Study: Daylight saving time a waste of energy

March 16, 2010 by Lin Edwards report
Daylight saving time

(PhysOrg.com) -- Daylight saving time is supposed to reduce energy use, but data gathered from a state in the US suggests it actually does the opposite.

The US state of has 92 counties, but until 2006 only 15 of them adjusted their clocks for daylight saving time, with the remainder keeping standard time all year, at least partly to appease farmers who did not want the change. Then in 2006 the Indiana Legislature decided the entire state should adopt daylight saving time, beginning that spring.

This unique situation enabled professor of economics Matthew Kotchen and his PhD student Laura E. Grant, both from the University of California at Santa Barbara, to study how the adoption of daylight saving affected . They studied over seven million electricity meter readings in southern Indiana every month for three years, and compared the before and after the change. The 15 counties that had adopted daylight saving time much earlier were the control group, which allowed them to adjust for the effects of weather extremes over the period.

The result of the study showed that electricity use went up in the counties adopting daylight saving time in 2006, costing $8.6 million more in household electricity bills. The conclusion reached by Kotchen and Grant was that while the lighting costs were reduced in the afternoons by daylight saving, the greater heating costs in the mornings, and more use of air-conditioners on hot afternoons more than offset these savings. Kotchen said the results were more “clear and unambiguous” than results in any other paper he had presented.

Kotchen and Grant's work reinforces the findings of an Australian study in 2007 by economists Ryan Kellogg and Hendrik Wolff, who studied the extension of daylight saving time for two months in New South Wales and Victoria for the 2000 Summer Olympics. They also found an increase in energy use.

Daylight saving was initially introduced, and has been extended, because it was believed to save energy, but the studies upon which this idea was based were conducted in the 1970s. A big difference between then and the present is the massive increase in the take-up of air conditioning. In hot periods means air conditioners tend to be run more when people arrive home from work, while in cooler periods more heating is used.

Professor Kotchen presented the paper at the March National Bureau of Economic Research conference.

More information: via WSJ

© 2010 PhysOrg.com

4.7 /5 (49 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

DozerIAm
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: 3.9 / 5 (7)
Daylight Savings Time - another example of the government trying to do good, and failing - and in the process doing harm.
Kedas
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: 2.8 / 5 (4)
Does he really know when and for what the extra energy was used?

Otherwise it would make sense to just say if it's longer day then people are more/longer productive hence the higher energy use.
THoKling
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
DozerIAm: Society is always learning. Ideals we take for granted with our current technological standing may well be proven false in the future.

Energy use is reduced at home when fewer people are at home and are at business. So does the system balance out between commercial and residential energy use? If so, we may wish to look at alternate pattern adjustments and play with it until a flexible medium is found.
CSharpner
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
Kedas: He had a control group in nearby counties, so same length of day and same general weather. The only known variable difference between the two groups was one group went through the time change. It's safe to assume that the time change did affect energy use, not the weather or length of days.
Marcopolo80z
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
What utterly amazes me is how many DST cheerleaders who comment in the popular press insist that an extra hour of daylight has been created. To do this, nearly every law of astrophysics since the big bang would have to be turned upside down. It's merely shifting a time zone, in my case GMT -5 to GMT -5. BTW, I still despise it. I now have to turn on far more lights when getting ready for work in the morning, am less likely to take pubic transit to work since I hate getting up earlier to make the bus, and need to turn the heat up since I get up closer to the coldest part of the 24 hour cycle. An in Ohio, March and April tend to be cold, rainy months. So thrilling that it's daylight between 6 and 7 pm to watch the rain and sleet.
Marcopolo80z
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Correction:

GMT -5 to GMT -4 ( I live in Ohio, which is on Eastern time)
hiranyu
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
I live in Indiana. I just forwarded a link to this article to Governor Daniels.
plasticpower
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
DST needs to be forgotten and not used anymore. Nobody likes it. It doesn't save energy. It's utterly useless.
PinkElephant
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
DST needs to be forgotten and not used anymore. Nobody likes it. It doesn't save energy. It's utterly useless.
Then again, from the linked WSJ article:
There may also be social benefits to daylight-saving time that weren't covered in the research. When the extension of daylight-saving time was proposed by Mr. Markey, he cited studies that noted "less crime, fewer traffic fatalities, more recreation time and increased economic activity" with the extra sunlight in the evening.

In Indiana, the debate goes on. "The simpler the issue, the more people have opinions about it," says Indiana State Rep. Scott Reske, who voted against the switch to daylight-saving time. In the aftermath of the time shift, "a lot of people who hated it now love it, and a lot of people who loved it now hate it," he says.
meeker
Mar 16, 2010

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
I like the extra hour in the Fall, but hate the missing hour in the Spring. DST is pretty stupid, just like February only having 28 or 29 days.

I can't wait to live in outer-space, then we don't have to deal with this 24-hour nonsense. I'd much prefer a 30-hour day. I can usually stay up for 20-22 hours before feeling the need to sleep for 8. Of course, by that time ... we'll have invented a pill that allows our bodies to not need sleep.
trekgeek1
Mar 17, 2010

Rank: 3.5 / 5 (2)
I like it getting darker later. I never get much use out of the morning and it's nice to have "longer" days. More sunlight for me!
Bob_Kob
Mar 17, 2010

Rank: 3.5 / 5 (2)
I'm going to be really disappointed when daylight savings ends next month. Really I never actually heard it being used to 'save energy'. I just enjoyed having sunlight up until 7pm. The mornings are pretty much the same unless you get up at 6am or so.
Caution
Mar 17, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
If you must be up early because of work or school or kids, and you are a morning person to boot, I can understand how this would be bothersome. I am not a morning person so I love the extra light at the end of the day. Having to remove DST during the winter, when we already have little to no evening light, is insane to me. I would love to be able to get up with the sun at close to 9 a.m. in the winter.

The cost increase is pretty minor for all the extra evening light we get during the season most desirable for outside activities: summer! My fondest memories as a child were enjoying the outdoors into the evening hours.
barakn
Mar 17, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
... am less likely to take pubic transit to work since I hate getting up earlier to make the bus.....

Pubic transit sounds pretty painful anyway.
physpuppy
Mar 19, 2010

Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
Anyone interested in this subject should visit the US Navel Observatory web site -

Daylight time:
http://aa.usno.na...time.php

Map of their web site:
http://aa.usno.navy.mil/AAmap

Info on Daylight time, time zones, moon phases, sun rise, set and so on.

PinkElephant
Mar 19, 2010

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
um.. "Navel Observatory"?

I didn't realize US was so deep...

=D
Nartoon
Mar 21, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Extra Daylight while I'm awake in the evening beats extra daylight in the morning before I get up. If you don't like DST don't move to Alaska.
Nartoon
Mar 21, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
BTW, it's called Daylight Savings Time *NOT* Energy Savings Time because there is much more to it than simple energy savings, more daylight after work increases ones level of outdoor activity etc.
Skeptic_Heretic
Mar 21, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
um.. "Navel Observatory"?

I didn't realize US was so deep...

=D

Someone has to keep an eye on all those exposed belly buttons.
Zilwiki
Mar 21, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
I like the extra hour in the Fall, but hate the missing hour in the Spring. DST is pretty stupid, just like February only having 28 or 29 days.

I can't wait to live in outer-space, then we don't have to deal with this 24-hour nonsense. I'd much prefer a 30-hour day. I can usually stay up for 20-22 hours before feeling the need to sleep for 8. Of course, by that time ... we'll have invented a pill that allows our bodies to not need sleep.


February has 28 or 29 days, and other months 30 or 31, so we don't have absurdities like winter in July or summer in January(in the nothern hemisphere). The idiots of the French revolution tried a " metric" calendar; it didn't work.
DADDYBEAR
Mar 22, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
How much did this fact finding cost? If they had just asked the people who are impacted by this they would have found out this is a waste of time and money. Get rid of it now.
maiselm
Mar 22, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
OK, it's clear to me that everybody on this list is a mere baby. Daylight time was introduced in World War II, when factories, mostly lit by daylight, needed extra time to run to produce war materiel. The British added two hours in the summer (which they could do, being farther north than most of the US) for the same purpose, calling it "double summer time." Because the idea did reduce electricity usage for household lighting, it saved a considerable amount of energy at the time.

It may be true that it doesn't do so today. If so, cutting it out might spark a labor campaign for a seven-hour or six-hour day in winter, and I'd be for that!
maiselm
Mar 22, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
@Ziwiki: the French Revolutionary calendar worked just fine. It was Napoleon who got rid of it, along with other remnants of the epoch.
lessmith
Mar 23, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
no air no electric heat does not apply
Skeptic_Heretic
Mar 23, 2010

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
OK, it's clear to me that everybody on this list is a mere baby. Daylight time was introduced in World War II, when factories, mostly lit by daylight, needed extra time to run to produce war materiel.

That's completely untrue.

DST originated with farming practices in the late 1700's. Franklin was the first to suggest and push for implementation. Very Clavenesque of you.
shotei
Mar 26, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
hiranyu thank you I will do the same. I hear they claim less crime but nobody is saying anything about more crime against children waiting for the bus while it's pitch black outside at 7 am.
tbotcotw
Apr 05, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
That's completely untrue.

DST originated with farming practices in the late 1700's. Franklin was the first to suggest and push for implementation. Very Clavenesque of you.


No, _that's_ completely untrue. Franklin suggested we get up earlier in the summer, not that we change our clocks. Farmers hated DST (and are at least part of the reason Indiana had such a weird DST/non-DST split). Finally, DST wasn't invented until around the turn of the 20th century, and the US didn't adopt it until 1918... and then immediately repealed it in 1919, not to come back until WWII.
DozerIAm
Apr 07, 2010

Rank: not rated yet
...nobody is saying anything about more crime against children waiting for the bus while it's pitch black outside at 7 am.


Have you got ANY statistics to back up that claim, or are you just speculating here?
Rank 4.7 /5 (49 votes)
Related Stories
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • The Biggest Lie Ever
    created5 hours ago
  • What are the limits of learning?
    createdFeb 06, 2012
  • Isn't that grammatically wrong?
    createdFeb 06, 2012
  • What does it mean when traders are indifferent?
    createdFeb 04, 2012
  • Peak of Our Civilization
    createdFeb 04, 2012
  • bonds and YTM
    createdFeb 03, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - Social Sciences

More news stories

Prague gets hold of modern genetics founder Mendel's papers

Germany has handed to the Czech Republic a manuscript of Johann Gregor Mendel, founder of modern genetics, on his plant hybridization experiments, the Czech foreign minister said Thursday.

Other Sciences / Other

created 2 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0

US workers are 'giving away the store,' costing firms billions

Nearly 70 percent of the nation's service employees give away free goods and services – from hamburgers to cable TV – costing companies billions of dollars a year, according to a groundbreaking study.

Other Sciences / Economics & Business

created 5 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 6

Storm warning: Financial tsunami heading this way

In today's global village, national coffers are more interconnected than ever before. And as the current economic crisis has proven, a downturn in one country can travel in a wave across the globe, like a financial tsunami. ...

Other Sciences / Economics & Business

created 6 hours ago | popularity 1 / 5 (1) | comments 5

'Flipped classroom' teaching model gains an online community

Researchers at Harvard University have launched the Peer Instruction (PI) Network, a new global social network for users of interactive teaching methods.

Other Sciences / Social Sciences

created 6 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 0

Kids show cultural gender bias

(PhysOrg.com) -- Talk about gender confusion! A recent study by University of Alberta researchers Elena Nicoladis and Cassandra Foursha-Stevenson in the Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology into whether speaki ...

Other Sciences / Social Sciences

created 11 hours ago | popularity 2 / 5 (1) | comments 2


'Dark plasmons' transmit energy

Microscopic channels of gold nanoparticles have the ability to transmit electromagnetic energy that starts as light and propagates via "dark plasmons," according to researchers at Rice University.

Anyone can learn to be more inventive, cognitive researcher says

There will always be a wild and unpredictable quality to creativity and invention, says Anthony McCaffrey, a cognitive psychology researcher at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, because an "Aha moment" is rare and ...

Ultraviolet protection molecule in plants yields its secrets

Lying around in the sun all day is hazardous not just for humans but also for plants, which have no means of escape. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun can damage proteins and DNA inside cells, leading ...

New method makes culture of complex tissue possible in any lab

Scientists at the University of California, San Diego have developed a new method for making scaffolds for culturing tissue in three-dimensional arrangements that mimic those in the body. This advance, published online in ...

Hydrogen from acidic water: Researchers develop potential low cost alternative to platinum for splitting water

A technique for creating a new molecule that structurally and chemically replicates the active part of the widely used industrial catalyst molybdenite has been developed by researchers with the Lawrence Berkeley ...

Cell biologists describes mechanism by which some people may be more susceptible to colon cancer

An international research team led by cell biologists at the University of California, Riverside has uncovered a new insight into colon cancer, the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United ...