Researchers Recommend Using Jails to Help, Not Punish, the Homeless
October 13, 2009
Kevin Fitzpatrick
(PhysOrg.com) -- Jails could be a point of strategic intervention in helping homeless people access treatment for substance abuse and mental health problems, according to a study at the University of Arkansas.
“The homeless may be thought of as a community’s rabble, but the reality is that homeless arrestees are people with significant needs,” wrote sociology professor Kevin Fitzpatrick and colleague Brad Myrstol.
“The homeless aren’t who we think they are,” Fitzpatrick said. “A lot of the crimes they are arrested for are related to their housing status, such as sleeping on a park bench or going to the bathroom in a field. It’s because they don’t have their own place and are just more visible.”
Contrary to stereotypes, homeless people are jailed not for their dangerousness but for their offensiveness, the researchers found. Sixty-two percent of homeless arrestees were charged with minor offenses, and only 24 percent were charged with a crime of violence.
However, alcohol and drug use are more prevalent among the homeless arrestees. The researchers found that homeless arrestees are significantly more likely to report lifetime use of alcohol and every illicit drug examined in the study.
Because the homeless may demonstrate more long-term problematic behaviors while having fewer economic resources with which to pay for services, Fitzpatrick and Myrstol suggest that helping the homeless where they are — which, for many, is in jail — could be the answer.
“The jail represents a point of strategic intervention for slowing the revolving door,” they wrote. The researchers recommend either linking arrestees up with services — for pretrial detainees who can make bail — or providing services within jails.
Previous research into what is called the rabble-management thesis suggests “the primary function of the jail is to control and govern socially offensive people, not to process and punish dangerous, predatory criminals.” Fitzpatrick and Myrstol’s analysis provides substantial evidence in support of this thesis.
Fitzpatrick and Myrstol’s research used data from more than 47,000 interviews with jailed adults in 30 U.S. cities from the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring program. The data show that the homeless in jails are statistically less dangerous than other arrestees. They are more likely to be jailed for misdemeanors, less likely to be jailed for felony offenses, more likely to be jailed for maintenance and property offenses, and less likely to be jailed for violent offenses.
More information: Their article, “The Jailing of America’s Homeless: Evaluating the Rabble Management Thesis,” is published online in the journal Crime & Delinquency, and is available as a PDF at http://cad.sagepub.com/cgi/rapidpdf/0011128708322941v1
Provided by University of Arkansas (news : web)
May 12, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
Now you want to stick the homeless into the overcrowded jails, which btw, do have a purpose already, and are not equipped to handle more people.
Someone give this guy a clue....
These are not major criminals, dangerous to all society - they are (very sensibly, I may say) responding to a need that is not being satisfied otherwise.
The solution is, of course, far more nuisanced than just providing them with lodging, which is their basic need. Jailing them is only perpetuating the problem - other 'fixes' should be utilized.
Indeed the jails are too crowded, granting them what hey wish does nothing for recidivism (in fact it encourages it) and may save on poor defenceless windows.