Super Supernova: White Dwarf Star System Exceeds Mass Limit

March 15, 2010
Super Supernova: White Dwarf Star System Exceeds Mass Limit

Enlarge

Cosmologists use Type Ia supernovae, like the one visible in the lower left corner of this galaxy, to explore the past and future expansion of the universe and the nature of dark energy. (Photo: High-Z Supernova Search Team, HST, NASA)

(PhysOrg.com) -- An international team led by Yale University has, for the first time, measured the mass of a type of supernova thought to belong to a unique subclass and confirmed that it surpasses what was believed to be an upper mass limit. Their findings, which appear online and will be published in an upcoming issue of the Astrophysical Journal, could affect the way cosmologists measure the expansion of the universe.

Cosmologists use Type Ia —the violent explosions of dead cores of stars called —as a kind of cosmic ruler to measure distances to the supernovae's host galaxies and, as such, to understand the past and future expansion of the and explore the nature of . Until recently, it was thought that white dwarfs could not exceed what is known as the Chandrasekhar limit, a critical mass equaling about 1.4 times that of the Sun, before exploding in a supernova. This uniform limit is a key tool in measuring distances to supernovae.

Since 2003, four supernovae have been discovered that were so bright, cosmologists wondered whether their white dwarfs had surpassed the Chandrasekhar limit. These supernovae have been dubbed the "super-Chandrasekhar" supernovae.

Now Richard Scalzo of Yale, as part of a collaboration of American and French physicists called the Nearby Supernova Factory, has measured the mass of the white dwarf star that resulted in one of these rare supernovae, called SN 2007if, and confirmed that it exceeded the Chandrasekhar limit. They also discovered that the unusually bright supernova had not only a central mass, but a shell of material that was ejected during the explosion as well as a surrounding envelope of pre-existing material. The team hopes this discovery will provide a structural model with which to understand the other supermassive supernovae.

Using observations from telescopes in Chile, Hawaii and California, the team was able to measure the mass of the central star, the shell and the envelope individually, providing the first conclusive evidence that the star system itself did indeed surpass the Chandrasekhar limit. They found that the star itself appears to have had a mass of 2.1 times the mass of the Sun (plus or minus 10 percent), putting it well above the limit.

Being able to measure masses for all parts of the star system tells the physicists about how the system may have evolved—a process that is currently poorly understood. "We don't really know much about the stars that lead to these supernovae," Scalzo said. "We want to know more about what kind of stars they were, and how they formed and evolved over time."

Scalzo believes there's a good chance that SN 2007if resulted from the merging of two white dwarfs, rather than the explosion of a single white dwarf and hopes to study the other super-Chandrasekhar supernovae to determine whether they, too, could have involved a merger of two white dwarfs.

Theorists continue to explore how stars with masses above the Chandrasekhar limit, which is based on a simplified star model, could exist without collapsing under their own weight. Either way, a subclass of supernovae governed by different physics could have a dramatic effect on the way cosmologists use them to measure the expansion of the universe.

"Supernovae are being used to make statements about the fate of the universe and our theory of gravity," Scalzo said. "If our understanding of supernovae changes, it could significantly impact of our theories and predictions."

More information: Paper: http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2217

Provided by Yale University (news : web)

4.8 /5 (20 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

PinkElephant
Mar 15, 2010

Rank: 2.8 / 5 (4)
Here's one simple idea: what if the white dwarf is rapidly spinning? This would allow it to pack on a lot of mass at its equator, without triggering an explosion at 1.4 solar masses.

After all, theorists posit rapid rotation for millisecond pulsars, which they are supposed to acquire gradually over time as matter continues to accrete onto them from a co-spinning disk. Well, Type 1A supernovae are also supposed to be driven by accretion (presumably, from an accretion disk...) -- so they ought to be getting "spun up" by the selfsame process as ultimately brings them to the threshold of detonation.
jamey
Mar 15, 2010

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
That's actually been taken into account - as I recall the model, the 1.4 solar masses actually involves a white dwarf rotating just slower than the break-up point - part of the process leading to the formation of white dwarves involves it slinging said extra mass off due to the rotation.
PinkElephant
Mar 15, 2010

Rank: 3.3 / 5 (3)
@jamey,
That's actually been taken into account - as I recall the model, the 1.4 solar masses actually involves a white dwarf rotating just slower than the break-up point...
No. The 1.4 solar masses refers to the Chandrasekhar limit, which is derived for NON-rotating bodies. If you don't believe me, you can find the same thing being stated in the second sentence of the following article:

http://en.wikiped...ar_limit
...part of the process leading to the formation of white dwarves involves it slinging said extra mass off due to the rotation.
While rotation can play some role, it is not a necessary component for white dwarf origins. The key underlying process for the formation of white dwarfs, is depletion of hydrogen at the star's core, which leads to more energetic fusion reactions, which lead to a red giant phase, and then planetary nebula phase when the outgoing radiation pressure erodes away the outer layers of the star.
frajo
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Exciting news - the race is open again. If the theorists don't find plausible models to explain SN Ia luminosities in the light of these new observations then the quality of the most important cosmological standard candle has to be questioned.
And if they find such models the outcome might even be worse for the usability of that standard candle.
NotAsleep
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
Thanks, frajo. I always get 1/5 stars when I make a comment like that, haha.

I hope astronomers constantly keep an open mind to the possibilities of "facts" not always being "facts"
jamey
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
@PinkElephant - Wikipedia articles are *NOT* authoritative - unfortunately, the reference link is only to the abstract, and not the original paper. I find it difficult to believe that nobody has done the relatively minor extension to derive the value for a rotating white dwarf - and that would be the value used commonly. However, might be worth asking over on the BadAstronomy Blog - he might have references that *can* be found.
PinkElephant
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
@jamey,

If I had the lecture notes online from the cosmology class I took 10 years ago, I'd post them. As it stands, Wikipedia is a pretty convenient reference, and it happens to be quite correct. Chandrasekhar's calculations addressed only a strictly non-rotating problem, just like Schwarzschild addressed only the metric of non-rotating black holes. Lack of rotation makes the math a lot more manageable...
mattytheory
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I am curious as to what effect this will have on dark energy theories? Do we still need dark energy to explain the expansion of space if it turns out the standard candles by which we used to measure this expansion were not actually standard?
PinkElephant
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
@jamey,

Consider also, that for rotating objects there's no single solution. The dynamics depend entirely on how fast the object is spinning. One could, of course, take it to the absurd limit where the object's surface at the equator approaches light speed, but this wouldn't be remotely realistic, as no objects even close to such a limit would be likely to exist.

A nice thing about non-rotating objects, is that they produce a single, nice, final answer that only depends on mass as the single free parameter...

Anyway, to me rotation seems to just be a no-brainer when it comes to exceeding the Chandrasekhar limit. It is so simple, and so obvious, it's screaming for recognition. I find it actually rather odd, that it wasn't mentioned in the writeup to begin with. It seems to me much more likely, than a merging-of-two-dwarfs scenario. Not to say that the latter isn't possible, but it's just true that all stars spin, and most accretion disks spin up the target of accretion...
PinkElephant
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
@mattytheory,
I am curious as to what effect this will have on dark energy theories? Do we still need dark energy to explain the expansion of space if it turns out the standard candles by which we used to measure this expansion were not actually standard?
I'd imagine there's some concern about this. However, keep in mind that the estimates of cosmic expansion are not based on any single supernova. Rather, they are based on statistical analysis of many events. If there is a stable population mean for 1A brightness, then even with variation around the mean, given enough events it's possible to extract a reliable signal (in this case, distance map.)

So ultimately, the question would be settled by a balance between how much variation there is, vs. how large is the population of measured events. But at any rate, the error bars just widened considerably...
jamey
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
@PinkElephant - Yes, lack of rotation does make the Schwartzchild solutions of a black hole much simpler - but in the case of the white dwarf, structural issues are already being accounted for in prevention of the collapse, and so the oblation of a white dwarf is really not that much more complex than computing the oblation of Jupiter, Earth, or the Sun. The velocities involved are likely to be significantly less than relativistic, but possibly not. My guess is that the calculations have been done, and the addition of rotation does not significantly raise the mass limit.

I mean, seriously - Type 1 supernovae have been studied for at least a couple of decades now, and white dwarfs for another couple of decades before that, and *NOBODY* has bothered to compute what rotation does?

Now that I think about it, I am pretty sure Dr. Forward must have, when he was writing Dragon's Egg - though that concerns a neutron star, and not a white dwarf.
PinkElephant
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
My guess is that the calculations have been done, and the addition of rotation does not significantly raise the mass limit.
Well, next time before putting forth false information with such bombastic confidence, perhaps you ought to first double-check your hunches. In particular, you should re-read the article above, and note that it specifically mentions the CHANDRASEKHAR LIMIT. Which is, BY DEFINITION, non-rotational.

As for mass limit not being significantly affected by rotation, even a simple Newtonian analysis ought to convince you that's false. The gravitational acceleration at the surface of a white dwarf can be easily compensated by kinetic energy of a rapidly rotating surface.
Rank 4.8 /5 (20 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Scale of the Universe
    created12 hours ago
  • Titan's lack of impact craters
    createdFeb 09, 2012
  • Real pictures of black hole eating a star?
    createdFeb 08, 2012
  • Hypothetical way to travel faster than light, but not technically exceed lightspeed
    createdFeb 06, 2012
  • How do scientists monitor the Sun's activity?
    createdFeb 05, 2012
  • Search patterns in observational studies
    createdFeb 05, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy

More news stories

Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago

(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...

Space & Earth / Environment

created 23 hours ago | popularity 4.3 / 5 (13) | comments 13 | with audio podcast report

Could Venus be shifting gear?

(PhysOrg.com) -- ESA’s Venus Express spacecraft has discovered that our cloud-covered neighbour spins a little slower than previously measured. Peering through the dense atmosphere in the infrared, the ...

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 19 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (7) | comments 8 | with audio podcast

NASA budget will axe Mars deal with Europe: scientists

US President Barack Obama's budget proposal to be submitted next week for 2013 will cut NASA's budget by 20 percent and eliminate a major partnership with Europe on Mars exploration, scientists said Thursday.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 22 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 19

Mars Science Laboratory computer issue resolved

(PhysOrg.com) -- Engineers have found the root cause of a computer reset that occurred two months ago on NASA's Mars Science Laboratory and have determined how to correct it.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 20 hours ago | popularity 4.7 / 5 (6) | comments 4 | with audio podcast

Two new moons for Jupiter

Advances in technology have lead to the discovery of new planets outside of our Solar System, and now even new moons in our own backyard.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 19 hours ago | popularity 4 / 5 (1) | comments 7


Anonymous knocks CIA website offline (Update)

The website of the Central Intelligence Agency was inaccessible on Friday after the hacker group Anonymous claimed to have knocked it offline.

New error-correcting codes guarantee the fastest possible rate of data transmission

Error-correcting codes are one of the triumphs of the digital age. They’re a way of encoding information so that it can be transmitted across a communication channel — such as an optical fiber o ...

Small modular reactor design could be a 'SUPERSTAR'

(PhysOrg.com) -- Though most of today's nuclear reactors are cooled by water, we've long known that there are alternatives; in fact, the world's first nuclear-powered electricity in 1951 came from a reactor ...

New power source discovered

(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and RMIT University have made a breakthrough in energy storage and power generation.

The power of estrogen -- male snakes attract other males

A new study has shown that boosting the estrogen levels of male garter snakes causes them to secrete the same pheromones that females use to attract suitors, and turned the males into just about the sexiest ...

Google users warned of threat to smartphone wallets

Users of Google smartphone wallets were being warned on Friday that there is a way to crack pass codes intended to thwart thieves from going on illicit shopping sprees.