Laser Fusion and Exawatt Lasers
October 1, 2009(PhysOrg.com) -- In the recent past, producing lasers with terawatt (a trillion watts) beams was impressive. Now petawatt (a thousand trillion watts, or 10^15 watts) lasers are the forefront of laser research. Some labs are even undertaking work toward achieving exawatt (10^18 watts) levels.
Todd Ditmire at the University of Texas currently produces petawatt power through a process of chirping, in which a short light pulse (150 femtoseconds in duration) is stretched out in time. This longer pulse is amplified to higher energy and then re-compressed to its shorter duration, thus providing a modest amount of energy, 190 joules in a very tiny bundle.
Ditmire claims that his petawatt device has the highest power of any laser system now operating, even the one at the National Ignition Facility at the Lawrence Livermore National Lab, owing to the very short pulse-compression he and his colleagues use.
The main research use for the Texas Petawatt Laser, as it is called, has been to produce thermonuclear fusion; the laser light strikes a target where fusion of light nuclei occurs, releasing neutrons into the vicinity. These neutrons can themselves be used for doing research. The first results of this fusion experiment will be presented at this meeting. Other applications include the study of hot dense plasmas at pressures billions of time higher than atmospheric pressure and the creation of conditions for accelerating electrons to energies of billions of electron-volts.
Another figure of merit for a laser, in addition to power, is power density. The Texas device is capable of producing power densities exceeding 10^21 watts per square centimeter. At this level many novel interactions might become possible.
To get to exawatt powers, Ditmire hopes to combine largely-existing laser technology and his already-tested 100-femtosecond pulses with new laser glass materials that would allow amplification up to energies of 100 kilo-joules. Ditmire’s current energy level, approximately 100 joules, is typical of laser labs at or near the petawatt level, such as those in Oxford, England, Osaka, Japan and Rochester, N.Y. With support from the government and the research community, building an exawatt laser might take 10 years to achieve, Ditmire estimates.
Scientists will present their paper "The Texas Petawatt Laser and Technology Development toward an Exawatt Laser" at the Optical Society’s Annual Meeting, Frontiers in Optics, on Tuesday, Oct. 13. The meeting takes place at the Fairmont San Jose Hotel and the Sainte Claire Hotel in San Jose, Calif.
-
Most powerful laser in the world fires up
Apr 08, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Michigan laser beam believed to set record for intensity
Feb 15, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Giant laser system is under construction
Apr 24, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Rochester's Omega Laser Receives 50-Fold Power Increase to Become 'Petawatt' Laser
May 16, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Leader in laser research wins distinguished award for experimental physics
Jan 30, 2006 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (33) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (5) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (2) |
0
-
Forces of Magnets Attraction>Repulsion?
1 hour ago
-
Underwater projectile affected by Coriolis Effect
1 hour ago
-
Thermodynamics q
5 hours ago
-
what is electricity???
9 hours ago
-
Can Plasma Be Solid
9 hours ago
-
What is delta Δ ?
10 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Explained: Sigma
It's a question that arises with virtually every major new finding in science or medicine: What makes a result reliable enough to be taken seriously? The answer has to do with statistical significance -- but ...
Feb 09, 2012 |
5 / 5 (21) |
82
Quantum physicist explains $100K offer for proof scaled-up quantum computing is impossible
(PhysOrg.com) -- MIT researcher Scott Aaronson has certainly riled the physics community with his offer this past Friday, of $100,000 to anyone who can prove that scaled-up quantum computing is impossible. ...
Diamond light, brighter than the sun
Its the size of five football pitches and generates light 10 billion times brighter than the sun. As the Diamond Light Source celebrates its tenth anniversary this year, Penny Bailey visits one of the ...
Feb 07, 2012 |
4.1 / 5 (11) |
18
|
Physicists 'record' magnetic breakthrough
An international team of scientists has demonstrated a revolutionary new way of magnetic recording which will allow information to be processed hundreds of times faster than by current hard drive technology.
Feb 07, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (43) |
15
|
Hints of the Higgs - papers are submitted
Back in December 2011, the ATLAS and CMS experiments at CERN presented some exciting results that provided tantalising hints of the Higgs boson.
Feb 08, 2012 |
4.3 / 5 (8) |
10
Integrated pest management recommendations for the southern pine beetle
The southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann, is a chronic insect pest within pine forests in the southeastern United States. Under favorable environmental and host conditions, it is an agg ...
Botox developer rues missing out on billions
Botox developer Alan Scott says he rues the day he handed over rights to the best-selling wrinkle-smoothing drug to a US company for just $4.5 million, saying he might have become a billionaire.
Cognitive impairment in older adults often unrecognized in the primary care setting
A new study published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society reveals that brief cognitive screenings combined with offering further evaluation increased new diagnoses of cognitive impairment in older veterans two to ...
AT&T customers surprised by 'unlimited data' limit
(AP) -- Mike Trang likes to use his iPhone 4 as a GPS device, helping him get around in his job. Now and then, his younger cousins get ahold of it, and play some YouTube videos and games.
Climate change causes harmful algal blooms in North Atlantic: study
Warming oceans and increases in windiness could be causing of an abundance of harmful algal blooms in the North Atlantic Ocean and North Sea, according to new research.
Australian women reject 'I love u' texts
Australian women may have embraced the digital era, but they prefer a face-to-face declaration of affection to an "I love u" text and find men addicted to their mobile phones a major turnoff.
Oct 01, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Oct 02, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Oct 02, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Any idea on what material would be light enough to make the sail -and- withstand that kind of power density?
Oct 02, 2009
Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
A bigger problem is that the current petawatt lasers, as in the article, are actually very low power devices, compressing that power into short pulses. For a launching laser you need continuous power, which is still a long ways off.
Oct 03, 2009
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (3)
http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.4229
Oct 04, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
waves, not motes
Laser-sail propulsion is daft. Anyone who knows Coulomb's law would know better to use a matter beam, not laser.
Oct 04, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Matter beam projectors and laser cannons can be placed at strategic points along the space probe trajectory to save power.
Oct 05, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
The first is that it takes more energy to accelerate mass to a given energy than a photon. The most efficient possible reaction drive is a solar sail, as reflecting the photons gives twice the momentum transfer of absorbing/emitting them. Second best is a photon drive, which is basically a VERY large laser. Might as well leave the laser, and its power supply, at home. On the other hand, if it's easier to accelerate enough mass to a given energy than to convert the power required to coherent photons, the particle beam would have the advantage. Efficiency is less important than being able to build the thing!
The second problem with particle beams is more basic. It's very hard to accelerate a neutral particle. On the other hand, charged particles repel each other, causing the beam to spread. They would also be deflected by natural magnetic and electrical fields, making aiming difficult.
Oct 05, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
One could accelerate both protons and electrons separately and combine them to produce a neutral hydrogen beam, but that would seem to be rather complicated.
It might still be easier and cheaper than building a launching laser, though. Remember, that laser is, by definition, a photon drive. As Robert Forward pointed out, it will have to be in orbit around a planet-mass object, or the beam will push IT out of the system!
Oct 05, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Yes, using the Sun itself for a lightsail power source in the outer system wouldn't be practical, although it would work with a large enough sail. But for the inner system, out to Mars, the idea is very practical, even with just sunlight. The ships would have very low acceleration, but the "fuel" is free, and they can accelerate as long as they like.
The Messenger mission to Mercury is using the idea now, even though they didn't design the probe for solar sailing. They've save a small but measurable amount of fuel by using the reflective solar panels as "sails", and avoided some midcourse correction burns.
As for reaction mass, where are you going to get the matter for your particle beam? And how much extra energy will it take to transport and process it?