Study: Arctic seabed methane stores destabilizing, venting
March 4, 2010A section of the Arctic Ocean seafloor that holds vast stores of frozen methane is showing signs of instability and widespread venting of the powerful greenhouse gas, according to the findings of an international research team led by University of Alaska Fairbanks scientists Natalia Shakhova and Igor Semiletov.
The research results, published in the March 5 edition of the journal Science, show that the permafrost under the East Siberian Arctic Shelf, long thought to be an impermeable barrier sealing in methane, is perforated and is leaking large amounts of methane into the atmosphere. Release of even a fraction of the methane stored in the shelf could trigger abrupt climate warming.
“The amount of methane currently coming out of the East Siberian Arctic Shelf is comparable to the amount coming out of the entire world’s oceans,” said Shakhova, a researcher at UAF’s International Arctic Research Center. “Subsea permafrost is losing its ability to be an impermeable cap.”
Methane is a greenhouse gas more than 30 times more potent than carbon dioxide. It is released from previously frozen soils in two ways. When the organic material—which contains carbon—stored in permafrost thaws, it begins to decompose and, under oxygen-free conditions, gradually release methane. Methane can also be stored in the seabed as methane gas or methane hydrates and then released as subsea permafrost thaws. These releases can be larger and more abrupt than those that result from decomposition.
The East Siberian Arctic Shelf is a methane-rich area that encompasses more than 2 million square kilometers of seafloor in the Arctic Ocean. It is more than three times as large as the nearby Siberian wetlands, which have been considered the primary Northern Hemisphere source of atmospheric methane. Shakhova’s research results show that the East Siberian Arctic Shelf is already a significant methane source: 7 teragrams yearly, which is equal to the amount of methane emitted from the rest of the ocean. A teragram is equal to about 1.1 million tons.
“Our concern is that the subsea permafrost has been showing signs of destabilization already,” she said. “If it further destabilizes, the methane emissions may not be teragrams, it would be significantly larger.”
Shakhova notes that Earth’s geological record indicates that atmospheric methane concentrations have varied between about .3 to .4 parts per million during cold periods to .6 to .7 parts per million during warm periods. Current average methane concentrations in the Arctic average about 1.85 parts per million, the highest in 400,000 years, she said. Concentrations above the East Siberian Arctic Shelf are even higher.
The East Siberian Arctic Shelf is a relative frontier in methane studies. The shelf is shallow, 50 meters or less in depth, which means it has been alternately submerged or terrestrial, depending on sea levels throughout Earth’s history. During Earth’s coldest periods, it is a frozen arctic coastal plain, and does not release methane. As the planet warms and sea levels rise, it is inundated with seawater, which is 12-15 degrees warmer than the average air temperature.
“It was thought that seawater kept the East Siberian Arctic Shelf permafrost frozen,” Shakhova said. “Nobody considered this huge area.”
Earlier studies in Siberia focused on methane escaping from thawing terrestrial permafrost. Semiletov’s work during the 1990s showed, among other things, that the amount of methane being emitted from terrestrial sources decreased at higher latitudes. But those studies stopped at the coast. Starting in the fall of 2003, Shakhova, Semiletov and the rest of their team took the studies offshore. From 2003 through 2008, they took annual research cruises throughout the shelf and sampled seawater at various depths and the air 10 meters above the ocean. In September 2006, they flew a helicopter over the same area, taking air samples at up to 2,000 meters in the atmosphere. In April 2007, they conducted a winter expedition on the sea ice.
They found that more than 80 percent of the deep water and greater than half of surface water had methane levels more than eight times that of normal seawater. In some areas, the saturation levels reached at least 250 times that of background levels in the summer and 1,400 times higher in the winter.
They found corresponding results in the air directly above the ocean surface. Methane levels were elevated overall and the seascape was dotted with more than 100 hotspots. This, combined with winter expedition results that found methane gas trapped under and in the sea ice, showed the team that the methane was not only being dissolved in the water, it was bubbling out into the atmosphere.
These findings were further confirmed when Shakhova and her colleagues sampled methane levels at higher elevations. Methane levels throughout the Arctic are usually 8 to 10 percent higher than the global baseline. When they flew over the shelf, they found methane at levels another 5 to 10 percent higher than the already elevated arctic levels.
The East Siberian Arctic Shelf, in addition to holding large stores of frozen methane, is more of a concern because it is so shallow. In deep water, methane gas oxidizes into carbon dioxide before it reaches the surface. In the shallows of the East Siberian Arctic Shelf, methane simply doesn’t have enough time to oxidize, which means more of it escapes into the atmosphere. That, combined with the sheer amount of methane in the region, could add a previously uncalculated variable to climate models.
“The release to the atmosphere of only one percent of the methane assumed to be stored in shallow hydrate deposits might alter the current atmospheric burden of methane up to 3 to 4 times,” Shakhova said. “The climatic consequences of this are hard to predict.”
Shakhova, Semiletov and collaborators from 12 institutions in five countries plan to continue their studies in the region, tracking the source of the methane emissions and drilling into the seafloor in an effort to estimate how much methane is stored there.
-
Just How Significant Is Methane On Titan?
Sep 12, 2005 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Siberian permafrost melting
Aug 11, 2005 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Arctic land and seas account for up to 25 percent of world's carbon sink
Oct 14, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Warming ocean contributes to global warming
Aug 14, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Scientist: Microbe Community Deep Beneath Arctic Permafrost Needs Study
Dec 18, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (29) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
4 / 5 (22) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Wind Waves in Reservoir ~ Wind run-up and Wind set-up
12 hours ago
-
Balance of oxygen in the atmosphere
Feb 01, 2012
-
The case for a methanol-based economy
Jan 30, 2012
-
Weather in a rotating cylinder
Jan 25, 2012
-
Importance of difference between SVP over ice and water?
Jan 19, 2012
-
Ozone and atmosphere sampling
Jan 16, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Study shows global glaciers, ice caps, shedding billions of tons of mass annually
Earth's glaciers and ice caps outside of the regions of Greenland and Antarctica are shedding roughly 150 billion tons of ice annually, according to a new study led by the University of Colorado Boulder.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
1 hour ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Building mountains in a bottle
(PhysOrg.com) -- Scientists are preparing to launch a 10-year project to study water resources, gas exchange and carbon cycling in three man-made landscapes built in a half-acre laboratory at the University ...
6 hours ago |
4 / 5 (1) |
0
|
VLT takes most detailed infrared image of the Carina Nebula
(PhysOrg.com) -- ESO's Very Large Telescope has delivered the most detailed infrared image of the Carina Nebula stellar nursery taken so far. Many previously hidden features, scattered across a spectacular ...
6 hours ago |
5 / 5 (5) |
3
|
NASA looking for more space taxis
NASA is looking for more ways to get astronauts to the International Space Station. The space agency put out a call today for commercial space companies to submit bids as part of the latest round of the Commercial ...
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
4 hours ago |
4.3 / 5 (4) |
2
When stars play planetary pinball
Many of us remember playing pinball at the local arcade while growing up; it turns out that some stars like it as well. Binary stars can play tug-of-war with an unfortunate planet, flinging it into a wide ...
5 hours ago |
4 / 5 (1) |
0
Short fasting cycles work as well as chemotherapy in mice
Man may not live by bread alone, but cancer in animals appears less resilient, judging by a study that found chemotherapy drugs work better when combined with cycles of short, severe fasting.
Gene therapy for inherited blindness succeeds in patients' other eye
Gene therapy for congenital blindness has taken another step forward, as researchers further improved vision in three adult patients previously treated in one eye. After receiving the same treatment in their ...
Physicists build highly efficient 'no-waste' laser
A team of University of California, San Diego researchers has built the smallest room-temperature nanolaser to date, as well as an even more startling device: a highly efficient, "thresholdless" laser that ...
Study shows how DNA finds its match
It's been more than 50 years since James Watson and Francis Crick showed that DNA is a double helix of two strands that complement each other. But how does a short piece of DNA find its match, out of the millions ...
Transparent iron? For the first time, an experiment shows that atomic nuclei can become transparent
At the high-brilliance synchrotron light source PETRA III, a team of DESY scientists headed by Dr. Ralf Röhlsberger has succeeded in making atomic nuclei transparent with the help of X-ray light. At the ...
'Explorers,' who embrace the uncertainty of choices, use specific part of cortex
Life shrouds most choices in mystery. Some people inch toward a comfortable enough spot and stick close to that rewarding status quo. Out to dinner, they order the usual. Others consider their options systematically ...
Mar 04, 2010
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (13)
Mar 04, 2010
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (7)
Check out for example new solar cell discovery - 9%
efficiency, simple spin-coasting deposition (no need for expensive vacuum chemical vapour deposition)
accessible to any electrochemical lab, no rare elements, only Cu, Zn, S and a little Selenium (not that rare).
Kesterite cell:
http://www.physor...054.html
I am looking forward to buy one for my roof paying 0.1$/W.
Regards,
Yevgen
Mar 04, 2010
Rank: 2 / 5 (12)
Mar 04, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (6)
Hopefully, before long, the entire roof covering itself will be composed of some type of solar cell shingles or sheathing.
I hope that they can be manufactured with a very high "R Value"- it looks like it's gonna get hot!
Mar 04, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (11)
It is certainly isn't any warmer in the arctic today than it was in 1903 when Amundsen sailed thru the NW passage.
Mar 04, 2010
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (9)
Mar 04, 2010
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (9)
http://bit.ly/d1XxIz
The research seems to suggest that today's trends are pretty rapid and extensive. And they probably aren't done, given the inertia involved and the apparent dominance of amplifying feedbacks. The article also notes that methane is already at it's highest in 400,000 years. Still a secondary factor for now though.
Verkle, who said anything about "control"? That's a bit like saying someone who sets a forest fire has control. All we're doing is providing the rapid fossil carbon buildup to which the climate system responds. A massive experiment with the holocene biosphere.
On solar, what's needed is a reduced average cost per kW (and inexpensive storage or a major grid upgrade). For now, coal and oil remain the (relatively) low cost kings in the U.S. Putting a price on using the atmosphere as a fossil carbon sewer, and/or incentivizing the promising technologies for a given region, would be helpful.
Mar 05, 2010
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
Mar 05, 2010
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
Mar 05, 2010
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (7)
Mar 05, 2010
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (12)
Good job, deniers, you've accomplished terminal apathy across the internet. I hope you're happy.
Mar 05, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
Mar 05, 2010
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (6)
Mar 05, 2010
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (7)
Mar 05, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
Mar 05, 2010
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
I am satisfied that the science is solid, that AGW is real, and that we need a Game Plan to address it NOW. Relatively small increments of "A-Carbon" contribution drives and amplifies many other feedback processes, only two of which are discussed in the article.
It appears to me that most of those on the "denier" side attack AGW from the basis of percieved threat to their socioeconomic status. And we wonder why, when there is undoubtedly plenty of $$ to be made in green tech. I think mainly because there is bound to plenty of churn in the sector, as is usual with the development and deployment of new tech(s), and therefore plenty of money will be lost, too. So, to their way of thinking it is better to stick with the obsolete but still(if only for a little while longer) stable fossil-fuel driven economic model. Depressing
Mar 06, 2010
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (11)
Everybody that agrees with this statement, turn off your computers now!
Methane, from trees, plants, cows, beetles, ants and permafrost, we are doomed!
Assemble around your rubbish bins, and beat your chests, and cry, repent, repent!
The rest of us can carry on with our lives!
Mar 06, 2010
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
firstly; you do understand the ecocline from boreal forest to tundra with permafrost don't you. trees don't expell CH4 but CO2 and O2, vegetation only breaks down and releases CH4 under anarobic conditions, an its not the plants that give off CH4 but the bacterial decomposers.
secondly; where have you read in any of the science press any reports calling for a ludite solution to climate change? ludicrous.
your response smacks of a certain religious zeal and shows a familar ignorance of the science (read "ignorance" as not being learned in the subject your posting about)
your top line is quite right though and this report is quite alarming.
Hansens paper on trace gasses some years ago warned about just this kind of scenario contributing towards positive feedbacks.
Mar 06, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (10)
And to which address do I send the cheque for the primary school lesson you gave? Saturday, your day off, and away from the kindergarden are you?
AGW is a crock.
CO2 is heavier than air and drops to ground at night!
Miners and Speleologists are dead scared of CO2 because it lurks and accumulates in the bowels of the earth, caves, shaft bottoms, and big enclosed tanks.
But it is only in Climate Science that CO2 gets wings, must be all the Red Bull its drinking!
And we start another scardy store with Methane, and the tundura, and the next item.
Maybe methane is the cause of the Terrestrial Gamma-Ray Flashes, only recently discovered?
Mar 06, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
first time i've heard that CO2 drops to the ground at night, is that becuase the wind stops at night as well?
care to post any scienctificaly backed up responses or are you just going to subscribe to plain old odd philosophies here?
time is going to tell on this and sadly it looks like people like you are going to be proved very sadly wrong, not only that but the denier propaganda you post has very real detrimemental effects on very many peoples futures.
i do hope your religious mindset is prepared for the reprocusions of your actions
Mar 06, 2010
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (3)
Other scientists working on the subsea methane threat are not yet ready to make a mountain out of a mole hill just yet.
http://www.scient...ime-bomb
I have not seen any scientific evidence that this is anything but natural. The Paleo record shows that Arctic temperatures were much higher than today during the mid-Pliocene and the Eemian Eras when Greenland was mostly free of ice. Specialists say that clouds, El Nino and ocean currents bringing tropical water North were the cause for a hotter Arctic during those times. This was followed by increased cloud cover and rapid cooling.
Mar 06, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Mar 06, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
Oxygen is heavier than air as well, you know; 32 g/mol vs. about 29 g/mol. That's why fires don't burn during the day, when oxygen becomes diluted throughout the atmosphere, and trees spontaneously burst into flame during the night when all the oxygen sinks down to the surface.
Or at least that's what WOULD happen, but of course the fires don't burn because Argon, a noble gas that exists at much higher concentrations in the atmosphere than CO2 and that has an atomic mass of 40 g/mol, plunges down to the surface during the night, easily replacing all other gases except for CO2 and a few other trace compounds. This is also why all animal life has evolved special organic scuba gear to enable to to survive through the asphyxiating night.
...Or perhaps convection is powerful enough in the troposphere and stratosphere to mix all gases throughout the lower atmosphere without much regard to molecular weight.
Mar 07, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Mar 07, 2010
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
You are living proof that evolution is real, actual and still happening today! Pity the AGW mob wants to stop that strong force of nature dead in its tracks!
Hyena blood then, so strong that you can't suppress it at times?
Mar 07, 2010
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
Mar 07, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (7)
There is plenty of research about the nocturnal/diturnal concentration of CO2 at stations that includes amongst others Wisconsin and the Amazons. Wisconsin uses an observation tower and in the Amazon jungle, balloons were used to collect the samples. The day to night CO2 concentration swing is 100 ppm, with the just before dawn period recording the highest CO2 concentration, provided its a still night. This is supposed to be common knowledge.
If there is still night, without winds and turbulence, the CO2 concentration increases by 100 ppm. What explains the increase of the CO2 in the before dawn period?
Unless you believe that CO2 keeps floating away up to the moon, where it eats the cheese and cause big holes!
If CO2 doesn't drop down to the ground, pray, why are all the trees, plants and grasses so green?
Mar 07, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
However, I'd like to point out that there's another explanation for the change in CO2 concentrations than day/night temperature differences (which wouldn't change gas distribution, in any case; that would change the density of the atmosphere, but it wouldn't do a dad-blamed thing to stratification). With the exception of CAM plants, which make up a minority of the total number of plant species, most plants only take in CO2 during the daytime, when the sun's shining and they can conduct photosynthesis. As a result, at night CO2 is not being consumed by much of anything, while still being produced by animals--so its concentration rises.
Mar 07, 2010
Rank: 2 / 5 (7)
People can die in caves, underground excavations, wells, enclosed tanks because CO2 accummulates in the bottom. Ask any professional engineer in charge of workmen.
Ventilation in enclosed spaces is rather important.
CO2 sinks to the bottom, methane, Carbon monoxide, floats to the top of an excavation.
The Amazon study, done late 1990s, mentioned a maximum swing of 100 ppm.
Mar 07, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Again, I ask, why are you here? You obviously don't have much of a background in anything science based, but you feel the need to harass others with your beliefs.
Maybe in the future, if you want to be taken seriously, you can actually use citations and useful science, rather than routine assertions that are meaningless.
Mar 08, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
The response for the most part is ignorant claptrap about AGW and how science sucks because it tells us things we don't want to hear. I don't think any of this is going to reduce the emissions of methane, slow down global warming, or keep the guilt away when your children ask you why didn't you do something when you could.
Mar 08, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Mar 08, 2010
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (2)
Mar 08, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
Kindly explain the nocturnal/diturnal swing of up to 100 ppm in CO2 concentration measured by scientists, without letting CO2 drop down to ground.
It is a sad day, and maybe a true reflection of the insular mind set of 'climate change' scientists, when the botanists doing research for the American Peanut Growers Association produces more relevant and useable science than the rest put together!
And now we have to worry about Methane!
What happened to ozone, and the hole and the melting south pole? Demons and dragons all around!
Mar 08, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
the botanists would be measureing and looking at an entirely different situation then the climate scientists though, obviously eh.
trying to bring it back onto topic though, this report isn't about plant CO2 respiration or diurnal CO2 swings in the amazon but about accelerating CH4 release in the arctic.
rushty im interested where you've got the figure of us not knowing 90% about, your not going to do a rumsfield here are you and talk about known unknows and unknown unknowns.
and yes theres reports of measurements from spitsburgen island and off the california coast. and again CH4 measurements seem to be rising, sound scientific literature around to read about this.
Mar 08, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
As for the ozone hole? It is still there. Tazmania is almost empty of human habitation because of it. The South Pole stuff? Obviously you don't know anything about what you're talking, no one has recently claimed that the south pole is thawing. The Antarctic has one of the more complex climates of anywhere else.
Why don't you bring up the 4 authors that posted about global cooling in the 70's? That seems to be about your speed.
Mar 08, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
When are you going to throw the fact that you have TWO ADVANCED DEGREES in my face? It appears as if you cannot get the recognition in your workplace and must use a forum like this to boost your very low self-esteem.
The hole in the ozone is closing, of late its being blamed for contributing to Global Warming!
I cannot talk about Tasmania, however, when I visited Torres del Paine, we stayed in Punta Areanas, much further South than Tasmania. Punta Areanas is a lovely bustling city with lots of young educated - with environmental qualifications - Chileans moving there to get away from the Urban Rat Race.
If you cannot answer the question about the nocturnal swing in CO2 concentration, without getting personal, just say so.
Now you can blast out details of your exceptional, and surely impressive, CV, over to you!
Mar 08, 2010
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
without a citation to the work(s) that you are attempting to quote, I cannot agree or disagree with it. Right now, it is only your statement that there is a 100ppm nocturnal swing in CO2 in a single region of the Earth. I have nothing to go on but your word, which has shown incredible ignorance of the science at hand, and so has no credibility. Are there nocturnal swings? Probably. Are they different in different regions depending on fauna and temperature gradients. Probably. Have you given a citation for anything you've ever claimed? Absolutely not.
I'm more than willing to read anything you care to cite, why won't you do it?
But here is a challenge to you, would you please also cite where I have ever said anything about any degrees or certificates that I might have in order to shore up my opinions?
Mar 08, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Mar 08, 2010
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Facts not in evidence: Any indication of a positive feedback loop. This may just be the top of the bell curve = the undersea Methane source(s) are certainly finite ... and there is some evidence that Methane may be increasing, planet wide, sources being local breakdowns of longer chain hydrocarbons to entry into the atmosphere from space.
Besides, this is good news for an energy hungry society, Methane being the best of natural occurring hydrocarbon gas, combustion producing just CO2 and water.
(JayK: From your other posts here, you seem to include possible problems with increased CO2 in the atmosphere ... which in this articles time frame of 400,000 years = Not!)
Mar 08, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Could you also include your hypothesis on collection of this CH4? I'm sure the energy companies would love to know exactly how they can create a system that would tap into these reserves of trapped CH4 that are spread out over much of the Arctic circle.
Maybe a big huge funnel constructed entirely by the egos of denialists?
Mar 08, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Real Climate summary of tipping-points and positive feedback loops:
http://www.realcl...-return/
In the IPCC, 2007d:78 http://www.ipcc.c...port.htm
What else would you like?
Mar 08, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (3)
Now on the article, methane clathrates are always in danger of unsettling as each year they move closer and closer to the oceanic floor that is subducted along fault lines allowing massive amounts of Methane to escape from aqueous solution. This is a dangerous thing, there are some scientists that believed, (not sure if they still do) that clathrates could have been responsible for at least one mass extinction.
Mar 08, 2010
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (3)
The guilt over global warming that everyone feels is partially subconsciously related to humanity's addiction to air travel, which is a ridiculously high contributor of CO2 while it actually uses the oxygen intake to eliminate O2 in the process. Ironically, in this day and age, nobody actually needs to fly, so unless we stop talking about the problem and actually address it, all this talk is just so much rhetoric.
I happen to like GW. It is currently about 10 degrees Celsius higher than what we used to consider the seasonal norm where I live, and I'm quite enjoying it.
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (5)
What about that other lovely Climate Change Science mineral - Dry Ice?
As all solid states are now minerals!
Yeah, let's make our own rules and regulations up as we go along: -
Fly CO2 baby, fly up high!
Momma Gaia gave you wings!
Mar 13, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
-"To discern whether this extensive CH4 venting over the ESAS is a steadily ongoing phenomenon or signals the start of a more massive CH4 release period, there is an urgent need for expanded multifaceted investigations into these inaccessible but climate-sensitive shelf seas north of Siberia."-
In other words, we just started studying this, so we don’t know whether permafrost is gaining or losing its ability to cap the methane.
So there is nothing in the study that claims that the methane stores are "destabilizing" as the headline claims. The study specifically says that we don't know if they are destabilizing or not.
These are layers of subsea permafrost. They were flooded at the end of the last ice age. They have been melting ever since then, and will continue to do so no matter what we do. No need to panic.