On the move: 'Jumping genes' create diversity in human brain cells
August 5, 2009
"Jumping genes" could go a long way towards explaining brain development and individuality. Credit: Courtesy of Jamie Simon, Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Rather than sticking to a single DNA script, human brain cells harbor astonishing genomic variability, according to scientists at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies. The findings, to be published in the Aug. 5, 2009, advance online edition of Nature, could help explain brain development and individuality, as well as lead to a better understanding of neurological disease.
The team, led by Fred Gage, Ph.D., a professor in the Salk's Laboratory of Genetics and holder of the Vi and John Adler Chair for Research on Age-Related Neurodegenerative Diseases, found that human brain cells contain an unexpected number of so-called mobile elements—extraordinary pieces of DNA that insert extra copies of themselves throughout the genome using a "copy and paste" mechanism.
"This is a potential mechanism to create the neural diversity that makes each person unique," says Gage. "The brain has 100 billion neurons with 100 trillion connections, but mobile pieces of DNA could give individual neurons a slightly different capacity from each other."
The only other human cells known to remodel their genome are the cells of the immune system. There the genes coding for antibodies are shuffled to create the necessary variety of antibodies capable of recognizing an infinite number of distinct antigens.
In earlier work, Gage had already shown that mobile pieces of DNA known as LINE-1 elements (short for Long interspersed element 1) randomly add extra copies to the genome of mouse brain cells. But whether or not the same process, colloquially referred to as "jumping," held true for neurons in human brains had been a matter of some debate.
"It is known that these mobile elements are important in lower organisms, such as plants and yeast, but in mammals they are generally considered to be remnants of our past," says Gage. "Yet they are extremely abundant. Approximately 50% of the total human genome is made up of remnants of mobile elements. If this were true junk, we would be getting rid of it."
Initially, the Salk researchers simply tried to identify jumping events in human brain cells grown in a dish, as they had with mice. They succeeded, but neither Gage nor postdoctoral researcher and first author Nicole Coufal, Ph.D., was satisfied. They wanted to know whether this phenomenon occurred in people as well.
In mice, gene jumping is limited to the brain and to germ cells, the reproductive cells in our bodies, since these kinds of rapid changes would be detrimental in essential organs such as the heart or kidneys. If LINE-1 elements were indeed on the move in humans, there should be more copies in the brain than in the heart or liver, where Gage and Coufal did not expect LINE-1 jumping to occur.
When Coufal measured matched samples (brain versus other body tissues) from numerous individuals, she found that some brain samples had as many as 100 extra copies per cell. "This was proof that these elements really are jumping in neurons," explains Coufal. Strikingly, it also means that not all cells are created equal—humans are true chimeras since the DNA in their brain cells is different from the DNA in the rest of their cells.
In this way, mobile elements may actually drive evolution, creating more diversity than would occur through normal cell division (which makes an exact copy of the genome, save the occasional typo). "It's a different way of looking at diversity," says Gage. "The brain lives for 80 years with the environment coming at us unpredictably, and this provides an added element of adaptability. It makes sense that there would be this added level of complexity."
Trying to explain why only brain cells harbor truly "mobile" elements, Coufal looked at the LINE-1 promoter, which is the switch that turns LINE-1 elements on and off, and she discovered that in the brain, the switch is generally on, whereas in other tissues it is permanently locked in the "off" position.
More importantly, knowing that LINE-1 elements are jumping around in the brain opens up a new way to look at neurological disorders. Explains Coufal, "Dysregulated jumping could be contributing to the problems seen in these conditions." The Salk researchers are planning to look for changes in jumping frequency in the brains of individuals affected by Rhett's syndrome and other diseases.
Source: Salk Institute (news : web)
Oct 22, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
to begin with , one might conjecture that the jumping would reflect the impulse activity of neurons because this is a major function. but if i had to make a guess, i would say gene regulation would probably more reflect the creation or destruction of ion channels, axons, dendrites, and longer term metabolic activities of the nuerons ( the functions of neurons that take more time to manifest than the instantaneous transmission of neural impulses). these activities form the basis for the overall plasticity of the physical brain on both short term and long term scales.
however, i could be wrong, the jumping genes could also reflect or interact with changes in short term metabolism of the neurons, ph levels, short term reuptake, short term action potential transmission.
it may even make sense that the method by which jumping genes interact reflects a feedback loop between the instantaneous activity of the cell and the longer term activities. or it could be (as expressed earlier) reflective of the overall method by which the brain changes...i.e. allowing longer term changes in some neurons in the brain to mediate longer term changes in other parts.
but i still firmly believe that if were only seeing this phenomena in the immune system where form follows function, then we can infer the same should be the case for this phenomena in the brain.
the real question is how to approach studying the phenomena, by first focussing on form or function. as per the research done in this article, it seems like studying form is the only choice, and due to the complextiy of the brain, that the function of so subtle a phenomena as jumping genes will not truly be understood in any specific sense for MANY years, if it is even to be understood in any meaningful general sense.
I wrote a book on it:
http://www.lulu.c...t/899103
It is easy to read.