Trees invading warming Arctic will cause warming over entire region, study shows
January 12, 2010 By Robert Sanders
Denali National Park is one area where once-treeless tundra will be invaded by trees as a result of global warming. A new study indicates that as trees move northward with increasing temperatures, they will enhance warming over the entire Arctic north of about 60 degrees north latitude, accelerating the melting of sea ice. (Abigail Swann/UC Berkeley)
(PhysOrg.com) -- Contrary to scientists' predictions that, as the Earth warms, the movement of trees into the Arctic will have only a local warming effect, University of California, Berkeley, scientists modeling this scenario have found that replacing tundra with trees will melt sea ice and greatly enhance warming over the entire Arctic region.
Because trees are darker than the bare tundra, scientists previously have suggested that the northward expansion of trees might result in more absorption of sunlight and a consequent local warming.
But UC Berkeley graduate student Abigail L. Swann, along with Inez Fung, professor of earth and planetary science and of environmental science, policy and management, doubted this local scenario because, while broad-leaved trees are dark, they also transpire a lot of water, and water vapor is a greenhouse gas that is well-mixed throughout the Arctic.
Taking account of this in a standard model of global warming, the researchers discovered that, while broad-leaved trees do absorb some additional sunlight, the water vapor they pump into the atmosphere causes a more widespread warming.
"Broad-leaved deciduous trees are not as dark as evergreen trees and so are generally assumed to be less important. But broad-leaved trees transpire a lot more water through their leaves and are actually able to change the water vapor content and increase the greenhouse effect. As the air warms, it can hold more water vapor, and the greenhouse effect increases further," Swann said. "So, broad-leaved trees end up warming the entire Arctic."
More importantly, the researchers' model predicts that the increased water vapor would melt more sea ice, resulting in more absorption of sunlight by the open ocean and dumping more water vapor into the atmosphere. This positive feedback will warm the land even more and encourage faster, more efficient tree growth and perhaps a faster expansion of trees into the Arctic.
All told, the model predicts an additional 1 degree Celsius increase in temperature over the Arctic as a result of this effect. Global warming already is predicted to increase temperatures in the Arctic between 5 and 7 degrees Celsius within the next 100 years.
The analysis was reported Jan. 7 in the online Early Edition of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Trees are darker than tundra, absorbing more light, but they also transpire more water, increasing water vapor, a potent greenhouse gas. As a result, when trees overrun Artic tundra, they will enhance warming, not merely over the land, but in a feedback loop, increase temperatures up to 3 degrees Celsius over parts of the north. (Abigail Swann and Inez Fung/UC Berkeley)
In judging the impact of vegetation on global warming, most scientists have focused on the albedo, or reflectivity, of vegetation, Swann said. The new study shows that water transpiration can have a large effect as well, especially in "closed" environments like the Arctic, where there is greater confinement of atmospheric gases. Swann suggests that the greenhouse consequences of transpiration will be much less in the mid-latitudes and tropics, or at least harder to pin down."We are trying to identify the physical processes that are going to be important with these changes, and this is an interaction that wasn't really looked at before," Swann said. "Counter to assumptions, it's not just a change in the color of the surface vegetation that affects warming."
Previous studies have shown that needle-leaved trees, because they are much darker than bare tundra, will absorb more light and increase warming. But needle-leaved trees transpire much less water than broad-leaved deciduous trees, so the UC Berkeley researchers expect transpiration to only slightly increase this warming effect.
If past episodes of warming are any indication, however, broad-leaved deciduous trees will expand their range more quickly into northern regions than will needle-leaved trees.
“Alaska is already getting shrubbier," Fung said. "We hypothesize that there are 'pioneers,' like shrubs and deciduous trees, that modify the climate until it is comfortable, and then the whole clan moves in."
Co-authors with Swann and Fung are Samuel Levis and Gordon B. Bonan of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Col., and Scott C. Doney of the Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts.
Provided by University of California - Berkeley (news : web)
-
Surface-level ozone pollution set to reduce tree growth 10 percent by 2100
Dec 09, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Lands surface change on Alaska tundra creating longer, warmer summers in Arctic
Sep 22, 2005 |
not rated yet |
0
-
More reasons to hate humidity: It expands global warming, prof says
Feb 19, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Plant a tree and save the Earth?
Dec 13, 2006 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Shade trees fight global warming in Calif.
Sep 04, 2006 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (31) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Discrepancy between oxygen and carbon-dioxide levels
20 hours ago
-
where gems are found in the world
23 hours ago
-
Wind Waves in Reservoir ~ Wind run-up and Wind set-up
Feb 08, 2012
-
Balance of oxygen in the atmosphere
Feb 01, 2012
-
The case for a methanol-based economy
Jan 30, 2012
-
Weather in a rotating cylinder
Jan 25, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
NASA sees wide-eyed cyclone Jasmine
Cyclone Jasmine's eye has opened wider on NASA satellite imagery, as it moves through the Southern Pacific Ocean.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
50 minutes ago |
not rated yet |
0
NASA sees Giovanna reach cyclone strength, threaten Madagascar
Tropical Storm 12S built up steam and became a cyclone on February 10, 2012 as NASA's Terra satellite passed overhead. Residents of east-central Madagascar should prepare for this cyclone to make landfall ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
49 minutes ago |
not rated yet |
0
Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago
(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...
Could Venus be shifting gear?
(PhysOrg.com) -- ESAs Venus Express spacecraft has discovered that our cloud-covered neighbour spins a little slower than previously measured. Peering through the dense atmosphere in the infrared, the ...
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
8 hours ago |
5 / 5 (7) |
7
|
Clam fields found at deep, low-temperature Mariana vents
(PhysOrg.com) -- Scientists have marveled at the unusual life forms thriving at high temperature hydrothermal vents of the deep ocean.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
9 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
|
Google users warned of threat to smartphone wallets
Users of Google smartphone wallets were being warned on Friday that there is a way to crack pass codes intended to thwart thieves from going on illicit shopping sprees.
CIA website offline, Anonymous takes credit
The website of the Central Intelligence Agency was unresponsive on Friday after the hacker group Anonymous claimed to have knocked it offline.
Complex wiring of the nervous system may rely on a just a handful of genes and proteins
Researchers at the Salk Institute have discovered a startling feature of early brain development that helps to explain how complex neuron wiring patterns are programmed using just a handful of critical genes. ...
Putting the squeeze on planets outside our solar system
(PhysOrg.com) -- Using high-powered lasers, scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and collaborators discovered that molten magnesium silicate undergoes a phase change in the liquid state, abruptly ...
The power of estrogen -- male snakes attract other males
A new study has shown that boosting the estrogen levels of male garter snakes causes them to secrete the same pheromones that females use to attract suitors, and turned the males into just about the sexiest ...
New error-correcting codes guarantee the fastest possible rate of data transmission
Error-correcting codes are one of the triumphs of the digital age. Theyre a way of encoding information so that it can be transmitted across a communication channel such as an optical fiber o ...

Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 3.6 / 5 (10)
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (9)
One can't troubleshoot a car by just looking at the engine. This would be particularly disasterous if you're troubleshooting a car that isn't broken
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (19)
Leftists are not known for their science or reasoning or logic skills. They are known for their agenda and cool-aid drinking.
So I ask where are the facts that Global warming is actually happening. Where are the facts that IF it is happening that man is the cause. Where is the source data? Anyone who is upto date with Climategate knows that the facts have been played with, and that the source data has been deleted.
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (6)
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (10)
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 3.6 / 5 (7)
but whether or not our time sapn is long enough... Are we just in a cycle that we have not had enough data to realize? We have been recording temps for only 120 years... if the earth was in a 1500 year cycle then this is a non event. But yes it is clear that man/humans are contributing more than nature would have over the last 200 years. --But thats just it, this last 200 years has been calm for nature that is... the next 200 could have 100x more volcanic eruptions and blow what man did out of the water.
Just a thought.
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (18)
Research Climategate. You can even google it. Leftists have a political agenda and they manipulate facts, delete source data, persecute those that dont agree with their forgone conclusions. AGW is a leftist cause.
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (17)
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 2.9 / 5 (16)
The climate scientists that I have talked to personally are really quite alarmed. They would love to be proven wrong. But you cannot prove data wrong by raising the decimal level of the arguments.
For an AGW denier to talk about leftists manipulating the facts or deleting source data is mind boggling. The only way one could question climate warming is to manipulate the facts and ignore the data.
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 2.9 / 5 (15)
Yes, this is a global issue where the Nations bearing the burden of 90% of the population of the Earth see an easy way to get money from the "rich" countries.
Never mind that the US has never been in greater debt, which increases every day, has never faced such high inflation, and is still shipping it's jobs and industry over seas. You morons think we should be treating symptoms instead of ensuring our ability to adapt. You know, the thing that has allowed man to exist to this very day.
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (13)
Phsycology is very political. Leftist like to feel superior. (Never saw a study that doesnt show conservatives, or christians as ignorant or stupid)
AGW science, very political and corrupt.
Pure Medicine, generally not political (how to stop heart attacks generally is not political.)
Enviromental science, very political.
Only ignorant people who believe everything in the media (which is heavly biased towards leftist theology, but thats another story)are not aware of the biases and why there is bias in science today.
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (11)
I am sure that this has happened before now but in my long, inquisitive lifetime, I have never seen it so obvious as it is now with the money being funded to "researchers" based on what their findings will be. I am not sure that Al Gore started this phenomenon but he certainly has helped drive the expansion of this philosophy to the point where I no longer trust what ANY of the researchers are publishing in this field. Where's the BEEF?
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 4.6 / 5 (8)
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (13)
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (9)
Spooky Ghosts, Elvis's two headed alien baby and the Gumm-a-mint conspiracy to secretly increase everyone's thermometer...is coming to get you!!!
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (12)
This article is actually very interesting, in that it really outlines another facet of invasive species and how they are changing the world that we live in, and count on to survive.
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 3.6 / 5 (13)
you don't seriously expect someone to answer those questions (no less than 3 of them) within a space of 1000 characters, in a manner that you'll find satisfactory ... do you?
Though, without getting into details, I think all 3 of your questions have an underlying misunderstanding at heart. The climate is not determined by any single factor. It is a sum total of many influences. The anthropogenic forcing is one of those influences, but not the only one (and until recently, it didn't even exist to any significant degree.) Any notion that climate change is EITHER anthropogenic OR natural (but cannot be BOTH), is a false dichotomy.
Anthropogenic forcing overlays, and modulates, natural fluctuations. The former is geologically instantaneous, while the latter tend to unfold on much longer timescales. Both take place; and while we have no control over the latter, we have full control over the former.
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
It IS likely that the higher humidity will lead to greater snow cover. Then what? Those previously invasive species, now native species, will likely be replaced by something else. And so it goes.
@PinkE Yes, there is a mix of causes to the warming but our contribution can be no more than a tiny 5 - 8% of the total from the absorption spectrum of CO2. It's just physically impossible to be more than that. The universally predicted (models!) greenhouse warming 10 km up between +30 and -30 deg latitude shows absolutely no measured, i.e. real un-massaged data, temp. change over the past 30 yrs so, the 5 - 8% may be over generous.
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (8)
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (11)
I can think of two 'studies' that share the same traits, dietary salt and smoking. The levels of data manipulation in both were astounding. Both show the same resistance to releasing the raw data and to the use of meta-analysis of other researchers studies. Both also had legal and political involvement, large amounts of research money, and reputations made by out shouting everyone else.
Jan 13, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (10)
because when an astronomer finds a planet all they want to do is have it named after themselves, however when a watermelon, climate "scientist" claims the world is going to end in 10 years he/she usually wants a couple trillion dollars. not a good analogy parsec, as usual you reiterate what a true believer you are. on a side note astronomy is actually a branch of science, while "climate science" is a political philosophy and tool of big government.
Jan 13, 2010
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (7)
Then you should maybe read the studies by other nations where science isn't funded on the 'he-who.screams-loudest-doom'-principle
(funnily they come to the same conclusions that those you accuse of being doom-sayers do...must be a world-wide conspiracy. Here's your tin-foil hat)
Jan 13, 2010
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (2)
Jan 13, 2010
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (5)
You're contradicting yourself. I divided the quote just in case you wouldn't see it. I agree with the latter quote, yet in the former you're desperately trying to treat the symptoms.
Jan 13, 2010
Rank: 4.6 / 5 (9)
So... what 'model' did you base that assertion on -- which, one has to assume, is better than the models everyone else is using? (One might also consider that CO2 isn't the only factor in anthropogenic forcing, even though it certainly is the biggest political football of the lot...)
Odd. It was my impression that greenhouse models predict warming in the troposphere, with concomitant cooling in the stratosphere. That is warming well *below* 10 km, not "10 km up". Also, models predict much greater warming near the poles, and much less toward the equator.
So if you're going to posit assertions that diametrically oppose model predictions, then find those assertions wrong -- then you're in effect confirming the models... ???
Jan 13, 2010
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
Uhh, no.
Out of control government spending and the deindustrialization of America are in fact tangible and targetable ailments, as well as symptoms, of our failing society.
These however are much easier to address as a populace than our People's conditioned apathy, which of course is the real problem - i.e. people not wanting to take responsibility for their lives.
Jan 13, 2010
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (9)
I take issue with your characterizations. Deindustrialization of America (a.k.a. "free trade") is good for us, because so states the Gospel of Wall Street and the Free Market. And our government spending is definitely not out of control: it is deliberately Keynesian by design.
See how wrong you were? Feel better now? :-P
Seriously now, it isn't our society that's failing, so much as the economics-inspired ideologies of our business elite (to which our society has abdicated the responsibility of managing the country.)
On the plus side, the developing world is getting wealthier, as our former wealth flows out into their pockets and infrastructure. So perhaps the economists are right after all: free trade *is* a good thing, for humanity as a whole (at least if we neglect human rights and environmental devastation.) It just really sucks to whomever was on the high end of the wealth distribution prior to the commencement of the Great Equalization.
Jan 14, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (9)
Pretty sure you're being ironic, but I'm going to address this as if serious anyway.
Deindustrialization may be "good", in the short term, for corporations and on some level (reduced cost) for the people - again short term, but it is an unsustainable economic model/policy as we are finding out and will become more and more acutely aware of in the very near future as our currency and economy continues to shrink.
Spin it how you want, Keynes principles have always failed -the People- as it is not a sustainable principle and promotes false (unhealthy) growth, he was a politician first, a business man second, an average citizen never and a eugenicist - which you may say is not relevant to his theory, however it does give insight into how his mind works - he believes some are inherently better and more deserving than others.
And our society is failing -itself- the People are failing themselves by failing to give a damn.
Jan 14, 2010
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (10)
The only thing preventing complete economic free-fall in America is how much money we owe to the world. So what is bad for us, for the moment, is bad for the world.
What happens as that debt is turned over and over? It becomes others debt upon debt, is recouped or dissolves, but that original worth becomes less and less relevant as the debt shifts form (currencies, etc.) and moves farther from it, and the farther it moves, the closer the bottom is to collapsing beneath America.
Our government continues to grow (it is the fastest growing job sector), but has no product (except military) / produces no profit. How is this sustainable in any sight?
Finally, I'd like to thank MikeyK for being the daftest person on Physorg, voting me a 1 and PE a 5 when he is backing me. Thanks MikeyK for showing us all exactly how mindless you are. Keep throwing out those 1s, maybe someday it'll matter, but always knowing it proves you're an idiot.
Jan 15, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (3)
As they grow thicker they block the wind, and this eliminates wind chill which is a major factor in keeping temperature down.
Proportionatly less snow settles under trees which also reduces the cooling effect, and so the march north continues and the ice retreats.
Anyone find fault with this argument?
Jan 15, 2010
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
The earth is going thru a cycle.
Jan 16, 2010
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (7)
something about kettles an blackness when they state that climate scientist have a political agenda.
Jan 16, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (7)
Jan 17, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
For those that have forgotten, the trees are moving northward, the tide is coming in and most people can't see past the end of their nose!
Jan 17, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Jan 18, 2010
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (7)
It seems the usual 'climategate, hide decline, cover-up..blah blah blah' fuss has died down amongst them. Joe public now realises that this is all they have, and it isn't anything approaching 'evidence' of a cover up.
Jan 18, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Use all your intellect now, force your mental growth into the light of education, research, science, truth and perhaps personal revelation, as you avoid - by force of mental will power - to NOT click the One Star Rating.
Good luck. Don't shut up. Try to open your minds and learn ...
Jan 19, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (5)
Jan 19, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Jan 21, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
You must have recently come out of a coma not to know that anthropomorphic warming has been proved a fraud and a scandal. The "scientist" you mention has been fiddling with the evidence to try to prove the religious/political view that man is warming the planet.
Jan 22, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
OK, Cluadius, explain how I argued for ANTHROPOMORPHIC warming. Then explain how the article does so. I'll wait while you wake yourself from your trance....
Jan 25, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Is there some kind of irony here? It is really comical the way Denialists use the 'religion' card, especially as the vast majority come from the same right wing bible bashing crew that tried to get Darwinian evolution replaced by intelligent design in school teaching (the now-called Palinists).
As you don't understand how science works I would love to hear your take on gravity...are you one of those who think the theory is flawed as it is constructed by nasty scientists. Newton's apple falling was 'a trick' and objects are held to the ground by 'Angel Glue'..go on, tell us..
Jan 25, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
At least a denier that admits greenhouses work! Water has long been known as a greenhouse gas, as are a number of gasses. Where H2O and CO2 differ is that H2O is also a global coolant. No forms of CO2 are (despite that comic Watts trying to convince us that CO2 freezing at the poles raises albedo..priceless!)
They have already shown the link between solar output and global temperature changes started disappearing in the 1970's, the last decade has been noteworthy as there has been no correlation..see here..http://www.woodfo...et:-1366
Jan 25, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
I deny that I am a denier. And I resent the term, which automatically assumes anyone who questions AGW is a tin-foil wearing nutcase. I know very well there is a "natural" greenhouse effect. The question is whether man's industry is causing an additional effect.
It seems to me that the link between solar output and global temperature only disappeared when the CRU and the IPCC decided it needed to disappear. It is no longer debatable as to the reality of this accusation, as it was apparent before the release of the CRU emails, which confirmed the suspicion.
Jan 25, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
A nice oxymoron there!
Your comment shows why you are a denier, not a sceptic. As has been shown on other threads the emails do not show a big conspiracy, the deniersphere picked 6 out of over a thousand, took them out of context and presented that as 'proof'. When you start saying that the link between solar irradiance and global mean temperature has been made to 'disappear' then I'm afraid your tin-foil connection is confirmed. I don't know who you are trying to kid about your denier/conspiracy theorist status, us or yourself...
Jan 25, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Going back to 1610 there has been a close correlation between solar activity and climate change. Suddenly the correlation breaks around the time the political world decided to criminalize CO2. We know the CRU manipulated data to emphasize warming, the commented source code is very clear on that. So it isn't unreasonable to say that the CRU "made the correlation disappear."