World's largest laser opens (w/Video)

May 29, 2009 By Andy Evangelista

Scientists for decades have been hunting for ways to harness the enormous force of the sun and stars to supply energy here on Earth. The National Ignition Facility at the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory may spark the light at the end of the tunnel.

The facility was dedicated today (May 29) at a ceremony attended by numerous state and national officials.

Roughly the size of three football fields, the facility houses the world’s largest laser. Within the next three years, its 192 laser beams will deliver massive amounts of at a pea-sized target. That target, filled with , will in turn release 10 to 100 times the power than the amount injected by the laser.

FLV player

Video credit: Lawrence Livermore Laboratory

When all of the lasers’ energy slams the target, it will generate unprecedented temperatures in the target materials - temperatures of more than 100 million degrees and pressures more than 100 billion times the Earth’s atmosphere. These conditions are similar to those in the stars and the cores of . Igniting these conditions will create nuclear fusion, which is the reaction that gives the sun and the stars their immense power. Mimicking and controlling the highly volatile process - tantamount to creating a star in a laboratory - could lead to ways to produce plentiful clean and safe energy.

While demonstrating nuclear fusion as a viable means for abundant clean energy may be the most exciting offshoot of NIF research, another of its roles is to study the conditions associated with the inner workings of nuclear weapons.

The NIF is a cornerstone of a critical national security mission to ensure the reliability and safety of the U.S. nuclear stockpile without conducting underground testing. At NIF, scientists will be able to provide data for supercomputer simulations that replicate conditions that exist inside a thermonuclear weapon.

NIF experiments will also help scientists who are trying to understand the universe in many fundamental ways, including astrophysicists learning about the hot, dense interiors of large planets, stars and other phenomena.

Provided by University of California


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Stumble it Digg this share on Facebook retweet share on Reddit add to delicious
Rate this story - 4.6 /5 (23 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • OBSL33t - May 29, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Have fun guys.
    Don't ignite the atmosphere please.
  • el_gramador - May 30, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I have only one question. How would they contain the intense amount of energy released?
  • blackle4ps3 - May 30, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    maybe use it to destroy nuclear waste that's the real enemy
  • dhughes - May 30, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    500 000 000 000 000 Watts, 100 000 000 C and 100 000 000 000 atmospheres, Wow!
  • Mercury_01 - May 30, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    So will the reaction continue after the laser has pulsed???
  • eric96 - May 30, 2009
    • Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
    In Science as complicated as this, it either works or fails miserably. It is highly likely that there will be complications. However, the acclaimed most difficult task (reaching the temperatures and pressures of the sun) have "apparently" been solved. The laser would simply fire a split second; whether or not that's enough to start the reaction remains to be seen. Once the reaction is started there is no need for the laser to fire nor could it the grid only has enough power to do it for a split second; they accumulate charge like in tasers...then once its reached a certain point they fire the laser and have to wait for a recharge. Because it will only fire for a split second, the laser is no threat to earth, however if a big explosion does occur than we were "sort of" successful. It means the reaction occurred, but stability was lost. The next problems are stability of the reaction and containment of the reaction. Containment of the reaction if I recall made some headway where researchers discovered how to convert heat to light immediately thus it would reduce the heat produced to something containable. For actual containment, the use of molten metals and a magnetic field is the simplest way to put it.



  • david_42 - May 30, 2009
    • Rank: 4.3 / 5 (3)
    There will be no "big explosion", nor will the reaction continue. The target pellet is tiny and only one of them per firing. Hence, no possibility of a sustained reaction as all available hydrogen is burned in the initial pulse.
  • Mercury_01 - May 30, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    So if it works, would we then be able to design a system of sustaining a reaction, containing it, and harnessing the reaction? or is that way too far off to speculate?
  • otto1923 - May 30, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    Eric96 you sound like you really believe you know something about this.
  • Soylent - May 31, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    So if it works, would we then be able to design a system of sustaining a reaction, containing it, and harnessing the reaction?


    No. You can't contain a thermonuclear bomb. All ICF designs are focused on repeating the process at NIF approximately 10 times per second(instead of a few times per day), burning one tiny fuel pellet at a time.
  • Mercury_01 - May 31, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    So if it works, would we then be able to design a system of sustaining a reaction, containing it, and harnessing the reaction?




    No. You can't contain a thermonuclear bomb. All ICF designs are focused on repeating the process at NIF approximately 10 times per second(instead of a few times per day), burning one tiny fuel pellet at a time.


    No shit?! Are they planning on actually collecting the energy?
  • eric96 - Jun 01, 2009
    • Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
    I have been following the whole make a sun project since the beginning because I had a related idea; the same basic idea behind containment. I have been following all reported progress. what david_42 says is true and so is what I say. There immediate experiment supports david_42 whereas the long term goal supports what I was saying.
  • jldb - Jun 01, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    >Are they planning on actually collecting the energy?

    yes. that's the goal.

    https://lasers.ll...re/life/
  • El_Nose - Jun 02, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I believe this is all a part of the ITER project each country has its phase to complete to add to the total research goal of sustainable fusion.

    I remember when i originally read on ITER on project was ignition and another was rapid laser refiring as the two biggest hurdles everything past that was suspected as being easily overcomeable.

    ITER is currently on hold due to projected budget overruns --- meaning the people planning it who haven;t even started building it are now saying there estimates 5 years ago were wrong by about 60% IOW it will cost a bit more than twice the previous estimate.

    I say doit but i don;t have 500 Billion USd to fork over
  • Nevertheless - Jun 02, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I know very little about all this; however, I assume that the reaction is mainly deuterium-deuterium or deuterium-tritium or more likely a proportionate mixture of the two.

    Wouldn't a byproduct of the reaction be a plethora of fast neutrons that would induce radioactivity in the reactor environment and thus ultimately be a dirty process, hence not clean energy?
  • Hyperion1110 - Jun 06, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I believe this is all a part of the ITER project each country has its phase to complete to add to the total research goal of sustainable fusion.



    I remember when i originally read on ITER on project was ignition and another was rapid laser refiring as the two biggest hurdles everything past that was suspected as being easily overcomeable.



    ITER is currently on hold due to projected budget overruns --- meaning the people planning it who haven;t even started building it are now saying there estimates 5 years ago were wrong by about 60% IOW it will cost a bit more than twice the previous estimate.



    I say doit but i don;t have 500 Billion USd to fork over


    This is not related to ITER. Though both methods are inertial confinement fusion schemes, ITER is an advanced but traditional tokamak (magnetic containment) reactor. NIF, on the other hand, uses the momentum from the 192 laser beams to initiate fusion.

May 29, 2009 all stories

Comments: 16

4.6 /5 (23 votes)
  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • share this

  • hide
  • Related Stories

  • World's largest laser completed
    created Apr 01, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • World’s largest laser picks up the pace
    created Nov 29, 2007 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • World's largest laser gears up for ignition experiments
    created Mar 09, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Giant laser system is under construction
    created Apr 24, 2008 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • First experiments on national ignition facility validate computer simulations on road to ignition
    created Dec 02, 2005 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0



  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

  • Speed of light : missing energy
    created 3 hours ago
  • Can light produce darkness and can noise procude quiteness 4
    created 6 hours ago
  • Magnetic Oscillation Equations
    created 12 hours ago
  • US Physics Test Eligibility
    created 13 hours ago
  • More from Physics Forums - General Physics

Other News

Quick restart of Big Bang machine stuns scientists (AP)

Quick restart of Big Bang machine stuns scientists

Physics / General Physics

created 4 hours ago | popularity 4.4 / 5 (11) | comments 2

(AP) -- Scientists moved Saturday to prepare the world's largest atom smasher for exploring the depths of matter after successfully restarting the $10 billion machine following more than a year of repairs.


nuclear power plant

Doubts raised on nuclear industry viability

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 19, 2009 | popularity 3.2 / 5 (17) | comments 18

(PhysOrg.com) -- The investment in nuclear power has been growing around the world over the last few years, being viewed as a means for countries to control their energy security, avoid the price fluctuations ...


Researchers Find Innate Correlations Among Different Power Law Phenomena

Researchers Find Innate Correlations Among Different Power Law Phenomena

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 17, 2009 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (15) | comments 12

(PhysOrg.com) -- Studying the patterns that emerge in natural and social phenomena is a popular area of research, although usually individual phenomena are studied separately from each other. In a recent study, ...


Scientists demonstrate 'universal' programmable quantum processor

Scientists demonstrate 'universal' programmable quantum processor

Physics / Quantum Physics

created Nov 15, 2009 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (21) | comments 11

Physicists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology have demonstrated the first "universal" programmable quantum information processor able to run any program allowed by quantum mechanics -- th ...


Proton's party pals may alter its internal structure

Proton's party pals may alter its internal structure

Physics / General Physics

created Nov 18, 2009 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (17) | comments 9

A recent experiment at the DOE's Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility has found that a proton's nearest neighbors in the nucleus of the atom may modify the proton's internal structure.