Neanderthals wouldn't have eaten their sprouts either

August 12, 2009 by Denholm Barnetson Visitors at the Museum for Prehistory in Eyzies-de-Tayac look at a reconstruction of a Neanderthal man

Enlarge

Visitors at the Museum for Prehistory in Eyzies-de-Tayac look at a reconstruction of a Neanderthal man. Spanish researchers say they have found that a gene in modern humans that makes some people dislike a bitter chemical called phenylthiocarbamide, or PTC, was also present in Neanderthals hundreds of thousands of years ago.

Spanish researchers say they're a step closer to resolving a "mystery of evolution" -- why some people like Brussels sprouts but others hate them.

They have found that a gene in modern humans that makes some people dislike a bitter chemical called phenylthiocarbamide, or PTC, was also present in Neanderthals hundreds of thousands of years ago.

The scientists made the discovery after recovering and sequencing a fragment of the TAS2R38 gene taken from 48,000-year-old Neanderthal bones found at a site in El Sidron, in northern Spain, they said in a report released Wednesday by the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC).

"This indicates that variation in bitter taste perception predates the divergence of the lineages leading to Neanderthals and modern humans," they said.

Substances similar to PTC give a bitter taste to green vegetables such as Brussels sprouts, broccoli and cabbage as well as some fruits.

But they are also present in some poisonous plants, so having a distaste for it makes evolutionary sense.

"The sense of bitter taste protects us from ingesting toxic substances," the report said.

What intrigued the researchers most is that Neanderthals also possessed a recessive variant of the TAS2R38 gene which made some of them unable to taste PTC -- an inability they share with around one third of modern humans.

"This feature ... is a mystery of ," said the report.

"These (bitter) compounds can be toxic if ingested in large quantities and it is therefore difficult to understand the evolutionary existence of individuals who cannot detect them."

The report's lead author, Carles Lalueza Fox of the University of Barcelona, speculated that such people may be "able to detect some other compound not yet identified."

This would have given them some genetic advantage and explain the reason for the continuation of the variant gene.

Neanderthals and modern humans shared a common from which they diverged about 300,000 years ago.

Excavations since 2000 at the site at El Sidron, in the Asturias region, have so far recovered the skeletal remains of at least 10 Neanderthal individuals.

The squat, low-browed lived in parts of Europe, Central Asia and the Middle East for around 170,000 years but traces of them disappear some 28,000 years ago, their last known refuge being Gibraltar.

Why they died out is a matter of furious debate because they existed alongside modern man.

The CSIS research was published in the British Royal Society's Biology Letters.

(c) 2009 AFP


print this article email this article download pdf blog this article bookmark this article     Stumble it Digg this share on Facebook retweet share on Reddit add to delicious
Rate this story - 4.4 /5 (20 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • Caliban - Aug 12, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    It would be interesting to see all the available data on this question. If it is true that modern humans and neanderthals were capable of interbreeding, then it would also be possible for the mutation to have occured in the neanderthal genome, and then to have been transferred to the genome of modern humans. All a matter of timing. How closely the facts of this research are represented by this article is, of course, a matter for debate in itself as -inevitably- some distortion is introduced in the abstraction process.
  • John_balls - Aug 12, 2009
    • Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
    Hmm.. my guess is that modern humans killed off the neanderthals. Becuase humans to this day like to kill people that don't look like them, come from a different tribe, different culture ,religion..etc. Just a theory (:
  • snivvy - Aug 12, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    The real question here is would modern humans rather make babies with neanderthals or kill them? Knowing modern-modern humans, I'd bet the baby makers would dominate!
  • RHaston - Aug 12, 2009
    • Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
    More specifically male primates: chimps, primitives, and humans are motivated to kill stange males and mate with strange females. Look at our symbolic alpha male - James Bond - killing and screwing around the globe.

    The same evolutionary period gave birth to our conservative and liberal instinctual split: www.politicalspecies.com
  • wolfkeeper - Aug 12, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
    As I understand it, the genetic evidence is that neanderthals and humans did not successfully interbreed. They've found genes in neanderthals that code for ginger hair that are not present in any human populations. If they had interbred you would have expected these genes to be in some humans.

    The implication is that either they did not breed true (like a mule) or that they did not sucessfully breed at all.
  • paulthebassguy - Aug 12, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I would love to see them clone a Neanderthal. It would be so awesome to see what they're truly like.
  • DonR - Aug 12, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    Hmm.. my guess is that modern humans killed off the neanderthals. Becuase humans to this day like to kill people that don't look like them, come from a different tribe, different culture ,religion..etc. Just a theory (:


    No, that's at best a hypothesis. If you're going to use the word theory on a science news site, at least use it in the correct context and not the layman one. :)
  • docknowledge - Aug 12, 2009
    • Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
    Caliban, it says the divergence to sensitivity predates the divergence between humans and Neanderthals, not that they interbred.

    Anyhow, that some people are genetically indisposed to eat sprouts suggests that sprouts were never an important part of human diet. Otherwise all those poor people who don't like delicious little sprouts would be extinct.
  • John_balls - Aug 13, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Hmm.. my guess is that modern humans killed off the neanderthals. Becuase humans to this day like to kill people that don't look like them, come from a different tribe, different culture ,religion..etc. Just a theory (:




    No, that's at best a hypothesis. If you're going to use the word theory on a science news site, at least use it in the correct context and not the layman one. :)

    I stand corrected,thanks.
  • Ethelred - Aug 13, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    They've found genes in neanderthals that code for ginger hair that are not present in any human populations.


    Then how would anyone know that it coded for ginger hair? Do you have a link?

    Ethelred
  • Velanarris - Aug 13, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Hmm.. my guess is that modern humans killed off the neanderthals. Becuase humans to this day like to kill people that don't look like them, come from a different tribe, different culture ,religion..etc. Just a theory (:

    Well that's not true. Human beings kill each other for resources. Most likely, when human and neanderthal's would have crossed paths there wasn't as great an amount of people, meaning more available resources.

    Human beings cooperate more than they dissent. We have evidence that Neanderthals may be responsible for gifting humans the genes necessary for speech development. There's evidence of shared culture, and genetic merging. You really need to stop being so down on the human race. We're not as bad as you think.
  • Bonkers - Aug 13, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    They've found genes in neanderthals that code for ginger hair that are not present in any human populations.

    Are you suggesting that Ginger-haired people are not truly Human?
  • Velanarris - Aug 13, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Are you suggesting that Ginger-haired people are not truly Human?

    I thought we had established that as fact a long time ago. (I kid, I kid.)

  • tk1 - Aug 15, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    In the article it said :

    What intrigued the researchers most is that Neanderthals also possessed a recessive variant of the TAS2R38 gene which made some of them unable to taste PTC -- an inability they share with around one third of modern humans. "This feature ... is a mystery of evolution," said the report.

    "These (bitter) compounds can be toxic if ingested in large quantities and it is therefore difficult to understand the evolutionary existence of individuals who cannot detect them."

    The report's lead author, Carles Lalueza Fox of the University of Barcelona, speculated that such people may be "able to detect some other compound not yet identified."

    This would have given them some genetic advantage and explain the reason for the continuation of the variant gene.

    Wouldn't a simpler hypothesis be that Neanderthals and Humans lived or live in social groups and learn from what others in the group do. Therefore they are taught what foods to eat and would less likly to ingest the posionious plants?

    In other words, a social explanation rather than a biological one.


  • Velanarris - Aug 15, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Would it not be more clear to determine that humans and neanderthals had developed the gene that allows for detection? Or perhaps we have become more resistant than prior incarnations to PTC and as such the gene was no longer necessary in all cases?
  • docknowledge - Aug 15, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Yah, Velanarris, the article is indulging in what Wikipedia would call "original research" -- i.e., unfounded speculation in Wikispeak.
  • cosmicelk - Aug 15, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I am ginger and proud to be descended from Neanderthals. They had much bigger brains.
  • Ethelred - Aug 16, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I don't know what happened there. I can't even edit it. I only get the first link and the signature. I did NOT put the blockquote there. It looks like I may have discovered a secret weapon for the cognoscenti.

    Etherled

    Now to experiment:
    [blockquote]
    Is this part Quotable.
    [/blockquote]

  • RayCherry - Aug 16, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    Ethelred (the ginger haired?): for block quotes, replace the strings 'blockquote' with a simple 'q' in each case for your experiment above.

    Good luck :-)
  • Ethelred - Aug 16, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    In case you haven't noticed I quote extensively. That post was more a product of lack of sleep than anything else.

    And by the way the q must be lower case. Every once in a while I manage to use an uppercase Q an then it doesn't work.

    What happened was I made a snarky post about Dr. Milford Wolpoff's similarity to a Neanderthal. Somehow the only part of the post that wasn't marked as a quote was the link at the top. I didn't put [/blockquote] in the post yet there it was at the bottom of the it after the signature. And when I tried to edit the mess all that would show up was the first and last lines. Never seen that before. So I was trying to get the same odd result intentionally in my edit. After sleeping some and waking up I still can't match the odd behavior of the original version.

    Not a redhead. My brother does have a red beard. Well it was a rusty red but now it has more gray than red.

    Ethelred
  • OckhamsRazor - Aug 26, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    I am ginger and proud to be descended from Neanderthals. They had much bigger brains.


    And brows :)

August 12, 2009 all stories

Comments: 21

4.4 /5 (20 votes)
  • Stumble this up

  • Digg this

  • share this

  • hide
  • Related Stories




  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

  • Breeding program
    created 11 hours ago
  • How does a concentration gradient provide energy?
    created 15 hours ago
  • Eyesight and Neural Damage from Electronics
    created Nov 19, 2009
  • Quick question about the Golgi Apparatus?
    created Nov 19, 2009
  • More from Physics Forums - Biology

Other News

Researcher says text proves Shroud of Turin real (AP)

Researcher says text proves Shroud of Turin real

Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils

created 11 hours ago | popularity 1.7 / 5 (15) | comments 16

(AP) -- A Vatican researcher claims a nearly invisible text on the Shroud of Turin proves the authenticity of the artifact revered as Jesus' burial cloth. The claim made in a new book by historian Barbara ...


Three of a kind

Three of a kind: Revealing language’s universal essence

Other Sciences / Social Sciences

created 15 hours ago | popularity 3.7 / 5 (7) | comments 6

(PhysOrg.com) -- On the surface, English, Japanese, and Kinande, a member of the Bantu family of languages spoken in the Democratic Republic of Congo, have little in common. It is not just that the vocabularies ...


Active hearing process in mosquitoes

Active hearing process in mosquitoes

Other Sciences / Mathematics

created 22 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

A mathematical model has explained some of the remarkable features of mosquito hearing. In particular, the male can hear the faintest beats of the female's wings and yet is not deafened by loud noises.


Glorious Dawn: Sagan, Hawking Sing (w/ Video)

Other Sciences / Other

created Nov 12, 2009 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (17) | comments 8

Astronomer and long time science advocate Carl Sagan once said that he was "not very good at singing songs." But on Nov. 9 in Washington D.C., his voice could be heard singing about the wonders of universe -- 13 years after ...


Maya

New insights into the life of the Maya

Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils

created Nov 16, 2009 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (15) | comments 7

(PhysOrg.com) -- Ancient artifacts are almost always concerned with rich and powerful religious and political leaders, but new excavations of an ancient Maya site have unearthed a pyramid decorated with murals ...