The auroras in the Northern and the Southern hemispheres are not identical (w/ Video)
July 23, 2009
Asymmetric aurora. Polar VIS Earth (J. B. Sigwarth) and IMAGE WIC (S. B. Mende)
In a Nature letter published July 23, 2009, Norwegian researchers present evidence that the auroras in the Northern and the Southern hemispheres can be totally asymmetric. These findings contradict the commonly made assumption of aurora being mirror images of each other.
The study with the sensational results has been performed by PhD student Karl Magnus Laundal and professor Nikolai Řstgaard at the Institute of Physics and Technology at the University of Bergen.
The aurora is produced due to collisions between the Earth’s atmosphere and electrically charged particles streaming along the Earth’s geomagnetic field lines. "Since these processes occur above the two hemispheres, both the Northern and the Southern light are created. So far researchers have assumed that these auroras are mirror images of each other, but our findings show that this is not always the case," professor Nikolai Řstgaard says.
FLV player
Assymetric aurora. Animation based on data made by Espen Madsen.
The full version of this animation can be downloaded here.The researchers at the University of Bergen have used data from the two NASA-satellites IMAGE and Polar to examine the Northern and the Southern light. In the Nature letter they present several possible explanations to the unexpected result.
"The most plausible explanation involves electrical currents along the magnetic field lines. Differences in the solar exposure may lead to currents between the two hemispheres, explaining why the Northern and the Southern light are not identical," PhD student Karl Magnus Laundal says.
In addition to yielding new knowledge about the aurora, the results are important for other researchers studying the near-Earth space.
"Our study shows that data from only one hemisphere is not sufficient to state the conditions on the other hemisphere. This is important because most of our knowledge about the aurora, as well as processes in the upper atmosphere in the polar regions, is based solely on data from the Northern hemisphere," Řstgaard points out.
Nature has also chosen to use an image of the Northern and Southern light on their front cover, taken from the letter of Řstgaard and Laundal.
More information: Laundal, K.M. and Řstgaard, N., Asymmetric auroral intensities in the Earth's Northern and Southern hemispheres, Nature 460, 491-493 (23 July 2009); doi:10.1038/nature08154
Source: University of Bergen
Apr 06, 2005 |
not rated yet |
0
Might also help to explain why Saturn is glowing at only one pole. Congratulations to the Bergen team.
I was given to thinking that the electromagnetic field around the planet is maintained by the spin of the huge iron core, and that the dangerous particles emitted by the sun where captured in this field/shield and transfered to the south pole for absorption in the inner mantle, (if not the frictionless plasma surrounding the core itself). The energy emitted from the north pole being, primarily, a continuous immense flow of (relatively harmless for us) electrons, which either deflect the inbound solar material; collide with it and damage it causing the emission of photons (in the visible light spectra) known as the aurora; or conveyor-belt it to the south pole.
Ok, this is a very basic description, but is my understanding so wrong?
About all the core produces is a magnetic field, which controls the flow of the electrons and other particles produced by the Sun. Mars has auroras, and it doesn't even have a planet-wide magnetic field. The solar particles hit the atmosphere directly. It doesn't make nearly as good a show, because the particles have less energy, but it's there.
There is a current flow from the ionosphere to the ground and back, but it's maintained by solar ionization and thunderstorm activity.
I was thinking about the tilt too. It might be interesting for someone to check to see if they are more symetrical near spring and fall than during winter and summer.
I expect the most significant reason is the angle between Earth's axis and the ecliptic, causing particles from the Sun to enter the magnetic field in different angles.
Maybe this experiment should be performed around the equinox dates? But even then I wouldn't expect a symmetry - there would always be some differences. Differences in atmospheric conditions like winds, temperature and pressure should affect both the locations at which the light is generated as well as its scattering through the atmosphere. Differences in the solar activity directed towards the two poles, however small, obviously could have an effect as well.
Also, I found an interesting twist on the Earth Axis causing disparity between Northern ans Southern Lights. Apparently the Sun is also rotating on an axis that is not perpendicular to the plane of the orbits of the planets, (the ecliptic).
http://en.wikiped...currence
Like the weather, the rules for Aurora strength are more complex than we would initially imagine, and the fluctuations in magnetic field, solar wind and the consequent electic fields generated are, as many here have said, unlikely to produce a simultaneous symmetrical display at both Poles.
With all the fuss about collecting solar power, does the Aurora not only collect and concentrate solar energy, but through a natural interaction with our polar environments, convert the collected solar energy into electricity - albeit a 'randomly distributed' electric field.
Do the satelites montoring the Aurora have the equipment to map the consequent electric storms?
Citation?
As for generating electricity, it may be practical. I don't know the recharge rate, so don't know how much continuous power is available. Also, if there is a lot of energy stored in the ionosphere, tapping it could be hazardous. Considering the energy in a common lightning bolt, what would happen if we short-circuited the ionosphere, and, in effect, the Earth's magnetic field? It could be an interesting field of study, though, and might actually be practical.