Melting Greenland ice sheets may threaten Northeast United States, Canada
May 27, 2009
This visualization, based on new computer modeling, shows that sea level rise may be an additional 10 centimeters (4 inches) higher by populated areas in northeastern North America than previously thought. Extreme northeastern North America and Greenland may experience even higher sea level rise. (Graphic courtesy Geophysical Research Letters, modified by UCAR.)
Melting of the Greenland ice sheet this century may drive more water than previously thought toward the already threatened coastlines of New York, Boston, Halifax, and other cities in the northeastern United States and in Canada, according to new research led by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR).
The study, which will be published Friday in Geophysical Research Letters, finds that if Greenland's ice melts at moderate to high rates, ocean circulation by 2100 may shift and cause sea levels off the northeast coast of North America to rise by about 12 to 20 inches (about 30 to 50 centimeters) more than in other coastal areas. The research builds on recent reports that have found that sea level rise associated with global warming could adversely affect North America, and its findings suggest that the situation is more threatening than previously believed.
"If the Greenland melt continues to accelerate, we could see significant impacts this century on the northeast U.S. coast from the resulting sea level rise," says NCAR scientist Aixue Hu, the lead author. "Major northeastern cities are directly in the path of the greatest rise."
A study in Nature Geoscience in March warned that warmer water temperatures could shift ocean currents in a way that would raise sea levels off the Northeast by about 8 inches (20 cm) more than the average global sea level rise. But it did not include the additional impact of Greenland's ice, which at moderate to high melt rates would further accelerate changes in ocean circulation and drive an additional 4 to 12 inches (about 10 to 30 cm) of water toward heavily populated areas in northeastern North America on top of average global sea level rise. More remote areas in extreme northeastern Canada and Greenland could see even higher sea level rise.
Scientists have been cautious about estimating average sea level rise this century in part because of complex processes within ice sheets. The 2007 assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projected that sea levels worldwide could rise by an average of 7 to 23 inches (18 to 59 cm) this century, but many researchers believe the rise will be greater because of dynamic factors in ice sheets that appear to have accelerated the melting rate in recent years.
The new research was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy and by NCAR's sponsor, the National Science Foundation. It was conducted by scientists at NCAR, the University of Colorado at Boulder, and Florida State University.
How much meltwater?
To assess the impact of Greenland ice melt on ocean circulation, Hu and his coauthors used the Community Climate System Model, an NCAR-based computer model that simulates global climate. They considered three scenarios: the melt rate continuing to increase by 7 percent per year, as has been the case in recent years, or the melt rate slowing down to an increase of either 1 or 3 percent per year.
If Greenland's melt rate slows down to a 3 percent annual increase, the study team's computer simulations indicate that the runoff from its ice sheet could alter ocean circulation in a way that would direct about a foot of water toward the northeast coast of North America by 2100. This would be on top of the average global sea level rise expected as a result of global warming. Although the study team did not try to estimate that mean global sea level rise, their simulations indicated that melt from Greenland alone under the 3 percent scenario could raise worldwide sea levels by an average of 21 inches (54 cm).
If the annual increase in the melt rate dropped to 1 percent, the runoff would not raise northeastern sea levels by more than the 8 inches (20 cm) found in the earlier study in Nature Geoscience. But if the melt rate continued at its present 7 percent increase per year through 2050 and then leveled off, the study suggests that the northeast coast could see as much as 20 inches (50 cm) of sea level rise above a global average that could be several feet. However, Hu cautioned that other modeling studies have indicated that the 7 percent scenario is unlikely.
In addition to sea level rise, Hu and his co-authors found that if the Greenland melt rate were to defy expectations and continue its 7 percent increase, this would drain enough fresh water into the North Atlantic to weaken the oceanic circulation that pumps warm water to the Arctic. Ironically, this weakening of the meridional overturning circulation would help the Arctic avoid some of the impacts of global warming and lead to at least the temporary recovery of Arctic sea ice by the end of the century.
Why the Northeast?
The northeast coast of North America is especially vulnerable to the effects of Greenland ice melt because of the way the meridional overturning circulation acts like a conveyer belt transporting water through the Atlantic Ocean. The circulation carries warm Atlantic water from the tropics to the north, where it cools and descends to create a dense layer of cold water. As a result, sea level is currently about 28 inches (71 cm) lower in the North Atlantic than the North Pacific, which lacks such a dense layer.
If the melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet were to increase by 3 percent or 7 percent yearly, the additional fresh water could partially disrupt the northward conveyor belt. This would reduce the accumulation of deep, dense water. Instead, the deep water would be slightly warmer, expanding and elevating the surface across portions of the North Atlantic.
Unlike water in a bathtub, water in the oceans does not spread out evenly. Sea level can vary by several feet from one region to another, depending on such factors as ocean circulation and the extent to which water at lower depths is compressed.
"The oceans will not rise uniformly as the world warms," says NCAR scientist Gerald Meehl, a co-author of the paper. "Ocean dynamics will push water in certain directions, so some locations will experience sea level rise that is larger than the global average."
Source: National Center for Atmospheric Research
-
Sea Level Rise Due to Global Warming Poses Threat to New York City
Mar 13, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Freshwater runoff from the Greenland Ice Sheet will more than double by the end of the century
Jun 12, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Melting of Floating Ice Will Raise Sea Level
Aug 04, 2005 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Sea level rise of 1 meter within 100 years
Jan 08, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Science: Climate Change Inevitable
Mar 18, 2005 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (31) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Discrepancy between oxygen and carbon-dioxide levels
20 hours ago
-
where gems are found in the world
23 hours ago
-
Wind Waves in Reservoir ~ Wind run-up and Wind set-up
Feb 08, 2012
-
Balance of oxygen in the atmosphere
Feb 01, 2012
-
The case for a methanol-based economy
Jan 30, 2012
-
Weather in a rotating cylinder
Jan 25, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
NASA sees wide-eyed cyclone Jasmine
Cyclone Jasmine's eye has opened wider on NASA satellite imagery, as it moves through the Southern Pacific Ocean.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
1 hour ago |
not rated yet |
0
NASA sees Giovanna reach cyclone strength, threaten Madagascar
Tropical Storm 12S built up steam and became a cyclone on February 10, 2012 as NASA's Terra satellite passed overhead. Residents of east-central Madagascar should prepare for this cyclone to make landfall ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
1 hour ago |
not rated yet |
0
Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago
(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...
Could Venus be shifting gear?
(PhysOrg.com) -- ESAs Venus Express spacecraft has discovered that our cloud-covered neighbour spins a little slower than previously measured. Peering through the dense atmosphere in the infrared, the ...
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
9 hours ago |
5 / 5 (7) |
7
|
Mars Science Laboratory computer issue resolved
(PhysOrg.com) -- Engineers have found the root cause of a computer reset that occurred two months ago on NASA's Mars Science Laboratory and have determined how to correct it.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
10 hours ago |
4.7 / 5 (6) |
3
|
Google users warned of threat to smartphone wallets
Users of Google smartphone wallets were being warned on Friday that there is a way to crack pass codes intended to thwart thieves from going on illicit shopping sprees.
CIA website offline, Anonymous takes credit
The website of the Central Intelligence Agency was unresponsive on Friday after the hacker group Anonymous claimed to have knocked it offline.
Complex wiring of the nervous system may rely on a just a handful of genes and proteins
Researchers at the Salk Institute have discovered a startling feature of early brain development that helps to explain how complex neuron wiring patterns are programmed using just a handful of critical genes. ...
Putting the squeeze on planets outside our solar system
(PhysOrg.com) -- Using high-powered lasers, scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and collaborators discovered that molten magnesium silicate undergoes a phase change in the liquid state, abruptly ...
The power of estrogen -- male snakes attract other males
A new study has shown that boosting the estrogen levels of male garter snakes causes them to secrete the same pheromones that females use to attract suitors, and turned the males into just about the sexiest ...
New error-correcting codes guarantee the fastest possible rate of data transmission
Error-correcting codes are one of the triumphs of the digital age. Theyre a way of encoding information so that it can be transmitted across a communication channel such as an optical fiber o ...
May 27, 2009
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (9)
May 27, 2009
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (12)
May 27, 2009
Rank: 3.1 / 5 (8)
May 27, 2009
Rank: 3.2 / 5 (11)
http://deepseanew...sidered/
Could this impact the "consensus" (stifle laugh here) on which the Even More Dire predictions in this paper is modeled?
The AGW Loop
IF empirical_data contradicts model
AND fewer_people believe Dire_Predictions
THEN
Increment Dire_Predictions
Increment Hysterical_Tone
Loop
May 27, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (8)
LOL!
May 27, 2009
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (9)
May 27, 2009
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (10)
For the umpteenth time, it is not the CO2 that is causing the melt. CO2 levels were much lower 1,000 years ago but the shores and coastlands of Greenland really were green during those times and the global weather was hotter by about 5°C.
May 27, 2009
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (9)
As I said above. Dairy farms in Greenland in 1000AD. Yet 200 years later Iceland was surrounded by ice all year long.
Global warming? Global horsesh!t is more likely.
Freeman Dyson. Anyone here at all familiar with Freeman Dyson? Now that Feynman is dead, Dyson may well be the smartest man in the world. Dyson opines that water vapor is several orders of magnitude greater in its greenhouse effect . . . so much stronger than CO2 as to reduce CO2's impact into background noise, so far as the global climate is concerned.
Case closed.
May 28, 2009
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
And this has happened before when the Northwest passage opened up in the 1930s.
The interesting thing is that the last 2 winters have seen more ice accumulate than predicted. It threw the Germans for a loop when they flew over the arctic with their electromagnetic induction probe:
http://wattsupwit...sdicken/
May 28, 2009
Rank: 3.2 / 5 (5)
You are right about water vapor being a more potent green house gas than carbon dioxide. However, that completely misses the point. What follows is a technical description of heat transfer, not agreement with or argument against AGW.
To better understand why carbon dioxide is important, you have to look at the absorption lines for each of the molecules (water vapor and CO2). There are about a hundred of thousand cataloged lines for each asymmetric molecule that is sensitive to bending or rotation. Water vapor has a broad strong absorption spectra (made up of thousands of lines) in the infrared (which is what keeps the earth habitable). These lines come about by the quantum mechanical absorption of a photon of a specific wavelength causing bending and/or rotation in the molecule. However, there are holes in the water vapor absorption spectra (as there are in all gas spectra). If there were not, then the trace gases would not make a difference. Since there are holes in the spectra it becomes important to understand which molecules have absorption lines in those holes. The most important molecules that do are CO2 and CH4.
The bottom line is that CO2 absorption is relatively independent of H2O because the lines do not overlap in some important areas (or are much stronger for CO2 at a specific line than for H2O). Don't misunderstand, there are overlaps in many areas and there are complicating issues like line broadening that enhance overlap. However, water vapor is not 100% effective in absorbing infrared in the range the earth radiates at. CO2, CH4, and other gases are also not 100% effective. Instead, the trace gases pick up a bit of the energy that H2O misses. Those lines that are picking up missed energy are what makes CO2 and CH4 important even though H2O is the clearly stronger absorber. If you do not understand this very important issue then you need to get a good book on radiative heat transfer. I recommend "Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer" by Siegel and Howell.
May 28, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (7)
May 28, 2009
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
How about factoring in the elevation of most of the ice in Greenland. Most is so high that no matter how hot the lowlands get the temperature drop through altitude would stop the ice melting and considerably slow it down at moderate elevations. Same for Antarctica.
May 28, 2009
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
http://noconsensu...ore-3943
May 28, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (5)
May 28, 2009
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (8)
Let's talk satellite images:
If the atmosphere was capturing more heat due to increased CO2 there would be a visible hot spot at the tropopause, most notably where the Ozone is thinnest. This is one of the predictive aspects of the AGW hypothesis. Problem is, there's no hot spot. There isn't even really a deviation outside of instrumental variation.
May 31, 2009
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (6)
May 31, 2009
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
May 31, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Dagman,
You have almost made it to the real world, finish the process and join us my friend!!
The problem, you see, is that the speculators (theorists, if you prefer) continue to deny all the real world evidence that falsifies their man-made GW theories.
That's why it's all crap!!!!!!!!!!