Scientists stumped as bee population declines further
March 29, 2010 by Jean-Louis Santini
Bees gather pollen in a rose in Los Angeles, California, in 2009. The decline in the US bee population, first observed in 2006, is continuing, a phenomenon that still baffles researchers and beekeepers.
The decline in the US bee population, first observed in 2006, is continuing, a phenomenon that still baffles researchers and beekeepers.
Data from the US Department of Agriculture show a 29 percent drop in beehives in 2009, following a 36 percent decline in 2008 and a 32 percent fall in 2007.
This affects not only honey production but around 15 billion dollars worth of crops that depend on bees for pollination.
Scientists call the phenomenon "colony collapse disorder" that has led to the disappearance of millions of adult bees and beehives and occurred elsewhere in the world including in Europe.
Researchers have looked at viruses, parasites, insecticides, malnutrition and other environmental factors but have been unable to pinpoint a specific cause for the population decline.
The rough winter in many parts of the United States will likely accentuate the problem, says Jeff Pettis, lead researcher at Department of Agriculture's Bee Research Laboratory in Beltsville, Maryland.
Winter figures will be published in April. But preliminary estimates already indicate losses of 30 to 50 percent, said David Mendes, president of the American Beekeeping Federation.
"There are a lot of beekeepers who are in trouble" he said.
"Under normal condition you have 10 percent winter losses.. this year there are 30, 40 to 50 percent losses."
He said the phenomenon probably results from a combination of factors but that the increased use of pesticides appears to be a major cause.
"I don't put my bees in Florida because the last couple of years there has been tremendous increase in pesticide use in the orange crop to fight a disease," he said.
"It's a bacterium and the only way to control this disease is to use pesticide... a few years ago they did not use any pesticide at all."
He said that pesticide use "has changed dramatically" and has made beekeeping "more challenging."
Research conducted in 23 US states and Canada and published in the Public Library of Science journal found 121 different pesticides in 887 samples of bees, wax, pollen and other elements of hives, lending credence to the notion of pesticides as a key problem.
Pettis said the finding of pesticide residue is "troubling."
"It might not be the only factor but it's a contributing factor," he said.
The best thing to help bees, he said its "to try to limit habitat destruction," leaving more natural areas in agriculture and in cities such so honey bees can have "a diverse natural environment."
Ironically, he said the problem stems from expansion of agriculture to feed the world. But in destroying bee populations, that can hurt crop production.
"The world population growth is in a sense the reason for pollinators' decline," he said.
"Because we need to produce more and more food to feed the world and we grow crops in larger fields. A growing world means growing more food and to do that we need pollinators. And the fact that the world is continuing to grow is the driving force behind the habitat destruction."
(c) 2010 AFP
-
Probing Question: What's killing the honey bees?
Mar 01, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Survey finds slower decline of honeybee colonies
May 20, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Bees in more trouble than ever after bad winter
Mar 24, 2010 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Honeybees are on the rise but demand grows faster
May 07, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Asian bees threaten Australia
Jun 15, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (31) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Mitosis
8 hours ago
-
Stem cell question.
9 hours ago
-
Protease cleavage
16 hours ago
-
Pertubance in a model
22 hours ago
-
Cancer drugs and Alzheimer's, Oh my!
Feb 09, 2012
-
Squishing cells
Feb 09, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Biology
More news stories
The power of estrogen -- male snakes attract other males
A new study has shown that boosting the estrogen levels of male garter snakes causes them to secrete the same pheromones that females use to attract suitors, and turned the males into just about the sexiest ...
20 hours ago |
4.8 / 5 (6) |
2
|
Grass to gas: Researchers' genome map speeds biofuel development
Researchers at the University of Georgia have taken a major step in the ongoing effort to find sources of cleaner, renewable energy by mapping the genomes of two originator cells of Miscanthus x giganteus, a large perenn ...
17 hours ago |
3.8 / 5 (5) |
0
|
Experts reveal how plants don't get sunburn
(PhysOrg.com) -- Experts at the University of Glasgow have discovered how plants survive the harmful rays of the sun.
20 hours ago |
4.8 / 5 (5) |
0
|
Entire genome of extinct human decoded from fossil
(PhysOrg.com) -- In 2010, Svante Pääbo and his colleagues presented a draft version of the genome from a small fragment of a human finger bone discovered in Denisova Cave in southern Siberia. The ...
Feb 07, 2012 |
4.7 / 5 (56) |
42
|
Why are there so few fish in the Earth's oceans?
(PhysOrg.com) -- A Stony Brook University researcher has found that, contrary to popular belief, there are not plenty of fish in the sea.
Feb 08, 2012 |
4.3 / 5 (14) |
25
|
Anonymous knocks CIA website offline (Update)
The website of the Central Intelligence Agency was inaccessible on Friday after the hacker group Anonymous claimed to have knocked it offline.
New error-correcting codes guarantee the fastest possible rate of data transmission
Error-correcting codes are one of the triumphs of the digital age. Theyre a way of encoding information so that it can be transmitted across a communication channel such as an optical fiber o ...
Small modular reactor design could be a 'SUPERSTAR'
(PhysOrg.com) -- Though most of today's nuclear reactors are cooled by water, we've long known that there are alternatives; in fact, the world's first nuclear-powered electricity in 1951 came from a reactor ...
New power source discovered
(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and RMIT University have made a breakthrough in energy storage and power generation.
Advanced power-grid model finds low-cost, low-carbon future in West
(PhysOrg.com) -- The least expensive way for the Western U.S. to reduce greenhouse gas emissions enough to help prevent the worst consequences of global warming is to replace coal with renewable and other ...
Fool's gold may prove an unlikely alternative to overexploited catalytic materials
Catalytic materials, which lower the energy barriers for chemical reactions, are used in everything from the commercial production of chemicals to catalytic converters in car engines. However, with current catalytic materials ...
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
If you augment the amount of pest resistance that those crops exhibit then don't be surprised if the poisons mount up in those insects that feed on them.
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (7)
As the Holocene ends, the natural die off will enable the earth to adjust, once again.
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
I would think that gene altered crops would be a part of the problem -- particularly crops like bt corn which contain a pesticide in every cell, including the pollen.
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: 4.8 / 5 (4)
IMHO, this is the most plausible explanation for the bee population decline, as bees collect pollen of all kinds and feed it to their young. If the pollen is toxic, the bee larvae will die. I'm sure Monsanto could care less, however.
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Don't confuse pesticides with tannin based resistance mechanisms.
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Also, get BBC to do a bee documentary, in the process they could develop methods of monitoring bees in detail, then implemented by some research group. I'm sure direct monitoring into the minute details of bees will produce clearer evidence, it'd also be kinda neat. :)
We already tag animals in the wild with GPS collars, etc, let's figure something out for the little guys so we can get more evidence and stop guessing.
Some controlled studies on bee environments and their population should give some very clear and overall direction, and if bees are naturally dieing off then we can get the pros in there studying the colonies more in depth. This seems like the most obvious idea and direction to take, is there a good reason why I'm wrong? I'm confused as to why half the problems we have exist as problems at all.
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (4)
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: 4.8 / 5 (6)
courtesy, ats FORMe2p00p0n
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
It appears that the most likely culprit is a multiple cause scenario- varroa mite, virus, bacteria, and pesticide overload.
Another big factor is that honeybees are like most other organisms- they require a varied diet to meet nutritional requirements. In the wild, they feed on many different blossoms.
The main difference with these commercially employed colonies is that they a released into huge monoculture farms, thousands upon thousands of acres of almond, corn, soybean,orange, et c. They only get part of their dietary requirements, and so suffer from the bee equivalent of scurvy, ricketts, beri-beri, et c.
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Corn pollen is wind dispersed.
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (8)
This takes away all credibility from this article.
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Nice try, but you definitely don't get to light the stogie.
You deliberately misread. What was meant is simply that a burgeoning human population creates pressure to produce greater and greater amounts of food, which has lead to the proliferation of massive monoculture farming, which in turn leads to most, if not all, of the factors contributing to the recent decline in honeybee population.
Do you fancy yourself as being some kind of agent provocateur, or are you just dim?
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
The introduction of GMO into Great Britain in 1998 has caused a statistically significant step in generally increasing rate of food allergy, because GMO import was enabled in food market stepwise in legal act, i.e. not gradually in this particular case.
http://www.bmj.co...9.f1.gif
The Cry1A / Cry1Ab proteins are always produced in mixtures in GMO, some of active proteins (Cry1B, Cry3Bb1, Cry9c, EPSPS) in GMO strands aren't completely specific to Lepidopthera and other higher organisms as well and a various neglected toxicity synergies can exist here.
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
The correct function of immune system is based on correct distinction between healthy and pathogenic proteins. The higher number of foreign proteins is forced to distinguish for example in food, the higher risk of allergic response could be expected.
The Bacillus thuringiensis is very close to anthrax pathogens (Bacillus anthracis) - so high risk of coincidence in immune reactions (i.e. allergies) exists here.
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
If such decrease doesn't occur (because the organism remains in permanent contact with GMO contaminated food every day), its immune system continues in production of various another antigens, until their number and concentration in organism isn't so high, they initiate an accidental violent allergic reaction even in contact with proteins and various pollutants, which were harmless so far.
After then the positive feedback will be established under development of permanent allergic reaction with nonspecific symptoms. In this way, bees could be gradually allergized by presence of GMO toxins in pollens even in minute concentrations.
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Mar 29, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Mar 30, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Mar 30, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
No, he doesn't understand what "pseudoscience" means and as such when his posts are removed he assumes it's because he included a link to his AWT fanboy site.
Apr 04, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Apr 04, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Broad acre farming has been around for some time and it could be a contributing factor. Such a factor may take many generations before its influence became noticeable.
Genetically Modified crops could follow a similar path and take many generations before the effect became clearly noticeable.
Therefore it could be a combination of a number of "things", disease agents included.
Identifying the cause could be a difficult and protracted exercise.
Apr 04, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Don't be a fool. The amount of Ludditism in this community is astounding! You would be better put to believe, rightly, that Monsanto scientists are trying to determine the cause of this situation and find a solution.
Apr 05, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
IMHO, if Monsanto is "looking for a solution" it is to avoid a lawsuit, not to save bees.