Costs of adapting to climate change significantly underestimated
August 27, 2009
The new report claims that the cost of adapting to coastal flooding could be three times greater than predicted
Scientists led by a former co-chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change will warn today that the UN negotiations aimed at tackling climate change are based on substantial underestimates of what it will cost to adapt to its impacts.
The real costs of adaptation are likely to be 2-3 times greater than estimates made by the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), say Professor Martin Parry and colleagues in a new reviewed study published by the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) and the Grantham Institute for Climate Change at Imperial College London.
The study adds that costs will be even more when the full range of climate impacts on human activities is considered.
Professor Parry and colleagues warn that this underestimate of the cost of adaptation threatens to weaken the outcome of UNFCCC negotiations, which are due to culminate in Copenhagen in December with a global deal aimed at tackling climate change.
"The amount of money on the table at Copenhagen is one of the key factors that will determine whether we achieve a climate change agreement," says Professor Parry, visiting research fellow at the Grantham Institute for Climate Change at Imperial College London. "But previous estimates of adaptation costs have substantially misjudged the scale of funds needed."
The UNFCCC has estimated annual global costs of adapting to climate change to be US$40-170 billion, or the cost of about three Olympic Games per year.
But the report's authors warn that these estimates were produced too quickly and did not include key sectors such as energy, manufacturing, retailing, mining, tourism and ecosystems. Other sectors that the UNFCCC did include were only partially covered.
"Just looking in depth at the sectors the UNFCCC did study, we estimate adaptation costs to be 2-3 higher, and when you include the sectors the UNFCCC left out the true cost is probably much greater," warns Professor Parry, who co-chaired the IPCC working group on impacts, vulnerability and adaptation between 2002 and 2008.
The new study's key findings include:
• Water: The UNFCCC estimate of US$11 billion excluded costs of adapting to floods and assumes no costs for transferring water within nations from areas of surplus to areas of deficit. The underestimate could be substantial, according to the new study.
• Health: The UNFCCC estimate of US$5 billion excluded developed nations, and assessed only malaria, diarrhoea and malnutrition. This could cover only 30-50 percent of the global total disease burden, according to the new study.
• Infrastructure: The UNFCCC estimate of US$8-130 billion assumed that low levels of investment in infrastructure will continue to characterise development in Africa and other relatively poor parts of the world. But the new study points out that such investment must increase in order to reduce poverty and thus avoid continuing high levels of vulnerability to climate change. It says the costs of adapting this upgraded infrastructure to climate change will be eight times more costly than the higher estimates predicted by the UNFCCC.
• Coastal zones: The UNFCCC estimate of US$11 billion excluded increased storm intensity and used low IPCC predictions of sea level rise. Considering research on sea level rise published since the 2007 IPCC report, and including storms, the new study suggests costs will be about three times greater than predicted.
• Ecosystems: The UNFCCC excluded from its estimates the costs of protecting ecosystems and the services they can provide for human society. The new study concludes that that this is an important source of under -estimation, which will cost over US$350 billion, including both protected and non-protected areas.
The report calls for detailed case studies of what adaptation costs will be, and points out that the few that already exist suggest that costs will be considerable.
The new study adds that the UNFCCC estimates do not include the cost of bearing 'residual damage' that will arise from situations where adaptation is not technically feasible or simply too expensive.
"Finance is the key that will unlock the negotiations in Copenhagen but if governments are working with the wrong numbers, we could end up with a false deal that fails to cover the costs of adaptation to climate change," says Camilla Toulmin, director of the International Institute for Environment and Development, which co-published the study.
Professor Sir Brian Hoskins, Director of the Grantham Institute for Climate Change at Imperial College London, which co-published the study, says: "The costs of adapting to live with a changing climate are very uncertain. However, this new study suggests that previous attempts to figure out the costs have drastically under-estimated how expensive this could be. With such large sums potentially involved, the pressure to act now to reduce the extent of climate change is greater than ever."
The new study was reviewed by seven of the world's leading adaptation scientists, including the lead authors of the original UNFCCC study. Following this, close to 100 adaptation policy and research experts were invited to comment on the pre-publication draft.
The report's authors are: Professor Martin Parry (Imperial College London), Professors Nigel Arnell, Richard Tiffin and Tim Wheeler (University of Reading), Dr Pam Berry (University of Oxford), Drs David Dodman and David Satterthwaite (International Institute for Environment and Development), Dr Sam Fankhauser (London School of Economics), Dr Chris Hope (University of Cambridge), Dr Sari Kovats (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine), Professor Robert Nicholls (University of Southampton).
More information: The report is entitled 'Assessing the costs of adaptation to climate change: a review of the UNFCCC and other recent estimates'. Copies can be downloaded from the IIED website http://www.iied.org
-
Adaptation to global climate change is an essential response to a warming planet
Feb 07, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Storm costs to spiral, says report
Jun 29, 2005 |
not rated yet |
0
-
New studies find global warming will have significant economic impacts on Florida coasts
Sep 24, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
A changing climate for protected areas
Apr 02, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Targeted investments in climate science could present enormous economic savings across the globe
Aug 19, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (31) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Do some geologists actually act a lot like Randy Marsh?
Feb 11, 2012
-
Discrepancy between oxygen and carbon-dioxide levels
Feb 09, 2012
-
where gems are found in the world
Feb 09, 2012
-
Wind Waves in Reservoir ~ Wind run-up and Wind set-up
Feb 08, 2012
-
Balance of oxygen in the atmosphere
Feb 01, 2012
-
The case for a methanol-based economy
Jan 30, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Latin America mining boom clashes with conservation
Latin America is experiencing a mining boom as prices rise fuelled by a hike in global demand, but the region is also being hit by a wave of violent protests, strikes and rallies by environmentalists.
5 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Political leaders play key role in how worried Americans are by climate change: study
More than extreme weather events and the work of scientists, it is national political leaders who influence how much Americans worry about the threat of climate change, new research finds.
Feb 06, 2012 |
5 / 5 (6) |
72
NASA budget will axe Mars deal with Europe: scientists
US President Barack Obama's budget proposal to be submitted next week for 2013 will cut NASA's budget by 20 percent and eliminate a major partnership with Europe on Mars exploration, scientists said Thursday.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
Feb 10, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
55
Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago
(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...
High planetary tilt lowers odds for life?
Highly-tilted worlds would have extreme seasons, subjecting life to alternating periods of scorching and subzero temperatures. This could make the development of all but hardiest, simplest creatures a long ...
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
Feb 06, 2012 |
4.8 / 5 (12) |
14
|
Google might launch Drive for cloud storage soon
(PhysOrg.com) -- Google's next big move, according to the Wall Street Journal, is a cloud storage service called Drive. Hardly first to the plate, Google is simply catching up to introducing its cloud reposi ...
Love a click away in Indonesia's Twitter Republic
He was a geeky kid from Yogyakarta, she a glamorous city girl in Jakarta. In a country with one of the world's most vibrant social networking scenes they fell in love on Twitter.
Europeans protest controversial Internet pact
Tens of thousands of people marched in protests in more than a dozen European cities Saturday against a controversial anti-online piracy pact that critics say could curtail Internet freedom.
Walney offshore wind farm is world's biggest (for now)
(PhysOrg.com) -- The Walney wind farm on the Irish Sea--characterized by high tides, waves and windy weather--officially opened this week. The farm is treated in the press as a very big deal as the Walney ...
Navy to begin tests on electromagnetic railgun prototype launcher
The Office of Naval Research (ONR)'s Electromagnetic (EM) Railgun program will take an important step forward in the coming weeks when the first industry railgun prototype launcher is tested at a facility ...
Explained: Sigma
It's a question that arises with virtually every major new finding in science or medicine: What makes a result reliable enough to be taken seriously? The answer has to do with statistical significance -- but ...
Aug 27, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (8)
without the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change!
Some of us think its even more scary to have scientists helping politicians gain new levels of control the lives of over ordinary citizens.
See: "EARTH'S HEAT SOURCE - THE SUN",
Energy and Environment: SPECIAL ISSUE:
Natural drivers of weather and climate,
volume 20, numbers 1 & 2, pp. 131-144 (2009)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0905.0704
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://www.omatumr.com
Aug 27, 2009
Rank: 4.6 / 5 (32)
Aug 30, 2009
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Yet, there are no historical accounts from the period that mention any sort of flooding on the scale which the IPCC and clan say will happen if we warm up but 3°C more than today.
What gives?
Aug 30, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Where did you get the 4 to 5 degree figure from?
Aug 30, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
There are a couple others I have posted somewhere around here but I do not remember where and do not recall the references since I put them away.
Aug 30, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Thank you for the reference. I assume you are referring to this passage: -
"Thorkel Farserk, a cousin of Erik the Red who founded the colony, having no serviceable boat at hand, swam out across Hvalseyjarfjord to fetch a full-grown sheep from the island of Hvalsey and carry it home to entertain his cousin. The distance was well over two miles. Dr L.G.C.E.Pugh of the Medical Research Laboratories, Hampstead, has given his opinion, from studies of the endurance of Channel swimmers and others undertaking similar exploit, that 10C would be about the lowest temperature at which a strong person, even if fat, not specially trained for long distance swimming, could swim the distance mentioned. As the average temperatures in the fjords of that coast in August in modern times have seldom exceeded 6C ( 3 to 6C being more typical), it seems that the water must have been at least 4C warmer than this limit in the year in which Thorkel swam it and brought home his sheep.'
There are two issues here, the first being that the sea temperature at a single location outside the Arctic circle cannot be used to prove that "temperatures all over the Arctic were 4C to 5C higher than today". The second is that the story related above is not an accurate description of the feat as originally described in chapter 14 of Landnamabok (The Book of Settlement).
"There was a man named Thorkell Farserk, the sister son of Eirek the Red; he went to Greenland with Eirek, he settled Hvalseyfirth, and most places between Eireksfirth and Einarsfirth, and dwelt at Hvalseyfirth; from him the Hvalseyfirthers are descended. He was of exceeding strength. He swam out to Hvalsey, after an old ox, and brought it from the island on his back, when he wanted to give good cheer to his kinsman, Eirek, and there was not a seaworthy vessel at hand; that was a distance of half a sea knot or mile. Thorkell was interred in the (tun) enclosure at Hvalseyfirth, and his ghost has ever since haunted the place."
The first point to note is that the old (full grown) ox has become a full-grown sheep. It would be hard to imagine anybody, regardless of sea temperature, swimming far carrying an ox, it could be that this account, written a hundred and twenty five years after the event, exaggerates this deed to make it more heroic. However, whilst the beast is larger in the original account, the distance swam is less, half a sea knot or just over half a mile. This would obviously affect Dr L.G.C.E.Pugh's opinion of the minimum survivable temperature, even if other aspects of the story had not cast doubts on its veracity. Also, whilst not relevant to the discussion, Thorkell was Eirek's sister son (nephew) not his cousin.
http://www.northv.../003.php
Aug 31, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
It is apparent that you did not read all three pages. In addition, you should read other portions of the book as well. After all, I did tell you to read the three pages for starters. When you have read other portions of the book I referenced, you will see that it does discuss the entire area in and around the Arctic circle. Let me know when you have completed reading the other sections of the book dealing with the subject matter.
When you have completed that, take a look at and compare the Baffin Island and the Alaska isotope data for comparison. You will come to see that the higher temperatures applied to the entire Arctic region. For now, you have just seen the beginning.
Aug 31, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
What I found interesting about chapter 14 is this quote:
Enough and plentiful wood to build a ship at the time. That also confirms the warmer climate of Greenland at the time. Thanks for calling my attention to that. :)
Aug 31, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Now I need to see the original language text and make some observations. Know where I can find one?
Aug 31, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
At as high as 6°C the result is similar but would take a few minutes longer to kill the person.
Also consider that the record for a polar swimmer is 1 mile in 30 minutes or so in 2°C to 3°C water.
This man in the old text went a mile total time and did not die of cold-shock reflex or of hypothermia.
Therefore, the water had to have been warmer at that time than at present or this man, strong or not, would have died of cold-shock reflex within minutes of entering the water.
So, regardless of any discrepancies in details like whether a sheep or an ox (what size of this breed of ox we are not told, assuming that the translation "ox" is correct and not "sheep") we still have a recorded case of a man swimming across in water than did not kill him.
There is no record of which I am aware of people training to swim Arctic or Antarctic waters during that time period so the evidence of this event still points to being on the order of several degrees warmer than at present averages of between 3°C to 6°C in the waters around Greenland.
Aug 31, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
So, now the issue has become more complex and multiple recensions and translations will now need to be checked. The one that you have referenced is from the year 1895.
Well, I guess it is a good thing that the data is enough to confirm that it was warmer in Greenland than at present as this issue will take longer to look into as far as specifics are concerned.
There were trees and woods enough to build a ship or so, meaning that it had to have been warmer, and the fact that this guy made the swim in the first place, and did not die from cold-shock reflex, shows that the water was warmer on the order of several degrees C.
Aug 31, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
My apologies
Landnáma + Kristnisaga http://www.am.hi....w/?fl=20
Indeed, the numerous authors and translations would make this a less than reliable source.
I read all three pages. The section I quoted was the only part that mentioned actual temperatures. I have also read all other relevant sections and can find nothing to support your statement that MWP Arctic temperatures were 4C to 5C higher than today. If I have missed anything I would be grateful if you could provide a page number.
I have found no evidence to support your statement that MWP Arctic temperatures were 4C to 5C higher than today in any available literature. However there are numerous papers that support Arctic temperatures about 1C higher than today.
http://www.co2sci...ctic.php
I deliberately chose this site to avoid arguments regarding the source. I am sure that if they had evidence of higher Arctic temperatures they would have mentioned it.
I would be grateful if you could provide links to any papers that support your statement that MWP Arctic temperatures were 4C to 5C higher than today.
Aug 31, 2009
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Aug 31, 2009
Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
The US spent more money than this on the bailout.
Aug 31, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
It is not scores of data being overturned by this. You also need to look over the latest O18/O16 isotope ratio data taken across the Arctic. This new data also shows that temperatures 1000 years ago was at least 4°C higher.
I had links to the abstracts posted on one of the pages here on this site. However, I do not know where these pages went. I cannot see them in the Activity link any more due to responses to other posts making them go away. If you want to search for those pages and then check out the new data at the links, go ahead. The data is mounting and that data definitely shows a warmer Arctic 1000 years ago.
While you are at it, check the pollen data for Greenland. There was farming going on with crops that do not grow in Greenland. But, they did grow and were farmed 1000 years ago in Greenland.
Check archaeological data for the Norse colonies in Greenland, too, while you are at it. Deep graves were dug by hand in places where there is permafrost now. The ground is solid in places where once it was easier to dig graves by hand!
Quit ignoring the mounting data in favor of the pet IPCC.
Aug 31, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
I found the final comments of the same page you cite above interesting.
"Much warmer" is not 1°C. A careful reading of the paper you cited above shows that this "more than 1°C" climb occurred at the beginning of the MWP in question. This is to be expected since it was the beginning.
Again, search around for the recent O18/O16 isotope ratio data taken across the Arctic.
Sep 01, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
How much would the average temperature have to go up to allow crops and livestock to be raised in Greenland?
Or to drive the permafrost layer deep enough to allow people to be buried?
Sep 01, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Actually, not necessarily. All documents, particularly the older ones, go through this sort of process. Scribes sometimes want to make things more heroic, so a later scribe might change the word sheep to ox and make the guy stronger than "exceedingly strong" or might accidentally misspell a word or omit a material fact.
What we need to do is to go back to the earliest source possible using textual criticism. This 1895 source I am not sure that he did that effectively enough. I would need to see the manuscripts in their original language and all of the manuscripts in order to make a decision as to the older text--if such can be determined, that is.
In any case, the reliability and probability of the data is not as compromised as you might think simply due to the fact that other data can be marshaled to bolster the details, such as the Greenland pollen data, archaeological data, and the very most recent O18/O16 isotope ratio data.
Sep 01, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
At least 2°C to 4°C warmer than present, according to one website.
While the website does not agree in all details with the figures produced from the latest O18/O16 isotope ratio data, it is of interest to see what it does say about how much warmer it had to have been there 1000 years in order to allow roots of plants and deep graves:
The address of the page is valid but in Opera and a couple other browsers the page does not load properly. I do not know why but the link is valid. Perhaps it is the formatting of the link on Physorg. I cannot post on this page anymore using Internet Explorer 8 so had to switch to another browser even to post this!
Sep 01, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
I also noticed that Opera and Safari also do not display the degree symbol properly, at least from where I sit. Sorry about that but I cannot control inept coding for which I am not responsible. :)
Consider also the following information from the above page, derived from Lamb's information:
This coincides with my mention of temperatures 4°-5°C higher.
Sep 01, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Sep 01, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
A careful reading of the paper I cited shows that the data does not cover the beginning of the MWP
"On that basis, the varve record spans the period AD 1013–2004."
…and that no conclusions can be drawn from that data regarding recent warming.
"Comparisons with other proxies support our interpretation that conditions in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries were relatively warm, before turning cooler in the late fourteenth century. Coldest conditions of the last millennium prevailed in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Evidence for more recent warming is equivocal, with different interpretations possible depending on the parameter examined."
Besonen, M. R., W. Patridge, R.S. Bradley, P. Francus, J.S. Stoner and M.B. Abbott, 2008. A record of climate over the last millennium based on varved lake sediments from the Canadian High Arctic. The Holocene, 18,1, 169-180
http://www.geo.um...2008.pdf
I found your link here
http://www.physor...050.html
Can you tell me how this paper shows that MWP Arctic temperatures were 4C to 5C higher than today.
The full paper can be found here
http://epic.awi.d...004a.pdf
http://www.co2sci...4/C2.php]http://www.co2sci...4/C2.php[/url]
http://instaar.co...ct_id=67
https://dspace.st...rrig.pdf
http://www.co2sci...4/C1.php
http://www.co2sci...6/C2.php
http://www.co2sci...2/C1.php
http://www.co2sci...4/C2.php]http://www.co2sci...4/C2.php[/url]
Permafrost is not continuous in Southern Greenland, it only exists in isolated patches
http://maps.grida...misphere
And the active layer (the top layer that melts each summer) can be thick enough to dig a six-foot grave as far north as Sisimiut. Sisimiut, unlike the Norse settlements, is within the Arctic Circle.
"The permafrost thickness in Sisimiut (Holsteinborg) is estimated to be 33 ± 9m with TZAA at -0.3 ± 0.1°C. In Sisimiut, the average active layer thickness is 2.3 m."
http://www3.inter...abstract
Frydendahl, K.: Global and regional temperature development since 1850. Danish Meteorological Institute. Scientific Reprt, 89-6. Københaven 1989
Scheen, R.: navigation and maneuvering. In From mast to keel, p. 224-225. Gothenburg 1963, københaven 1972
The paleoclimatic evidence is from Lamb.
Can you provide links to any published papers that show MWP Arctic temperatures were 4C to 5C higher than today?
Sep 01, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
http://www.co2sci...4/C2.php]http://www.co2sci...4/C2.php[/url]
http://www.co2sci...4/C2.php]http://www.co2sci...4/C2.php[/url]
Sep 01, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Just remove everything before www.
Third time lucky
Sep 04, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
_____________________
The US spent more money than this on the bailout.
_____________________
The bailout is/was a one time cost. However the cost of adapting is the only way for life to continue. After the cost of adapting we'll still have cars, electricity etc. But after fighting AGW we'll have no cars (electricity doesn't grow on trees) and little electricity for home use, let alone cars.
Sep 04, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
The bailout is not a one time cost. The TARP act hasn't been completed. It's a long range 5 year plan of economic correction amounting to approximately 1 trillion dollars (estimated by the CBO).
We handed AIG 134 billion. We handed GM 50 billion. We handed Chrysler 7 billion.
I could go ahead and continue rattling off the banks we loaned money to, and the amount we borrowed from the Federal Reserve, and the amount we spend in Afghanistan (also in the tens of billions), and the money we spend on the military industrial complex, which is over 5% of our total 3 trillion dollar budget.
Truth is, this is nothing more than a drop in the bucket even on a semi-annual basis. Your pontification on electricity and AGW is irrelevant, the US will never go without energy or without cars unless a giant change in our daily reality occurs, either apocalyptic or technological.
Sep 05, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
ftp> open ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/" title="ftp://[url=ftp://ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/]ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">ftp://[url=ftp://ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/]ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/
Unknown host ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/" title="ftp://[url=ftp://ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/]ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">ftp://[url=ftp://ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/]ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/.
ftp> open ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/
Unknown host ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/.
I am pretty miffed and am expecting the data to be smoothed soon before it is released to the public again. This is not the first time they have done this, by the way!
Sep 05, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
ftp://ftp.ncdc.no.../summit/
Sep 05, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Sep 05, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Also, the link to a previous post of mine is not the one where I posted the data regarding 1000 years ago. It is the earlier paleodata. Like me, you do not seem to have found the actual page where I posted that data. I do not care to speculate as to why as that will be a fruitless endeavor.
Well, since it is going to be a bit harder to get the raw data from readily accessible sources, I will have to improvise a bit but the end result will be comparable.
Lamb is not the source for the data found on the website I cited earlier this thread. Lamb is dependent for various of his basic data and information from Dr. K. Frydendahl. He so states on page xx of his "Climate, History and the Modern World."
So, I will cite from the webpage I cited, since the source of the information on that page comes from the work of Dr. K[nud]. Frydendahl. Dr. Frydendahl states (after mentioning the swim):
The range of temperatures given in this quote is 4-5°C. Therefore, this information from a scientist who deals with meteorology and climate supports what I said earlier regardless of my temporary setback in being able to obtain the data I sought to prove my point.
Additionally, you misread what I cited above. It does not matter that the permafrost is patchy CURRENTLY in southern Greenland. What matters is that where there are deep graves, these are NOW permafrost. Here is that cite again from Dr. Fryendahl on the same page: