What will the Large Hadron Collider reveal?
January 7, 2010 By Steve Giddings
With its successful test run at the end of 2009, the Large Hadron Collider near Geneva, Switzerland, seized the world record for the highest-energy particle collisions created by mankind. We can now reflect on the next questions: What will it discover, and why should we care?
Despite all we have learned in physics -- from properties of faraway galaxies to the deep internal structure of the protons and neutrons that make up an atomic nucleus -- we still face vexing mysteries. The collider is poised to begin to unravel them. By colliding protons at ultra-high energies and allowing scientists to observe the outcome in its mammoth detectors, the LHC could open new frontiers in understanding space and time, the microstructure of matter and the laws of nature.
We know, for example, that all the types of matter we see, that constitute our ordinary existence, are a mere fraction -- 20 percent -- of the matter in the universe. The remaining 80 percent apparently is mysterious "dark matter"; though it is all around us, its existence is inferred only via its gravitational pull on visible matter. LHC collisions might produce dark-matter particles so we can study their properties directly and thereby unveil a totally new face of the universe.
The collider might also shed light on the more predominant "dark energy," which is causing the universe's expansion to accelerate. If the acceleration continues, the ultimate fate of the universe may be very, very cold, with all particles flying away from one another to infinite distances.
More widely anticipated is the discovery of the Higgs particle -- sometimes inaptly called the God particle -- whose existence is postulated to explain why some matter has mass. Were it not for the Higgs, or something like it, the electrons in our bodies would behave like light beams, shooting into space, and we would not exist.
If the Higgs is not discovered, its replacement may involve something as profound as another layer of substructure to matter. It might be that the most elementary known particles, like the quarks that make up a proton, are made from tinier things. This would be revolutionary -- like discovering the substructure of the atom, but at a deeper level.
More profound still, the LHC may reveal extra dimensions of space, beyond the three that we see. The existence of a completely new type of dimension -- what is called "supersymmetry" -- means that all known particles have partner particles with related properties. Supersymmetry could be discovered by the LHC producing these "superpartners," which would make characteristic splashes in its detectors. Superpartners may also make up dark matter -- and two great discoveries would be made at once.
Or, the LHC may find evidence for extra dimensions of a more ordinary type, like those that we see -- still a major revolution. If these extra dimensions exist, they must be wound up into a small size, which would explain in part why we can't see or feel them directly. The LHC detectors might find evidence of particles related to the ones we know but shooting off into these dimensions.
Even more intriguing, if these extra dimensions are configured in certain ways, the LHC could produce microscopic black holes. As first realized by Stephen Hawking, basic principles of quantum physics tell us that such black holes evaporate in about a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a second -- in a spectacular spray of particles that would be visible to LHC detectors.
This would let us directly probe the deep mystery of reconciling two conflicting pillars of 20th century physics: Einstein's theory of general relativity and quantum mechanics. This conflict produces a paradox -- related to the riddle of what happens to stuff that falls into a black hole -- whose resolution may involve ideas more mind-bending than those of quantum mechanics or relativity.
Other possible discoveries include new forces of nature, similar to electric or magnetic forces. Any of these discoveries would represent a revolution in physics, though one that had been already considered. We may also discover something utterly new and unexpected -- perhaps the most exciting possibility of all. Even not discovering anything is important -- it would tell us where phenomena we know must exist are not to be found.
Such talk of new phenomena has worried some -- might ultra-high-energy particle collisions be dangerous? The simple answer is no. Though it will be very novel to produce these conditions in a laboratory, where they can be carefully studied, nature is performing similar experiments all the time, above our heads. Cosmic ray protons with energies over a million times those at the LHC regularly strike the protons in our atmosphere, and in other cosmic bodies, without calamity. Also, there are significant indications that nature performed such experiments early in the universe, near the Big Bang, without untoward consequences. Physicists have carefully investigated these concerns on multiple occasions.
All this may seem like impractical and esoteric knowledge. But modern society would be unrecognizable without discoveries in fundamental physics. Radio and TV, X-rays, CT scans, MRIs, PCs, iPhones, the GPS system, the Web and beyond -- much that we take for granted would not exist without this type of physics research and was not predicted when the first discoveries were made. Likewise, we cannot predict what future discoveries will lead to, whether new energy sources, means of space travel or communication, or amazing things entirely unimagined.
The cost of this research may appear high -- about $10 billion for the LHC -- but it amounts to less than a ten-thousandth of the gross domestic product of the U.S. or Europe over the approximately 10 years it has taken to build the collider. This is a tiny investment when one accounts for the continuing value of such research to society.
But beyond practical considerations, we should ponder what the value of the LHC could be to the human race. If it performs as anticipated, it will be the cutting edge for years to come in a quest that dates to the ancient Greeks and beyond -- to understand what our world is made of, how it came to be and what will become of it. This grand odyssey gives us a chance to rise above the mundane aspects of our lives, and our differences, conflicts and crises, and try to understand where we, as a species, fit in a wondrous universe that seems beyond comprehension, yet is remarkably comprehensible.
___
ABOUT THE WRITER
Steve Giddings is a physics professor at the University of California Santa Barbara and an expert in high-energy and gravitational physics. He co-authored the first papers predicting that black hole production could be an important effect at the LHC and describing certain extradimensional scenarios that the LHC might explore.
(c) 2010, Los Angeles Times.
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
-
Is the Vacuum Empty? -- the Higgs Field and the Dark Energy
May 10, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Stephen Hawking tours the future of particle physics at CERN
Oct 03, 2006 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Michigan integral to world's largest physics experiment
Sep 05, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Nobel laureate Burton Richter to speak about future of particle physics
Feb 16, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Probing Question: Could the Large Hadron Collider swallow the Earth?
Jan 21, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (31) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Question about Gravity?
1 hour ago
-
Wearing black in a desert
2 hours ago
-
Did space exist before mass?
2 hours ago
-
How can E&M Waves be polarized?
2 hours ago
-
Does light travel for ever?
3 hours ago
-
Infinity by Particles
4 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Putting the squeeze on planets outside our solar system
(PhysOrg.com) -- Using high-powered lasers, scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and collaborators discovered that molten magnesium silicate undergoes a phase change in the liquid state, abruptly ...
9 hours ago |
4.4 / 5 (5) |
0
|
Hovering not hard if you're top-heavy, researchers find
Top-heavy structures are more likely to maintain their balance while hovering in the air than are those that bear a lower center of gravity, researchers at New York University's Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences ...
10 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
1
|
SLAC, Stanford team focuses on high-energy electrons to treat cancer
Accelerator physicists at SLAC and cancer specialists from Stanford are working on a new technology that could dramatically reduce the time needed for cancer radiation treatments. The team ran an initial experiment ...
13 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
Measurements from high-energy collisions lead to better understanding of why meson particles disappear
For several years, physicists at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), USA, have studied an unusual state of matter called the quarkgluon plasma, which they ...
14 hours ago |
4.5 / 5 (2) |
0
Explained: Sigma
It's a question that arises with virtually every major new finding in science or medicine: What makes a result reliable enough to be taken seriously? The answer has to do with statistical significance -- but ...
Feb 09, 2012 |
5 / 5 (16) |
53
Anonymous knocks CIA website offline (Update)
The website of the Central Intelligence Agency was inaccessible on Friday after the hacker group Anonymous claimed to have knocked it offline.
Google users warned of threat to smartphone wallets
Users of Google smartphone wallets were being warned on Friday that there is a way to crack pass codes intended to thwart thieves from going on illicit shopping sprees.
New error-correcting codes guarantee the fastest possible rate of data transmission
Error-correcting codes are one of the triumphs of the digital age. Theyre a way of encoding information so that it can be transmitted across a communication channel such as an optical fiber o ...
Complex wiring of the nervous system may rely on a just a handful of genes and proteins
Researchers at the Salk Institute have discovered a startling feature of early brain development that helps to explain how complex neuron wiring patterns are programmed using just a handful of critical genes. ...
Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago
(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...
The power of estrogen -- male snakes attract other males
A new study has shown that boosting the estrogen levels of male garter snakes causes them to secrete the same pheromones that females use to attract suitors, and turned the males into just about the sexiest ...
Jan 07, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Jan 08, 2010
Rank: 2 / 5 (8)
The report states the earth couldn't capture cosmic ray induced black holes, but it could capture LHC black holes. It goes on to state that in the hypothetical (much hypothesized) case of stability, they could also begin accreting the earth.
Jan 08, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
Jan 08, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Jan 08, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
By the way, if dark matter can only be seen by its gravitational interaction, how will the LHC detect it? Gravity is an extremely weak force, and especially when dealing with individual particles it seems like it would be greatly overshadowed by other effects. Can the LHC resolve such tiny forces, or is it able to visualize them in another way?
Jan 08, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
There's nothing mystical about it, we just can't see it yet.
Jan 08, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (27)
Jan 08, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
I expect it to reveal that Higgs boson, supersymmetry, string theory, WIMPs, extra dimensions, etc are no more then fashionable speculations which have nothing to do with reality.
Yes, I'm probably too optimistic.
Jan 08, 2010
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (4)
Jan 09, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Jan 09, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
There's significant hypothetical work which suggests black holes can't either exhibit a magnetic field, or be affected by them.
It really depends on how much faith you put in GR gravity, versus quantum gravity. So far, every successful gravity experiment has proven the strengths of GR, whereas none (that I know of) have demonstrated any verifiable signs of "quantum gravity effects."
Jan 09, 2010
Rank: 2 / 5 (3)
The fundamental thing which separates science from esoteric thinking is falsifiability. Forever.
Jan 09, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
So what happens if the LHC falsifies the "quantum gravity" concept? Should we worry?
Jan 10, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Do you know why we are not able to find other intelligences in the universe?
Because sooner or later these intelligences are trying to find the God particle!
Jan 10, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
You should worry about the proper meanings of the words "concept" and "falsification".
Jan 10, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
A great point. But invariably, certain people within the community who are prone to dismiss anything that was not their idea have a penchant for using scientific skepticism as a shield for their own chronic denialism. Take this piece of high strangeness for an off- the- wall example: Over a dozen people with very unusual issues have sought out or been referred to a certain Dr. Roger Leir, who has been more than forthright in his documentation and scientific analysis. He has removed small metallic objects from these patients that have tissues growing into them, rather than rejecting them. They all emit EM at 92.7 and 102.9 megahertz, contain carbon nano structures, are magnetic, have cilia and consist of isotopes not found on earth. This is a fact, yet it can not be true, therefore according to the scientific community, it isn't. No one wants to talk about it, end of story. Talk about it, and say good bye to your career.
Jan 10, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Jan 10, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Jan 10, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jan 11, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
Now then, we know of all the particles which comprise matter, ie. the quarks, leptons, and force carriers. Furthermore, the reason that all the possible combinations of color change within the realm of quantum chromo dynamics cannot be met is that reality must of course be skewed, otherwise there would be no differentiation.
And creating a black hole by colliding a few subatomic particles? Even more ludicrous, since even the sun doesn't have enough mass to become a black hole should it ever collapse in on itself.
The LHC experiments will discover nothing new.
Jan 19, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Helium gas glows under impact of ultraviolet radiation or X-rays emanated by many gallaxies, so we should notice such thing already. I admit, substantial portion of dark matter could be formed by heavily ionized atom nuclei in accordance to Alfven's Plasma Universe theory, thus evading detection in optical range.
Jan 20, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Jan 25, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Wow. you get your degree at 7-11?