WHO study suggests link between cell phones and tumors

October 27, 2009 by Lin Edwards weblog
A woman dials a cell phone in her car

(PhysOrg.com) -- Preliminary results of an International investigation by the World Health Organization (WHO) suggest there may be a "significantly increased risk" of some types of brain tumors after use of mobile phones for a decade or more.

The investigation lasted a decade and covered studies of 12,800 people in 13 countries during the period 2000 to 2004. Six of eight studies on found a link between an increased risk of the most common type of brain tumor, , and heavy use of mobile phones, with one finding a 39 percent increase. Of seven studies into a benign tumor of a nerve between the brain and the ear (acoustic neurinoma), two found an elevated risk in people using cell phones for ten years or more.

Previous studies have yielded inconclusive results, but head of the WHO study, Dr Elisabeth Cardis, said the report would include a public health message and a recommendation the use of mobile phones by young children should be restricted. She noted that cell phones can be an important tool in emergencies, and maintaining contact between parents and children can be reassuring, and therefore she would not go as far as suggesting their use should be banned.

Dr Cardis said that a number of studies have suggested possible deleterious effects of the radio frequency radiation emitted by mobile phones, and while these studies were limited and not yet definitive, precautions are important, especially in their use by children except for essential calls.

Critics of the study have pointed out that it included people who only made one call a week using a cell phone, and it did not include any children, both of which could underplay the results. They also point out the research was partly funded by the . Other critics have noted that some results suggested short-term use appeared to protect against cancer, which may indicate flaws in the studies.

Publication of the results of the 30 million dollar investigation has been delayed because of disagreements over the best way to present the conclusions, but the findings have been submitted and are expected to be published within the next few months.

Meanwhile, for people in the market for a new cell phone who are interested in limiting their exposure to radiation, the Environmental Working Group has published a guide to the radiation emitted by most models of cell phone, as explained in this article.

You can also reduce exposure by sending text rather than speaking, and by avoiding use if the signal is weak, because the radiation is greatest then. should also limit their use because their skulls are thinner and less able to protect their brains from the radiation.

© 2009 PhysOrg.com

4.2 /5 (23 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

BBPhD
Oct 27, 2009

Rank: 3 / 5 (6)
This is horrible enough, but you should add that for X-ray induced brain tumors you have to wait 20-30 years to see the real effects. So what we have at 10 years is the tip of the iceberg. Also, they have not looked at memory loss and other sorts of brain damage, which I think are being caused based on Salford et al. 2003 findings on microwave exposure.
NameIsNotNick
Oct 27, 2009

Rank: 4.5 / 5 (6)
Yet another study! Do enough of them and eventually everyone will get results that satisfy their preconceived notions...
OregonWind
Oct 27, 2009

Rank: 4 / 5 (5)
Just wait another week and another study will change the whole thing again.
ealex
Oct 27, 2009

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Wait, isn't everyone going to throw their cellphones away now?

Awww and I went ahead and did it already. Darn!
Sean_W
Oct 27, 2009

Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
"Six of eight studies..." so this was a meta-analysis? Meta-analysis is a statistical term meaning "utter clump of lies" in laymen's English. There were probably 290 or so studies that contradicted the conclusion but the rules of meta-analysis (there are no actual rules you just ignore the ones you want) helped them squeeze out the right results. Meta-analysis is so commonly used to prove the unprovable that science writers avoid even using the term when reporting on results. Even the public has caught on to the scam.
CarolinaScotsman
Oct 27, 2009

Rank: 4.7 / 5 (3)
A recent study has proven that 80% of all cancer is caused by research studies.

Seriously, if someone is concerned about any possible risk, all they have to do is use a headset. A simple fix, but then that's common sense; something that seems to elude so many.
magpies
Oct 28, 2009

Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
Luckly I dont use a cell phone... but im all for cell phone bans because of second hand calling.
Rawley
Oct 28, 2009

Rank: 4 / 5 (3)
I don't see how non-ionizing radiation can cause cancer.
Egnite
Oct 28, 2009

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
A study concerned by WHO is blatantly bs. I guess cellphones cause cancer just as much as herbs/vitamins don't help prevent it? The WHO have thier own agenda and anything they spout is a step forward in enforcing it.

Google Codex Alimentarius and let me know why they think making herbs/viatmins a prescription drug is necessary, or why the planet requires to be "immunised"/poisioned to reduce deaths from a low-risk flu?

I never used to be so sceptic or humour conspiracys but when they are obviously after money and don't care about peoples wellbeing (like with the Codex Alimentarius), you begin to question other things this "health organisation" promotes.
superhuman
Oct 28, 2009

Rank: 3.4 / 5 (5)
I don't see how non-ionizing radiation can cause cancer.

DNA is constantly being damaged by reactive metabolic byproducts, natural radiation and carcinogens and repaired by specialized protein complexes. It is enough for cell phone radiation to somehow destabilize those complexes decreasing efficiency of repair to potentially lead to higher cancer incidence.

Destabilization could be due electromagnetic forces exerted on charged and dipole molecules or heating.
gwargh
Oct 28, 2009

Rank: 2.8 / 5 (4)
I love all the conspiracy theorists here. Because, you know, damaging the cell phone business somehow helps the WHO in their goal of world domination and/or getting more money.

Yet another study! Do enough of them and eventually everyone will get results that satisfy their preconceived notions...


I believe the idea behind science IS to do a lot of studies, and see what tallies up. If they're done well (which these are, as far as I've read through them), it's fairly hard to fabricate results.

rubberman
Oct 28, 2009

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
This would be the first time humans did something that they thought was safe, then turned out to not be...
wiserd
Oct 29, 2009

Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Regarding non-ionizing radiation; Cell phone radiation interferes with gated ion channels. Personally, I get horrible brain fog of I use my cell phone too much, so I've stopped.

Life can be affected by very small stimuli.
Incidentally, photosynthesis doesn't rely on ionizing radiation.
jerryd
Oct 31, 2009

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Regarding non-ionizing radiation; Cell phone radiation interferes with gated ion channels. Personally, I get horrible brain fog of I use my cell phone too much, so I've stopped.

Cell phone don't put out enough energy to do much of anything. The only thing they do is heat the very top layer of skin a millionth of a degree. Your body make millions of times more than a cell phone does.
If you are having a brain fog it's either psychosomatic or having problems understanding the garbled speech they put out. It's not from RF. Why do I know this? Because we are bombarded by far higher amounts RF all the time and have been for 5 decades.

(q)Life can be affected by very small stimuli.
Incidentally, photosynthesis doesn't rely on ionizing radiation.


Plants are designed to use photons, not RF. Photons, infrared, ultraviolet, etc are far higher energies and do far more damage than the very, very low levels of RF every could. Get over it.

superhuman
Nov 01, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
Cell phone don't put out enough energy to do much of anything. The only thing they do is heat the very top layer of skin a millionth of a degree.

They put out enough energy to send an electromagnetic signal to base stations kilometers away. The heating is not a millionth of a degree but something on the order of 0.1 degree.

The whole point is that it is possible although far from proven that cell phones have a detrimental effect on human health and further research is certainly warranted. If you use your phone a lot it is also a good idea to get a headset to be safe.

Wikipedia seems to have a balanced article on the subject:
http://en.wikiped...d_health
superhuman
Nov 01, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
Plants are designed to use photons, not RF. Photons, infrared, ultraviolet, etc are far higher energies and do far more damage than the very, very low levels of RF every could. Get over it.

RF is mediated by photons too, photons mediate all electromagnetic interactions from gamma rays to low frequency radio waves.
GrayMouser
Nov 01, 2009

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
If they are so concerned about the risks why don't they advocate outlawing cell phones? It would be the right thing to do, a step above outlawing CO2.
Rank 4.2 /5 (23 votes)
Related Stories
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Is Everyday Technology Killing Us?
    createdFeb 08, 2012
  • Exercise and weight loss
    createdFeb 08, 2012
  • Why do we have head aches? Our brains can't feel anything.
    createdFeb 07, 2012
  • "The end of diseases" by David Agus, interview from Daily Show with Jon Stewart
    createdFeb 04, 2012
  • Oncolytic adenovirus
    createdFeb 04, 2012
  • Nutrition label stuffs and diets
    createdFeb 02, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - Medical Sciences

More news stories

FDA-approved drug rapidly clears amyloid from the brain, reverses Alzheimer's symptoms in mice

Neuroscientists at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine have made a dramatic breakthrough in their efforts to find a cure for Alzheimer's disease. The researchers' findings, published in the journal Science, show t ...

Medicine & Health / Neuroscience

created 12 hours ago | popularity 4.9 / 5 (32) | comments 14 | with audio podcast

Anyone can learn to be more inventive, cognitive researcher says

There will always be a wild and unpredictable quality to creativity and invention, says Anthony McCaffrey, a cognitive psychology researcher at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, because an "Aha moment" is rare and ...

Medicine & Health / Psychology & Psychiatry

created 8 hours ago | popularity 4.8 / 5 (6) | comments 1 | with audio podcast

Cell biologists describes mechanism by which some people may be more susceptible to colon cancer

An international research team led by cell biologists at the University of California, Riverside has uncovered a new insight into colon cancer, the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United ...

Medicine & Health / Cancer

created 9 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Researchers weigh in on ethics of H5N1 research

(Medical Xpress) -- In a commentary on the biosecurity controversy surrounding publication of bird flu research details, a bioethicist and a vaccine expert at Johns Hopkins reaffirm that "all scientists have an affirmativ ...

Medicine & Health / Other

created 11 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0 | with audio podcast

To perform with less effort, practice beyond perfection

Whether you are an athlete, a musician or a stroke patient learning to walk again, practice can make perfect, but more practice may make you more efficient, according to a surprising new University of Colorado Boulder study.

Medicine & Health / Neuroscience

created 11 hours ago | popularity 4.6 / 5 (9) | comments 3 | with audio podcast


'Dark plasmons' transmit energy

Microscopic channels of gold nanoparticles have the ability to transmit electromagnetic energy that starts as light and propagates via "dark plasmons," according to researchers at Rice University.

Hydrogen from acidic water: Researchers develop potential low cost alternative to platinum for splitting water

A technique for creating a new molecule that structurally and chemically replicates the active part of the widely used industrial catalyst molybdenite has been developed by researchers with the Lawrence Berkeley ...

Ultraviolet protection molecule in plants yields its secrets

Lying around in the sun all day is hazardous not just for humans but also for plants, which have no means of escape. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun can damage proteins and DNA inside cells, leading ...

Soraa LED light may dim 50-watt halogen rivals

(PhysOrg.com) -- Soraa, a Fremont, California company founded in 2008, this week launched its first product, a light that uses LEDS (light emitting diodes). The "Soraa LED MR16 lamp" is the "perfect" replacement ...

Flexible paper robots

(PhysOrg.com) -- These inexpensive robots can stretch, bend and twist under control, and lift objects up to 120 times their own weight. Being soft, they can apply gentle and even pressure, and adapt to varied ...

New method makes culture of complex tissue possible in any lab

Scientists at the University of California, San Diego have developed a new method for making scaffolds for culturing tissue in three-dimensional arrangements that mimic those in the body. This advance, published online in ...