottleneck in our development of transistors for low-power applications," he says. "We have to understand the problem before we can fix it—and troublingly, we don't know what's actually happening."

Campbell, who credits NIST colleague K.P. Cheung for first noticing the possibility of trouble with the theory, presented* some of the group's findings at an industry conference on May 19, 2009, in Austin, Texas. Researchers from the University of Maryland College Park and Rutgers University also contributed to the study.

More information: J.P. Campbell, L.C. Yu, K.P. Cheung, J. Qin, J.S. Suehle, A. Oates, K. Sheng. Large Random Telegraph Noise in Sub-Threshold Operation of Nano-scale nMOSFETs. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Integrated Circuit Design and Technology. Austin, Texas. May 19, 2009; and Random Telegraph Noise in Highly Scaled nMOSFETs. 2009 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium, Montreal, Canada, April 29, 2009.

Source: National Institute of Standards and Technology (news : web)

4.5 /5 (20 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

ScientistAmauterEnthusiast
May 21, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
Minor set back if any
For all we know the big chip makers ( you know who you are ) know this already and have a workaround.

Sciences new solution to everything: Carbon nanotube the s**t out of it! =]
Arikin
May 21, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
That last paragraph says that the lower power level causes more noise. But, before that they said that smaller sizes down to nano don't cause more noise... So only the power level matters in the amount of noise?

If so... when you miniaturize add more of them to equate to the same power usage as the bigger one. Believe me in computing we ALWAYS want more computing power. Sort of like getting the computing power of 4 CPUs in the space of 1 CPU.
SMMAssociates
May 22, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
Arikin:

Just IMHO, but the "more power" thing probably refers to more power used by each junction, not the total for the entire "chip".... And, I'm almost certain, this has nothing to do with "computing power"....
Vlasev
May 22, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
Can this be related to the single electron interference?
Lower power, less electrons, maybe larger portion of them diverted trough this mysterious interference.
wiyosaya
May 22, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
That last paragraph says that the lower power level causes more noise. But, before that they said that smaller sizes down to nano don't cause more noise... So only the power level matters in the amount of noise?

What they said was that the noise does not increase in frequency as devices shrink, and this is the nature of the difficulty with existing theory; they did not say that smaller sizes do not cause more noise. The "frequency" and the "amount" of noise are two different quantities. They do not say anything with regards to "amount" of noise - which is what it sounds like you are referring to.

Speculation: As the amount of power the device uses shrinks, something known as the "signal to noise ratio" could decrease. So if signal decreases and noise increases, it would become more difficult to pick out the "signal" from the "noise." What you are interested in is "signal" and if "noise" is so great that you cannot pick out the "signal" then the device becomes useless. "Signal" is what carries the useful information.

If so... when you miniaturize add more of them to equate to the same power usage as the bigger one. Believe me in computing we ALWAYS want more computing power. Sort of like getting the computing power of 4 CPUs in the space of 1 CPU.

What they are talking about is the electrical power the chip uses not the computing power of the chip. There is a difference there, too. Computing power is related to the number of computations the chip can make in a second. Electrical power is how many watts does the chip consume when making those computations.
Slotin
May 23, 2009

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
I don't know, why they're expecting, smaller transistors will be of smaller noise. Noise is the result of particles, which are crossing boundaries of PN junction or whole transistor. And the surface of this junction doesn't change significantly, when the size of transistor goes down, because PN junction is of flat shape. Quantum fluctuations inside of transistor will always compensate mutually, so they cannot contribute to noise of the whole transistor significantly.

http://www.aether...oise.gif

Formal theory is one thing, good reason the other..
Slotin
May 23, 2009

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
..Campbell says that the fluctuations his group observed grow even more pronounced as the power decreased...
The noise of rest state of transistor is more significant, then the noise of transistor in its opened state, because every transistor amplifies it's own noise too and the amplification factor goes down with power load.
sender
May 24, 2009

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
reminds me of the problem non-blinking transistors solved
PPihkala
May 25, 2009

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Noise is the result of particles, which are crossing boundaries of PN junction or whole transistor. And the surface of this junction doesn't change significantly, when the size of transistor goes down, because PN junction is of flat shape.

You are way off here, just look at the title of this research, given at the end of article: 'Large Random Telegraph Noise in Sub-Threshold Operation of Nano-scale nMOSFETs'. MOSFETs do not use PN junction. They are charge based so that charge on the gate determines how much current can flow at the channel. This research tells that at the smallest levels theory used currently to predict FET behaviour is not valid. So they need to find a better theory that can agree with measurements to be able to confidently make even smaller FETs.
Alizee
Jun 07, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
MOSFETs do not use PN junction
They just use two ones.;-)
http://en.wikiped...SFET.JPG
Rank 4.5 /5 (20 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Books To Inspire a Beginnig Physics Student
    created2 hours ago
  • Pith balls problem
    created2 hours ago
  • Electrostatics
    created2 hours ago
  • what is phase constant
    created2 hours ago
  • Basics In electromagnetic wave
    created2 hours ago
  • How to calculate theoretical initial velocity?
    created3 hours ago
  • More from Physics Forums - General Physics

More news stories

Putting the squeeze on planets outside our solar system

(PhysOrg.com) -- Using high-powered lasers, scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and collaborators discovered that molten magnesium silicate undergoes a phase change in the liquid state, abruptly ...

Physics / Condensed Matter

created 13 hours ago | popularity 4.3 / 5 (7) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Hovering not hard if you're top-heavy, researchers find

Top-heavy structures are more likely to maintain their balance while hovering in the air than are those that bear a lower center of gravity, researchers at New York University's Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences ...

Physics / General Physics

created 14 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 1 | with audio podcast

SLAC, Stanford team focuses on high-energy electrons to treat cancer

Accelerator physicists at SLAC and cancer specialists from Stanford are working on a new technology that could dramatically reduce the time needed for cancer radiation treatments. The team ran an initial experiment ...

Physics / General Physics

created 17 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 0

Measurements from high-energy collisions lead to better understanding of why meson particles disappear

For several years, physicists at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), USA, have studied an unusual state of matter called the quark–gluon plasma, which they ...

Physics / General Physics

created 18 hours ago | popularity 4.5 / 5 (4) | comments 0

Explained: Sigma

It's a question that arises with virtually every major new finding in science or medicine: What makes a result reliable enough to be taken seriously? The answer has to do with statistical significance -- but ...

Physics / General Physics

created Feb 09, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (16) | comments 53


Anonymous knocks CIA website offline (Update)

The website of the Central Intelligence Agency was inaccessible on Friday after the hacker group Anonymous claimed to have knocked it offline.

New error-correcting codes guarantee the fastest possible rate of data transmission

Error-correcting codes are one of the triumphs of the digital age. They’re a way of encoding information so that it can be transmitted across a communication channel — such as an optical fiber o ...

Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago

(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...

Google users warned of threat to smartphone wallets

Users of Google smartphone wallets were being warned on Friday that there is a way to crack pass codes intended to thwart thieves from going on illicit shopping sprees.

New power source discovered

(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and RMIT University have made a breakthrough in energy storage and power generation.

The power of estrogen -- male snakes attract other males

A new study has shown that boosting the estrogen levels of male garter snakes causes them to secrete the same pheromones that females use to attract suitors, and turned the males into just about the sexiest ...