Quantum measurement precision approaches Heisenberg limit

February 26, 2010 By Lisa Zyga feature
Quantum measurement precision approaches Heisenberg limit

Enlarge

This illustration shows an adaptive feedback scheme being used to measure an unknown phase difference between the two red arms in the interferometer. A photon (qubit) is sent through the interferometer, and detected by either c1 or c0, depending on which arm it traveled through. Feedback is sent to the processing unit, which controls the phase shifter in one arm so that, when the next photon is sent, the device can more precisely measure the unknown phase in the other arm, and calculate a precise phase difference. Image credit: Hentschel and Sanders.

(PhysOrg.com) -- In the classical world, scientists can make measurements with a degree of accuracy that is restricted only by technical limitations. At the fundamental level, however, measurement precision is limited by Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. But even reaching a precision close to the Heisenberg limit is far beyond existing technology due to source and detector limitations.

Now, using techniques from machine learning, physicists Alexander Hentschel and Barry Sanders from the University of Calgary have recently shown how to generate measurement procedures that can outperform the best previous strategy in achieving highly precise quantum measurements. The new level of precision approaches the Heisenberg limit, which is an important goal of quantum measurement. Such quantum-enhanced measurements are useful in several areas, such as atomic clocks, gravitational wave detection, and measuring the optical properties of materials.

“The precision that any measurement can possibly achieve is limited by the so-called Heisenberg limit, which results from Heisenberg's uncertainty principle,” Hentschel told PhysOrg.com. “However, classical measurements cannot achieve a precision close to the Heisenberg limit. Only quantum measurements that use can approach the Heisenberg limit. Yet, devising quantum measurement procedures is highly challenging.”

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle ultimately limits the achievable precision depending on how many quantum resources are used for the measurement. For example, gravitational waves are detected with laser interferometers, whose precision is limited by the number of photons available to the within the duration of the gravitational wave pulse.

In their study, Hentschel and Sanders used a computer simulation of a two-channel interferometer with a random phase difference between the two arms. Their goal was to estimate the relative phase difference between the two channels. In the simulated system, photons were sent into the interferometer one at a time. Which input port the photon entered was unknown, so that the photon (serving as a qubit) was in a superposition of two states, corresponding to the two channels. When exiting the interferometer, the photon was detected as leaving one of the two output ports, or not detected at all if it was lost. Since photons were fed into the interferometer one at a time, no more than one bit of information could be extracted at once. In this scenario, the achievable precision is limited by the number of photons used for the measurement.

As previous research has shown, the most effective quantum measurement schemes are those that incorporate adaptive feedback. These schemes accumulate information from measurements and then exploit it to maximize the information gain in subsequent measurements. In an interferometer with feedback, a sequence of photons is successively sent through the interferometer in order to measure the unknown phase difference. Detectors at the two output ports measure which way each of the photons exits, and then transmit this information to a processing unit. The processing unit adapts the value of a controllable phase shifter after each photon according to a given policy.

However, devising an optimal policy is difficult, and usually requires guesswork. In their study, Hentschel and Sanders adapted a technique from the field of artificial intelligence. Their algorithm autonomously learns an optimal policy based on trial and error - replacing guesswork by a logical, fully automatic, and programmable procedure.

Specifically, the new method uses a machine learning algorithm called particle swarm optimization (PSO). PSO is a “collective intelligence” optimization strategy inspired by the social behavior of birds flocking or fish schooling to locate feeding sites. In this case, the physicists show that a PSO algorithm can also autonomously learn a policy for adjusting the controllable phase shift.

As Hentschel and Sanders show, after a sequence of input qubits have been sent through the interferometer, the measurement procedure learned by the PSO algorithm delivers a measurement of the unknown phase shift that scales closely to the Heisenberg limit, setting a new precedent for quantum measurement precision. The new high level of precision could have important implications for the gravitational wave detection.

“Einstein’s theory of General Relativity predicts gravitational waves,” Hentschel said. “However, a direct detection of has not been achieved. Gravitational wave detection will open up a new field of astronomy that augments electromagnetic wave and neutrino observations. For example, gravitational wave detectors can spot merging black holes or binary star systems composed of two neutron stars, which are mostly hidden to conventional telescopes.”

More information: Alexander Hentschel and Barry C. Sanders. “Machine Learning for Precise Quantum Measurement.” Physical Review Letters 104, 063603 (2010). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.063603

Copyright 2010 PhysOrg.com.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or part without the express written permission of PhysOrg.com.

4.8 /5 (46 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

broglia
Feb 26, 2010

Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
If gravitational waves are forming longitudinal waves of vacuum environment, then they cannot be detected just because of uncertainty principle - they would form just the longitudinal portion of CMB noise, which prohibits us to observe objects more exactly.
axemaster
Feb 26, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (7)
Broglia, I'm taking quantum in college right now, and I have no idea what are you talking about...

CMB noise is microwaves, emitted quite a while after the Big Bang, when the first stars ionized the interstellar hydrogen and made the universe transparent to EM radiation. Gravitational waves and the CMB shouldn't be related at all.

Moreover, any gravity waves generated around that time would have stretched to very long wavelengths by now, making them pretty much impossible to detect.

The gravitational waves they are hoping to detect are those emitted by black holes, particularly when they coalesce (they make a big pulse). The CMB is irrelevant.
seneca
Feb 26, 2010

Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
..gravitational waves and the CMB shouldn't be related at all.
You can use the water surface model to understand the relation between light and gravitational waves. Water surface corresponds the space-time, formed by vacuum foam: it's so large, just because energy spreads so slowly around in in transversal waves, which are corresponding light waves in vacuum. After then the gravitational waves are density (scalar) waves of sound, spreading through underwater. They're so weak just because they're spreading so fast. But waves faster then the surface waves cannot behave like true waves at the water surface, instead of it, they would appear like noise. This model doesn't exclude existence of harmonic waves though, in analogy to sound spreading through SOFAR channel.

This model is supported by holographic model of Universe, too. In this model Universe cannot behave like holographic projection, until speed of gravitational waves wouldn't highly superluminal.
seneca
Feb 26, 2010

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
..any gravity waves generated around that time would have stretched to very long wavelengths by now..
This stance can be objected again by using of surface water wave model of space-time, where speed of transversal waves decreases with increasing frequency, while speed of longitudinal waves (which are forming analogy of GW here) behaves in the opposite way.

Again, this model is supported for example by prof. Turok/Steinhardt's cyclic cosmology, in which gravitational waves are blue-shifted due to the propagation of gravity through the dimensional manifold.

http://arxiv.org/...59v2.pdf
http://arxiv.org/...53v1.pdf
seneca
Feb 26, 2010

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Although this model of gravitational waves has a robust meaning in dense aether theory, there is only subtle experimental evidence of it. The passage of gravity waves would appear like less or more temporal change in CMB intensity, as some events from GEO600 interferometer indicate:

http://startswith...mg35.gif

We can compare it to our experience from underwater nuclear explosions, where passage of sound wave from underwater appears like wave of noise at water surface.

http://www.youtub...XJuv8tDM
baudrunner
Feb 26, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
The problem with detecting gravitational waves is that no wave, as such, is actually produced. Rather, a shift in the gravitational field equilibrium, which is not reflected (very important), will occur when massive bodies interact in space. The process preserves that equilibrium. It's like an ongoing, web-like action. You pull the web in a number of directions, but no oscillating function is produced, ergo - no wave.
seneca
Feb 26, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
..shift in the gravitational field equilibrium, which is not reflected, will occur when massive bodies interact in space..
Maybe you're right, maybe not - but I don't see any logic in this sentence. What the "gravitational field equilibrium" is supposed to be, for example?

In general you should explain/predict unknown phenomena by using of known phenomena, not by introduction of new unknown concepts - because it just introduces tautology into such explanation.
seneca
Feb 26, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Why not - the derivation of the number of Kaluza spheres in our Universe by using of well known constants is nice - but I don't see any way, how such result could be tested.

This approach is somewhat analogous to previous post of baudrunner: you're deriving untestable numbers by using of well testable physical constants, thus increasing entropy of human understanding. After all, this is the reason, why string theory is considered a fring theory: it predicts lotta numbers, but these numbers cannot be tested so easily, being quite abstract. It lacks robust predictions at logical level.
Question
Feb 27, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
It would appear they are using a computer simulation and the photon (pulse) may or may not be detected. What this tells me is that they would be using such a small quantity of light that when it enters the splitter and is reduced by 1/2 it may register at either detector or NO detector at all. It is such a small pulse it would not be detected by both detectors because if it were they would automatically assume two or more photons were used and the pulse would be reduced in strength.

The experiment is flawed from start to finish.
Thrasymachus
Feb 27, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
Seneca, in an earlier post, you write "You can use the water surface model to understand the relation between light and gravitational waves. Water surface corresponds the space-time, formed by vacuum foam: it's so large, just because energy spreads so slowly around in in transversal waves, which are corresponding light waves in vacuum."

Later, you write, " ...where speed of transversal waves decreases with increasing frequency, while speed of longitudinal waves (which are forming analogy of GW here) behaves in the opposite way."

However, light waves travel at the same speed c, regardless of their frequency or wavelength. This has been measured to be true to an arbitrary degree of precision. Please explain. (dance crazy monkey, dance!)
seneca
Feb 27, 2010

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
The relativity model in light speed understanding was forced in 1983 by introduction of SI meter unit based on the wavelength of krypton-86 light. While time unit is defined by frequency of light, it effectively means, the light speed is invariant by its very definition (in fact isn't, because second unit is based on radiation of cesium 133 atoms, so that dispersion of vacuum foam still could apply here - but the differences will be really small).

But at the moment, when we use for example iridium prototype, then the changes in light speed in vacuum emerge, because the space-time inside of matter expands faster, then the rest of Universe (space-time inside of matter is condensed). This behavior manifests itself by dilatation and evaporation of iridium kilogram and meter prototypes, for example.

http://www.physor...s64.html
http://www.physor...759.html

These subtle phenomena render our Universe as a much more dynamic environment, then it appears at the first sight.
seneca
Feb 28, 2010

Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
..This has been measured to be true to an arbitrary degree of precision..
Well, only locally: light speed measured locally is really invariant. But the observation of gravitational lensing means, the light propagates in different speed through lens. The relativist would say, it's because, the space-time is deformed there. But strictly speaking, such claim is just a conjecture, because the measurement of space-time deform would require to place clock into this gravitational lens. In another words, we are assuming measurement, which was never done.

Gravitational lensing and time dilatation can never occur at the same moment: when we would visit galactic cluster with clock to prove space-time deform, we would observe, the relativistic aberration would disappear, because space-time is homogeneous at the center of cluster.

This principal inconsistency in measurements brings a conceptual problem into relativity. The quite similar, just dual problem exists with quantum mechanics.
KBK
Mar 01, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
The problem with detecting gravitational waves is that no wave, as such, is actually produced. Rather, a shift in the gravitational field equilibrium, which is not reflected (very important),..........an ongoing, web-like action. You pull the web in a number of directions, but no oscillating function is produced, ergo - no wave.


Massive bodies in space are a secondary function, not primary. Which leads to situation where the effects of the interactions are a minimum of a full logarithmically (and spherical-progressive from all individual wave interactives) calculated magnitude less.

Makes for interesting results, but the Newtonian gross calcs that Einstein used are known, even by him, to have been incorrect. (Corrected by him in 1927 via his proper inclusion of Maxwell's full works not the edited ones) to achieve a proper and working Unified Field theory, which since 1927, has slowly been buried/removed, due to it's extreme ramifications.
KBK
Mar 01, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
As far as i can tell, tho, this article is not about precise measurement, but rather is about enforced determination from the superposition dual wave state..to a historical point of the past.

Time is linear, it moves, according to our observation, in one direction only. The past is locked and permanent, but the future has a minimum of two indeterminate states, which are fused to the single, upon observation.., thus, in the moment, CREATING the flow of time and the past, from the 'prior' moments of 'indeterminacy'.

The Hitachi experiment in the 1980's proved this. So to utilize a system of measurement that attempts to do a loopback and remove the open possibility of the future and fuse it into the locked character of the past results in nothing but some bizarre form of attempting to force potentiality to a permanent state that reflects the past. ie, to erase possibility and/or potential--- from the future.

And THAT, is very seriously messed up.
broglia
Mar 01, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
All these seemingly miraculous phenomena have their very trivial analogy at water surface, where transversal waves are always affected by Brownian noise. We can arrange 2D analogy of observation by using of pair of surface wave detectors - the precision in detection of location and speed of objects observed would be affected by this background noise in similar way, like during observation in vacuum by CMB noise.

Such model enables to think about quantum phenomena from perspective, which is unachievable for us, because in vacuum we can use only transversal waves for observation - the gravitational waves are too weak and low distance ones for being available for more objective observations.

http://www.physor...511.html
VerGreeneyes
Mar 01, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
Particle Swarm Optimization, eh? Milkyway@Home also uses that - they're also trying Differential Evolution, and have tried a Genetic search in the past. I wonder if these scientists have considered those alternatives as well?
Rank 4.8 /5 (46 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Light Resonance
    created6 hours ago
  • Infrared light and prisms
    created7 hours ago
  • Oscilloscope triggering function on aperiodic signals...
    created8 hours ago
  • How can pulleys or levers multiply forces?
    created14 hours ago
  • why higher resistance means more heat produced in a circuit
    created17 hours ago
  • Pascals principle
    created20 hours ago
  • More from Physics Forums - Classical Physics

More news stories

Transparent iron? For the first time, an experiment shows that atomic nuclei can become transparent

At the high-brilliance synchrotron light source PETRA III, a team of DESY scientists headed by Dr. Ralf Röhlsberger has succeeded in making atomic nuclei transparent with the help of X-ray light. At the ...

Physics / General Physics

created 9 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (5) | comments 1 | with audio podcast

Physicists build highly efficient 'no-waste' laser

A team of University of California, San Diego researchers has built the smallest room-temperature nanolaser to date, as well as an even more startling device: a highly efficient, "thresholdless" laser that ...

Physics / General Physics

created 9 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (14) | comments 2 | with audio podcast

Quantum physicist explains $100K offer for proof scaled-up quantum computing is impossible

(PhysOrg.com) -- MIT researcher Scott Aaronson has certainly riled the physics community with his offer this past Friday, of $100,000 to anyone who can prove that scaled-up quantum computing is impossible. ...

Physics / Quantum Physics

created 14 hours ago | popularity 4.5 / 5 (8) | comments 27 | with audio podcast weblog

Flipping a light switch in the cell: Quantum dots used for targeted neural activation

By harnessing quantum dots—tiny light-emitting semiconductor particles a few billionths of a meter across—researchers at the University of Washington (UW) have developed a new and vastly more targeted ...

Physics / Optics & Photonics

created 11 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Unusual 'collapsing' iron superconductor sets record for its class

(PhysOrg.com) -- A team from the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the University of Maryland has found an iron-based superconductor that operates at the highest known temperature for a material ...

Physics / Superconductivity

created 13 hours ago | popularity 4.3 / 5 (3) | comments 2 | with audio podcast


Astronomy team discovers nearby dwarf galaxy

(PhysOrg.com) -- A team led by UCLA research astronomer Michael Rich has used a unique telescope to discover a previously unknown companion to the nearby galaxy NGC 4449, which is some 12.5 million light years ...

Amasia: As next supercontinent forms, Arctic Ocean, Caribbean will vanish first

(PhysOrg.com) -- Geologists at Yale University have proposed a new theory to describe the formation of supercontinents, the epic process by which Earth’s major continental blocks combine into a single ...

Why are there so few fish in the Earth's oceans?

(PhysOrg.com) -- A Stony Brook University researcher has found that, contrary to popular belief, there are not plenty of fish in the sea.

Scientists strengthen memory by stimulating key site in brain

Ever gone to the movies and forgotten where you parked the car? New UCLA research may one day help you improve your memory.

Most stretchable spider silk reported

The egg sac silk of the cocoon stalk of the cave spider Meta menardi is the most stretchable egg sac silk yet tested, according to a study published Feb. 8 in the open access journal PLoS ONE.

Study shows how DNA finds its match

It's been more than 50 years since James Watson and Francis Crick showed that DNA is a double helix of two strands that complement each other. But how does a short piece of DNA find its match, out of the millions ...