New research sheds light on Earth's coldest temperatures
January 12, 2010
East Antarctic ice sheet
(PhysOrg.com) -- Results from the first detailed analysis of the lowest ever temperature recorded on the Earth's surface can explain why it got so cold and how cold it could possibly get.
During the Antarctic winter of 1983 (July) temperatures plunged to a record-breaking -89.2°C at the Russian Vostok research station — more than 30°C lower than the average winter temperature. Until this study scientists did not understand why or how the temperature on the vast East Antarctic plateau could hit such an extreme low.
Scientists at British Antarctic Survey (BAS) and the Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute (AARI) in Russia found that for a period of 10 days the air flow that is normally fed from the Southern Ocean on to the high Antarctic plateau almost stopped.
A flow of cold air circling Vostok was preventing the mixing of this warmer air from lower latitudes, isolating the station and causing near optimum cooling conditions. Adding to this was the absence of cloud cover and the layer of tiny particles of ice suspended in the air (known as diamond dust) allowing more heat from the ice surface to be lost to space.
The study was able to successfully simulate the rapid loss of heat over the 10 day period, which will aid the development of climate models used to predict the future evolution of the Antarctic climate system.
Lead author Professor John Turner at BAS says,
“The majority of Antarctica has not yet warmed to the same extent as the Arctic, but over the next century we expect to see this situation change as the effects of greenhouse gas emissions have an impact. Distinguishing between natural variability and human induced changes to the Earth’s atmospheric climate is at the heart of our research and we wanted to understand why this ‘normal’ weather system was thrown out of balance so severely. Our findings indicate that this was a natural event, but this is an important reminder of just how extreme Earth’s natural events can be and that we must always consider the potential for such anomalies to occur. The East Antarctic plateau is remote from the ocean and extremely cold, and we believe that Vostok, at an altitude of 3,488m could get even colder, possibly reaching −96°C if an extreme isolation period such as this occurred over a longer period of time. Temperatures may even drop to −100°C at the higher Dome A — the summit of the East Antarctic Ice Cap. By appreciating that such possibilities can occur and in turn striving to understand the processes that cause them we are better equipped to make predictions for how the planet might react to future changes in polar atmospheric climate.”
-
Russia celebrates 50 years at Antarctic
Dec 16, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Increasing Antarctic sea ice extent linked to the ozone hole
Apr 21, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Mysteriously warm times in Antarctica
Nov 18, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Antarctic losing ice at historic pace
Aug 05, 2005 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Hundreds of Antarctic Peninsula glaciers accelerating as climate warms
Jun 05, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (31) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Discrepancy between oxygen and carbon-dioxide levels
16 hours ago
-
where gems are found in the world
19 hours ago
-
Wind Waves in Reservoir ~ Wind run-up and Wind set-up
Feb 08, 2012
-
Balance of oxygen in the atmosphere
Feb 01, 2012
-
The case for a methanol-based economy
Jan 30, 2012
-
Weather in a rotating cylinder
Jan 25, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Could Venus be shifting gear?
(PhysOrg.com) -- ESAs Venus Express spacecraft has discovered that our cloud-covered neighbour spins a little slower than previously measured. Peering through the dense atmosphere in the infrared, the ...
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
5 hours ago |
5 / 5 (5) |
7
|
Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago
(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...
Mars Science Laboratory computer issue resolved
(PhysOrg.com) -- Engineers have found the root cause of a computer reset that occurred two months ago on NASA's Mars Science Laboratory and have determined how to correct it.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
6 hours ago |
5 / 5 (5) |
3
|
Clam fields found at deep, low-temperature Mariana vents
(PhysOrg.com) -- Scientists have marveled at the unusual life forms thriving at high temperature hydrothermal vents of the deep ocean.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
5 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
|
Two new moons for Jupiter
Advances in technology have lead to the discovery of new planets outside of our Solar System, and now even new moons in our own backyard.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
5 hours ago |
not rated yet |
2
Putting the squeeze on planets outside our solar system
(PhysOrg.com) -- Using high-powered lasers, scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and collaborators discovered that molten magnesium silicate undergoes a phase change in the liquid state, abruptly ...
Employers feel no love for unscrupulous practice of 'service sweethearting'
A new study led by two Florida State University marketing professors finds that some frontline service employees who are rewarded for hikes in customer loyalty and satisfaction also may engage in "service ...
US issues guidelines to avoid heparin contamination
Four years after US drug-maker Baxter International's blood thinner heparin was contaminated in China, causing dozens of deaths, US regulators on Friday issued draft guidelines for safe production.
Expat French get Internet vote for first time
French citizens will for the first time this year be able to vote in a parliamentary election over the Internet, an experiment that could be extended to other elections if successful.
"Twisted Metal" gamers get shot at real gunplay
Fans of "Twisted Metal" will get to welcome a long-awaited sequel of the car-battle videogame with a real-world bang by blasting an ice cream truck to bits with a machine gun.
The power of estrogen -- male snakes attract other males
A new study has shown that boosting the estrogen levels of male garter snakes causes them to secrete the same pheromones that females use to attract suitors, and turned the males into just about the sexiest ...
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (12)
Good to know our buddies down in Vostok aren't biased at all...
Seriously there is no reason to make this comment.
"The majority of Antarctica has not yet warmed to the same extent as the Arctic. Distinguishing between natural variability and human induced changes to the Earth’s atmospheric climate is at the heart of our research..."
Is all they needed to say, but I thank them for demonstrating their personal bias, their forthrightness is admirable even if their objectivity is not.
I understand this was a rare phenomenon but why qualify that normal with quotes, they say themselves it was entirely natural. It's disgusting and terrifying that these are the types of people, all over the world, who do the science which politicians would like to base our policy upon.
Why are they like this? Because of how science is funded. i.e. special interest.
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 3.2 / 5 (10)
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (8)
How much energy does it take to raise the average temperature of the Earth 1 degree? More than the human race has produced? Maybe. But how do you measure the average temperature of the Earth? From what I've seen there is no basis for an "average temperature" and, if there was, it would have an error range measured in multiple degrees. Far more than AGW is worried about (ie. why worry about a increase of 0.1 degree when your error is plus or minus 4 degrees?)
Jan 12, 2010
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (9)
It would be really great if you would understand what I'm (and this article is) talking about before posting on it, thanks.
And if I understood the point of what you were blathering about, I'd respond but since it's mindless, well...
As for my bias, coming out of college I fully believed AGW was real, hook line and sinker. It was what I was told by science, it had to be true, right?
Then I started examining the principles and 'evidence' and presumptions and suppositions and discovered it simply doesn't hold water under scientific scrutiny.
My bias is that AGW has not been anywhere close to proven yet with actual science, that there is far more evidence to suggest what we are seeing is within the range of natural variability and further more, you will never convince me that a warming globe is an environmental problem, because it simply is not.
Jan 13, 2010
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (11)
Jan 13, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (6)
Nonsense. What is shows is that he had faith in science. He believed that scientists are only looking for the truth and are not swayed by political or financial pressures. He found out otherwise. Welcome to the real world.
Jan 13, 2010
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
Someone who has faith in science can't be a scientist.
That's why he can't be a scientist. Scientist never claim the truth. Instead they use words like "theory", "hypothesis", or "to our best knowledge".He thought they are holy? Why did he think so?Don't confuse science with scientists.
Jan 13, 2010
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Yes thats why I'm not a scientist, your logic is infallible. People never change and I do not revere and practice the scientific method as a part of my job.
Again your golden logic shines through. Certainly there is no scientist in the world who believes his discipline strives to represent reality as best it can.
Really? That's interesting, because I'm pretty sure that replicable results achieved through well documented procedure and approved via peer review are a truth, and claimed as such all the time.
You've obviously never been through a liberal arts collegiate institution.
Welcome to reality is right. College = idealist, reality = everything college wishes wasn't true.
frajo, please get a clue. Your posturing serves no purpose other than to make you look like an arrogant elitist.
Jan 13, 2010
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
I did not say scientists claim to know the truth. If you read it again, you will note the key word "looking" for truth.
It is the search for truth that I as a scientist have faith in. The failings of those who have distorted science in the past and recently (the CRU, obviously) are good enough reason to doubt any scientific theory, no matter how much "evidence" is presented.
I know many in the scientific world who are sure they know the "truth" and refuse to alter their views even when presented with irrefutable contradictory evidence. They rely on things like "consensus" and peer review to form their opinions about the "truth."
This seems to be the state of affairs regarding those who have put themselves on the AGW bandwagon. So who's being unscientific now?
Jan 15, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Jan 15, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Instead of focusing on his "faith" in science, you should consider the issue of faith in the AGW hypothesis, which is as supported by evidence as much as belief in the afterlife. Maybe even less so, as there are near-death experiences to consider.
Jan 15, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
By EVAN LEHMANN of ClimateWire
Published: January 13, 2010
But Detlefsen's letter says the "e-mails show that a close-knit group of the world's most influential climate scientists actively colluded to subvert the peer-review process ... manufactured pre-determined conclusions through the use of contrived analytic techniques; and discussed destroying data to avoid government freedom-of-information requests."
"Viewed collectively, the CRU e-mails reveal a scientific community in which a group of scientists promoting what has become, through their efforts, the dominant climate-change paradigm are at war with other scientists derisively labeled as 'skeptics,' 'deniers,' and 'contrarians,'" he added.
http://www.nytime...554.html
Jan 16, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
It's not science to claim knowing the "truth" - neither for the proponents nor for the deniers.
Another point is the question how to act responsible. That's not a scientific question; it's a question of ethics.
Jan 17, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Well, it may not be science to claim to possess the truth, but it is common practice among scientists, incorrect as it may be.
And if a certain group of scientists had acted responsibly (not to say legally) we wouldn't be wasting our time debating whether the AGW religion is valid or not.