Doubts raised on nuclear industry viability

November 19, 2009 by Lin Edwards weblog
nuclear power plant

(PhysOrg.com) -- The investment in nuclear power has been growing around the world over the last few years, being viewed as a means for countries to control their energy security, avoid the price fluctuations of other energy sources, and reduce their carbon dioxide emissions, but concerns are now being raised.

A scientist from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology predicts that supplies of are running out and countries relying on imports of uranium may face shortages by 2013, while a New York Times journalist suggests new nuclear power plants are an "abysmal" investment that will never pay for itself without government financial support.

Dr Michael Dittmar, a physicist with CERN (the European Organization for Nuclear Research), said in the fourth and final part of an essay on the world's nuclear industry published this week that civilian stockpiles of uranium could be depleted by as early as 2013.

According to Dittmar civilian and military stockpiles and re-enriched or reprocessed uranium sources contribute 25,000 of the 65,000 tons of uranium used globally each year. The rest is mined directly, but Dittmar claims nobody knows where the mining industry can find enough uranium to make up the shortfall, and disputes the Nuclear Energy Agency's estimates of reserves of Uranium.

Dittmar is unconvinced that fission breeder reactors can provide a solution, saying that their inefficiency, high construction costs and poor safety mean they are unlikely to become commercially viable alternatives. He considers even less likely to provide the needed energy.

New York Times energy reporter Matthew Wald, writing in Technology Review, said new reactors would be unable to pay for themselves because of the massive cost of construction and competition from emerging alternatives that could affect the energy price. Wald compared the costs per kilowatt of capacity of nuclear ($4,000), coal ($3,000) and natural gas ($800), which makes the nuclear option a big financial gamble. The future cost of fossil fuels is unknown, and could also affect the nuclear industry's viability.

More information:

• Chapter I: Nuclear Fission Energy Today, arxiv.org/abs/0908.0627
• Chapter II: What is known about Secondary Uranium Resources? arxiv.org/abs/0908.3075
• Chapter III: How (un)reliable are the Red Book Uranium Resource Data? arxiv.org/abs/0909.1421
• Chapter IV: from Breeder Reactors and from Fusion? arxiv.org/abs/0911.2628

© 2009 PhysOrg.com

3.2 /5 (24 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

3432682
Nov 19, 2009

Rank: 4 / 5 (7)
Lots of nonsense. The Earth has huge amounts of uranium and thorium, enough to last 30,000 years. Nuke costs are high because of absurd licensing hurdles and other dumb rules and laws. The French have proven it safe and efficient. The French also recycle nuke material, where the US has the boneheaded policy (instituted by Carter) to bury the waste and not recycle. Nuclear power problems are self-imposed, in order to kow-tow to hysterics. If we had not listened to the stupid ideas, we'd be using a lot less fossil fuel, and far more nuclear power. Nuclear plants would have been researched and developed into far better technology today, but 30 years of stupidity have crippled us.
david_42
Nov 19, 2009

Rank: 4.6 / 5 (5)
This evaluation is based on some very old technologies and ancient assumptions (less than 3% fuel burn and no re-processing). Japan just started operating its first pluthermal reactor, which burns a plutonium-uranium mix recycled from light-water reactors.
Mesafina
Nov 19, 2009

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Lots of nonsense. The Earth has huge amounts of uranium and thorium, enough to last 30,000 years.


Really? I am not saying your wrong because I honestly don't know, but I would love to know where you got that information from. Link please?
Fabian
Nov 19, 2009

Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
I'm dissapointed such a shoddy article as this would be found here. As a previous poster said, there's plenty of uranium to be mined, if we cut the irrationality that stands in the way of getting it. And I'm quite suspicious when a NY Times reporter starts spouting about "costs" given that publications's political slant. Wind and solar are currently uneconomical as well, but you'd be hard pressed to find an article in the NY Times about that.
frajo
Nov 19, 2009

Rank: 2.5 / 5 (2)
Wind and solar are currently uneconomical as well, but you'd be hard pressed to find an article in the NY Times about that.

There won't be a shortage of wind and solar in the next 30K years. Neither for fusion resources.
Noumenon
Nov 19, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
Lots of nonsense. The Earth has huge amounts of uranium and thorium, enough to last 30,000 years.


Really? I am not saying your wrong because I honestly don't know, but I would love to know where you got that information from. Link please?


www DOT world-nuclear DOT org/info/inf75 DOT html
brianweymes
Nov 19, 2009

Rank: 2.7 / 5 (3)
If you actually read the article calmly, number, you would see they aren't disputing that there's a lot of uranium left in the Earth, but that there aren't enough mines open in all those potential places.
nextfuture
Nov 19, 2009

Rank: not rated yet

nextbigfuture dot com /2009/11/uranium-to-2020-update dot html

I have taken a close analysis of the uranium countries and companies. UxC consulting is projecting Kazakhstan will increasing their uranium production to about 40,000 tons/year. Kazakhstan will continue its growth until 2015-2017. Kazakhstan is producing about 12,500-13,000 tons in 2009 (9525 tons in the first nine months, 61% more than first nine months of 2008). In 2008, Kazakhstan produced 8521 tons. The Malawi Kayelekera began exporting uranium on Sept, 2009 It will be producing 1269 tons per year.

2009 should have 48,000+ tons of production

2010 should have 54,000+ tons of production
The world is going to over 100,000 tons of uranium per year in a business as usual mode before 2020. More from Kazakhstan than the Redbook projection and less for Canada.
Dittmar offered a bet - 2009 not higher than 45,000 tons and 2010 not higher 47,000 tons for world prod. I accept the bet. It will be more
NeilFarbstein
Nov 19, 2009

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
That news made my day. Solar energy wont pollute the earth. Don't risk nuclearizing the world. Terrorists can dig up buried nuclear reactors deemed "foolproof" by greedy proponents who lie through their teeth.
WillB
Nov 19, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
That news made my day. Solar energy wont pollute the earth. Don't risk nuclearizing the world. Terrorists can dig up buried nuclear reactors deemed "foolproof" by greedy proponents who lie through their teeth.


Remove government control from all energy industries and let the best energy win.
dirk_bruere
Nov 19, 2009

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
There is a lot more Thorium than Uranium and it is just as easy to build a reactor using it.
Ask the Indians.
ormondotvos
Nov 19, 2009

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Fear, fear, fear. Woo-woo, cars burn, planes crash, obese people die of food. Nuke fearmongers are religious fundamentalists at heart.
highcountry
Nov 20, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
The earth holds sufficient resources of uranium for hundreds of years. A large portion of these resources are contained in phosphate deposits and are recoverable as a by-product of fertilizer with current technologies. New technologies for lower-cost production are in R&D.

Huge quantities of uranium are recoverable from sea water. Extraction technologies for uranium from sea water are currently in the R&D mode.
Alexa
Nov 20, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
..Nuke costs are high because of absurd licensing hurdles and other dumb rules and laws..
This silly claim could be refused easily by wildly undulating price curve of uranium ore. It's evident, uranium is following hard market price model, where offer is strictly limited by demand and vice-versa.

http://static.see...nch2.jpg
Husky
Nov 20, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
When demand rises, the market will "find" the uranium, for instance, there is a mine in sasketchewan sitting idle, waiting for uranium prices to go up. In a stroke of luck French socialism/government policy turns out to work well for building series of the big reactors using the same specs. Then you have india and scandinavia looking at thorium and japan at advanced breeders and extraction techniques and China setting up mass assembly lines for AP1000's for substantal lower $ per BTU. I don't share the pessimism in this report at all, to me a nuclear renaissance seems more likely
pauldentler
Nov 21, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
Wind and solar are currently uneconomical as well, but you'd be hard pressed to find an article in the NY Times about that.

There won't be a shortage of wind and solar in the next 30K years. Neither for fusion resources.

Within 4 miles of where I live, five wind turbines have been installed during the past ten years, four of them are now just laying on the ground and the one that is still standing looks like it is about to fall, that is not the kind of dependability I would call "hi-tech".
AuldLochinvar
Nov 21, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
Has Dr. Dittmar ever heard of the highly successful Integral Fast Reactor (IFR) that was cancelled in 1994, in spite of having proved that it could, as designed, survive the deliberately imposed loss of coolant as caused Chernobyl? In the very same month?
cf. http://www.pbs.or...ill.html

It was designed at Argonne labs, and according to their calculations could in effect give renewable, sustainable energy for more than a hundred years at the USA's current rate, __from_surplus_uranium_and_plutonium already_above_ground_in barrels,_etc.
AuldLochinvar
Nov 21, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
As for wind turbines, this is a place for physicists, so it'll be almost obvious to you that the power the wind supplies is proportional to the cube of the wind speed. Which makes the power from a wind turbine even more fickle than the wind itself.

The things are big, puny, ugly, and they kill bats rather horribly and big seabirds especially, because big birds and sea birds didn't evolve to dodge about in the air.
yamahaeleven
Nov 21, 2009

Rank: not rated yet
This Malthusian argument by Lin Edwards was lost the moment she wrote the first sentence. Not a single argument from scarcity has ever been won since the time of Malthus. Makes for scary headlines, but nothing else. Using Thorium reactors, along with breeder reactors will give any conceivable earth bound civilization ample power for billions of years, yes, billions, Carl Sagan Billions. Technology, know-how, and human ingenuity always win. Dr Michael Dittmar needs a new job and not as a physicist, or he should stick to physics, not economics! Burning stockpiles of Russian and US weapons uranium, a common current source, would keep reactors humming well beyond 2013.

Rank 3.2 /5 (24 votes)
Related Stories
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Question on Kirchoff's Laws
    created4 hours ago
  • Changes in Water Weight
    created5 hours ago
  • Some superconductor help
    created5 hours ago
  • perturbance in a model
    created6 hours ago
  • Combustion: where does the heat come from?
    created7 hours ago
  • How does dynamic pressure affect static pressure?
    created7 hours ago
  • More from Physics Forums - General Physics

More news stories

Borexino Collaboration succeeds in spotting pep neutrinos emitted from the sun

(PhysOrg.com) -- To learn more about how the sun works, scientists study particles that are emitted from it into space due to thermonuclear reactions that occur inside; by applying known physics principles, ...

Physics / General Physics

created 13 hours ago | popularity 4.4 / 5 (5) | comments 0 | with audio podcast report

Explained: Sigma

It's a question that arises with virtually every major new finding in science or medicine: What makes a result reliable enough to be taken seriously? The answer has to do with statistical significance -- but ...

Physics / General Physics

created 13 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (8) | comments 20

Physics research suggests new pathways for cancer progression

Observing that certain cancer cells may exhibit greater flexibility than normal cells, some scientists believe that this capability promotes rapid tumor growth. Now computer simulations developed by Boston University Biomedical ...

Physics / General Physics

created 10 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 0

Quantum physicist explains $100K offer for proof scaled-up quantum computing is impossible

(PhysOrg.com) -- MIT researcher Scott Aaronson has certainly riled the physics community with his offer this past Friday, of $100,000 to anyone who can prove that scaled-up quantum computing is impossible. ...

Physics / Quantum Physics

created Feb 08, 2012 | popularity 4 / 5 (10) | comments 31 | with audio podcast weblog

Physicists build highly efficient 'no-waste' laser

A team of University of California, San Diego researchers has built the smallest room-temperature nanolaser to date, as well as an even more startling device: a highly efficient, "thresholdless" laser that ...

Physics / General Physics

created Feb 08, 2012 | popularity 4.9 / 5 (19) | comments 5 | with audio podcast


'Dark plasmons' transmit energy

Microscopic channels of gold nanoparticles have the ability to transmit electromagnetic energy that starts as light and propagates via "dark plasmons," according to researchers at Rice University.

Ultraviolet protection molecule in plants yields its secrets

Lying around in the sun all day is hazardous not just for humans but also for plants, which have no means of escape. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun can damage proteins and DNA inside cells, leading ...

Anyone can learn to be more inventive, cognitive researcher says

There will always be a wild and unpredictable quality to creativity and invention, says Anthony McCaffrey, a cognitive psychology researcher at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, because an "Aha moment" is rare and ...

Hydrogen from acidic water: Researchers develop potential low cost alternative to platinum for splitting water

A technique for creating a new molecule that structurally and chemically replicates the active part of the widely used industrial catalyst molybdenite has been developed by researchers with the Lawrence Berkeley ...

FDA-approved drug rapidly clears amyloid from the brain, reverses Alzheimer's symptoms in mice

Neuroscientists at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine have made a dramatic breakthrough in their efforts to find a cure for Alzheimer's disease. The researchers' findings, published in the journal Science, show t ...

New method makes culture of complex tissue possible in any lab

Scientists at the University of California, San Diego have developed a new method for making scaffolds for culturing tissue in three-dimensional arrangements that mimic those in the body. This advance, published online in ...