Plans for an international linear electron smasher - the ILC
July 26, 2010 by Lin Edwards
Artist's impression of the ILC tunnels. (Graphic courtesy of Fermilab/Sandbox Studio)
(PhysOrg.com) -- Physicists at the European particle physics laboratory CERN are planning a straight collider 31 kilometers long to complement the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and help them explain the mysteries of the universe.
CERN's 27-kilometer ring atom smasher, the LHC, only became fully operational in March this year, but the scientists plan to start building a new International Linear Collider (ILC), at a cost of $6.7 billion, in 2012 to smash electrons and positrons together. The only other linear electron collider is the 3.2-kilometer-long Stanford Linear Accelerator built in 1962 in California.
The tunnel will use superconducting magnets to accelerate electrons and their antimatter equivalents, positrons, towards each other at near light speed. Construction is expected to take seven years. European director of the ILC project, Professor Brian Foster, said the linear collider would enable physicists to explore in more detail the findings of the LHC.
The ILC is expected to work with the LHC, which smashes protons together. Foster describes proton crashes as “dirty,” and said it’s like smashing two oranges together at 45 mph and hoping the pips hit each other head-on. In the proton, the “pips” are the quarks making up the proton, and often only one quark from each colliding proton will have a direct hit. Foster said the LHC is good at finding things, but it only gives physicists information on the maximum amount of energy a collision might involve, but tells them little about how the energy is distributed between quarks.
The ILC will give them more precise information on the high-energy frontier because it smashes electrons together, which are 2,000 times smaller than protons, and are not thought to contain sub-particles. When two electrons collide the released energy is known exactly. Electrons cannot be effectively collided in the LHC because the tunnel is a ring, and when electrons are bent by magnetic fields they emit X-rays, as do other particles. Electrons are so small that most of the energy pumped into an electron would only replace that lost as X-rays.
The International Linear Collider.
Some of the questions the ILC and LHC are attempting to answer include how many dimensions there are, why there are so many subatomic particles, what happened to the antimatter predicted by the Big Bang theory, and what does a Higgs particle (the so-called "God" particle) look like? The most prominent theory of how the universe works predicts the existence of a Higgs particle that gives matter its mass. If discovered, it could pave the way towards a unification of the theories of quantum and general relativity.
The location of the ILC is not finalized, but somewhere close to CERN's headquarters in Geneva is likely because most of the physicists who will want to use it are there. Around 700 scientists based at 300 universities and laboratories are already working on the project. The exact length is also not finalized, and will not be decided until the LHC identifies the energy ranges of most interest. At this point the energy levels are expected to be about 0.5 TeV.
A session of the International Conference on High-Energy Physics (ICHEP) in Paris this week is being devoted to the ILC and other next-generation colliders.
More information: ILC - http://www.linearcollider.org/
© 2010 PhysOrg.com
-
Nobel laureate Burton Richter to speak about future of particle physics
Feb 16, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Is the Vacuum Empty? -- the Higgs Field and the Dark Energy
May 10, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
LHC Ready for Duty Again
Feb 21, 2010 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Web site offers Large Hadron Collider info
Sep 12, 2007 |
not rated yet |
0
-
CERN boss wants to bid for linear collider
Sep 16, 2009 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Engineers build first sub-10-nm carbon nanotube transistor
Feb 01, 2012 |
4.9 / 5 (30) |
30
-
Something old, something new: Evolution and the structural divergence of duplicate genes
Jan 31, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (7) |
1
-
The hidden nanoworld of ice crystals: Revealing the dynamic behavior of quasi-liquid layers
Jan 30, 2012 |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
-
Stock market network reveals investor clustering
Jan 27, 2012 |
3.9 / 5 (23) |
8
-
Of microchemistry and molecules: Electronic microfluidic device synthesizes biocompatible probes
Jan 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
-
Physical laws .... are they material?!!
52 minutes ago
-
increasing time of daylight
1 hour ago
-
Light & Sight
1 hour ago
-
Wind Turbine Power
4 hours ago
-
Steam Table issues
6 hours ago
-
electrostatic induction in a conductor should be immpossible
10 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Hovering not hard if you're top-heavy, researchers find
Top-heavy structures are more likely to maintain their balance while hovering in the air than are those that bear a lower center of gravity, researchers at New York University's Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences ...
1 hour ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
1
|
SLAC, Stanford team focuses on high-energy electrons to treat cancer
Accelerator physicists at SLAC and cancer specialists from Stanford are working on a new technology that could dramatically reduce the time needed for cancer radiation treatments. The team ran an initial experiment ...
4 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
Measurements from high-energy collisions lead to better understanding of why meson particles disappear
For several years, physicists at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), USA, have studied an unusual state of matter called the quarkgluon plasma, which they ...
4 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Quantum physicist explains $100K offer for proof scaled-up quantum computing is impossible
(PhysOrg.com) -- MIT researcher Scott Aaronson has certainly riled the physics community with his offer this past Friday, of $100,000 to anyone who can prove that scaled-up quantum computing is impossible. ...
Explained: Sigma
It's a question that arises with virtually every major new finding in science or medicine: What makes a result reliable enough to be taken seriously? The answer has to do with statistical significance -- but ...
Feb 09, 2012 |
5 / 5 (14) |
34
Grass to gas: Researchers' genome map speeds biofuel development
Researchers at the University of Georgia have taken a major step in the ongoing effort to find sources of cleaner, renewable energy by mapping the genomes of two originator cells of Miscanthus x giganteus, a large perenn ...
Researchers develop new method for creating tissue engineering scaffolds
Researchers at Northwestern University have developed a new method for creating scaffolds for tissue engineering applications, providing an alternative that is more flexible and less time-intensive than current technology.
Molecular profiling reveals differences between primary and recurrent ovarian cancers
There is a need to analyze tumor specimens at the time of ovarian cancer recurrence, according to a new study published in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. Researchers used a diagnostic technology called molecular profiling to examine ...
C-sections linked to breathing problems in preterm infants
Research conducted at Yale School of Medicine shows that a cesarean (C-section) delivery, which was thought to be harmless, is associated with breathing problems in preterm babies who are small for gestational age.
Review: Netflix and Hulu's new scripted originals
Within just over a week, Netflix and Hulu are both debuting their first stabs at original scripted programming.
India probes Google over 'forex transactions'
Indian authorities are probing whether online giant Google broke domestic foreign-exchange transactions rules while shifting funds abroad, the Press Trust of India reported on Friday.

Jul 26, 2010
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (4)
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (8)
It is like some math people they only do math for the math.
Here they do the physics for the physics.
Very doubtful that what they find will be more important than the life's they did not safe with that money.
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 3.1 / 5 (7)
VestaR practical science will more then likely come from these massive accelerators. Just because nothing is practical for now doesn't mean that in 20 ,30 or 50years time when the technology to create and control them is developed could open up the possibility of a matter - anti-matter reactor or something even more bizarre which could change the face of humanity forever. How is Pluto, a dusty ice ball floating in an estranged orbit likely to help in our quest for understanding the building blocks of the universe? Or drive some form of new power source? (other then something that could reasonably fit in a space craft, and yes there is a satellite on it's way to Pluto so your science is already under way)
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (7)
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 4 / 5 (8)
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (8)
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
Except for the fact that Jefferson Lab's CEBAF (Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility) in Virginia is doing quite well, and in fact just wrapped up an experiment to attempt to find the A' boson, a potential dark matter candidate. It only does 6 GeV right now, but its 12 GeV upgrade is expected to be done by 2015.
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (10)
There's a large disconnect in how easy it is to do something and how to do it. Without particle colliders we wouldn't have the knowledge to build a VASMIR, which currently looks like the only way we'll ever get manned missions beyong Mars.
You're missing all the fundamental prerequisites using your manner of thinking. Hitting the moon needed more than Newton and found no aether.
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (9)
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (8)
Our understanding about light and materials made possible the laser and nowadays there are lasers everywhere, we cannot predict what new discoveries and technologies will come out thanks to the experiments being carried out at the LHC, but the stakes as quite high, we are talking about what gives mass to particles, how does gravity really works.
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (9)
I'm not sure if "you're realizing" but whatever may govern LENRs, if they're happening, is being probed by relativistic collisions. The fundamental forces govern all of reality. The only time someone questions this is if they have God on the brain and believe in magic.
I don't doubt you suffer from either of the two aforementioned maladies.
The VASMIR is based on plasma physics and electromagnetic theory, both derived from particle colliders.
Again, a little education would do you good.
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (11)
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 2 / 5 (3)
Suppose the LHC team does claim that they have discovered the Higgs. How are you going to go about confirming the results? Unless the LHC is operating at energy levels that other existing accelerators can achieve it would just be an unconfirmed result.
The cost and complexity of these experiments would make independent confirmation very difficult and in my mind no matter the oversight would leave the results inquestion until confirmed outside the LHC.
The stakes are too high and sadly man has proven he can not be trusted when very large sums of money are involved.
We need to be doing more science not less. I have many questions and I am certain others do as well and we want to know the answers even if they are not the ones we wanted or expected.
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (8)
It's easy: because we aren't investing into it in the same way, like into Higgs boson finding, for example. And laymans are ignorants, who are reading headlines only.
http://www.physor...829.html
Actually the cold fusion events can be monitored by common infrared camera, which is incomparable with expensive detection of HEP stuffs, where physicists are tracing few events between billions ones for many years. With compare to some top quark the cold fusion is as real, as the moon on the sky.
http://www.youtub...V_qFKf2M
People don't realize, they're fooled with mafia, which ignores important finding for decades.
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (9)
Jul 26, 2010
Rank: 1 / 5 (8)
It's time to STOP sending money to these welfare dependents and instead SPEND THE PEOPLE'S MONEY FOR THE PEOPLE. No more corporate welfarism disguised as 'defense' or these other 'programs' like the perpetually failing 'tokamak' fusion that drain taxpayer dollars like so many black holes.
All those billions could go to build affordable housing, end poverty, support better wages for huge sectors of the populations whose wages are too low.
All those billions could be used to get government out of debt - out of the clutches of filthy rich private banks.
The money and the materials used to build these destructive projects is a theft from the people. It is a material theft and a theft of their time and labour.
Jul 27, 2010
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Jul 27, 2010
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (4)
Jul 27, 2010
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (7)
Jul 27, 2010
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (5)
You'll need more information on small scale reactions and quantum information for nanotechnology and biomedical.
I think you are not a physicist and shouldn't be using the statement "we".