Consciousness is the brain's Wi-Fi, resolving competing requests, study suggests

September 30, 2009 Consciousness is the brain's Wi-Fi, resolving competing requests, study suggests

Enlarge

During the Stroop Task (pictured), which involves having to say the name of the color that the word is written in (blue for the top word) rather than reading the word (red), we feel conflicting urges as we fight the urge to read the word. New research by San Francisco State University Professor Ezequiel Morsella suggests it is our consciousness that resolves this kind of dilemma, acting as the brain's Wi-Fi network that mediates competing requests from different parts of the body. Credit: San Francisco State University

Your fingers start to burn after picking up a hot plate. Should you drop the plate or save your meal? New research suggests that it is your consciousness that resolves these dilemmas by serving as the brain's Wi-Fi network, mediating competing requests from different parts of the body. Published today in the journal Emotion, the study also explains why we are consciously aware of some conflicting urges but not others.

"If the is like a set of computers that control different tasks, consciousness is the Wi-Fi network that allows different parts of the brain to talk to each other and decide which action 'wins' and is carried out," said San Francisco State University Assistant Professor of Ezequiel Morsella, lead author of the study. The study finds that we are only aware of competing actions that involve skeletal muscles that voluntarily move parts of the body, the bicep for example, rather than the muscles in the or the iris of the eye.

In lab experiments, participants were trained to identify and report changes in their awareness, or the feeling of being about to make a mistake, while in a state of readiness to perform simple exercises.

The results demonstrated that merely preparing to perform an incompatible action, for example preparing to move simultaneously left and right, triggered stronger changes in awareness than preparing to perform a compatible action or experiencing a conflict that does not engage the muscles that move our bodies. Participants rated changes in their awareness on an eight-point scale and reported an average rating of 4.5 when mentally preparing to perform an incompatible action and an average rating of two for compatible actions.

Consciousness is the brain's Wi-Fi, resolving competing requests, study suggests
Enlarge

This is an fMRI image of the brain, viewed from above. New research shows that the changes in awareness we feel when preparing to do two incompatible actions are uniquely associated with increased activity in areas of the brain used for working memory, including the pre and post central sulcus. These areas are responsible for consciousness and selecting the right action at the right time. This finding supports San Francisco State University Professor Ezequiel Morsella's new theory that it is consciousness that resolves the dilemma of conflicting urges. The findings were presented at the Proceedings of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society Annual Meeting in April 2008. Credit: Morsella, Kang, Shamosh, Bargh and Gray

The findings support a new theory developed by Morsella which predicts that the primary role of consciousness is to bring together competing demands on . Morsella's theory also proposes that consciousness allows individuals to adapt their actions in the future, for example wearing an oven mitt to hold a hot dish.

The results give credence to an interesting idea that 'thinking is for doing,' a framework psychologists are using to explore the link among consciousness, perception and action. "Our findings add to the growing body of evidence that when you prepare to perform two competing actions you prime the same areas of the brain associated with carrying out that same action," Morsella said.

In a related, but separate study, Morsella and colleagues used fMRI scans to identify the regions of the brain that produce the changes in awareness associated with conflicting urges. The findings were presented at the Proceedings of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society Annual Meeting in April 2008.

"What's interesting is that the changes in awareness that participants felt when preparing to perform conflicting actions was uniquely associated with increased activation of areas of the brain associated with action and perception, as we would expect, and also with working memory, including the pre- and post-central sulcus," Morsella said. "This is consistent with our theory because these brain regions are responsible for and selecting the right action at the right time."

The authors suggest that both studies identify the common elements underlying all conflicting urges and that the findings shed light on managing addiction and failures of self control.

Source: San Francisco State University (news : web)


   
Rate this story - 3.8 /5 (12 votes)

Rank Filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

  • axemaster - Sep 30, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    "New research shows that the changes in awareness we feel when preparing to do two incompatible actions are uniquely associated with increased activity in areas of the brain used for working memory, including the pre and post central sulcus."

    Oh yes, we know how accurate brain scan images are... they are easy to misinterpret, unreliable, etc... I am dead tired of seeing them used in practically every neurology study. It's almost a pseudoscience, the way it's used most of the time.

    Plus I love the concept that consciousness "allows individuals to adapt their actions in the future". That's like saying that something unphysical can effect physical things. It doesn't even make logical sense. A better way to say it (and hopefully what they meant), is to say that consciousness comes about because of neurological systems that "allow individuals to adapt their actions in the future". Not the other way around.

    -Axemaster
  • mogmich - Sep 30, 2009
    • Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
    If consciousness is defined as unphysical, then something unphysical can clearly effect physical things. But the relation must of course be different than the cause-effect relation between two physical events.

    If consciousness is defined as physical, then our current understanding of physics is severely flawed, I think.

    What is absurd, is to deny the existence of your own consciousness.
  • magpies - Sep 30, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    How much information does a consciousness hold?
  • acarrilho - Oct 01, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    "Consciousness" could exist as much as a movie does, in that it could be the illusion caused by a stream of conscious moments, if one subscribes to quantum consciousness... or something like that...
  • zevkirsh - Oct 01, 2009
    • Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
    there is inherent difficulty in reading the stream of articles like this one, about 'locating' specific 'thought' centers in the brain via imaging a persons brain while in some controlled setup. they are clearly studying something ...BUT--consider that the experimental setup is a narrow scientific construction. the difficulty lay in deciphering how this setup and its result-- actually relates to the way they are represented and spoken about in the common language of popular psychology, as expressed as an explanation/description of the research in said article

    the answer is that as the layperson, you accept your ignorance and then either shun the article or shun the research it is describing, as meaningless. i'm inclined to blame it on the former because it's tantamount to avoiding the process of laying blame altogether while respecting the fact the research might actually be above your head , and, as such, is also beyond explanation within the confines of a short descriptive piece.
  • gwrede - Oct 01, 2009
    • Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
    "Our findings add to the growing body of evidence that when you prepare to perform two competing actions you prime the same areas of the brain associated with carrying out that same action,"

    That can be demonstrated with a much easier test. Give a person four buttons of different colors and show him colors on the screen. Tell him to quickly press the correct button.

    But, have the computer randomly show only three of the colors for some time, after which it includes the fourth color.

    The time it takes to press the fourth color button for the first time, is significantly longer.

    This follows from the brain areas of the fourth color action "losing" their preparedness as the color is not shown. The subject feels "I was not prepared", if asked about the delay.

    PS: some of the above commentators have a problem understanding the word consciousness in scientific context, as opposed to its religious meaning. Blame the church and creationists.
  • Hyperion1110 - Oct 01, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    gwrede, consciousness cannot have a definition other than that which is understood by all. If there is a "scientific" definition of consciousness, then the debate it already over, as the object of "scientific" inquiry is not longer the same as the object of which the researchers intended to investigate.

    Consciousness is outside the ability of biomedical science to quantify, as can be seen by this rather poor attempt to pigeon hole it into mechanistic terms. The Computational Theory of the Mind, of which the proposed model is a version, has been known for quite some time to be a logically untenable position. It is vulnerable to, among other things, the Homunculus fallacy.

    Methinks that a consistent theory of consciousness will require some sort of paraconsistent logic to overcome the inevitable contradictions inherent to a self-referential system. To begin, one would need to first reject the notion that unphysical consciousness cannot cause physical changes.
  • magpies - Oct 03, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    What does logic have to do with consciousness?
  • Hyperion1110 - Oct 05, 2009
    • Rank: not rated yet
    magpies, I'm not sure how to answer your question. Logic is foundational to all understanding. It pertains to the forms arguments, and, by extension, all knowledge, may take. So, when a theory is shown to be logically untenable, it is automatically false. The Computational Theory of the Mind, for example, is false because its suppositions entail an infinite regression, with no real possibility of a ground to halt the regression.

September 30, 2009 all stories

Comments: 9

3.8 /5 (12 votes)

  • hide
  • Related Stories

  • Brain energy use key to understanding consciousness
    created Jun 16, 2009 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Measuring awareness is not as simple as a single number
    created Dec 05, 2006 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Revealing secret intentions in the brain
    created Feb 08, 2007 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Brain's action center is all talk
    created Sep 18, 2006 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0
  • Does the brain control muscles or movements?
    created May 07, 2008 | popularity not rated yet | comments 0



  • hide
  • Relevant PhysicsForums posts

Other News

boredom

Bored to death? It's possible

Medicine & Health / Psychology & Psychiatry

created 20 hours ago | popularity 3.7 / 5 (16) | comments 8 | with audio podcast report

(PhysOrg.com) -- Scientists from the University College London in the U.K. have found that living a life of boredom can kill you.


Feeling blue? You'll shun the new

Feeling blue? You'll shun the new

Medicine & Health / Psychology & Psychiatry

created 10 hours ago | popularity 4.8 / 5 (5) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

A sick or sad child might cling to mom's leg. But that same child - fed, rested and generally content - will happily toddle off to explore every nook and cranny of the known world. Or: You're chipper and you ...


Babies wise to what we really mean: Researchers find first evidence that six-month-olds comprehend adults' intentions

Medicine & Health / Psychology & Psychiatry

created 11 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

A study by York University researchers reveals that infants as young as six months old know when we're "playing" them - and they don't like it.


Depression and lack of concentration do not necessarily go together

Medicine & Health / Psychology & Psychiatry

created 6 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0

Many clinicians believe that depression goes hand in hand with cognitive difficulties such as memory problems or difficulties concentrating and paying attention, but a recent review of nearly 20 years of literature conducted ...


Early life stress may predict cardiovascular disease

Early life stress may predict cardiovascular disease

Medicine & Health / Health

created 10 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Early life stress could be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in adulthood, researchers report.