Acid test: Study reveals both losers and winners of CO2-induced ocean acidification
December 1, 2009
The effect of different CO2 levels on an American lobster.
(PhysOrg.com) -- As the world’s seawater becomes more acidic due to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide, some shelled marine creatures may actually become bigger and stronger, according to a new study.
The finding, based on research by University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill marine scientist Justin Ries, could have important implications for ocean food webs and the multi-billion dollar global market for shellfish and crustaceans.
Previous research has shown that ocean acidification - the term for falling pH levels in the Earth’s oceans as they absorb increasing amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere - is likely to slow the growth or even dissolve the shells of such creatures.
However, the new study, published in the December issue of the journal Geology, suggests that sediment-dwelling marine organisms may exhibit a wider range of responses to CO2-induced acidification than previously thought: some may get weaker while others become stronger.
Researchers also found that creatures whose shells grew the most, such as crabs, tend to prey on those whose shells weakened the most, such as clams.
Such changes could have serious ramifications for predator and prey relationships that have evolved over hundreds of millions of years, said Ries, Ph.D., assistant professor of marine sciences in the UNC College of Arts and Sciences.
“There is no magic formula to predict how different species will respond, but one thing you can be sure of is that ecosystems as a whole will change because of these varied individual responses,” Ries said.
The effect of different CO2 levels on a blue crab.
Researchers grew 18 different species of economically and ecologically important marine calcifiers (creatures that make their shells out of calcium carbonate) at various levels of CO2 predicted to occur over the next several centuries. When CO2 combines with water, it produces carbonic acid, raising the overall amount of carbon in seawater but reducing the amount of the carbonate ion used by organisms in their calcification.
Seven species (crabs, lobsters, shrimp, red and green calcifying algae, limpets and temperate urchins) showed a positive response, meaning they calcified at a higher rate and increased in mass under elevated CO2. Ten types of organisms (including oysters, scallops, temperate corals and tube worms) had reduced calcification under elevated CO2, with several (hard and soft clams, conchs, periwinkles, whelks and tropical urchins) seeing their shells dissolve. One species (mussels) showed no response.
“Shelled marine organisms need carbonate ions to build their shells that protect them from the intense predation that defines everyday life on the shallow sea floor,” Ries said. “The organisms that responded positively to higher CO2 levels are apparently more adept at converting the elevated dissolved inorganic carbon in the seawater, which results from elevated atmospheric CO2, back into a form that they can use directly in their calcification. The others, however, appear to be less adept at manipulating dissolved inorganic carbon.”
Ries said the varied responses may reflect differences in organisms’ ability to regulate pH levels at their sites of calcification; their ability to generate a protective organic layer that limits their exposure to surrounding seawater; whether they use more soluble forms of calcium carbonate in their shells; and their ability to utilize CO2 directly via photosynthesis.
The effect of different CO2 levels on a sea urchin.
Provided by University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill-
Ocean acidification could have broad effects on marine ecosystems
Dec 17, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Acidifying oceans add urgency to CO2 cuts
Jul 03, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Shellfish face an uncertain future in a high CO2 world
May 27, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Ocean acidification threatens cold-water coral ecosystems
Apr 03, 2006 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Ocean acidification: impact on key organisms of oceanic fauna
Sep 15, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (31) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Discrepancy between oxygen and carbon-dioxide levels
20 hours ago
-
where gems are found in the world
Feb 09, 2012
-
Wind Waves in Reservoir ~ Wind run-up and Wind set-up
Feb 08, 2012
-
Balance of oxygen in the atmosphere
Feb 01, 2012
-
The case for a methanol-based economy
Jan 30, 2012
-
Weather in a rotating cylinder
Jan 25, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
NASA sees wide-eyed cyclone Jasmine
Cyclone Jasmine's eye has opened wider on NASA satellite imagery, as it moves through the Southern Pacific Ocean.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
1 hour ago |
not rated yet |
0
NASA sees Giovanna reach cyclone strength, threaten Madagascar
Tropical Storm 12S built up steam and became a cyclone on February 10, 2012 as NASA's Terra satellite passed overhead. Residents of east-central Madagascar should prepare for this cyclone to make landfall ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
1 hour ago |
not rated yet |
0
Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago
(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...
Could Venus be shifting gear?
(PhysOrg.com) -- ESAs Venus Express spacecraft has discovered that our cloud-covered neighbour spins a little slower than previously measured. Peering through the dense atmosphere in the infrared, the ...
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
9 hours ago |
5 / 5 (7) |
7
|
Mars Science Laboratory computer issue resolved
(PhysOrg.com) -- Engineers have found the root cause of a computer reset that occurred two months ago on NASA's Mars Science Laboratory and have determined how to correct it.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
10 hours ago |
4.7 / 5 (6) |
3
|
Google users warned of threat to smartphone wallets
Users of Google smartphone wallets were being warned on Friday that there is a way to crack pass codes intended to thwart thieves from going on illicit shopping sprees.
CIA website offline, Anonymous takes credit
The website of the Central Intelligence Agency was unresponsive on Friday after the hacker group Anonymous claimed to have knocked it offline.
Complex wiring of the nervous system may rely on a just a handful of genes and proteins
Researchers at the Salk Institute have discovered a startling feature of early brain development that helps to explain how complex neuron wiring patterns are programmed using just a handful of critical genes. ...
Putting the squeeze on planets outside our solar system
(PhysOrg.com) -- Using high-powered lasers, scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and collaborators discovered that molten magnesium silicate undergoes a phase change in the liquid state, abruptly ...
The power of estrogen -- male snakes attract other males
A new study has shown that boosting the estrogen levels of male garter snakes causes them to secrete the same pheromones that females use to attract suitors, and turned the males into just about the sexiest ...
New error-correcting codes guarantee the fastest possible rate of data transmission
Error-correcting codes are one of the triumphs of the digital age. Theyre a way of encoding information so that it can be transmitted across a communication channel such as an optical fiber o ...


Dec 01, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (5)
biger crabs biger fish more food for humans
ofcoourse we aka al gore we dont want that
they want hunger sufering and genocide
chek update on global warming scam hoax
climate gate
http://www.youtub...XssuWtyc
Dec 01, 2009
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
It is improbable that we can increase levels above 1000ppm.
Of course if the oceans warm up and releases CO2, the atmosphere levels will go up and the ocean levels will go down.
By the way these critters evolved at CO2 levels far higher than 2850ppm.
Dec 01, 2009
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
However, is there anything with ocean acidification or does the data belong with AGW climategate?
Dec 01, 2009
Rank: 2 / 5 (1)
Dec 01, 2009
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
You and I obviously have an ongoing disagreement so I don't expect you to take my word for anything, but I'm not aware of any significant attack on the pH data. I'd like to think those measurements are so repeatable that no one's seriously going to argue them.
I've long heard from the AGW Denier crowd that the ocean will continue to act as a wonderful carbon sink, so they don't seem to disagree that the oceans absorb CO2. That absorption necessarily affects pH levels.
There's a ton of research on it, including about 40 recent studies cited in the wikipedia article. I encourage you to check it out.
Dec 02, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
Could it be because I'm not a AGW believer?
Dec 04, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
My guess, though, is that some people rate you down so low because you go so far out of your way to accuse scientists of being a bunch of scammers. This time you engaged in the Fox News style attack "I'm not saying they're full of crap, but are they full of crap just like those AGW guys?".
If you really wanted to know, you would have asked where you could find the data or studies. I assumed you were being honest in your question and provided you with a starting point, but your reply was not one of thanks but another attempt to stir the pot, accusing people of persecuting you because you're an AGW denier.
Although I should also note that you and your friends rated me "1 out of 5" on every AGW-related post where I disagreed with you.
Dec 04, 2009
Rank: not rated yet
You never bother to argue against our logic or even our science, you just throw out the 1 as if that can make you correct. You've been rating AGW opponents 1 for as long as I've been on this forum, only recently (when the AGW castle began to crumble) have you started posting anything for your side.
PS I think a decent portion of the present day AGW deniers (many used to rate me 1 as off-handedly as you still do) on this site were at one time proponents or at least didn't know for sure, however they were able to be honest and objective and acknowledge openly the deeply flawed theory and it's even more deeply flawed legislation.