Puzzled Physicists Solve Decade-Long Discrepancies
October 9, 2009
Physicist Igor Zaliznyak
(PhysOrg.com) -- A team led by physicists at the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) and Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) have resolved a decade-long puzzle that is set to have huge implications for use of one of the most versatile classes of materials available to us for future technology applications: copper oxide ceramics. The results are published online this week in the journal Nature Physics.
Professor Toby Perring, using the ISIS neutron source at the STFC’s Rutherford Appleton Laboratory and Dr Igor Zaliznyak from BNL have been studying the properties of copper oxide ceramics, some of the most puzzling materials ever made that serve as a grueling testing ground to our basic understanding of physics.
Comparing experimental data with predictions from exact theories and first principle calculations is one of the major parts of any scientific method, allowing scientists to make sure they have a full grasp of the basic principles at work and to study if there are gaps in our understanding. However for copper oxide ceramics, long-standing discrepancies between experiment and calculation have made it difficult to robustly identify the most promising explanations of their physical properties. Many of the copper oxide ceramics are electrically superconducting (a phenomenon occurring in certain materials that happens generally at very low temperatures characterised by exactly zero electrical resistance and the exclusion of the interior magnetic field) and also have unusual magnetic properties.
“When making comparisons between experiment and calculation, we, and others, were often finding discrepancies that were then being explained away as systematic errors, imperfections in the samples, or other effects,” said Professor Perring. “But there are only so many times you can ignore these factors before you have to work out why they are there. The answer in the end was as straightforward as making sure to include all the physics”.
The Maps spectrometer (green, foreground) in the ISIS target 1 experimental hall.
Calculations previously had been based on copper atoms being isolated; the correct shape of the magnetism of copper atoms when part of a covalent bond (a form of chemical bonding that is characterised by the sharing of pairs of electrons between atoms, or between atoms and other covalent bonds) had not been taken into account.Copper-oxygen-copper bonds are a common feature of the copper oxide ceramic family, with the atomic level magnetism arising from the arrangement of electrons on each copper atom. Their bonding causes the spin distribution of the electrons to be changed quite dramatically from what would be found on a single isolated copper atom.
Dr Zaliznyak from BNL said; “Normally to keep things simple, to describe the magnetism of the copper atoms, people tend to use a spin distribution based on isolated copper atoms. But in reality, the spin density must be spread out along the strong copper-oxygen covalent bonds that are part of the structure of the material and which are responsible for the remarkable magnetic properties in the first place.
“Once colleagues at Brookhaven had correctly calculated the real magnetic form factor for the copper atoms in this material, we found that we could get the exact match between the calculations from Jean Sebastien Caux and our neutron scattering data”.
Now the team has shown how to correctly compare theoretical models to experimental data, they are hoping that the hunt for the answer to high-temperature superconductivity in the cuprate materials can be reached more quickly.
It is widely believed that the magnetism of the copper atoms, which as this study shows is that of copper-oxygen covalent complexes, plays a vital role in superconductivity.
“Whilst we cannot sort out the differences for everyone, we think they should apply our method to their own situation. This could be a great help in narrowing down the range of possible explanations for high-temperature superconductivity”, said Perring.
It is thought that superconductivity could in the future be used for applications such as radiofrequency and microwave filters in mobile phones and powerful electromagnets used in maglev trains which use magnetic levitation from a large number of magnets for lift and propulsion, the result of which has the potential to provide faster, quieter and smoother trains.
More information: “Effect of covalent bonding on magnetism and the missing neutron intensity in copper oxide compounds”, Andrew C Walters, Toby G Perring, Jean-Sébastien Caux, Andrei T Savici, Genda D Gu, Chi-Cheng Lee, Wei Ku and Igor A Zaliznyak. DOI:10.1038/NPHYS1405
Provided by Brookhaven National Laboratory (news : web)
Jun 04, 2004 |
not rated yet |
0
However, I just have to say this:
(Warning rant follows!)
Apply the correct shape to the molecule and then you get the correct results. DUH!!!!
As they say, Garbage In, Garbage Out!
Sometimes, I lose faith in mainstream science when I hear stuff like this. How many years have we been trying to figure this out because of its applicability to high-temperature superconductors? If I did not find the situation so sad, I would be laughing right now.
(Rant End!)
How do you think science works for gods sake? If they don't know the proper shape, how did you expect them to calculate the resultant fields and such? Science goes in fits and starts and stumbles so don't disparage the research if you haven't been there.
Choosing the best simplifying assumptions is very much an art form -- arguably a black art, which is glossed over in almost all media reports of any given scientific study. There's a lot of art in science -- more than most people realize. It's a balancing act between thoroughness and speed of progress. But as our tools become more powerful, more and more simplifying assumptions can be removed.
But it does occur across the differentials in voltage. In the same moment -- magnetism, gravitation, and 'time' occur/appear.
Copper is active in many biological systems. Always try to find a connection between physics and biology. Your work could make a great contribution in that realm. Copper has many poorly understood roles in biology, human and otherwise:
http://www.spirit...ole.html
A copper atom is the key ingredient in hemocyanin, an oxygen carrier:
http://en.wikiped...mocyanin
and in ceruloplasmin:
http://www.spring...4737121/
On another topic, would your new calculations be helpful in investigating this supposed 254K transition temperature material?
http://www.superc...254K.htm
Skepticism is the natural reaction to that report, but it would make an amazing collaboration if they really have found something with that high a Tc.