Mystery mechanism drove global warming 55 million years ago

July 13, 2009
A runaway spurt of global warming 55 million years ago turned Earth into a hothouse, scientists said

Enlarge

Close up of a melting glacier. A runaway spurt of global warming 55 million years ago turned Earth into a hothouse but how this happened remains worryingly unclear, scientists said on Monday.

A runaway spurt of global warming 55 million years ago turned Earth into a hothouse but how this happened remains worryingly unclear, scientists said on Monday.

Previous research into this period, called the Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, or PETM, estimates the planet's surface temperature blasted upwards by between five and nine degrees Celsius (nine and 16.2 degrees Fahrenheit) in just a few thousand years.

The warmed to 23 C (73 F), or about the temperature of a lukewarm bath.

How PETM happened is unclear but climatologists are eager to find out, as this could shed light on aspects of today.

What seems clear is that a huge amount of heat-trapping "greenhouse" gases -- natural, as opposed to man-made -- were disgorged in a very short time.

The theorised sources include and the sudden release of methane hydrates in the ocean.

A trio of Earth scientists, led by Richard Zeebe of the University of Hawaii, try to account for the carbon that was spewed out during PETM.

They believe that levels of (CO2) rose by 70 percent during PETM's main phase to reach 1,700 parts per million (ppm), attaining a concentration of between four and five times that of today.

But all this CO2 can only account for between one and 3.5 C (1.8-6.3 F) of PETM's warming if the models for climate sensitivity are right, the team found.

There must have been some other factor that stoked temperatures higher.

Even though there are big differences between Earth's geology and ice cover then and now, the findings are relevant as they highlight the risk of hidden mechanisms that add dramatically to warming, says the paper.

Some of these so-called "positive feedbacks" are already known.

For instance, when a patch of melts, this exposes the uncovered sea to sunlight, depriving it of a bright, reflective layer.

That causes the sea to warm, which leads to the loss of more ice, which in turn helps the sea to warm, and so on.

But these "feedbacks" are poorly understood and some scientists believe there could be others still to be identified.

"Our results imply a fundamental gap in our understanding about the amplitude of global warming associated with large and abrupt climate perturbations," warns Zeebe's team.

"This gap needs to be filled to confidently predict future climate change."

After the big warm-up, the planet eventually cooled around 100,000 years later, but not before there had been a mass extinction, paving the way to the biodiversity that is familiar to us today.

Man-made global warming, driven mainly by the burning of oil, gas and coal, has amounted to around 0.8 C (1.12 F) over the past century.

Last week in L'Aquila, Italy, the Group of Eight (G8) industrialised countries and other economies that together account for 80 percent of greenhouse-gas emissions pledged to try to limit overall warming to 2 C (3.6 F) over pre-industrial times.

(c) 2009 AFP

4.2 /5 (26 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

defunctdiety
Jul 13, 2009

Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
pledged to try to limit overall warming to 2 C


::facepalm::
patnclaire
Jul 13, 2009

Rank: 3 / 5 (10)
The Inconvenient Truth is that people caused it then just like now. What?

Okay, then Java men caused it. What?

Chimpanzees playing with fire caused it. What?

Okay, then Lemurs caused it because of lighting torches to see in the night. What?
Okay, my bottom line...lets blame it on Mother Nature. We all know that it is not nice to fool with Mother Nature but who cares?

Flip Wilson says to blame it on Satan ...the devil made him do everything else!

Ockham's Razor says People did it ... so maybe A Sound of Thunder - kind of people?



What this finding should help with is the notion that our climate theory is incomplete, hence our climate models are incomplete, hence our data is incomplete, ergo our conclusions are incomplete. It may not be Politically Correct but it seems that there still may be room for skepticism. Was not it Carl Sagan who said that Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence? or was it someone else who said it?

mysticshakra
Jul 13, 2009

Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
If the Arctic was 73 degrees then the Arctic was obviously not in the same position on the planet that it currently resides and was much further south.

Since we know that Antarctica had no ice at one point (see the Piri Reis map and others like it) it shows that the continents are subject to some other mechanism than just plate tectonics.

The crustal shift/displacement model provides one possible answer.
Velanarris
Jul 13, 2009

Rank: 3.4 / 5 (5)
What this finding should help with is the notion that our climate theory is incomplete, hence our climate models are incomplete, hence our data is incomplete, ergo our conclusions are incomplete. It may not be Politically Correct but it seems that there still may be room for skepticism. Was not it Carl Sagan who said that Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence? or was it someone else who said it?
Correct, it was Sagan.

One would only hope that research like this will allow us to continue to refine our models to a point of congruence with our observations.

Especially given as the potential for warming due to CO2 is so low and grossly exaggerated.
If the Arctic was 73 degrees then the Arctic was obviously not in the same position on the planet that it currently resides and was much further south.
Wrong. The temperature of the poles was not always as cold as it is now.
di0nysus
Jul 13, 2009

Rank: 1.5 / 5 (2)
Why doesn't anyone ever seem to consider the Earths magnetic field when talking about climatology? I just dont understand how they can ignore it, it seems so basic.
Doug_Huffman
Jul 13, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
And what is the connection, please, between a fractional Gauss strength surface magnetic field?
Shootist
Jul 13, 2009

Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
"For instance, when a patch of Arctic sea ice melts, this exposes the uncovered sea to sunlight, depriving it of a bright, reflective layer.

That causes the sea to warm, which leads to the loss of more ice, which in turn helps the sea to warm, and so on."

This causes evaporation to increase, which increases cloud cover, lowering temperatures and reflecting more sunlight back into space, while also increasing snowfall at higher latitudes, thus increasing ice and snow cover . . . feedback mechanisms indeed.



di0nysus
Jul 13, 2009

Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
And what is the connection, please, between a fractional Gauss strength surface magnetic field?


you mean aside from the fact that it changes its polarity on average every 200,000 years on average. And during the cycle changes the earth is completely stripped of its defense from the sun? We are undergoing a flip as we speak today as well, the field is getting weaker and weaker.
steelfire2
Jul 13, 2009

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Finally, Physorg displays an argument from the other side!

According to the article the globe was warmer 55 million years ago. The most recent ice age was about 20,000 years ago, so doesn't anyone consider that this might be more natural than man-made?
jyro
Jul 13, 2009

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Gee, news flash, we don't understand climate change yet we think it can be controlled by what we do? Spend resources to adapt to climate change, not trying to control it.
thermodynamics
Jul 13, 2009

Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Since this paper does not address the subject, I will bring up Milankovitch Theory. As far as I know our GCMs do not take Milankovitch Theory into account and that means that the most potent driver for temperature (the position of the earth with respect to the sun) is not taken into consideration. If this article said they did take it into consideration I would be more surprised. Since they don't seem to mention it, I would expect that to be the basis of the discrepancy.
SDMike
Jul 13, 2009

Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
Republicans are apparently older than we thought.
BobArmstrong
Jul 14, 2009

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
So perhaps 9c higher mean temperature ? About 3% increase on our approximately 300k . Since the Stefan-Boltzmann Law shows objects in our orbit are about 1/21 the surface temperature of the sun , why is it inconceivable that the sun for one reason or another went up about 270c on its approximately 6000k ?
Doug_Huffman
Jul 14, 2009

Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
"And during the cycle changes the earth is completely stripped of its defense from the sun?" Completely?

NO. Magnetic field shields only charged particles. Photons still get through.

What is the connection between climatology and a fractional Gauss field?
lengould100
Jul 14, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
... As far as I know our GCMs do not take Milankovitch Theory into account ...
Whaaaaaaaat?
SDMike
Jul 14, 2009

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Milanovitch Theory - http://www.empori...eory.htm
GMC - Global Climate Models
di0nysus
Jul 14, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)

NO. Magnetic field shields only charged particles. Photons still get through.

What is the connection between climatology and a fractional Gauss field?


who said anything about photons?

maybe you should look at this detailed source:
http://www.appins...ield.htm

as well as countless others that cn be found quite easily, before you completely dismiss the idea altogether.
Velanarris
Jul 14, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)








who said anything about photons?







maybe you should look at this detailed source:







http://www.appins...ield.htm







as well as countless others that cn be found quite easily, before you completely dismiss the idea altogether.


I don't find the relevance here. These magnetic pole shifts happen often and spontaneously.

It appears you're trying to link Earth's local magnetic field to climate variation, however, Earth's magnetic field flux is driven by the magnetic field interactions with the sun and other local celestial bodies. Not the other way around. If anything you're jsut furthering the hypothesis that terrestrial climate is driven by magnetic fluxuation in the sun based on Earth's relationship to the Sun and the dynamics of the Milankovich theory.

... As far as I know our GCMs do not take Milankovitch Theory into account ...
Whaaaaaaaat?

He's correct. They also don't take into account current findings that raindrop fall faster than terminal velocity or one of many other thousands of possible relationships to climate variability.

dachpyarvile
Jul 14, 2009

Rank: 1.7 / 5 (3)
... As far as I know our GCMs do not take Milankovitch Theory into account ...
Whaaaaaaaat?


Come off it, len. We already know you don't understand the science. I mean, you could not even figure out by the science how using ethanol instead of straight gasoline could reduce CO2 emissions... :)
PPihkala
Jul 14, 2009

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
One part of uncertainty is how are permafrost buried CO2 and methane deposits going to force the climate after they are freed into air when (not if) the permafrost will melt. I hope we can delay that event, since it has potential to make current human caused temperature rise seem very mild.
SDMike
Jul 14, 2009

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Hum, links to NASA where data supporting Milanovitch Theory WAS located now return a 404 error. Politics over science? Obama silencing GWT dissenters? Next they'll be burning books.
mysticshakra
Jul 14, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (7)
One of these days it will finally be admitted that there are no ice ages. The idea is based on a lot of assumptions and the evidence has other interpretations. It makes no sense to say the Earth suddenly started to periodically cool and thaw when there is no mechanism to achieve this besides the sun's energy output (which does not change).
Koen
Jul 15, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
What is cause and what is effect? Changes in atmospheric content because of global warming, or vice verse? The sun is most influential on global temperature? Solar radiation fluctuations and solar wind fluctuations anyone?
defunctdiety
Jul 15, 2009

Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
One of these days it will finally be admitted that there are no ice ages. The idea is based on a lot of assumptions and the evidence has other interpretations. It makes no sense to say the Earth suddenly started to periodically cool and thaw when there is no mechanism to achieve this besides the sun's energy output (which does not change).


Yeah, there's certainly no indisputable evidence that glaciers at one time extended south into the northern parts of the US... certainly no glacial till beneath top soil and thousands of lakes carved into bedrock or anything like that, anything could have done that.

And there's certainly no planetary and orbital ocillation mechanisms that would change the angle and energy with which the suns rays hit the earth thereby drastically affecting the amount of energy reaching certain given latitudes...

And there's most certainly no runaway albedo affect possible, and never have there been volcanic eruptions or cometary impacts that sent reflective particulate matter miles up into the atmosphere that would take decades to settle out, all the time reflecting significant portions of the suns energy, cooling the planet.

No... NO!! It makes no sense at all!

Oh, and let's not forget the scientific fact that the sun does have cycles and events which affect it's energy output... fluctuations which are insignificant to it's own measure and surely they are just as insignificant to any bodies around it which only recieve tiny portions of that total energy... ... le sigh.
Rank 4.2 /5 (26 votes)
Related Stories
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Discrepancy between oxygen and carbon-dioxide levels
    created7 hours ago
  • where gems are found in the world
    created11 hours ago
  • Wind Waves in Reservoir ~ Wind run-up and Wind set-up
    createdFeb 08, 2012
  • Balance of oxygen in the atmosphere
    createdFeb 01, 2012
  • The case for a methanol-based economy
    createdJan 30, 2012
  • Weather in a rotating cylinder
    createdJan 25, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - Earth

More news stories

Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago

(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...

Space & Earth / Environment

created just added | popularity not rated yet | comments 0 | with audio podcast report

New views show old NASA Mars landers

(PhysOrg.com) -- The High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) camera on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter recorded a scene on Jan. 29, 2012, that includes the first color image from orbit showing ...

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 21 hours ago | popularity 4.9 / 5 (7) | comments 9 | with audio podcast

Black holes and star formation

(PhysOrg.com) -- It has long been recognized that galaxy mergers or even close interactions can play a vital role in shaping the morphology of galaxies. One way they can do so, it is thought, is by triggering ...

Space & Earth / Astronomy

created 20 hours ago | popularity 4.1 / 5 (7) | comments 5 | with audio podcast

Deconstructing a mystery: What caused Snowmaggedon?

In the quiet after the storms, streets and cars had all but disappeared under piles of snow. The U.S. Postal Service suspended service for the first time in 30 years. Snow plows struggled to push the evidence ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 13 hours ago | popularity 4.7 / 5 (3) | comments 1 | with audio podcast

Ocean microbe communities changing, but long-term environmental impact is unclear

As oceans warm due to climate change, water layers will mix less and affect the microbes and plankton that pump carbon out of the atmosphere – but researchers say it's still unclear whether these processes ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 15 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 2 | with audio podcast


Japan scientist makes 'Avatar' robot

A Japanese-developed robot that mimics the movements of its human controller is bringing the Hollywood blockbuster "Avatar" one step closer to reality.

Fighting crimes against biodiversity: How to catch a killer weed

Invasive species which have the potential to destroy biodiversity and influence global change could be tracked and controlled in the same way as wanted criminals, according to new research from Queen Mary, University of London.

Metastatic breast cancer hitches a free ride from the immune system

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most lethal form of breast cancer . It spreads easily through the lymphatic and blood vessels, forming metastasis which can lead to multi-organ failure. New research published in BioMed ...

A novel method for simultaneously measuring blood pressure and arterial stiffness

Arterial stiffness due to is a major contributor to cardiovascular disease but is very difficult to measure. It also can influence blood pressure readings since these rely on the time taken for arteries to return to normal ...

India's global pharmacy role threatened by EU pact

(AP) -- Efforts by India and the European Union to strengthen trade are threatening India's ability to deliver lifesaving medicines to the world's poorest, analysts say as the two sides push through protracted ...

US video game sales fall 34 percent in January

(AP) -- U.S. retail sales of video game hardware, software and accessories fell 34 percent in January from a year earlier to $751 million due to the lack of new game titles, according to market researcher NPD Group.