Cro Magnon skull shows that our brains have shrunk
March 15, 2010 by Lisa Zyga
A 3D image of a Cro Magnon brain. Credit: Times Online.
(PhysOrg.com) -- A new replica of an early modern human brain has provided further evidence for the theory that the human brain has been shrinking. The skull belonged to an elderly Cro Magnon man, whose skeleton is called Cro Magnon 1. The entire skeleton was discovered in 1868 in the Cro Magnon cave in Dordogne, France, and has since become one of the most famous Upper Palaeolithic skeletons. Using new technology, researchers have produced a replica of the 28,000-year-old brain and found that it is about 15-20% larger than our brains.
To produce the brain replica, called an endocast, the scientists first digitally scanned the interior of the empty skull. The images revealed the impression left by the brain on the neurocranium, which was then transformed into a 3D image. Software was then used to fabricate the brain endocast.
The researchers, including anthropologist Antoine Balzeau of the French Museum of Natural History, said that an initial assessment of Cro Magnon 1's skull supported the theory that brains have grown slightly smaller over the past tens of thousands of years, reversing an earlier trend toward larger brains.
The finding doesn’t suggest that humans today are less intelligent than earlier humans. Although previous studies have found a very small relationship between brain size and intelligence, many other factors affect brain intelligence.
For instance, different parts of the brain have different functions. The researchers found that the Cro Magnon brain appears to have had a smaller cerebellum - the brain region linked to motor control and language - than our brains today. The researchers explain that this finding shows that some parts of the brain are more “compressible” than others, while other regions seem to provide a benefit by growing larger.
Although scientists don’t know for sure why our overall brains are shrinking, some researchers hypothesize that our brains are becoming more efficient as they grow smaller. Having a large brain comes at a cost, so smaller brains have an advantage since they enable the body to use the extra energy for other purposes. On the other hand, perhaps a large skull had certain advantages for earlier people. One idea is that Cro Magnons needed large skulls because of the difficulty in chewing their food, which included lots of meat such as rabbits, foxes, and horses. Since our food has become easier to eat, we don’t need such large skulls or jaws. Another theory is that the high infant mortality rate in earlier times meant that young humans had to be physically robust (with large heads) to survive their early years.
The researchers plan to show a mold of the skull later this week at the National Museum of Natural History in Washington, DC.
More information: via: Times Online
© 2010 PhysOrg.com
-
Big-brained birds survive better in nature
Jan 10, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Did modern humans eat Neanderthals?
May 18, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Hippo's island life helps explain dwarf hobbit (w/Video)
May 07, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Study shows 28,000 year-old Europeans' DNA was like ours
Jul 16, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Are tigers 'brainier' than lions?
Sep 03, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (31) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Protease cleavage
5 hours ago
-
Pertubance in a model
12 hours ago
-
Cancer drugs and Alzheimer's, Oh my!
20 hours ago
-
Squishing cells
20 hours ago
-
Any books/articles for evolutionary stable strategy models in humans?
Feb 09, 2012
-
Science behind the bore feeling?
Feb 09, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Biology
More news stories
The power of estrogen -- male snakes attract other males
A new study has shown that boosting the estrogen levels of male garter snakes causes them to secrete the same pheromones that females use to attract suitors, and turned the males into just about the sexiest ...
10 hours ago |
4.8 / 5 (5) |
0
|
Grass to gas: Researchers' genome map speeds biofuel development
Researchers at the University of Georgia have taken a major step in the ongoing effort to find sources of cleaner, renewable energy by mapping the genomes of two originator cells of Miscanthus x giganteus, a large perenn ...
7 hours ago |
3.7 / 5 (3) |
0
|
Experts reveal how plants don't get sunburn
(PhysOrg.com) -- Experts at the University of Glasgow have discovered how plants survive the harmful rays of the sun.
10 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
0
|
Protein libraries in a snap
(PhysOrg.com) -- A Rice University undergraduate will depart with not only a degree but also a possible patent for his invention of an efficient way to create protein libraries, an important component of biomolecular ...
13 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
0
|
Miami battling invasion of giant African snails
No one knows how they got there. But an invasion of African giant snails has southern Florida in a panic over potential crop damage, disease and general yuckiness surrounding the slimy gastropods.
14 hours ago |
4 / 5 (1) |
4
Google users warned of threat to smartphone wallets
Users of Google smartphone wallets were being warned on Friday that there is a way to crack pass codes intended to thwart thieves from going on illicit shopping sprees.
Anonymous knocks CIA website offline (Update)
The website of the Central Intelligence Agency was inaccessible on Friday after the hacker group Anonymous claimed to have knocked it offline.
Complex wiring of the nervous system may rely on a just a handful of genes and proteins
Researchers at the Salk Institute have discovered a startling feature of early brain development that helps to explain how complex neuron wiring patterns are programmed using just a handful of critical genes. ...
NASA sees wide-eyed cyclone Jasmine
Cyclone Jasmine's eye has opened wider on NASA satellite imagery, as it moves through the Southern Pacific Ocean.
Putting the squeeze on planets outside our solar system
(PhysOrg.com) -- Using high-powered lasers, scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and collaborators discovered that molten magnesium silicate undergoes a phase change in the liquid state, abruptly ...
NASA sees Giovanna reach cyclone strength, threaten Madagascar
Tropical Storm 12S built up steam and became a cyclone on February 10, 2012 as NASA's Terra satellite passed overhead. Residents of east-central Madagascar should prepare for this cyclone to make landfall ...
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (5)
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Skull sizes vary considerably from person to person.
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (6)
We are only just beginning to understand the pernicious long-term effect of over exposure to CO2!
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
However, I have to agree with some of the commentators here, the fossil samples are quite few and the human brain does varies, in size, from people to people.
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
how many std dev's is 10-20% larger than today's norm?
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
However, are we not required to learn how to read those books we carry, to remember what we read, to learn how to use all the tools we have, to use computers, mathematics, smart phone, driving, piloting, printers, fax machine, etc, etc?
I bet that average modern human carries far more information in the brain that the average guy 28000 years ago.
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
While it's true that we possess a lot of devices, et c. that we have to know how to use, a lot , if not most, aren't essential to survival. I understand that you mean that just the knowledge necessary to make use of these things is probably sufficient to offset any difference, but let's just say that I remain uncertain. I think that there is a difference between essential and nonessential relative to ensuring the survival of both yourself and the larger community.
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Aside from no externalization of knowledge, ancient humans also lived in smaller tribes, and so had to be more versatile: they couldn't afford to specialize like modern humans do. E.g. I have no idea how to make my own clothes, how to hunt down and prepare my own meal from scratch, make my own tools and weapons, treat my own diseases and injuries, etc. Put out alone into the wild, most modern humans would be dead within weeks...
As to what might be driving us toward smaller brains: how about the narrow(ing?) human birth canal? Obviously, babies with smaller heads have a better chance of surviving birth, and a smaller chance of killing their mothers in the process. I think it's telling that ancient "earth mother" figurines show women with exaggerated pelvises: a universal ancient attribute of female beauty. The prevailing modern ideal of women is closer to that of boys, with hips being the narrower, the better...
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Slower reactions, coupled with less refined coordination, would create a disadvantage in battle. As human population densities escalated, war would have become increasingly common and frequent, selecting the quick and the agile, over the ostensibly just clever.
And here's yet another possibility: diet. Maybe the Cro Magnons ate a lot more meat and fat (building blocks for brain matter), while more modern humans eat mostly grains and vegetables (sufficient for overall body maintenance, but not so great for brain construction.) Perhaps part of the blame goes to agriculture (and attendant periodic famines) and in general the maturation environment, rather than genetics. Check this out:
http://en.wikiped...sumption
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Hard to say what that might correlate to. Perhaps their's was more efficient? Less? At any rate, I rate it as highly doubtful that they were less well-coordinated than moderns.
Mar 15, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Mar 16, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
The grater 'compressability' theory does not seem to me to be the least hypothesis - perhaps we are just better now at language and motor skills.
Mar 16, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Information is stored in neurons so unless you believe they had larger brain but fewer neurons which seems unlikely they stored a comparable amount of information.
The main difference is the type of information stored, we don't have to worry about many things that used to occupy our ancestors - how to acquire enough food in the wild depending on the season, how to prepare it for eating, where to find water, how to avoid predators, parasites and diseases, which plants are safe and useful, how to produce tools and clothes, how to build shelters, and how to pass all that knowledge to ones offspring.
Mar 16, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Mar 16, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Mar 16, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Mar 16, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
I don't think that the survival instinct had decreased its intensity in the last 28000 years. I think that we have the same needs just in a more complex world. Today's environment should favor a bigger brain. for information storage or faster ones for processing it.
The social and intellectual complexity of the world today is a much bigger challenge to our survival instinct and require us more sophisticated response and adjustment.
The reason our brain is shrinking is not very clear at this point. However, the idea that we changed our diet in the last thousands of years could be a reasonable hypothesis to be considered.
Mar 16, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Switching from high protein, high fat diet to grain based diet may be the answer. Certain high fat (specific type) diets help epileptics.
http://www.epilep...nic.html
This was CroMags diet.
Mar 16, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
That hypothesis could be tested in today's world if we find isolated populations living with different diet. A possible candidate would be the natives in the deep Amazon forest. The anthropologists could compare the natives in the deep Amazon ( never affected by today's diet) with the people living in the cities. The natives are hunting and gathering probably (emphasis here) in the same way that did the Cro-Magnons. Are their brains bigger in average or the same size?
Mar 16, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Now if we detect that even the deep Amazon natives also have their brains in the process of going smaller then we would need some other ideas.
Mar 16, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Mar 17, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
In addition, we are less active physically. When was the last time you had to go out hunting or gathering to put food on the table (Going hunting at a supermarket and gathering food from aisle 4 doesn't count)?
All that information...a lot of it has become garbled. E.g. Masturbation leads to hairy palms...and blindness.
lol...it's ok to think we are smarter now :) How many jack-of-all-trades are out there? Probably very few. Most of us specialize in a specific field but are clueless in others. It doesn't mean we are stupid...but being smart can be relative :P
Mar 17, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Perhaps in the end, we're just that good at killing stuff. A.k.a. we are the top dogs and the cro-magnons came out as dead dogs :O
Smart at killing and warfare. E.g., a Scientist vs. a Navy seal. Both are intelligent, both specialize in different fields.
Of course, inter-species off-spring is a possibility...we have inter-racial off-spring so...giggidy giggidy, alright! :P
Mar 20, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
If modern humans do have smaller relative brains, it must be due to evolutionary pressure. Agriculture produced surpluses, which gave us the resources to wage war. Medicine saved many who wouldn't have survived birth. Evolution does not favour intelligence, just survival.
Mar 21, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Mar 21, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
http://en.wikiped...skop_Man
Mar 22, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
We ARE the Cro-Magnon. They didn't die off, as they are us.
Their brains were about the same size as ours. Some were larger, some smaller, but they averaged out about the same. One specimen says absolutely nothing against the many other skulls that have been found.
The Neanderthals however, had a somewhat larger brain than we do.
If you were to look at some isolated tribe, you would find that again, their brains are about the same as ours.
You can Google all of this, and get more reliable info then you will get here.
Mar 22, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Improved circulation alone could be responsible for allowing a brain of equal or greater wattage to be contained in a smaller cranium. That's just a hypothetical explanation for which I know of no evidence, but there could be reasons that have nothing to do with intellect.
Mar 22, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Apr 01, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Apr 02, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Those with slightly smaller heads would have been easier to birth, meaning less complications and a lower mortality rate for both baby and mother.
Also, to those people sobbing about this being a single skull and the sample size being small, go back and read the VERY FIRST SENTENCE and note the use of the word "further".