Shoppers who try harder to estimate spend more
March 2, 2010 By Susan Lang(PhysOrg.com) -- The harder consumers try to track how much their groceries will cost, the worse they do, according to a new study co-authored by Brian Wansink in the March issue of the Journal of Marketing.
Almost one in three U.S. households shop on a budget -- and one in six can only afford basic necessities. So it's no wonder that 78 percent of budget shoppers -- twice as many as those who shop without a budget (37 percent) -- try to track how much their groceries are likely to cost as they roll through the aisles.
But the harder they try, the worse they do -- overspending as much as 19 percent, according to a new study, which was conducted by a Cornell professor and colleagues and is published in the March issue of the Journal of Marketing.
In general, the researchers found that all consumers tend to underestimate how much their groceries are going to cost.
"But those who try to calculate the exact total price almost always do worse than those who just estimate prices," said co-author Brian Wansink, Cornell's John S. Dyson Professor of Marketing, who co-authored the series of studies with two colleagues. The studies included two field studies and two laboratory studies.
And it is low-income shoppers who try most to calculate, rather than estimate, Wansink said.
That means that those on the tightest budgets -- those most motivated to track their spending -- may be at greatest risk for spending more than their budget allows, said Wansink, forcing them to cut back in other areas, which "could cause shoppers unexpected financial distress." This chain of events can also cause these shoppers to develop negative feelings toward the store they patronize because they spent more than they planned.
The researchers also found that the most accurate shoppers based their estimates on the dominant range of price endings in their baskets -- such as the 99 cents in $4.99. In other words, if the price endings of most of the grocers are between $.50 and $.99, people rounded up to the nearest dollar. "When people don't round up, it leads to some unpleasant surprises at the cash register said co-author Koert van Ittersum of the Georgia Institute of Technology.
Wansink suggests that the retailers might help consumers estimate the cost of their groceries with cart scanners, by changing their price-setting strategies or by providing shopper trainings in the principles of decision making, statistics and mental computation.
In the meantime, Wansink offers these tips:
• Round each item to the nearest dollar -- $2.25 down to $2 and $5.50 to $6.
• If you lose track, estimate the total number or items, then guess the price of the average item and multiply them together.
• If you really want to know the exact total price, use a calculator.
-
What is in-store slack? Consumers often plan for unplanned purchases
Feb 17, 2010 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Pricing practices cost consumers
Apr 12, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
'Healthy' restaurants help make us fat, says a newl study
Sep 24, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Can kitchen spoons be dangerous spoons?
Jan 04, 2010 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Beware the left-digit effect: Price gimmicks may affect choice
Feb 23, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (31) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Can I forget a language?
5 hours ago
-
The Biggest Lie Ever
Feb 09, 2012
-
What are the limits of learning?
Feb 06, 2012
-
Isn't that grammatically wrong?
Feb 06, 2012
-
What does it mean when traders are indifferent?
Feb 04, 2012
-
Peak of Our Civilization
Feb 04, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Social Sciences
More news stories
A frank discussion of the power law and linking correlation to causation
(PhysOrg.com) -- Michael Stumpf a mathematics professor at Imperial College in London, and Mason Porter a lecturer at Oxford have teamed together to write and publish a perspective piece in Science regarding the in ...
Employers feel no love for unscrupulous practice of 'service sweethearting'
A new study led by two Florida State University marketing professors finds that some frontline service employees who are rewarded for hikes in customer loyalty and satisfaction also may engage in "service ...
Other Sciences / Economics & Business
2 hours ago |
not rated yet |
3
The question of life in the ancient world
Theres a general feeling that we dont get the Greeks ancient or modern. Many, including heads of state like Angela Merkel, visibly shake their head in exasperation, rightly or wrongly, at ...
Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils
7 hours ago |
1 / 5 (1) |
3
Sonic Cradle lands spot in TED exhibition
A Simon Fraser University graduate student project that melds music, meditation and modern technology has landed a rare spot as an exhibit at TEDActive 2012 in Palm Springs, California this month.
4 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Chilean miners' rescue capsule on show in London
The capsule used to rescue Chilean miners trapped underground for two months goes on display Saturday at the Science Museum in London -- the first time it has been seen in Europe.
6 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Complex wiring of the nervous system may rely on a just a handful of genes and proteins
Researchers at the Salk Institute have discovered a startling feature of early brain development that helps to explain how complex neuron wiring patterns are programmed using just a handful of critical genes. ...
CIA website offline, Anonymous takes credit
The website of the Central Intelligence Agency was unresponsive on Friday after the hacker group Anonymous claimed to have knocked it offline.
Q&A: Obama and the birth control controversy
(AP) -- What birth control debate? A half-century after the introduction of the pill, acceptance of birth control by American women is virtually universal.
The power of estrogen -- male snakes attract other males
A new study has shown that boosting the estrogen levels of male garter snakes causes them to secrete the same pheromones that females use to attract suitors, and turned the males into just about the sexiest ...
Human cognitive performance suffers following natural disasters, researchers find
Not surprisingly, victims of a natural disaster can experience stress and anxiety, but a new study indicates that it might also cause them to make more errors - some serious - in their daily lives. In their upcoming Human Fa ...
New error-correcting codes guarantee the fastest possible rate of data transmission
Error-correcting codes are one of the triumphs of the digital age. Theyre a way of encoding information so that it can be transmitted across a communication channel such as an optical fiber o ...
Mar 02, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
1) They are poor because they can't do math. Or at least, this is a contributing factor.
2) People who estimate tend to do better because they overestimate the prices.
3) People who estimate do so because they already have good restraint. So they know they can afford to estimate.
4) People who calculate do so because they want to cut it REALLY CLOSE. So they end up overspending. Actually, they'd probably be overspending anyway.
5) The most absurd part - people who "calculate" end up having a WORSE idea of how much they are spending????
So how can they say they are calculating when they are actually failing at math? Doesn't that violate the meaning of calculating? Aren't people estimating because they ALREADY have good shopping habits and can relax?
This study leaves so many variables unaccounted for that it's practically useless. YOU NEED CONTROL VARIABLES FOR GOOD SCIENCE!!!
Mar 02, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
-------
To sum it up, I see no reason to believe that people are overspending as a result of their strategy (Estimate or Calculate). There's nothing but a correlation here, and that doesn't tell us anything about cause and effect.
Unfortunately, the researchers don't seem to understand this:
"When people don't round up, it leads to some unpleasant surprises at the cash register said co-author Koert van Ittersum of the Georgia Institute of Technology."
No, you idiot. Wrong. Your entire study is contradictory and worthless. Lets review:
1) People who calculate overspend.
What is your definition of "calculate", then? Surely it means "to know the correct value". But you contradict that meaning. Worthless.
By any logic, people who know LESS should be overspending more. It's a failure to identify what you're actually measuring that leads to your idiotic conclusion.
Next time, use the scientific method.
-------
Rant ends.