New evidence for quantum Darwinism found in quantum dots
May 10, 2010 By Lisa Zyga
These images show a recurring scar found in simulations that bears a strong resemblance to experimental images. Scars were found to replicate and produce offspring states in agreement with quantum Darwinism. Image credit: A.M. Burke, et al. ©2010 APS.
(PhysOrg.com) -- Physicists have found new evidence that supports the theory of quantum Darwinism, the idea that the transition from the quantum to the classical world occurs due to a quantum form of natural selection. By explaining how the classical world emerges from the quantum world, quantum Darwinism could shed light on one of the most challenging questions in physics of the past century.
The basis of almost any theoretical quantum-to-classical transition lies in the concept of decoherence. In the quantum world, many possible quantum states “collapse” into a single state due to interactions with the environment. To quantum Darwinists, decoherence is a selection process, and the final, stable state is called a “pointer state.” Although pointer states are quantum states, they are “fit enough” to be transmitted through the environment without collapsing and can then make copies of themselves that can be observed on the macroscopic scale. Although everything in our world is quantum at its core, our classical view of the universe is ultimately determined by these pointer states.
Since quantum Darwinism was first proposed in 2003 by Wojciech Zurek of Los Alamos National Laboratory, several studies have found evidence to support the idea. Most recently, a team of physicists and engineers from Arizona State University and the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C., has performed experiments using scanning gate microscopy to image scar structures in an open quantum dot. Their results have revealed the existence of periodic scar offspring states that evolve and eventually contribute to a robust state, much in the way that the derivation of pointer states is predicted by quantum Darwinism.
The “scars,” as the researchers explained, are actually scarring on the quantum wave functions, which cause the wave functions’ amplitudes to be highly concentrated along classical trajectories. Scars are traditionally thought to be unstable, where any small perturbation could break up the connection to the classical trajectory. However, when scar states replicate and evolve through quantum Darwinism, becoming a family of mother-daughter states, they can become coherent and eventually stabilize into multiple pointer states.
To detect this scar replication, the researchers used scanning gate microscopy to scan a conductive tip over the scar structures at a constant height. The tip acts as a local perturbation by causing a change in electrical conductance proportional to the sample’s electron density at that location. By measuring the change in conductance at different locations, the technique revealed that the scar structures have a periodic magnetic field that fits well with the idea of periodic offspring states.
“The magnetic periodicity, which we used to get the experimental data results, is the ‘smoking gun’ for quantum Darwinism,” coauthor David Ferry of Arizona State University told PhysOrg.com.
The agreement of the experimentally derived patterns and simulation patterns during variations in conductance also supports the idea that these periodic patterns represent offspring states. As the scientists explain, when the magnetic field increases, these offspring modes “push through” an energy level called the Fermi level and emerge as pointer states, which are detectable.
The ability of pointer states to make copies of themselves and produce descendants, as shown in these observations, is a key requirement of quantum Darwinism. By demonstrating this pointer state evolution in the scar structures of an open quantum dot, the physicists’ discovery provides evidence for the theory of quantum Darwinism - and, in turn, why we live in a classical world that is free from quantum effects such as superposition and uncertainty. Still, as Ferry explained, more work is needed before the theory becomes widely accepted.
“It is a theory, and our data provides support,” he said. “But, the experiments have to be confirmed by other groups, perhaps many times if the theory is to be fully accepted.”
More information: A.M. Burke. “Periodic Scarred States in Open Quantum Dots as Evidence of Quantum Darwinism.” Physical Review Letters 104, 176801 (2010). Doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.176801
Copyright 2010 PhysOrg.com.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or part without the express written permission of PhysOrg.com.
-
Quantum cryptography: No Signaling and quantum key distribution
Jul 05, 2005 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Pure mathematics behind the mechanics
Feb 07, 2008 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Report: Scientists 'teleport' two photons
Sep 18, 2006 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Physicists study remote quantum networks
Nov 01, 2006 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Physicists make discovery in quantum mechanics
Sep 23, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (30) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
second law of thermodynamics
12 hours ago
-
Static Electric Orbiting of H2O Droplet to Knitting Needle
12 hours ago
-
Acousto optical modulators
13 hours ago
-
Jerk during Gravitation
14 hours ago
-
2 springs attached by a rigid massless bar
15 hours ago
-
Thermal conductivity value of (.17-.20)W/m.K
15 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - Classical Physics
More news stories
Explained: Sigma
It's a question that arises with virtually every major new finding in science or medicine: What makes a result reliable enough to be taken seriously? The answer has to do with statistical significance -- but ...
22 hours ago |
5 / 5 (13) |
32
Borexino Collaboration succeeds in spotting pep neutrinos emitted from the sun
(PhysOrg.com) -- To learn more about how the sun works, scientists study particles that are emitted from it into space due to thermonuclear reactions that occur inside; by applying known physics principles, ...
Physics research suggests new pathways for cancer progression
Observing that certain cancer cells may exhibit greater flexibility than normal cells, some scientists believe that this capability promotes rapid tumor growth. Now computer simulations developed by Boston University Biomedical ...
20 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
Quantum physicist explains $100K offer for proof scaled-up quantum computing is impossible
(PhysOrg.com) -- MIT researcher Scott Aaronson has certainly riled the physics community with his offer this past Friday, of $100,000 to anyone who can prove that scaled-up quantum computing is impossible. ...
Physicists 'record' magnetic breakthrough
An international team of scientists has demonstrated a revolutionary new way of magnetic recording which will allow information to be processed hundreds of times faster than by current hard drive technology.
Feb 07, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (39) |
14
|
Humans may have helped the decline of African rainforests 3000 years ago
(PhysOrg.com) -- Large areas of rainforests in Central Africa mysteriously disappeared over three thousand years ago, to be replaced by savannas. The prevailing theory has been that the cause was a change ...
Japan scientist makes 'Avatar' robot
A Japanese-developed robot that mimics the movements of its human controller is bringing the Hollywood blockbuster "Avatar" one step closer to reality.
Sleep breathing machine shows clear benefits in children with sleep apnea
Children and adolescents with obstructive sleep apnea had substantial improvements in attention, anxiety and quality of life after treatment with positive airway pressure (PAP)a nighttime therapy in which a machine ...
Neurologic improvement detected in rats receiving stem cell transplant
In a study to be presented today at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine's annual meeting, The Pregnancy Meeting, in Dallas, Texas, researchers will report that early transplantation of human placenta-derived mesenchymal ...
Miami battling invasion of giant African snails
No one knows how they got there. But an invasion of African giant snails has southern Florida in a panic over potential crop damage, disease and general yuckiness surrounding the slimy gastropods.
NASA budget will axe Mars deal with Europe: scientists
US President Barack Obama's budget proposal to be submitted next week for 2013 will cut NASA's budget by 20 percent and eliminate a major partnership with Europe on Mars exploration, scientists said Thursday.
May 10, 2010
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (11)
The more interesting question may be, why more animals are larger, then the CMB wavelength? The above model works not for creatures as such, but for their brain waves, which such creatures are hosting. The true observers of universe are just the clusters of solitons inside of our brains - our bodies are just envelopes, providing safety for these virtual organisms and it enables to survive longer.
When we consider this, then the geometric model of Universe works well. The another question is, are the CMB waves adopted to human brains, or vice-versa, or the wavelength of both waves converges together?
May 10, 2010
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (10)
http://www.scienc...0531.htm
From these reasons I presume, the first organisms were formed by rather large droplets (liposome coacervates), which divided by mechanical forces, probably at the interface of all three phases of matter, i.e. at coastal surf or something simmilar. In this way, the most advanced organisms were always rather close the scale of CMB radiation, which is the distance scale of the highest complexity.
May 10, 2010
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (9)
http://www.physor...148.html
But the scale of quantum phenomena is substantially larger, then many people belive, because weak ekvivalence principle is broken by many common forces, like the electrostatic force, Casimir force, dispersion etc at centimeter scale. The size of magnetic domains inside of ferromagnetics could exceed many milimeters in size. And the CMB noise is the most tangible source of quantum fluctuations, which introduces extradimensions and violates equivalence principle and Lorentz symmetry in vaccum at small scales. In dense aether theory just the CMB noise is the manifestation of superluminal gravitational waves, too.
May 10, 2010
Rank: 4.6 / 5 (5)
May 10, 2010
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (5)
May 10, 2010
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
I don't know, how LHC experiments could help us in evolution of these thingies, though. IMO these experiments could reverse human evolution fast, instead. Quantum Darwinism is strictly reversible process (like every quantum phenomena) - and it doesn't care about complexity of its products.
May 10, 2010
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (7)
In dense aether model the evolution of foam of living matter is just a seamless continuation of evolution of foam of nonliving matter. And the evolution of various theories and memes inside of human society is just a continuation of the evolution of living matter, too. Conceptually all these processes are the same and they're product of brane collisions (the splash of aether density gradients, during which the more and more complex foam phases gradually emerge). The success of human evolution would depend on many cosmological factors, which we cannot affect at all
May 10, 2010
Rank: 2.9 / 5 (8)
May 10, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man
May 10, 2010
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (9)
With the approach of dense aether theory you can actually get into new testable predictions, regarding the mechanism of life evolution, for example.Of course, 60% of Americans still doesn't believe in evolution at all...
May 10, 2010
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
Such small droplet suffers by collisions of neighboring particles - parasites, which are attempting to break it into molecules again. Other large droplets are attempting to merge with it and swallow it instead like predators.
If the newly formed droplet is lucky, then it is sniffing for another density fluctuations like mouse for food, then it swallows them. If it succeeds in swallowing more molecules, then it evaporates, it will grow into large, stable fat droplet, until its so huge, it will divide into smaller ones.
The life cycle of droplet in rain is basically a common life cycle of every bacterium
May 10, 2010
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
http://physicswor...ws/41645
Even in human society the slight asymmetry is attributed to "most natural beauty".
http://cogprints.org/4601/
We can see, even these silly droplets have some aesthetic criteria built in.
May 10, 2010
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
http://en.wikiped...niverses
With compare to it, Smolin denies the existence of a multiverse - there are no others, nor is there anything isomorphic to it. I cannot understand, how proponent of cosmological evolution can refuse existence of other Universes and vice-versa.
http://physicswor...th/39306
May 10, 2010
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (4)
JayK - now if they could just add, in there somewhere, the term (as a noun, adjective, adverb or possibly a verb) NANO - they could really have a winner ... movie rights assured.
May 10, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
May 10, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
May 11, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
May 11, 2010
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (6)
in the context of physics, natural selection is simply a math problem : throw a zillion atoms together, shake and stir well for an indefinite amount of time and you will see human being assemble out of thin air ( with all the evolution in between ). the actual probably as computed by some physicist of this happening is longer than the lifetime of the universe as we understand it. go figure. you see, darwinism is not a theory, it is simply a belief.
May 12, 2010
Rank: 2.9 / 5 (7)
Of course, we cannot go back into history to make sure, evolution occured in the way, which corresponds the phylogenetical tree - but this falsifiability poses exactly the same problem, like at the case of creationism. But we can predict various consequences - for example in stratification of fossil layers (dinosaurs had less genes then apes, because they existed here before apes - so we will find them in deeper layers, then the ape fossils - which is testable easily). Etc.
May 12, 2010
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
http://www.newsci...ion.html
Dense aether theory considers evolution as a sort of biological thermodynamics.
http://www.wired....n-as-bi/
May 13, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
May 13, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Great, another person completely ignorant of evolution theory. Humans are not decendants of apes, evolution has not stated that we are. Apes and us come from a common ancestor, who is no longer around. Please learn the basics of a topic before you attempt to speak on said topic.
Then it's a good thing that Evolution isn't random, like your suggested experiment above.
If I punch you in the face, it hurts.
If the environment changes and "punches a species in the face", particular characteristics hurt the animal that has them.
May 15, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
May 15, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Quantum Awsomeness Quantum Brothers.
May 16, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (6)
May 18, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
I disagree. -Ape, Neanderthal, Cro-magnon (Humans) is 3 distinct species which evolved from a common-ancestor.
May 18, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
May 18, 2010
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
This is our current understanding and yes, I've truncated the different homonidae that either cannot be jsutified as a human precursor, or who we cannot assimilate into either line. And yes, this is a very simplistic overview.
May 29, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
The subject restated:
Space time (reality) emerges from the evolution in the state matter driven by wave forms of quantum and/to relativistic scales then manipulation of the state matter would be the creation of 3D scaffoldings, that interact with the state of matter, quantum and relativistic waves modifying or expanding the current domain of reality.
May 29, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 02, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
http://en.wikiped...arwinism
Main problem is, Darwinian theory has very wide parameter space, so that it's virtually impossible to formalize it for obtaining of some testable predictions. And theories are defined only by their postulate sets.
We can see natural evolution in nearly everything, for example in condensation and coalescence of rain droplets during their fall - but actually, what can we predict/compute from such "model"? Such perspective is good mainly for writers of esoteric books about quantum mechanics, who need to extend their manuscript by few easy pages, which contradict to anything from the previous content.