Wind resistance: Analysis suggests generating electricity from large-scale wind farms could influence climate
March 12, 2010 by Morgan Bettex
Wind power has emerged as a viable renewable energy source in recent years -- one that proponents say could lessen the threat of global warming. Although the American Wind Energy Association estimates that only about 2 percent of U.S. electricity is currently generated from wind turbines, the U.S. Department of Energy has said that wind power could account for a fifth of the nation's electricity supply by 2030.
But a new MIT analysis may serve to temper enthusiasm about wind power, at least at very large scales. Ron Prinn, TEPCO Professor of Atmospheric Science, and principal research scientist Chien Wang of the Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, used a climate model to analyze the effects of millions of wind turbines that would need to be installed across vast stretches of land and ocean to generate wind power on a global scale. Such a massive deployment could indeed impact the climate, they found, though not necessarily with the desired outcome.
In a paper published online Feb. 22 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Wang and Prinn suggest that using wind turbines to meet 10 percent of global energy demand in 2100 could cause temperatures to rise by one degree Celsius in the regions on land where the wind farms are installed, including a smaller increase in areas beyond those regions. Their analysis indicates the opposite result for wind turbines installed in water: a drop in temperatures by one degree Celsius over those regions. The researchers also suggest that the intermittency of wind power could require significant and costly backup options, such as natural gas-fired power plants.
Prinn cautioned against interpreting the study as an argument against wind power, urging that it be used to guide future research that explores the downsides of large-scale wind power before significant resources are invested to build vast wind farms. “We’re not pessimistic about wind,” he said. “We haven’t absolutely proven this effect, and we’d rather see that people do further research.”
Daniel Kirk-Davidoff, a chief scientist for MDA Federal Inc., which develops remote sensing technologies, and adjunct professor of meteorology at the University of Maryland, has examined the climate impacts of large-scale wind farms in previous studies. To him, the most promising result of the MIT analysis is that it indicates that the large-scale installation of wind turbines doesn’t appear to slow wind flow so much that it would be impossible to generate a desirable amount of energy. “When you put the wind turbines in, they are generating the kind of power you’d hope for,” he said.
Tapping the wind resource
Previous studies have predicted that annual world energy demand will increase from 14 terawatts (trillion watts) in 2002 to 44 terawatts by 2100. In their analysis, Prinn and Wang focus on the impact of using wind turbines to generate five terawatts of electric power.
Using a climate model developed by the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research, the researchers simulated the aerodynamic effects of large-scale wind farms — located both on land and on the ocean — to analyze how the atmosphere, ocean and land would respond over a 60-year span.
For the land analysis, they simulated the effects of wind farms by using data about how objects similar to turbines, such as undulating hills and clumps of trees, affect surface “roughness,” or friction that can disturb wind flow. After adding this data to the model, the researchers observed that the surface air temperature over the wind farm regions increased by about one degree Celsius, which averages out to an increase of .15 degrees Celsius over the entire global surface.
According to Prinn and Wang, this temperature increase occurs because the wind turbines affect two processes that play critical roles in determining surface temperature and atmospheric circulation: vertical turbulent motion and horizontal heat transport. Turbulent motion refers to the process by which heat and moisture are transferred from the land or ocean surface to the lower atmosphere. Horizontal heat transport is the process by which steady large-scale winds transport excessive heat away from warm regions, generally in a horizontal direction, and redistribute it to cooler regions. This process is critical for large-scale heat redistribution, whereas the effects of turbulent motion are generally more localized.
In the analysis, the wind turbines on land reduced wind speed, particularly on the downwind side of the wind farms, which reduced the strength of the turbulent motion and horizontal heat transport processes that move heat away from the Earth’s surface. This resulted in less heat being transported to the upper parts of the atmosphere, as well as to other regions farther away from the wind farms. The effect is similar to being at the beach on a windy summer day: If the wind weakened or disappeared, it would get warmer.
In contrast, when examining ocean-based wind farms, Prinn and Wang found that wind turbines cooled the surface by more than one degree Celsius. They said that these results are unreliable, however, because in their analysis, they modeled the effects of wind turbines by introducing surface friction in the form of large artificial waves. But they acknowledge that this is not an accurate comparison, meaning that a better way of simulating marine-based wind turbines must be developed before reliable conclusions can be made.
In addition to changes in temperatures and surface heat fluxes, they also observed changes in large-scale precipitation, particularly at the mid-latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere. Although these changes exceeded 10 percent in some areas, the global total changes were not very large, according to Prinn and Wang.
To investigate the effect of wind variability on the intermittency in wind power generation, the researchers used the climate model to estimate the monthly-mean wind power consumption and electrical generation for each continent, concluding that there are very large and geographically extensive seasonal variations, particularly over North and South America, Africa and the Middle East. They explain that this unreliability means that an electrical generation system with greatly increased use of wind turbines would still require backup generation even if continental-scale power lines enabled electrical transmission from windy to non-windy areas.
Although Prinn and Wang believe their results for the land-based wind farms are robust, Wang called their analysis a “proof-of-concept” study that requires additional theoretical and modeling work, as well as field experiments for complete verification.
Their next step is to address how to simulate ocean-based wind farms more accurately. They plan to collaborate with aeronautical engineers to develop parameters for the climate model that will allow them to simulate turbines in coastal waters.
Provided by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (news : web)
-
Recycling wind turbines
Sep 21, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Smart wind turbines can predict the wind
Jan 05, 2010 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Ocean Wind Power Maps Reveal Possible Wind Energy Sources
Jul 09, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Global wind map identifies wind power potential
May 16, 2005 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Winter shutdown approved for wind farms
Sep 24, 2005 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (30) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Discrepancy between oxygen and carbon-dioxide levels
10 hours ago
-
where gems are found in the world
13 hours ago
-
Wind Waves in Reservoir ~ Wind run-up and Wind set-up
Feb 08, 2012
-
Balance of oxygen in the atmosphere
Feb 01, 2012
-
The case for a methanol-based economy
Jan 30, 2012
-
Weather in a rotating cylinder
Jan 25, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Mars Science Laboratory computer issue resolved
(PhysOrg.com) -- Engineers have found the root cause of a computer reset that occurred two months ago on NASA's Mars Science Laboratory and have determined how to correct it.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
13 minutes ago |
not rated yet |
0
|
Putin receives 'prehistoric' water from Antarctic lake
Prime Minister Vladimir Putin was given a water sample Friday taken from a pristine lake hidden under Antarctic ice for over a million years, after Russian scientists drilled down to its surface.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
19 minutes ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
Rockot to launch two Sentinel satellites
ESA and Eurockot today signed contracts for launching two ESA satellites: Sentinel-2A and Sentinel-3A will fly in 2013 on Rockot vehicles from the Plesetsk Cosmodrome in northern Russia for Europes GMES ...
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
15 minutes ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
Probing a link from Sahara dust to climate change
Qilong Min, Ph.D., Senior Research Associate and Professor with the Atmospheric Sciences Research Center (ASRC) at the University at Albany is developing innovative ways to measure how dust in the Sahara Desert ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
8 minutes ago |
not rated yet |
0
Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago
(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...
New error-correcting codes guarantee the fastest possible rate of data transmission
Error-correcting codes are one of the triumphs of the digital age. Theyre a way of encoding information so that it can be transmitted across a communication channel such as an optical fiber o ...
A frank discussion of the power law and linking correlation to causation
(PhysOrg.com) -- Michael Stumpf a mathematics professor at Imperial College in London, and Mason Porter a lecturer at Oxford have teamed together to write and publish a perspective piece in Science regarding the in ...
Advanced power-grid model finds low-cost, low-carbon future in West
(PhysOrg.com) -- The least expensive way for the Western U.S. to reduce greenhouse gas emissions enough to help prevent the worst consequences of global warming is to replace coal with renewable and other ...
Small modular reactor design could be a 'SUPERSTAR'
(PhysOrg.com) -- Though most of today's nuclear reactors are cooled by water, we've long known that there are alternatives; in fact, the world's first nuclear-powered electricity in 1951 came from a reactor ...
High school students test best with 7 hours' rest
(Medical Xpress) -- Whether or not you know any high school students that actually get nine hours of sleep each night, thats what federal guidelines currently prescribe.
The question of life in the ancient world
Theres a general feeling that we dont get the Greeks ancient or modern. Many, including heads of state like Angela Merkel, visibly shake their head in exasperation, rightly or wrongly, at ...
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (5)
Strategically positioning wind turbines to generate electricity in places where they can cool the earth will be a triple benefit; namely a clean energy source, a cooler planet, and less hurricanes.
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (7)
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 4.6 / 5 (5)
But before doing that, this research needs to be duplicated (without using the same software) and refined. It would be nice to have a model which can predict the local and global affects of particular wind farm projects.
As for hurricanes, don't expect much effect. Wind farms may change the latitude at which hurricanes become extra-tropical. To affect the creation of hurricanes from tropical depressions would require wind farms far from land at latitudes where they won't produce much power. Much easier to dump a few shiploads of ping-pong balls in the right locations.
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (13)
To guarantee the base load you need back-up facilities. So you need 200% installed capacity!
Nice to live in a very rich country that can put-up windmills just for fun! Always looks good on postcards!
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (9)
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (10)
Meaning, that use of fossil and other hydrocarbon fuels still would be necessary in many cases, which means that there would be an increase in emissions... Nice. :)
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (5)
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
I don't think that's what the study was saying. The study does not say that wind turbines heat the air; it said they slow down the transfer of natural heat away from the wind farms, which will heat the farm while cooling nearby areas that used to receive that heat (such as the atmosphere above the farm), just like a beach warming up on a still day. Likewise, wind turbines over the ocean do not cool the atmosphere overall. The atmosphere would not be warmed or cooled overall by any turbines anywhere; heat would merely be distributed differently. The article could be read to imply otherwise (especially the part where they "average out" the effect of the land-based turbines by themselves to a 0.15 deg C heating globally), but these articles are often fuzzier than the source material.
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
That would be one of the affects of CO2 production that we want to eliminate. Wind power appears to be contrary to our goals.
Yet another reason to support nuclear.
Most geothermal plants actually increase the incidence of volcanic and tectonic activity.
Nuclear is the only option that can be used cleanly and effectively with little environmental effect.
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (8)
In other words, there would be areas that rose in temperature in and around the wind farms that would go as high as 1 degree Celsius. The temperature rise on land at the other side of the wind farms of the sizes mentioned is predicted to rise by a smaller amount but it still will rise. Globally, it would contribute 0.15 degree Celsius. Well, at least that is what is predicted by the model. :)
It still does not change the fact that fossil fuels still will be needed, all those emissions included--unless we go nuclear as Skeptic_Heretic suggested. Otherwise, large scale wind farms are not in our best interest at present level of technology.
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 3.2 / 5 (5)
To some extent, wind power will merely replace the production of plant-derived solar power(fossil- an bio- fuels). Also, solar arrays themselves-especially if so engineered, will cause shade, and therefore cooling. I would expect that between the two, some balance will be struck.
The replacement of fossil fuels(and the solar energy they represent) with wind and direct solar will likely result in more overall cooling than heating. And it is inevitable that there will be some local variability in heating/cooling wherever these technologies are deployed.
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (4)
No investor in their right mind would invest in windmills just for fun. They cost money to install, and to maintain, and you get power to sell. At the end of the equation you get profit. Thats why people put up windmills.
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
They are not talking about replacement of fossil fuel generators with wind. They are talking about adding wind to existing infrastructure. The same goes for solar.
Both large scale solar and wind farms are bad for the environment. The gases used to manufacture and clean them are respectively over 17,000 and 23,000 times more potent GHGs than CO2. And, both require backup power plants, to boot. That means fossil fuels unless the backup plants are nuclear.
They will make the situation worse than you know done large scale. Geothermal or nuclear (whether by fission or, when the technology becomes viable, fusion) are the way to go.
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (4)
Both need backup storage, not generation.
The amount of relative heating created by solar arrays depends on surface proximity and co-generation tech being deployed, and again, also depends on the way the arrays are materially engineered.
I do agree with you though, that fusion would be the way to go- barring some truly breakthrough technology like harvesting vacuum energy or something along those lines.
Mar 12, 2010
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (6)
Where does the article above say that? I have not yet read the paper. Perhaps it says this there. It is sitting on my desktop as I type this so I will read it as I find a little spare time.
As to solar arrays, large solar arrays are not laid on rooftops or mounted on frames like those one sees in home installations. They are on stands that resemble rows of rather large bleachers and have heatsinks attached to their backs to increase efficiency. These suckers radiate quite a bit of heat all around them. Your mileage may vary, however... :)
Mar 13, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
The waste produced is dangerously radioactive for ten thousand years. All the waste produced so far is sitting around in temporary storage in containers that are in danger of leaking radioactive material and there has been no permanant storage sites yet agreed upon.
This is very dangerous material that could contaminate water, soil or air at any time in that next ten thousand years.It could also be stolen and used in a dirty bomb.I would hardly call that clean with little environment effect.
Mar 13, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
Believe nothing that you read or hear without verifying it yourself unless it fits your preexisting world view. I live on a small poor Island (and like it that way). Through careful management our power costs 6¢ KWh^-1. Our infrastructure costs are very high, for maintaining the 10 miles of UW cable and the 5 MW diesel-electric capability.
Please cite a reliable audit of a windmill producing a profit today and with zero indebtedness, subsidies, grants ad nauseam.
If such existed then Wisconsin Statutes §66.0401 would not be needed.
Mar 13, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
The US isn't in it's right mind. You know that.
Mar 13, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
fail
but a win for irony
Mar 14, 2010
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
But as to the models, I can give anecdotal testimony that large scale windmill farms do cause a degree of interference with respect to air flow across a landscape and thereby raise temperatures, the same as solar farms do in their own way. It stands to reason that this effect would only increase on larger scale deployment of said environmentally unfriendly technology.
But, if you noticed my post above, I placed a smiley after the word "model" and qualified my remarks with the words "at least" in the same sentence.
And, even the scientists who wrote the study acknowledged problems with the models. Read the article and the actual paper. I did. :)
Mar 14, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I'm not suggesting that more forests be removed, just stating the fact that there has already been large-scale deforestation, so at the very least, more turbines would restore the regime closer to it's original state.
If, at some point, deforestation stops and windmill farms continue to proliferate, then we may see the effects that this study suggests.
Mar 14, 2010
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (7)
Valid, functional peer-review would have caught the errors before their finding their way into the final version of the report.
Nevertheless, the fact remains that the WWF and like organizations exaggerate information to draw in funding from those of like mindset.
The article and the actual study already lend support to what I already suspected only anecdotally. Well, there is that and the fact that thousands of birds of all kinds (including endangered species) are killed every year by these environmentally unfriendly monstrosities.
Mar 14, 2010
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (7)
you quote something often said by nimby's against windfarms, the bird death rate, quite wrong, well not when their correctly placed anyways.
maybe you could consider how our energy infrastructure could be changed? instead of having centralised power distribution, change it to a more localised system, taking it out of the hands of multi-national power generation companies and into the hands of local communities. or would that be against your capitalist growth model to have local communities empowered and making decisions for themselves?
Mar 14, 2010
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (4)
Bird kills are not the only thing I have against wind farms. Those on large scale are not a viable solution to the energy problem for several reasons, not the least of which are inefficiency, unsightliness and potential to modify climate, environment and habitat in serious ways.
How many windfarms are "placed correctly" and would you be so kind as to describe how one sets one up "correctly" so as not to kill flying wildlife?
As to how to change the energy infrastructure, I have no real idea as to how we can accomplish that at this point. Local control? Government control? World control? Everyone for oneself with individual power generation for all? Who could afford it? Better or worse for society?
Mar 14, 2010
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (3)
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (4)
The facility in the Diablo Mountains/Altamont Pass area, in California, alone kills--conservatively--4,700 birds a year, including California Golden Eagles and a number of migratory birds. That facility is the No. 2 producer of wind power.
The facility over in Backbone Mountain, in the Appalachians, killed over 4,000 bats in one year alone (2004). I have not even bothered to tally up the total kills to date.
I cannot even fathom the amount of kills that could grow with a 10% increase. I can conceive of more damage done to the environment than the current done by fossil fuels as a whole, to date. (Just to keep things in perspective, mind you). But, your mileage may vary--depending upon with whom you speak. :)
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
And if it could be used for that, why not for farming desert areas using rechargable machines. If it were in a place like Arizona, you could use the supports for shade cloth to lessen the sun. Plants reflect IR pretty darn well.
This whole article is just discussing a model, not an actual study. Though it would be interesting if you could generate a very mild hurricane in the tropics and then harvest the wind...
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
I am amazed that no one else noticed.
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
In addition, generative capacity/availability/demand very often is measured by Watts (W), Kilowatts (KW), Megawatts (MW), Gigawatts (GW), and Terawatts (TW), whereas a term like kwH (kilowatt Hour) is often applied to actual consumption. Something like that isn't worth mentioning in such a context.
Mar 16, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
http://www.batsan...port.pdf
Note that the way to limit the kills is to shut the turbines down during certain times or to lower cut-in time so as not to attact them. Even the report states that for some facilities such practices will impact productivity.
A search for information will show other information regarding kills of wildlife by these monstrosities.
Nonetheless, shutting them down or limiting cut-in time means use of fossil fuels during these times to make up for lower productivity.
Mar 17, 2010
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Mar 17, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Certainly it is alright to kill tens of thousands more birds and tens of thousands of bats because so many flying things die by automobile, right? :rolleyes:
Silly me! I thought the reasoning behind so-called green techologies was to help the environment, not make things worse.
Combined with with all the new bird and bat kills that should be expected, the fact that there is a chance that these devices potentially could make things worse globally to any degree seem to me to make them not so green an option, after all.
Mar 18, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
May be you should reread what you have written, and hopefully you can see the funny side otherwise you just might go insane with shame..
Mar 18, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
One domesticated cat kills approx 200 birds per year! Non IPCC peer-reviewed source and therefor more reliable than next week's weather forecast!
Go Green! Ban all pets!
Mar 18, 2010
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
It is plain to see that they account for a tiny fraction of mortalities, summarised here:
We have reviewed reports indicating the following estimated annual avian collision mortality in
the United States:
; Vehicles: 60 million - 80 million
; Buildings and Windows: 98 million - 980 million
; Powerlines: tens of thousands - 174 million
; Communication Towers: 4 million - 50 million
Housecats 100 million
; Wind Generation Facilities: 10,000 - 40,000
I hope no-one is suggesting there is a form of avian apartheid where only the rare and endangered birds can seek out wind turbines..that would be insane... wouldn't it?
Mar 18, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Mar 20, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
seems like a nonsense thing to even think about. the answer is " i don't know" nothing more.