Physicists Explain How Human Eyes Can Detect Quantum Effects
September 29, 2009 By Lisa Zyga
How human eyes could detect quantum entanglement: A single-photon qubit is amplified through cloning via stimulated emission in a nonlinear crystal (red box). The clones are split into two orthogonal polarization modes, with the polarization basis varied with the help of a wave plate (green box). Each mode is then detected by a naked human eye. Image credit: Pavel Sekatski, et al.
(PhysOrg.com) -- By greatly amplifying one photon from an entangled photon pair, physicists have theoretically shown that human eyes can be used as detectors to observe quantum effects. Usually, detecting quantum phenomena requires sensitive photon detectors or similar technology, keeping the quantum world far removed from our everyday experience. By showing that it’s possible to perform quantum optics experiments with human eyes as detectors, the physicists can bring quantum phenomena closer to the macroscopic level and to everyday life.
The group of physicists is from the University of Geneva, and includes Pavel Sekatski, Nicolas Brunner (also from the University of Bristol), Cyril Branciard, Nicolas Gisin, and Christoph Simon. In their study published in a recent issue of Physical Review Letters, the scientists theoretically show how human eyes can be used to detect a large Bell inequality violation, which proves the existence of quantum entanglement.
As the physicists explain, the key to achieving human-eye detection of quantum effects is to use the process of quantum cloning by stimulated emission. Recently, using quantum cloning, researchers in Rome have experimentally created tens of thousands of clones starting from a single-photon. Then, by amplifying one photon of an entangled pair, the researchers managed to demonstrate entanglement. In order to do this, specific detectors are required, which can distinguish two orthogonal amplified states with a high success rate.
Now, what Sekatski and co-workers have shown is that the human eye performs extremely well at the task of distinguishing between orthogonal amplified states. This is a consequence of the eye's main characteristic, namely as a detection threshold. Below a certain threshold number of incoming photons, the eye remains blind (no light is seen), whereas above the threshold the efficiency (i.e. the probability of seeing) is close to one.
In their calculations, the authors also considered the influence of experimental imperfections, such as photon losses, which are inevitable in a real experiment. They found that the setup is surprisingly robust. A strong Bell violation can be obtained even in case of high losses, demonstrating the presence of entanglement. This is a very astonishing feature since entanglement is generally an extremely fragile property, highly sensitive to experimental imperfections such as losses.
To solve this apparent paradox, the scientists uncovered a loophole in the system. They showed that a specific multi-photon state could actually behave exactly as the entangled state. Therefore, the high Bell violation actually witnesses the entanglement of the original photon pair, i.e. before the amplification occurs, but not the entanglement between the amplified state and the single photon. Still, the authors show that the amplified state and the single photon are nevertheless entangled, but revealing this entanglement would require more sophisticated measurements. This subtle issue provides a much better understanding of the quantum nature of amplified states, which were recently the subject of a controversy among the scientific community.
As the researchers finally note, using human eyes as detectors in actual quantum experiments will face significant technical challenges. However, the possibility of observing quantum effects directly with our own eyes is fascinating. Naked eye observation would bring the observer one step closer to the quantum world.
“From our theoretical study, the experimental perspectives appear very promising,” Brunner told PhysOrg.com. He added that, although there will be many technical challenges, Nicolas Gisin’s research group in Geneva has already started working on experiments.
More information: Pavel Sekatski, Nicolas Brunner, Cyril Branciard, Nicolas Gisin, and Christoph Simon. “Towards Quantum Experiments with Human Eyes as Detectors Based on Cloning via Stimulated Emission.” Physical Review Letters 103, 113601 (2009).
Copyright 2009 PhysOrg.com.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or part without the express written permission of PhysOrg.com.
-
Entanglement Swapping: A New Quantum Trick
Oct 11, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Researchers violate Bell’s inequality with an atom and a photon
Aug 31, 2004 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Scientists demonstrate quantum nature of entanglement swapping
Mar 31, 2006 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Getting many quantum states from one experimental setup
Jul 15, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Measurement precision beats standard quantum limit
Apr 21, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (30) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
second law of thermodynamics
10 hours ago
-
Static Electric Orbiting of H2O Droplet to Knitting Needle
10 hours ago
-
Acousto optical modulators
11 hours ago
-
Jerk during Gravitation
12 hours ago
-
2 springs attached by a rigid massless bar
13 hours ago
-
Thermal conductivity value of (.17-.20)W/m.K
13 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - Classical Physics
More news stories
Explained: Sigma
It's a question that arises with virtually every major new finding in science or medicine: What makes a result reliable enough to be taken seriously? The answer has to do with statistical significance -- but ...
20 hours ago |
5 / 5 (12) |
30
Borexino Collaboration succeeds in spotting pep neutrinos emitted from the sun
(PhysOrg.com) -- To learn more about how the sun works, scientists study particles that are emitted from it into space due to thermonuclear reactions that occur inside; by applying known physics principles, ...
Physics research suggests new pathways for cancer progression
Observing that certain cancer cells may exhibit greater flexibility than normal cells, some scientists believe that this capability promotes rapid tumor growth. Now computer simulations developed by Boston University Biomedical ...
18 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
Quantum physicist explains $100K offer for proof scaled-up quantum computing is impossible
(PhysOrg.com) -- MIT researcher Scott Aaronson has certainly riled the physics community with his offer this past Friday, of $100,000 to anyone who can prove that scaled-up quantum computing is impossible. ...
Physicists 'record' magnetic breakthrough
An international team of scientists has demonstrated a revolutionary new way of magnetic recording which will allow information to be processed hundreds of times faster than by current hard drive technology.
Feb 07, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (39) |
14
|
'Dark plasmons' transmit energy
Microscopic channels of gold nanoparticles have the ability to transmit electromagnetic energy that starts as light and propagates via "dark plasmons," according to researchers at Rice University.
FDA-approved drug rapidly clears amyloid from the brain, reverses Alzheimer's symptoms in mice
Neuroscientists at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine have made a dramatic breakthrough in their efforts to find a cure for Alzheimer's disease. The researchers' findings, published in the journal Science, show t ...
Hydrogen from acidic water: Researchers develop potential low cost alternative to platinum for splitting water
A technique for creating a new molecule that structurally and chemically replicates the active part of the widely used industrial catalyst molybdenite has been developed by researchers with the Lawrence Berkeley ...
Ultraviolet protection molecule in plants yields its secrets
Lying around in the sun all day is hazardous not just for humans but also for plants, which have no means of escape. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun can damage proteins and DNA inside cells, leading ...
Soraa LED light may dim 50-watt halogen rivals
(PhysOrg.com) -- Soraa, a Fremont, California company founded in 2008, this week launched its first product, a light that uses LEDS (light emitting diodes). The "Soraa LED MR16 lamp" is the "perfect" replacement ...
Anyone can learn to be more inventive, cognitive researcher says
There will always be a wild and unpredictable quality to creativity and invention, says Anthony McCaffrey, a cognitive psychology researcher at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, because an "Aha moment" is rare and ...
Sep 29, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Sep 29, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Sep 29, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Sep 29, 2009
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (3)
Sep 29, 2009
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
Sep 30, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Sep 30, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Sep 30, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Sep 30, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
But what is an "imperfect" copy in a binary quantum system? An imperfect copy of a 1 is a 0. So that is a big error, whereas the phrase "imperfect copy" makes it seem like it is a workable version? Or perhaps is it making 100 copies where 99 are 1 (correctly)and one is 0 (incorrectly)?
Sep 30, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Sep 30, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Even if the probability of a photon collapsing into state 1 was more likely than into state 0, the probability element still means that one is unsure what is going to be the collapsed state until after the collapse event. No wonder cloning is "imperfect". Even a 'perfect' clone will not necessarily collapse the same way as the original. (At least I doubt it.) But I suppose that if you get 75% (say) success on uniformity of direction of collapse then the clone is reasonably good. I wonder what the success rate is?
Sep 30, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Sep 30, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
to TegiriNenashi: the eyes can be two observers, and
to ben 6993: they need not be eyes -- collapse or splitting into worlds (whichever) does not depend on sentience.
Finally, Mercury_1 is correct: an understanding of quantum effects will show that they are all around you.
Sep 30, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Sep 30, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Oct 01, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Oct 01, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Umm... the diagram is drawn as would a diagram of electronic circuitry. It's not a visually correct diagram of the actual shape of the device, or schema, but exagerated so the functions of each component are clear.
Oct 04, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Oct 05, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)