How does the proton get its spin?

February 17, 2010 by Anne Trafton
How does the proton get its spin?

Enlarge

Artist's rendering of the inner structure of a proton showing quarks and quark-antiquark pairs, with springs showing the gluons that bind the quarks. Image courtesy of Klaus Rith

(PhysOrg.com) -- At a meeting this week of the American Physical Society in Washington, MIT Associate Professor of Physics Bernd Surrow reported on new results from the STAR experiment at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) that provide a better understanding of the internal structure of the proton, the basic building block of all nuclei.

The world’s only polarized collider, at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, N.Y., RHIC is used by MIT physicists to understand how the proton gets its , a fundamental quantum mechanical property (spin manifests itself as an intrinsic , a property that is the basis of magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI). In 2009, spin-polarized protons were collided in RHIC at a record high center-of-mass energy of 500 giga electron volts (GeV). At this high energy — an energy 250 times the mass of the two individual protons making the collision — the protons are moving essentially at the and the inside the proton are able to “see” each other at a resolution that is very small compared to the size of the proton. This allows scientists to study the proton's internal structure.

Nobody has yet succeeded in performing a decomposition for the proton spin in terms of its constituent quarks and . The accompanying cartoon shows a model of how complicated the “simple” proton actually is; its structure arises through the strong force and is described by the of quarks and gluons known as quantum chromodynamics (QCD). This theory has thus far been unable to explain the origin of proton spin, so new insight is obtained from experiments. It has been established that the quarks themselves account for only about 25 percent of the proton’s spin and previous Brookhaven data provided by Surrow’s team indicate that the gluon’s contribution is also small.

Protons have a spin of ½, a number whose simplicity is compelling, considering that the proton is made up of several constituent particles.

The results presented in Washington this week have established a new way to explore the spin structure of the proton by using the weak interaction, which is responsible for radioactive β-decay (a process that converts a neutron into a proton while emitting an electron and an electron antineutrino). The weak interaction is mediated by very massive (about 80 GeV) particles known as W bosons. At RHIC, the longitudinal polarization of the colliding polarized proton beams at high energies allows the experiments to directly observe the weak interactions by detecting the decay electrons of the W bosons produced. This process gives rise to a large parity violating signal. (Parity violation means that physics results are different in processes occurring in left- and right-handed systems.) Such a signal has now been established for the first time by careful measurement of the spin-dependent cross section under the leadership of Surrow's group at the MIT Laboratory for Nuclear Science. The STAR experiment is well suited to carry out such measurements because of its large acceptance for the detection of the decay electron produced by the W boson. In addition, it can discriminate against background processes from the strong interaction.

The production of W bosons provides an ideal tool to study the quark spin structure of the proton. W bosons are produced in quark-antiquark collisions and can be detected through their respective decay electrons. The analysis distinguishes the electric charge sign of the decay product, which provides a direct view of the quark polarization at high energies where fundamental calculations are well under control. The results from Surrow’s group clearly establish the different polarization patterns of up and down quarks. They are consistent with fundamental calculations within the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics. This new technique allows direct sensitivity to the polarization of anti-quarks.

Surrow’s group is also developing new tracking detectors that will greatly increase the ability to detect the parity-violating W events in further data-taking planned for 2011/2012. These measurements will focus on measuring the polarization of the anti-quarks, which only live fleetingly in the proton.

Provided by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (news : web)

4.3 /5 (33 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

jsa09
Feb 17, 2010

Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
The Title? I don't see the answer. So I presume this article is about studies into the question.
mgmirkin
Feb 17, 2010

Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
Another article that fails to answer its titular question...

If the question isn't going to be answered in the text, why ask the question at all? Especially in the title.

It would be more aptly titled "We still don't know how the proton gets its spin. Despite the latest research..."
OckhamsRazor
Feb 17, 2010

Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
There is no definitive rule stating that if you ask a question in a title it must be answered in the following text. The title is valid - they're asking the question and following with how they will attempt to answer it with new insights. I'd have more of a problem with them titling it along the lines of a statement like "How the Proton Gets its Spin".

It will be interesting to see what the final results are in any case.

seneca
Feb 17, 2010

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
The title is valid - they're asking the question
I admit, the "measurement of the spin-dependent cross section during collisions of spin-polarized protons" isn't so catchy name for most of laymans. Such title works like packet of product in cheap supermarket: it's promising more, then it provides, but some people prefer to be cheated.
Noumenon
Feb 18, 2010

Rank: 4.8 / 5 (4)
Why all this critique and nit-picking of how the article is written? The title is in the form of a rhetorical question, which is a way of telling you the aim of the research. Are you just poking it with a stick because you don't understand what it is? And don't bother pointing out that I'm critiquing your critique, it just that I see these type of responses often at this site.
Adriab
Feb 18, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
Noumenon, I think the major issue is we get excited by the title, thinking that the problem has been solved, then we are let down when the article is not what we expected.

Not so much the fault of the writing as it is a fault of the way we interpret it.

I appreciate these kinds of articles, I'd just rather not have my hopes go up with the title, and down with the article.
dev2000
Feb 18, 2010

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Geez! I can imagine how disappointed you would be with an article titled "Is there a God?" or "Are we alone in the Universe?"...
broglia
Feb 18, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
Well, there you can find something about subject...

http://focus.aps..../v12/st5
jgfox
Feb 18, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
My question is:

How do they get those tiny, very tiny springs into the proton?

And, what are they made of?
Crackpot
Feb 18, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
Another explanation for the 1/2-spin could be a much simpler model of the proton, like the one described on http://classicala...ons.html

But the convention requires quarks and gluons, of course...
seneca
Feb 18, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
How do they get those tiny, very tiny springs into the proton?
They're supposedly formed by density fluctuations of every dense fluid, the extremely dense nuclear fluid in particular. We can observe them inside of supercritical fluid, for example.

http://www.chem.l...ics.html

be a much simpler model of the proton
At the case of electron, the Mobius strip model was proposed a long time ago already (Wasserman, Spec.Sc.Tech.(1992)). This model was detailed later:

http://members.ch...tron.pdf

IMO strip model of hadrons correspond the path of quarks triplets which are revolving each other like system of gravitating bodies. More massive down-quarks (3.5–6.0 MeV/c2) are concentrated bellow up-quark (1.5–3.3 MeV/c2) near the center of neutron, like inside of gravitationaly coupled Eefimov state of three massive bodies of different mass.

http://cerncourie...rn/41014
seneca
Feb 18, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
Indeed this model doesn't explain 1/2 spin of particles, but the coincidence of charge value of electron with those of calculated indicates, Mobius strip is quite close model of internal structure of particles. At the case of proton particle is composed of three 2/3 parts of Mobius strips, which are representing valence quarks. These parts are joined in characteristic ratios, described by CKM matrix of mixing angles.

http://en.wikiped...a_matrix
brant
Feb 18, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
There real is no such thing as "spin" in the physical sense for a proton..

Why dont they just call it a magnetic field???
Which is what it is.
broglia
Feb 19, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
But proton has no magnetic field around it, until it doesn't move with respect to observer.
Jarek
Feb 19, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
There real is no such thing as "spin" in the physical sense for a proton..

Look at quantum rotation operators - spin means that 'quantum phase' (whatever it means...) makes something like this
http://demonstrat...arities/
on each plane orthogonal to spin axis, what through Aharonov-Bohm effect connects with its internal magnetic structure ... for me it also automatically leads to proton's internal structure without any problems with spin (4th section of http://arxiv.org/...0.2724v1 ) which also while deep inelastic scattering would look to be made of three parts which carry small part of its mass and fulfilling asymptotic freedom ...
Alizee
Feb 20, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
Every particle can be understood as a droplet with undulating surface and the rotation connected with surface undulations denotes it's spin.

http://misclab.um...ve_b.jpg

The existence of spin follows from special relativity, too. By special relativity light spreads by constant speed, so if we can see energy spreading by subluminal speed, for example near black hole or inside of atom orbitals, then the energy always circulates at place. Without spin our universe would remain fully transparent and empty, because all energy would propagate through it in the same speed in all directions.
ggg
Feb 20, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
What I like is that our poor twin travels to a distant system taking longer then we expect and coming back less aged than we yet the proton travels almost at the speed of light, still takes the expected amount of time, and doesn't drop into an energy level less than a proton. Go figure?
Rank 4.3 /5 (33 votes)
Related Stories
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Non-Integrable Quadratic Hamiltonian
    created1 hour ago
  • Mysteries in Classical Physics
    created3 hours ago
  • (Conceptual) questions about capacitors, circuits
    created4 hours ago
  • a steel rod and an iron rod is placed inside an ac current soleoid
    created5 hours ago
  • Nature of principal strains
    created5 hours ago
  • Magnet in a AC current solenoid
    created6 hours ago
  • More from Physics Forums - Classical Physics

More news stories

Putting the squeeze on planets outside our solar system

(PhysOrg.com) -- Using high-powered lasers, scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and collaborators discovered that molten magnesium silicate undergoes a phase change in the liquid state, abruptly ...

Physics / Condensed Matter

created 15 hours ago | popularity 4.3 / 5 (7) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Hovering not hard if you're top-heavy, researchers find

Top-heavy structures are more likely to maintain their balance while hovering in the air than are those that bear a lower center of gravity, researchers at New York University's Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences ...

Physics / General Physics

created 16 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 1 | with audio podcast

SLAC, Stanford team focuses on high-energy electrons to treat cancer

Accelerator physicists at SLAC and cancer specialists from Stanford are working on a new technology that could dramatically reduce the time needed for cancer radiation treatments. The team ran an initial experiment ...

Physics / General Physics

created 19 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 0

Measurements from high-energy collisions lead to better understanding of why meson particles disappear

For several years, physicists at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), USA, have studied an unusual state of matter called the quark–gluon plasma, which they ...

Physics / General Physics

created 20 hours ago | popularity 4.5 / 5 (4) | comments 0

Explained: Sigma

It's a question that arises with virtually every major new finding in science or medicine: What makes a result reliable enough to be taken seriously? The answer has to do with statistical significance -- but ...

Physics / General Physics

created Feb 09, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (16) | comments 53


Anonymous knocks CIA website offline (Update)

The website of the Central Intelligence Agency was inaccessible on Friday after the hacker group Anonymous claimed to have knocked it offline.

New error-correcting codes guarantee the fastest possible rate of data transmission

Error-correcting codes are one of the triumphs of the digital age. They’re a way of encoding information so that it can be transmitted across a communication channel — such as an optical fiber o ...

Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago

(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...

Small modular reactor design could be a 'SUPERSTAR'

(PhysOrg.com) -- Though most of today's nuclear reactors are cooled by water, we've long known that there are alternatives; in fact, the world's first nuclear-powered electricity in 1951 came from a reactor ...

New power source discovered

(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and RMIT University have made a breakthrough in energy storage and power generation.

The power of estrogen -- male snakes attract other males

A new study has shown that boosting the estrogen levels of male garter snakes causes them to secrete the same pheromones that females use to attract suitors, and turned the males into just about the sexiest ...