Trying to spot differences in the sun
June 28, 2009 By Anthony R. Wood
The sun is the focus of a deepening mystery. Solar scientists want to know: Why is the sun so quiet?
So-called sunspots, intense solar storms that eject mass amounts of energy and darken the solar surface, have been all but missing the last two years. Typically, the more spots, the more energy the sun gives off.
What effect this might have on world climate is unclear. Earth's atmosphere and the sun have had a long and complex relationship, and scientists acknowledge they still are not sure precisely what goes on between them.
But changes in the deceptively volatile star evidently do have some impact on the planet's weather.
Sunspots have been tied to everything from droughts to wine vintages to the sinking of the Titanic. A sunspot lull correlated with the Little Ice Age -- from the 14th through 19th centuries -- when "Greenland" became a misnomer.
Recently, the sun has been ever-so-subtly weaker than usual. Last year, 266 days were spot-free, and not a single spot was detected in August, said David Hathaway, a NASA expert in Huntsville, Ala. And while 2008 was one of the warmest years on record worldwide, it was the coolest since 2000.
"The current minimum is now the longest we have seen," said Ken Tapping, a scientist with the Penticton, Canada, Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, which has been tracking sunspots since 1947.
NASA is forecasting the sun's activity will pick up before the end of the year. "However, we are now getting into new territory," Tapping said. The solar lull was supposed to have ended months ago.
Sunspots typically follow 11-year cycles of lull, crescendo, lull. But, like EPA gas-mileage estimates, 11 years represents a rough range. Cycles can vary from nine to 14 years.
Tapping cautions against reading too much into recent observations, or even those that date to Galileo, who first noticed them. In the old days, observers tracked them by projecting solar images onto paper, and the technology has improved tremendously since World War II.
But the period of sun-spotting by earthlings, he notes, is "very small compared with the 4.5 billion-year life of the sun."
What's more, no one yet has quite figured how to isolate the effects of solar variations from other forces that drive the climate system, such as volcanic ash, seesawing temperatures in the tropical Pacific Ocean, and human activity.
"How much the sun affects short-term weather is really not known," said Caspar Ammann, a climate specialist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo. "A lot of speculation exists, but I would caution and doubt any conclusions."
Although the sun is by no means a steady star, the range of change in solar output is only on the order of 0.2 percent, the experts say.
Fred House, a solar-energy specialist at Drexel University, says the total wattage beamed at the top of the atmosphere over a square meter is equivalent to about 13 100-watt light bulbs directed at a card table. Remove 0.2 percent of that wattage, and you'd probably still be able to see the cards.
How these tiny changes work their way into the climate system is "the million-dollar question," Tapping says. "The first step -- what the sun does at the top of the atmosphere -- is a relatively simple thing, but what the atmosphere does with it is very complicated."
The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimates that solar fluctuations have about one-fifth the climate impact of human greenhouse gases but cautions that that is based on a "low level of understanding."
That said, the current lull could have some effect on Earth's temperatures for the next two years or so, according to NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York City. Don't expect another ice age, though, according to the agency.
To put the last two years in perspective, Hathaway says that sunspots were absent in 31 of the 70 years from 1645 to 1715, in the cold heart of the Little Ice Age, with none sighted from 1661 to 1671.
The infamous "year without a summer," 1816, coincided with another lull from 1798 to 1825. But that chilly summer followed the cataclysmic eruption of Tambora in Indonesia, which cast a sun-screening veil across the atmosphere.
More recently, 1911 to 1913 all had more than 200 spotless days each, with 1913 having 314. One British researcher has suggested that the lack of sunspots may have contributed to the formation of the iceberg that sunk the Titanic in 1912, but Hathaway says the lull does not show up in temperature records.
Given the long career of the sun and the relatively short period of observation, Tapping said it was unrealistic for anyone to expect the sun to give up its secrets.
"It's like walking into town, taking a photograph, and trying to deduce what's going on," he said.
___
(c) 2009, The Philadelphia Inquirer.
Visit Philadelphia Online, the Inquirer's World Wide Web site, at http://www.philly.com/
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
-
What's Wrong with the Sun? (Nothing)
Jul 11, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Spotless Sun: Blankest Year of the Space Age
Oct 01, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
The Sun Shows Signs of Life
Nov 10, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
The Sun Loses its Spots
Jul 24, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Solar Variability: Striking a Balance with Climate Change
May 08, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (29) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
4 / 5 (22) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Hypothetical way to travel faster than light, but not technically exceed lightspeed
Feb 06, 2012
-
How do scientists monitor the Sun's activity?
Feb 05, 2012
-
Search patterns in observational studies
Feb 05, 2012
-
Derivation of Pogson's law
Feb 03, 2012
-
Landing on comet by Rosetta probe in 2014 (YouTube)
Feb 02, 2012
-
Star whose pressure support is degenerate electrons.
Feb 01, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
New images capture 'stealth merger' of dwarf galaxies
New images of a nearby dwarf galaxy have revealed a dense stream of stars in its outer regions, the remains of an even smaller companion galaxy in the process of merging with its host. The host galaxy, known ...
15 minutes ago |
not rated yet |
0
|
Chandra finds Milky Way's black hole grazing on asteroids
(PhysOrg.com) -- The giant black hole at the center of the Milky Way may be vaporizing and devouring asteroids, which could explain the frequent flares observed, according to astronomers using data from NASA's ...
21 minutes ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
1
|
In scientific coup, Russians reach Antarctic lake
After more than two decades of drilling in Antarctica, Russian scientists have reached a gigantic freshwater lake hidden under miles of ice for some 20 million years - a pristine body of water that may hold ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
12 minutes ago |
not rated yet |
0
Study shows global glaciers, ice caps, shedding billions of tons of mass annually
Earth's glaciers and ice caps outside of the regions of Greenland and Antarctica are shedding roughly 150 billion tons of ice annually, according to a new study led by the University of Colorado Boulder.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
2 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
1
|
VLT takes most detailed infrared image of the Carina Nebula
(PhysOrg.com) -- ESO's Very Large Telescope has delivered the most detailed infrared image of the Carina Nebula stellar nursery taken so far. Many previously hidden features, scattered across a spectacular ...
7 hours ago |
5 / 5 (5) |
3
|
Windows 8 preview set for February 29
Microsoft on Wednesday revealed plans to unveil a test version of its latest Windows computer operating software later this month.
European Internet campaigners battle ACTA
A controversial international accord billed as a way to beat online piracy has sparked a fightback led by Internet users in ex-communist countries who say the region's past underlines the need to defend freedom.
Phelps using hyperbaric chamber to aid recovery
(AP) -- Michael Phelps is the latest athlete to use a hyperbaric chamber to aid his recovery from training.
No anorexia emergency, La Scala ballerinas claim
The ballet company at Milan's famous La Scala opera house fought back Wednesday, after one of their leading dancers was fired for giving interviews in which she said the industry has an anorexia problem.
Quantum physicist explains $100K offer for proof scaled-up quantum computing is impossible
(PhysOrg.com) -- MIT researcher Scott Aaronson has certainly riled the physics community with his offer this past Friday, of $100,000 to anyone who can prove that scaled-up quantum computing is impossible. ...
Short fasting cycles work as well as chemotherapy in mice
Man may not live by bread alone, but cancer in animals appears less resilient, judging by a study that found chemotherapy drugs work better when combined with cycles of short, severe fasting.
Jun 28, 2009
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (5)
Jun 28, 2009
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (7)
Jun 28, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (6)
This cosmic ray hypothesis has already been empirically disproven with considerable authority. There is no statistically significant correlation between atmospheric cosmic ray flux and cloud cover. For more details, see this half-year-old news item:
http://www.scienc...5138.htm
Jun 28, 2009
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (8)
Jun 28, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (6)
That means there's a certain flux of cosmic rays, yes even during a solar maximum. Then an outburst of solar activity leads to a "strong reduction" in that flux. So first you have cosmic rays, then you have a lot fewer cosmic rays, then you again have a lot more cosmic rays. If there were any dependency of cloud cover at all, _some_ statistically significant effect should have been seen. But there was no such effect. AND, this is not the only such study. Indeed,
and
This "strawman" just broke the back of the camel you rode in on.
Jun 29, 2009
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (5)
?,this article spends most of the time saying that solar variations are not the cause of Global Warming, not "why is the Sun so quiet?"
I thought the IPCC believed Man was 100% at fault.
Jun 29, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (6)
...so NOW the Earth is cooling (?)...can they please make up their minds!
Jun 29, 2009
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (7)
Jun 29, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (8)
Jun 29, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
We could just go clog up yours if you prefer.
Jul 01, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Well, that may be true on the world average, but ironically, where I live (Hammond/Ponchatoula are, Louisiana, just north of lakes Maurepas and Ponchartrain), we have had some of the hottest summers on record actually in the past 4 years. This June has had the record high temperature and the record high heat index broken by several degrees almost every day of the month. In some cases, we broke previous record highs before noon, when the hottest part of the day is, on average, about 2pm to 4pm. Just yesterday, the heat index was 118 degrees, which I have NEVER seen in this area in my life. I think there were only a couple days in June which did not break previous record highs, and those records were set in 2003-2006.
Ironically, this past december, we got BY FAR the heaviest snow accumulation in my entire life. NOrmally, It only snows w/ accumulation about once every 10 years here, and even then only half an inch to one inch. But this past december we got 8-9 inches of accumulation, which hasn't happened in this area in at least 80 years. However, other than this snow, which survived on the ground for about 3 days, maybe 4 in the shade (also longest I'd ever seen,) but other than this, it was actually a ridiculously hot winter, with very few days getting below freezing, or even close to freezing temperatures.
This past month, according to the weather channel, it rained 2.93 inches in Hammond. yet we live within about 5 miles or so of that station, and according to our THREE rain gauages, we have only gotten about 0.25 inches for the entire month of june. (and the grass shows it because even though we have watered it, a lot of it is turning brown.)
The point I'm making is that "global averages" based on point measurements at cities and buoys are misleading. It can rain two or three inches at point A, and yet not rain at all at point B a few minles away. Similarly, the record high or humidity at Point B can be broken by several degrees, and just a few miles away you may even end up setting a record low(because of cloud cover and rain, fontal boundaries, etc). It happens.
The global data don't take into account for all the spaces where there are no measurements, i.e. wilderness, and miles and miles of open oceans, and small towns that aren't really given much attention by the NWS.
ANYWAY, I still do not believe in AGW as any more than a minor, almost insignificant factor in all of this, in the greater scheme of things. It is my belief that we are still experiencing recovery from the events of the Little Ice Age. After all, the coldest day on record, and the coldest winter on record for this area (since the NWS was formed,) also happened in my lifetime (I'm 29 years old). Looks like normal fluctuations to me.