Giant eruption reveals 'dead' star
June 16, 2009An enormous eruption has found its way to Earth after travelling for many thousands of years across space. Studying this blast with ESA's XMM-Newton and Integral space observatories, astronomers have discovered a dead star belonging to a rare group: the magnetars.
X-Rays from the giant outburst arrived on Earth on 22 August 2008, and triggered an automatic sensor on the NASA-led, international Swift satellite. Just twelve hours later, XMM-Newton zeroed in and began to collect the radiation, allowing the most detailed spectral study of the decay of a magnetar outburst.
The outburst lasted for more than four months, during which time hundreds of smaller bursts were measured. Nanda Rea from the University of Amsterdam led the team that performed the research. "Magnetars allow us to study extreme matter conditions that cannot be reproduced on Earth," she says.
Magnetars are the most intensely magnetised objects in the Universe. Their magnetic fields are some 10 000 million times stronger than Earth's. If a magnetar were to magically appear at half the Moon's distance from Earth, its magnetic field would wipe the details off every credit card on Earth.
This particular magnetar, known as SGR 0501+4516, is estimated to lie about 15 000 light-years away, and was undiscovered until its outburst gave it away. An outburst takes place when the unstable configuration of the magnetic field pulls the magnetar's crust, allowing matter to spew outwards in an exotic volcanic eruption. This matter tangles with the magnetic field which itself can change its configuration, releasing more energy. And this was where Integral came in.
Only five days after the big eruption, Integral detected highly energetic X-rays coming from the outburst, beyond the energy range that XMM-Newton can see. It is the first time such transient X-ray emission has been detected during the outburst. It disappeared within 10 days and was probably generated as the magnetic configuration changed.
Magnetar outbursts can supply as much energy to Earth as solar flares, despite the fact they are far across our Galaxy, whereas the Sun is at our celestial doorstep. There are two ideas as to how a magnetar forms. One is that it is the tiny core left behind after a highly magnetic star has died. But such magnetic stars are very rare, with just a few known in our Galaxy.
Another suggestion is that during the death of a normal star, its tiny core is accelerated, providing a dynamo that strengthens its magnetic field, turning it into a magnetar.
Currently most astronomers favour the first idea but as yet they have no conclusive proof. "If we could just find a magnetar in a cluster of highly magnetic stars, that would prove it," says Rea.
So far only 15 magnetars in total are known in our Galaxy. SGR 0501+4516 is the first new soft gamma repeater, one of the two types of magnetars, discovered after a decade of searches. So, astronomers continue to search for more, waiting for the next giant eruption. As for their newly discovered SGR 0501+4516, the team has been granted time to return and observe it again next year with XMM-Newton. Now they know where to look, they hope to detect the object in a quiescent state, rather than in outburst, so that they can study the calm after a big storm.
-
XMM-Newton measures speedy spin of rare celestial object
Jan 13, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Astronomers Pinpoint Origin of Nature's Most Powerful Magnetic Bursts
Sep 20, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
VLA Probes Secrets of Mysterious Magnetar
Feb 18, 2005 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Scientists find giant ring encircling exotic dead star
May 28, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
X-ray satellites catch magnetar in gigantic stellar 'hiccup'
Apr 04, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (33) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (4) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (2) |
0
-
Never ending outer space.....
19 hours ago
-
Neutron Star fragments?
21 hours ago
-
stationary or not?
Feb 11, 2012
-
Scale of the Universe
Feb 10, 2012
-
Titan's lack of impact craters
Feb 09, 2012
-
Real pictures of black hole eating a star?
Feb 08, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Latin America mining boom clashes with conservation
Latin America is experiencing a mining boom as prices rise fuelled by a hike in global demand, but the region is also being hit by a wave of violent protests, strikes and rallies by environmentalists.
12 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
1
Salvage workers begin pumping fuel from Italian shipwreck
Salvage workers Sunday began pumping fuel from the shipwrecked Italian cruise liner Costa Concordia, a day ahead of schedule, officials said.
4 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Political leaders play key role in how worried Americans are by climate change: study
More than extreme weather events and the work of scientists, it is national political leaders who influence how much Americans worry about the threat of climate change, new research finds.
Feb 06, 2012 |
5 / 5 (6) |
73
NASA budget will axe Mars deal with Europe: scientists
US President Barack Obama's budget proposal to be submitted next week for 2013 will cut NASA's budget by 20 percent and eliminate a major partnership with Europe on Mars exploration, scientists said Thursday.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
Feb 10, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
58
Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago
(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...
Overeating may double risk of memory loss
New research suggests that consuming between 2,100 and 6,000 calories per day may double the risk of memory loss, or mild cognitive impairment (MCI), among people age 70 and older. The study was released today and will be ...
Google might launch Drive for cloud storage soon
(PhysOrg.com) -- Google's next big move, according to the Wall Street Journal, is a cloud storage service called Drive. Hardly first to the plate, Google is simply catching up to introducing its cloud reposi ...
Scientists discover molecular secrets of 2,000-year-old Chinese herbal remedy
For roughly two thousand years, Chinese herbalists have treated Malaria using a root extract, commonly known as Chang Shan, from a type of hydrangea that grows in Tibet and Nepal. More recent studies suggest that halofuginone, ...
New method to examine batteries -- MRI from the inside
There is an ever-increasing need for advanced batteries for portable electronics, such as phones, cameras, and music players, but also to power electric vehicles and to facilitate the distribution and storage of energy derived ...
Lab study raises questions over nano-particle impact
Tests involving chickens have raised questions about the impact on health from engineered nano-particles, the ultra-fine grains commonly used in drugs and processed foods, scientists said on Sunday.
Injured boomers beware: Know when to see doctor
(AP) -- It happened to nurse Jane Byron years after an in-line skating fall, business owner Haralee Weintraub while doing "men's" push-ups, and avid cyclist Gene Wilberg while lifting a heavy box.
Jun 17, 2009
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jun 17, 2009
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Like that would be the worst thing that could happen if something more massive than the Sun was dumped on our doorstep.
'The horror, I can't buy anything in the ten seconds of life remaining.'
Ethelred
Jun 18, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
If the magnetic fields of magnetars "are some 10 000 million times stronger than Earth's", how do they compare with the magnetic fields of neutron stars?
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://www.omatumr.com
Jun 18, 2009
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
http://en.wikiped...Magnetar
Ethelred
Jun 20, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
. . . study rest masses of the 3,000 atoms that comprise the entire visible universe and discover for yourself why neutrons are so energized in large assemblages of neutrons [Or read: "Attraction and repulsion of nucleons: Sources of stellar energy", Journal of Fusion Energy 19 (2001) 93-98].
With kind regards,
Oliver k. Manuel
http://www.omatumr.com/
Jun 21, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Thanks, Ethelred.
What is the magnetic field of a typical neutron star?
~1,000,000,000,000 Gauss?
How much greater is the magnetic field of a magnetar?
Thanks,
Oliver K. Manuel
Jun 22, 2009
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Not a clue. I think it would depend on the rotation rate and that it might depend on the magnetic field of the star before the supernova. I don't think there is a way to experimentally determine a star's magnetic field except by inference based on what goes on if there is an accretion disc.
Let me see if there is an answer of some sort.
http://www.astro....tar.html
That one does have it in that range. Says it is inferred.
Ethelred
QubitTroll will be released from my sig at the end of June.
Jun 23, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Thanks, Ethelred, that's helpful.
If an ordinary star, like the Sun, had a neutron star at its core, what would be the range of magnetic fields expected at its surface?
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Jun 23, 2009
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Assume for a moment that neutron star could be smaller. Say .8 Solar mass. The hydrogen AND the helium on the surface would be at a sufficient pressure and temperature to fuse. Right there on the surface. Kicking out raw x-rays. The whole solar system would be sterilized.
Ignore that for the moment. The magnetic field would restrict movement of ionized gases. If the field had a different poles than the mass itself did I suppose that would might churn the gas. Assuming there would be any gas. This is the thing about the surface. The star wouldn't have a radius of around 450,000 miles as the Sun does. The surface of a neutron star is believed to consist of degenerate matter. I don't see how it could be anything else.
Pretend that it could be the same radius as our sun. Then it might have a similar magnetic field at the surface. Its the compression of the field that causes the high field strength in a neutron star. Of course there is the idea that there is superconduction going on and that could increase the field strength beyond the level of the original star. So I don't know. I suppose it could be similar to what we see or much higher.
Ethelred
QubitTroll will be released from my sig at the end of June.