Online poker advocates lobby Congress to lift federal ban

July 22, 2009 By Carrie Wells

Poker players are gambling on Congress seeing things their way.

Advocates for legalizing online poker have descended on Washington this week for a lobbying blitz that's supposed to last until Friday. They're betting they can overturn or at least ease federal laws that generally bar Internet .

They're seeking regulation of Internet gaming, a change they say would reduce compulsive and underage gambling, according to John A. Pappas, the executive director of the Poker Players Alliance, whose slogan is "Poker is Not a Crime."

Members of his organization plan to meet with 100 members of Congress from 35 states this week and were to host a charity poker tournament Tuesday night benefiting the USO and the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. They've enlisted the help of famous poker players such as Annie Duke, Andy Bloch and Howard Lederer.

Among those pushing legislation is Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, who sees the measure as consumer protection and a potential source of revenue, since winnings could be taxed.

Pappas kicked off the lobbying effort Monday by hosting a panel to promote the benefits of lifting the gambling ban. Many American poker players have been getting around the ban since it was instituted in 2006 by using sites based in the Caribbean or the United Kingdom. The sites make up more than a third of all online players.

However, Rep. Spencer Bachus of Alabama, the top Republican on the House committee, condemned the gambling legislation in the works. Bachus helped write the 2006 bill, which made it illegal for banks or credit card companies to process money earned through online gambling, although it doesn't specifically define online gambling.

Bachus, in a statement, said he'd continue to support efforts to discourage online gambling.

"Illegal off-shore Internet gambling sites are a criminal enterprise, and allowing them to operate unfettered in the United States would present a clear danger to our youth, who are subject to becoming addicted to gambling at an early age," he said. "In fact, studies have shown that earlier one begins , the more likely it is he or she will become a compulsive problem gambler."

Regulation, however, wouldn't only protect children by instituting age identifying software, but also would keep players from being defrauded by shady sites or other players, Pappas and other panelists said.

"I really see this as a consumer protection issue," said Parry Aftab, who was on Monday's panel and serves as the executive director of Wired Safety, an Internet safety charity organization. Online players "can't go to the (Federal Trade Commission) and say 'someone defrauded me.' You can't get any help," she said.

Pappas, whose organization has spent $400,000 in the past three months alone on lobbying efforts, agreed.

"It's a marketplace based on trust," Pappas said. "There is no business if people don't trust them. It's a bottom-line business issue that they have the safest, securest site out there."

___

(c) 2009, McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
Visit the McClatchy Washington Bureau on the World Wide Web at http://www.mcclatchydc.com

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

earls
Jul 22, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
While this should absolutely be legal for common sense, freedom reasons, it still doesn't address "poker bots."
Velanarris
Jul 22, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
poker bots are under the TOS which is enforcable as a fiscal contract. Well outside the purview of the federal government.

However, how there's a ban on online poker at all confounds me. It's not as though you can paypal them the money. You need a credit card, which makes any access to the online poker site a fiscal contract, also outside the purview of the federal govt.
earls
Jul 22, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
I did not mean to suggest I want the government regulating the bots or the like... Only that even with legality out of the way, there are still major hurdles for online gambling.

From my brief research, it's actually not illegal for an individual to gamble online (minus sports betting). It is illegal however for the "casino" to make money (take a rake) and also illegal for banks to transfer money to online "casinos." Such explains why most (if not all) are out of the United States and have third party financial intermediaries.

Oh well.
RFC
Jul 22, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
The right to contract does not preclude federal or state regulation of the activity under the contract. If it did, you would be able to contract for illegal services (which you are not). Remember, a "contract" means nothing without the ability to enforce the contract, and enforcement comes from the government (i.e. the courts). The government is not going to enforce contract provisions for conduct it has otherwise deemed illegal (except in extremely rare cases).

The problem here is that countries cannot effectively prevent or stop online gambling, except through the most extreme means. So the idea here is to legalize online gambling on the federal level (because online gambling qualifies as interstate commerce). By legalizing it, the expectation is that more people will gamble and that profits will increase, even though there will be costs associated with complying with government regs. If taxes and reg costs cut too far into profits, gambling sites will stay off-shore.

Now, there are a ton of issues to work out before this actually becomes viable federal legislation, not the least of which is the fact that several states will have seizures over federal legalization because (a) they fear it will cut into their own state gambling or (b) they fear it will legalize gambling in states that have resisted legalizing gambling.

Oh, and the debates on this issue promise to be painfully moralistic and uninformed. Think a bastard cross between Bible-thumping, internet "tubes," typical misunderstanding of constitutional law and (for good measure) a host of difficult-to-predict economic effects. No matter what side you're on, the numb-skulls will be out in force.
Velanarris
Jul 22, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
RFC, unless there is a specific local, state, or federal statue making gambling illegal, your argument against my statement is moot.

Gambling is not illegal in the US, so on what grounds is there a legality restriction imposed on the medium over which a lawful activity is performed?

Effectively this is going to become, as you said, a "vice debate", much like the marijuana foolishness at play.
RFC
Jul 22, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
Velanarris - I'm no pro at local and federal gambling laws, but there are plenty of state laws that make gambling illegal. Even Nevada (where gambling is famously legal) actually regulates casino type gambling (which is to say, follow the regs or your gambling business is illegal).

Gambling laws across the states vary widely, but most make typical forms of profitable gambling illegal. (Most states do not prohibit social or charitable gaming or gambling, but that's not what we're talking about here.)

You say that "Gambling is not illegal in the US." That is simply untrue. The whole premise of the article is based on the fact that online gambling is illegal under federal law. Every day in Ohio, I hear about the debate to legalize casinos or slot machines... why? Cuz it's presently illegal.
Velanarris
Jul 23, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
Velanarris - I'm no pro at local and federal gambling laws, but there are plenty of state laws that make gambling illegal. Even Nevada (where gambling is famously legal) actually regulates casino type gambling (which is to say, follow the regs or your gambling business is illegal).



Gambling laws across the states vary widely, but most make typical forms of profitable gambling illegal. (Most states do not prohibit social or charitable gaming or gambling, but that's not what we're talking about here.)



You say that "Gambling is not illegal in the US." That is simply untrue. The whole premise of the article is based on the fact that online gambling is illegal under federal law. Every day in Ohio, I hear about the debate to legalize casinos or slot machines... why? Cuz it's presently illegal.


RFC, can you cite the federal statute that mandates all gambling is illegal in the US? THere isn't one. So gambling is not illegal in the US. Online gambling is federally illegal. Now what is the difference between gambling in person or gambling online? Other than the medium, the mechanics are the exact same. So the medium makes the activity illegal.

What if it was illegal to sell books online? Sure you can go to the library, or Barnes and Noble, but Amazon.com, not a chance.

That make my point clearer? If it is illegal in your state or city, that's fine, you shouldn't be able to gamble online and if yuou're caught doing it you're going to be subjected to whatever punishment is on the books. Same thing if you're running blackjack tables in a town or city where unregulated gambling is illegal.

But if my town, state, region, and country have no problem with me going to a casino, why do they mandate that I have to drive there and place my bets in person, especially when casinos encourage alcohol consumption. So now I've had a few drinks, lost some cash, and I'm ready to go home. Now I'm unsuited to drive and guess where I am, the casino hotel.

It's a partnership between government and established physical casinos.
RFC
Jul 23, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
Well, if you think that your statement that "Gambling is not illegal in the US" is correct despite the fact online gambling is illegal under federal law (the Wire Act, to name one law), and numerous localities and states have laws against gambling... then go your own way. You consider "gambling" to be categorically distinct from "online gambling." I consider "online gambling" to be a logical sub-set of "gambling." I'm sticking with my interpretation... my bet is that it will cause far less confusion.

earls
Jul 23, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
There's no confusion now, except on the governmental level where they're trying figure out a way to outlaw something unenforceable.

Regardless of how you feel about gambling, it should be obvious that the governments failed on a multitude of levels and any positions they're holding on to are quickly eroding.

If you'd like a really interesting debate, check out the state of Delaware - they want to make sports betting legal. Sports betting is illegal nation wide, but the state falls under a grandfather clause allowing them to do so. Many leagues, associations, and even senators have already rallied against them to prevent this even though they're clearly permitted by law.
Rank not rated yet
Related Stories
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • How to tilt a object
    created8 hours ago
  • How to calculate total compressibility in liquid porous solid system
    created14 hours ago
  • Need help reading 3-D
    createdFeb 11, 2012
  • A way to send and receive wireless data
    createdFeb 11, 2012
  • Calling function with no input argument
    createdFeb 10, 2012
  • Force free body diagram problem on gym equipment
    createdFeb 10, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - General Engineering

More news stories

AT&T customers surprised by 'unlimited data' limit

(AP) -- Mike Trang likes to use his iPhone 4 as a GPS device, helping him get around in his job. Now and then, his younger cousins get ahold of it, and play some YouTube videos and games.

Technology / Telecom

created 39 minutes ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0

Japan's Fukushima reactor may be reheating: operator

Temperature readings at one of the crippled Fukushima nuclear reactors have risen above Japan's stringent new safety standard but there was no immediate danger, its operator said Sunday.

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created 1 hour ago | popularity 3 / 5 (2) | comments 0

Google might launch Drive for cloud storage soon

(PhysOrg.com) -- Google's next big move, according to the Wall Street Journal, is a cloud storage service called Drive. Hardly first to the plate, Google is simply catching up to introducing its cloud reposi ...

Technology / Internet

created 22 hours ago | popularity 4.2 / 5 (6) | comments 5 | with audio podcast report

Iran blocks email, restricts net access: reports

Iran has further restricted access to the Internet and blocked popular email services for the past few days, in a move a top lawmaker said could "cost the regime dearly," media reports said on Sunday.

Technology / Internet

created 15 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 5

Walney offshore wind farm is world's biggest (for now)

(PhysOrg.com) -- The Walney wind farm on the Irish Sea--characterized by high tides, waves and windy weather--officially opened this week. The farm is treated in the press as a very big deal as the Walney ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created Feb 11, 2012 | popularity 4.1 / 5 (14) | comments 59 | with audio podcast weblog


Integrated pest management recommendations for the southern pine beetle

The southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann, is a chronic insect pest within pine forests in the southeastern United States. Under favorable environmental and host conditions, it is an agg ...

Cognitive impairment in older adults often unrecognized in the primary care setting

A new study published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society reveals that brief cognitive screenings combined with offering further evaluation increased new diagnoses of cognitive impairment in older veterans two to ...

Climate change causes harmful algal blooms in North Atlantic: study

Warming oceans and increases in windiness could be causing of an abundance of harmful algal blooms in the North Atlantic Ocean and North Sea, according to new research.

Many lung cancer patients get radiation therapy that may not prolong their lives

A new study has found that many older lung cancer patients get treatments that may not help them live longer. Published early online in CANCER, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society, the findings suggest that p ...

Young adults allowed to stay on parents' health insurance have improved access to care

Researchers from Mount Sinai School of Medicine have found that laws permitting children to stay on their parents' health insurance through age 26 result in improved access to health care compared to states without those ...

Cancer rate 4 times higher in children with juvenile arthritis

New research reports that incident malignancy among children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is four times higher than in those without the disease. Findings now available in Arthritis & Rheumatism, a journal publis ...